to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
So there is no popular framework
+1.
Now is 2015 :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group,
anybody know the easiest way to create web applications and deploy to
amazon web services? (either EC2 or elastic beanstalk)
Thanks,
Jon
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Well for creation itself, http://www.luminusweb.net/ represents best
practices with Ring, Compojure, and the usual attendant libraries.
For deployment, I'd say something like Fabric or Ansible is going to be the
simplest way to start.
On Friday, September 13, 2013 10:45:10 AM UTC-7, Jon Barker
Hi John,
It's super easy to deploy Clojure web app (ring) to Amazon Beanstalk. I
think there were few blog posts about that.
Basically you just need https://github.com/weavejester/lein-beanstalk
Anton
On Friday, September 13, 2013 2:45:10 PM UTC-3, Jon Barker wrote:
anybody know the easiest
There's now an example and a tutorial for using the CHP web framework.CHP - https://github.com/runexec/chpWork with HTML, CSS, _javascript_, and SQL using Clojure.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email
Lets not forget http://clojurescriptone.com/
Its a pretty amazing artifact, a complete app with perfect
documentation. Its also essentially a template.
If someone is totally lost on how to get started with clojure web
programming, just go to that.
In the more general case, I strongly agree that
].
___
[0] http://todomvc.com
[1] http://todomvc.herokuapp.com
[2] https://github.com/phperret/cjone-todomvc.git
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2012 09:36:20 UTC+2, Yakovlev Roman a écrit :
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1
own with the use of noir pre-route and maybe a
middleware or is there something in existence which I am not aware of?
Thank you for any replies.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 10:36:20 AM UTC+3, Yakovlev Roman wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
Roman wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
So
wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in
google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing
Ok that's good idea really.
As i can see you just use ring compojure korma for mysql and postgresql for
pg database.
As for me i use for my first project this config
(defproject testpro 0.1.0-SNAPSHOT
:plugins [[lein-catnip 0.4.1]]
:description FIXME: write description
:url
Hi Simone,
Simone Mosciatti mweb@gmail.com writes:
Immutant ( http://immutant.org/ ) IMO is moving in a great direction,
if I have understand is wrapping several libraries in just one
enviroment...
Since you brought it up, I'd like to clarify terminology a bit in case
anyone thinks
Frameworks have benefits which can't easily be achieved with documentation.
The most obvious to me is that a framework lets you fire up a complete
system of carefully curated components in no time. They also let you defer
choices until you actually need to care about them.
Because Clojure's
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:27 PM, James MacAulay jmacau...@gmail.comwrote:
Frameworks have benefits which can't easily be achieved with
documentation. The most obvious to me is that a framework lets you fire up
a complete system of carefully curated components in no time. They also let
you
Immutant ( http://immutant.org/ ) IMO is moving in a great direction, if I
have understand is wrapping several libraries in just one enviroment...
And red hat is behind it I just find out, that usually means great doc...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
So we are back to the documentation reach issue again.
I think the best solution would be one (!) central community wiki and
prominent mentions of it from the clojure.org .
The wiki could contain the links to the latest tutorials and so on. It
should have quite low barrier to entry.
--
You
queries and common sense.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 2:36:20 AM UTC-5, goracio wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo
to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
So there is no popular framework these days
On Saturday, September 29, 2012 1:48:10 PM UTC+2, Anthony Grimes wrote:
I do not have access to the website in order to update it
Somebody (Chris Granger ???) has the access, if you are actually
maintaining it you should have the access too...
Chris has things he wanted to see done
like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
So there is no popular framework
, September 28, 2012, goracio wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5
Documentation is always an issue, few times ago I propose to organize a
fund raiser to improve OUR project, the project of OUR community, stuff we
should be proud of, and the improve of the doc was one of the biggest
issue... However nobody supported me.
I think it helps when there is money
people ( David Nolen and
maybe Rich Hickey) what they think about that.
пятница, 28 сентября 2012 г., 11:36:20 UTC+4 пользователь goracio написал:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
So there is no popular
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:36 AM, goracio felix...@gmail.com wrote:
So what i suggest :
Take 1 platform for web development in Clojure (for example noir as most
mature framework) .
Form working core group from 5-6 people.
Decide about name of the project ( or take Noir)
Make good site about
No i don't. Project page for now https://github.com/noir-clojure/noir and
it's updated 3 months ago. I guess project maintained by one person
https://github.com/Raynes and i guess he does not have much time to do the
work. Usage info still outdated
If you want to include Noir in an already
On 28 September 2012 10:22, goracio felix...@gmail.com wrote:
No i don't. Project page for now https://github.com/noir-clojure/noir and
it's updated 3 months ago. I guess project maintained by one person
https://github.com/Raynes and i guess he does not have much time to do the
work. Usage
/2012/07/19/2012-state-of-clojure-survey/
[2] http://www.clojurebook.com
On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:36 AM, goracio wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google get
these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow
://www.clojurebook.com
On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:36 AM, goracio wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed
for three years :)
Sean
On Friday, September 28, 2012, goracio wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing
. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
So there is no popular framework these days for clojure.
Noir
a thin convention-based veneer over those to
achieve most of what the CFML version has offered for three years :)
Sean
On Friday, September 28, 2012, goracio wrote:
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2
There is already a rails like Clojure web framework which has been around
for a while called Conjure: https://github.com/macourtney/Conjure
Here is the wiki to get started: https://github.com/macourtney/Conjure/wiki
The most recent release is out of date, but I have been working on an
update
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Martin DeMello martindeme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Abhishek Reddy arbs...@gmail.com wrote:
More generally, the fragmented state of support -- too many separate and
underused mailing lists, IRC channels, websites, each for small,
On Sep 4, 5:45 am, HB hubaghd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
working on a Clojure web framework?
Personally, I wish.
Its also worth looking at Conjure if you're interested in a web
framework:
http://github.com/macourtney/Conjure
On 9/3/10 11:45 PM, HB wrote:
Hey,
Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
working on a Clojure web framework?
Personally, I wish.
We aren't currently working on creating a new web framework, but I am
working to make the web development experience a little better
.
On Sep 4, 4:32 pm, Aaron Bedra aaron.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/3/10 11:45 PM, HB wrote: Hey,
Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
working on a Clojure web framework?
Personally, I wish.
We aren't currently working on creating a new web framework
On Sep 4, 8:51 pm, HB hubaghd...@gmail.com wrote:
My wish is vanquished :)
But I really wish if Relevance will work on a web framework since it
is in a unique position to achieve this (having the brightest Clojure
folks).
I read that Relevance embracing the 20% principle like Google, this
What's missing, frankly, is a coherent design. Lots of pieces are
there, but they don't always fit together well. As one trivial
example, we discovered this week that Sandbar's user authentication
doesn't work with Ring's keyword-parameter-names middleware. But
these problems will be ironed out
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
I am interested to know what deficiencies do you see in present state
of affairs in Clojure web development space. It would be something
useful to discuss. There are libraries, such as:
1. Ring+Clout+Compojure,
26 pm, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.com wrote:
I am interested to know what deficiencies do you see in present state
of affairs in Clojure web development space. It would be something
useful to discuss.
I think the packages that exist are exciting and that some of them
represent a step
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Shantanu Kumar
kumar.shant...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Enlive, Hiccup, Gulliver, Clj-StringTemplate, Cfmljure etc for web
template stuff
Since cfmljure got a mention...
Would folks be interested in a ready-to-run Jetty-based download that
ran CFML and Clojure
On Sep 5, 12:25 am, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Shantanu Kumar
kumar.shant...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Enlive, Hiccup, Gulliver, Clj-StringTemplate, Cfmljure etc for web
template stuff
Since cfmljure got a mention...
Would folks be
The best thing we can do for Clojure web development right now is
start developing web applications in Clojure, find the pieces that are
missing, and fill them in.
This is the best advise I have heard in a while. We need to just start
doing it. If something that we need is missing then there
Thank you all guys, I'm really happy and proud to be around.
Shantanu,
Stuart, Abhishek and Brenton said every thing I was thinking about and
much more:
Lack of coherent design, sometimes it is really hard to get help,
documentation is rare.
I don't know even how to getting started with
Here are some resources to get you started with Ring/Compojure web
development.
http://mmcgrana.github.com/2010/03/clojure-web-development-ring.html
http://mmcgrana.github.com/2010/07/develop-deploy-clojure-web-applications.html
http://mmcgrana.github.com/2010/08/clojure-rest-api.html
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Abhishek Reddy arbs...@gmail.com wrote:
More generally, the fragmented state of support -- too many separate and
underused mailing lists, IRC channels, websites, each for small, composable
components.
This is an endemic problem, though, not one confined to
Hey,
Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
working on a Clojure web framework?
Personally, I wish.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
On Mar 16, 11:17 pm, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote:
After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
What do you think and what you add. This is ambitious and just a
ideas of what I would add. What would you
Hi Jeffrey,
I was recently thinking of adding support for https://grizzly.dev.java.net/
in http://github.com/weavejester/compojure/tree/master.
Just need some time to get my head around compojure.
Cheers,
Hubert.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Jeffrey Straszheim
straszheimjeff...@gmail.com
I hadn't heard of Grizzly before. Thanks for the pointer (er..., reference,
or whatever we're calling them these days).
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Hubert Iwaniuk neo...@kungfoo.pl wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
I was recently thinking of adding support for
https://grizzly.dev.java.net/ in
Personally, I've been noodling about what a Tapestry/Clojure hybrid
might look like.
I'd advise that you take a peek at Lift, a functional web framework
built on Scala.
I have some ideas about what a component based framework would look
like in a function world (note: this would be leaving JSPs
I'd love to see something built around very-high scalability, using NIO and
thread pools and such.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Sean francoisdev...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if some of the design inputs make sense, specifically
Spring and Hibernate.
Point 1 - I've found the strength
On Mar 16, 7:52 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim straszheimjeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd love to see something built around very-high scalability, using NIO and
thread pools and such.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Sean francoisdev...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if some of the design inputs
Okay, if you have to work with something rpe-existing that makes more
sense. My main point is that if I were started from scratch, I'd do
it different.
On Mar 16, 8:12 pm, Berlin Brown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 7:52 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim straszheimjeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm mostly a front-end UI person with crazy amounts of JS experience so most
of my input will be from that stand point.
1. I agree with Sean on this one. No need to bring in middleware that can't
be expressed in 10X-20X less code in pure Clojure.
2. The framework should allow for any backend
On Mar 16, 7:17 pm, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote:
After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
What do you think and what you add. This is ambitious and just a
ideas of what I would add. What would you
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Stuart Sierra
the.stuart.sie...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mar 16, 7:17 pm, BerlinBrown berlin.br...@gmail.com wrote:
After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
What do you think and
59 matches
Mail list logo
