Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Happy Birthday CMake!

2018-09-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/2/2018 6:54 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: And thanks to you for coming up with such a useful tool in the first place! Can you recommend a site that gives a (fairly) short history of CMake that at least lists the most fundamental changes made to this software since its inception?  For

[cmake-developers] Happy Birthday CMake!

2018-08-31 Thread Bill Hoffman
http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/2000-August/024248.html Thanks to everyone that has contributed or used CMake! -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various

Re: [cmake-developers] Using CMake to build big projects with cross-dependencies

2018-05-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/17/2018 11:46 AM, Brad King wrote: On 05/17/2018 05:56 AM, Kinga Kasa wrote: cmake running for hours and hours (stuck at saying Configuring done, eventually it will finish, but it runs for hours). That's not expected. Even on projects with tens of thousands of source files and thousands

[cmake-developers] Free CMake course at Kitware Headquarters March 13-15, 2018 at Kitware's Clifton Park, NY, USA

2018-02-06 Thread Bill Hoffman
Kitware is offering a free course on VTK/ParaView/CMake March 13-15, 2018 at Kitware's Clifton Park, NY, USA. The signup can be found here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeee7oTBzapITmark0dIX0E86zEyyPmh-LEbecz2zm_822WFw/viewform Hope to meet some of you in person. -Bill --

Re: [cmake-developers] Make it easier for beginners

2017-10-22 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/21/2017 10:56 AM, Lectem wrote: _Question :_ Would it possible to delete the wiki, or reset/reopen it ? _Reason:_ The wiki is full of old stuff, but we can't register to edit stuff. Still, people willing to learn will end up visiting it, thinking it gives good advice. "How could it not

Re: [cmake-developers] C++ IDE

2017-08-18 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 8/18/2017 9:37 AM, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: IMHO, Visual Studio's CMake integration is a joke in comparison to QtCreator and CLion. Microsoft has been working to fix that. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/10/05/cmake-support-in-visual-studio/ MS is shipping a version of

Re: [cmake-developers] Future of ccmake and cmake-gui and internationalization

2017-08-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 8/17/2017 12:11 PM, Eric Wing wrote: Oddly, I don't have any direct experience with FLTK even though I've known about it for years. The projects I get involved with usually need a lot more native UI integration, so FLTK is never on the list. And I personally prefer native UI experience. But

Re: [cmake-developers] Disabling leaks check when using Address Sanitizer

2016-12-16 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 12/16/2016 7:55 AM, Brad King wrote: It looks like this was added in commit 44726714322ca0b75628e234229f4583a480d7ec when support for asan was first added. Bill, do you recall why? I don't recall exactly. I guess I figured if you were running asan you might as well check for leaks as well.

Re: [cmake-developers] Android Support

2016-09-26 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/26/2016 5:50 PM, David Neto via cmake-developers wrote: I agree. I work for Google but not in this area, and I don't know who is doing this support. I suspect this is just an accidental duplication of effort. I've pinged someone to see about finding the right person to coordinate with.

Re: [cmake-developers] Parallel ctest issues on the MinGW-w64/MSYS2 platform

2016-03-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 3/29/2016 5:34 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: In any case, whatever the issue is, Arjen appears (so far) to have found a reliable reproducer with the -j option for ctest. So I hope others here try the -j option for ctest on MinGW-w64/MSYS2 platforms for their favorite projects to get a better idea

[cmake-developers] Happy Birthday CMake!

2015-08-31 Thread Bill Hoffman
Today is the 15th birthday of CMake: http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/959 Thanks to everyone that has used and contributed to CMake over the years! -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware

Re: [cmake-developers] Modules/GetPrequisites.cmake issues

2015-07-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 7/29/2015 10:17 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: Is there a reason not to look for objdump before dumpbin? I was under the impression that dumpbin was selected first for non-MinGW Windows builds, I have no idea if objdump works with binaries produced by compilers other than GNU/CLang. This is why

Re: [cmake-developers] [MODERN] CMake 3.3 vs Qt 5.5 vs MSVC2015

2015-07-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 7/23/2015 10:16 AM, Nils Gladitz wrote: 6. App-local deployment of the Universal CRT is not supported. I think that means installation should not be handled by InstallRequiredSystemLibraries. You should probably just require users to run Windows Update. Yuck! That will be a pain. I

Re: [cmake-developers] A policy for Policies

2015-06-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/10/2015 4:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: If the conclusion would be a policy is removed after 5 years, it's deadline could even be part of the error/warning message right from the point when it is introduced (you are relying on CMP1234 OLD behaviour. This will be removed June 2020.).

Re: [cmake-developers] Visual Studio and multi-core builds.

2015-06-03 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/3/2015 4:32 PM, Davy Durham wrote: Greetings, Any reason that cmake's own VS project generation doesn't make use of /MP https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb385193.aspx to make use of multiple cores? I added it manually, and cmake build times go through the floor. That option has

Re: [cmake-developers] Visual Studio and multi-core builds.

2015-06-03 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/3/2015 5:55 PM, Davy Durham wrote: I haven't ever had this be a problem, but FWIW one can find Maximum number of parallel project builds under Tools - Options - Projects and Solutions - Build and Run and set that to 1 to disable target parallelism. Of course, that's environmental rather

Re: [cmake-developers] NMake Batch-Mode Rules

2015-05-27 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/27/2015 2:13 PM, Brad King wrote: One can achieve multi-core builds without third-party tools by using the VS IDE generators. It is still possible to build from the command line with these. http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/434 -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep

Re: [cmake-developers] Regarding the 'run-include-what-you-use' topic

2015-05-20 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/20/2015 8:48 AM, Brad King wrote: It also would be great to have more than one static analyzer enabled at a time. Like IWYU and clang-tidy and KWStyle and ... We also have support for asan, tsan: http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/762 We can also use scan-build (ccc-analyzer and

Re: [cmake-developers] Fortran support for Ninja generator

2015-03-24 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 3/24/2015 5:46 AM, Nils Gladitz wrote: I am not very familiar with fortran myself but there was this discussion on the ninja mailing list that implied that this might also require changes to ninja itself: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ninja-build/b1-AF3pRJuE/NkPDsO0C2IUJ Yes, the problem

Re: [cmake-developers] CTestCoverageCollectGCOV and ctest_submit(CDASH_UPLOAD)

2015-02-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 2/23/2015 9:47 AM, Brad King wrote: Specifically I couldn't tell from the existing documentation what new use cases or features the new implementations support. Currently it is just a different implementation of the same use cases. However, logic for processing the gcov output moves from

Re: [cmake-developers] build on multiple cores

2015-01-27 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 1/27/2015 10:52 AM, Deepak Garg wrote: I want to build my cmake code with multiple cores (64). For this I am trying to test the build on 4 cores by typing make -j 4 But still build is done by a single core. The time taken for build by make and make -j 4 is same. Can anyone guide me that

[cmake-developers] Fwd: Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
FYI, a conversation on the KDE mailing list. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:11:02 +1300 From: Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org Reply-To: KDE build system (cmake) kde-buildsys...@kde.org To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe regression caused by #14972 fixes

2014-10-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/7/2014 8:47 AM, Brad King wrote: Please note that from thehttp://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14972 fixes on, we can no longer compile ReactOS. Also, if you really care about ReactOS, you could run a nightly cmake dashboard. Or it is almost certain that it will get broken again. If

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe regression caused by #14972 fixes

2014-10-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/7/2014 10:42 AM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: Which of course doesn't mean that there shouldn't be a dashboard for it nonetheless:) Yup, this is what I understand. It isn't a problem with compiling CMake on ReactOS, but problem of compiling ReactOS with latest CMake master. I'll follow the

Re: [cmake-developers] Contract testing of CMake

2014-10-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/7/2014 4:59 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Of course, once I got such a contract test to work by hand, I would probably want to move to a formal automated procedure so your advice on that would be appreciated as well. The idea is to test next CMake against a version of the contract project that

Re: [cmake-developers] iOS support

2014-09-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/23/2014 8:09 AM, Robert Maynard wrote: The lowest hanging fruit would be to transition over to setting the global variable CMAKE_MACOSX_BUNDLE which is used to initialize the MACOSX_BUNDLE property on all the targets. CMake also supports CMAKE_XCODE_ATTRIBUTE global variables to allow easy

Re: [cmake-developers] iOS support

2014-09-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
That said it would be really cool to beef up the xcode support enough to be able to create an actual ios app. I have not dug into that enough. Should be able to do most of it with CMAKE_XCODE_ATTRIBUTE. I will look into this try_compile COPY_FILE issue today and get back to the list. It

Re: [cmake-developers] iOS support

2014-09-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/23/2014 11:42 AM, Florent Castelli wrote: I also have a couple of patches for finding the binary during a try_compile that works with my other change to have an extra variable for the add_executable and I would need to change it. It's mostly changing cmCoreTryCompile::FindOutputFile() and

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 1/6] Use find on UNIX for fast executable lookup

2014-09-04 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/4/2014 12:49 PM, Brad King wrote: On 09/04/2014 12:43 PM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: Generally specifying UNIX mask for present/missing bits Rather than trying to do this with file(GLOB), perhaps we should consider a file(FIND) command for this purpose. It could have more options, including

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 1/6] Use find on UNIX for fast executable lookup

2014-09-04 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/4/2014 1:43 PM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: First of all, it looks if find exists on system, otherwise it falls back to old (slow) behavior. So find is optional dependency. My main concern is that it finds a find that does not work as you expect. Also, if it were done in C++ it would

Re: [cmake-developers] Cross compile tests on open.cdash.org

2014-08-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 8/29/2014 9:47 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote: Hi Everybody I'm interested in cross compilation, and am already using it extensively for Linux and Embedded Linux. But now I ran into some problems cross compiling for Windows Compact Embedded 2013 using Visual Studio. After some discussion on IRC,

Re: [cmake-developers] Patch: Detect Fujitsu compilers

2014-08-11 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 8/11/2014 10:39 AM, Brad King wrote: The attached patch provides detection for the Fujitsu C/C++ compilers Can you run a dashboard for this compilers? It would be good to make sure it keeps working in the future. http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Git/Dashboard Thanks. -Bill -- Powered

[cmake-developers] scan-build of CMake

2014-07-30 Thread Bill Hoffman
I am working on scan-build integration with ctest/CDash and did a build of CMake. The results show up in the warning section of the build: http://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?type=1buildid=3429991 I excluded a few things in STL, but the rest of this might be worth looking at if anyone

Re: [cmake-developers] Compiler features/extensions remaining/future issues

2014-06-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/10/2014 11:30 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: I think http://sscce.org/ explains is quite well. I want to avoid having to understand all of the ParaView CMake code and that of its dependencies, and whether python bindings need to be enabled etc. The real problem is that we need to have some

Re: [cmake-developers] cmake --find-package

2014-04-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 4/23/2014 12:22 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: However, if you discover the problem is a general one for --find-package and Qt5, then it appears that Qt5 might be a good illustrative example to use for your renewed effort at developing a reliable --find-package capability. I recently ran into a

Re: [cmake-developers] Building executables as libraries

2014-03-26 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 3/26/2014 10:18 AM, J Decker wrote: and (sorry for double reply) having add_executable always build as a library means I can't build real executables... if it did it based on the WIN32 flag (or equivalent0 it would be better Maybe that is a good analogy. Instead of WIN32, we add an ANDROID

Re: [cmake-developers] Who does CMake contract work?

2014-03-06 Thread Bill Hoffman
-- Vince Harron | Technical Lead Manager | vhar...@google.com mailto:vhar...@google.com | 858-442-0868 -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573

[cmake-developers] ninja parallelism and LLVM cmake builds

2014-02-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
Someone just posted this comment to one of my blogs: (http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/434) I don’t know if CMake or Ninja (or LLVM’s build rules) are at fault here, but when I build Clang and LLVM under CMake and Ninja, parallelism often drops to zero when a static library is being

Re: [cmake-developers] WG: [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

2014-01-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 1/29/2014 8:35 AM, Dominik Bernhardt wrote: I just tested it again with the latest master from today. For my particular project the configure step with the current master takes 290s. If I only replace the UseQt4.cmake in the master with the version from 2.8.12.1 the configure time goes down

Re: [cmake-developers] WG: [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

2014-01-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 1/29/2014 11:54 AM, Dominik Bernhardt wrote: Unfortunately it did not help. Approximately same results as before. Have you run --trace to see why UseQt4 is being parsed so many times? -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

2014-01-16 Thread Bill Hoffman
Moving this to cmake-developers list: On 1/16/2014 9:55 AM, Clinton Stimpson wrote: On one of my projects, I see ~3.0 seconds for CMake 2.8.12 and ~3.8 seconds for CMake master. I don't have an idea why, but with my test, it doesn't see like much slower. 3.8 from 3.0 is much slower in my

Re: [cmake-developers] Better QNX QCC handling

2014-01-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 1/10/2014 9:12 AM, Brad King wrote: On 01/09/2014 06:08 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: The solution would seem to be to create a new compiler id 'QCC' If the compiler has its own command-line front-end that uses different flags than the currently detected compiler id, then yes a new id makes

Re: [cmake-developers] cmake build does too much work

2013-12-12 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 12/12/2013 11:46 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Where template.hpp changes (testing with 2.8.12.1 shows that touching template.hpp triggers a rebuild with Ninja, but not Unix Makefiles), That sounds like a bug :-). Yes, this is a bug. ninja and make should be the same. -- Powered by

Re: [cmake-developers] cmake build does too much work

2013-12-11 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 12/11/2013 5:13 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: I've been working on a project lately that isn't *that* massively large, but has an unusually high number of library and executable targets. One thing that's been bugging me is that any trivial change in a lower level library causes more than a

Re: [cmake-developers] cmake build does too much work

2013-12-11 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 12/11/2013 6:00 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: You opposed a sensible default for CMAKE_LINK_DEPENDS_NO_SHARED: https://www.mail-archive.com/cmake-developers@cmake.org/msg06169.html I continue to consider the default value of that to be a mistake. I am on the fence with this one. It is always

[cmake-developers] Fwd: [Bug 375012] Re: Cmake is screwed building KDE Application

2013-11-25 Thread Bill Hoffman
FYI. Original Message Subject: [Bug 375012] Re: Cmake is screwed building KDE Application Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:38:35 - From: Launchpad Bug Tracker 375...@bugs.launchpad.net Reply-To: Bug 375012 375...@bugs.launchpad.net To: cm...@packages.qa.debian.org Status

[cmake-developers] Fwd: Re: Ninja keeps starting cmake

2013-10-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
An issue came up on the ninja list. Seems that the most recent version of cmake in some cases re-runs cmake every time in some cases on the Mac. It seems to be related to app bundle creation. Here is the information so far: Original Message Subject: Re: Ninja keeps

Re: [cmake-developers] CTest: Request review of topic ctest-fix-run-serial

2013-10-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/23/2013 3:53 AM, Nils Gladitz wrote: Hello Bill, Would you approve a merge of the topic into next? Who else should I be asking for approval? e.g. is there a CTest specific maintainer? Thanks in advance. I am traveling right now at our NC Kitware office. There is someone there that has

Re: [cmake-developers] CTest: Request review of topic ctest-fix-run-serial

2013-10-21 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/21/2013 2:39 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote: I haven't see that fail on my local test runs. Is it sporadic or does it fail for you consistently? Never mind on this one. Looks like it fails for me without your changes. -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source

Re: [cmake-developers] Perforce Patch for CTest

2013-10-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/17/2013 1:52 PM, Pedro Navarro wrote: Ok, I have the patch working and I'm going to send it soon. One question, is it possible to launch a detached process from within CMake? If I use EXECUTE_PROCESS to start p4d, CMake waits for it to finish so -for now- I'm launching the Perforce daemon

Re: [cmake-developers] CTest: Request review of topic ctest-fix-run-serial

2013-10-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/17/2013 4:41 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote: I pushed my topic ctest-fix-run-serial to stage. I am taking a look. It has been a long time since I looked at this code. However, it seems like your patch removes the running of dependent tests. old code did this: StartTest(int test) ...

Re: [cmake-developers] Perforce Patch for CTest

2013-10-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/17/2013 4:59 PM, Brad King wrote: As I explained in a sibling response the KWSys Process library has support for creating detached processes. It should only be a matter of exposing that through execute_process command options. +1, this does come up a lot. It would be good to have this

Re: [cmake-developers] CTest: Request review of topic ctest-fix-run-serial

2013-10-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Bill, thanks for looking into this! All four tests in my example are still run (as you can see in the test output I provided). This includes the dependent test. What I did change is that all tests (from an

Re: [cmake-developers] Support for coverage.py coverage on the topic stage

2013-10-01 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/1/2013 9:44 AM, Patrick Reynolds wrote: There is definitely a use case in which we want to aggregate coverage between C++, Python, and Javascript in a web application. By the way, sorry for the warning on the nightlies. That's fixed in next. Right, so the change needs to be in

Re: [cmake-developers] Support for coverage.py coverage on the topic stage

2013-09-30 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/29/2013 2:37 PM, Patrick Reynolds wrote: I'll leave this one to folks who are better versed in the arcane art of Bullseye... Does anyone still use this? ;) Yes, it is still in use, and no it is not arcane. It is a really good commercial cross platform branch based coverage tool.

Re: [cmake-developers] Support for coverage.py coverage on the topic stage

2013-09-30 Thread Bill Hoffman
but there was nothing in the DB pointed to by COVFILE, basically no coverage. This is the same thing that gcov and the other handlers do. If you don't find any coverage files move on to the next coverage type and try that. I don't understand what you mean by parallel? -Bill -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28

[cmake-developers] Need HP-UX dashboards for CMake (HP-UX B.11.31)

2013-09-30 Thread Bill Hoffman
Hi all, Does anyone have access to a HP-UX B.11.31 machine that can run nightly CMake dashboards? Thanks. -Bill -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573

Re: [cmake-developers] ExternalProject and git clone

2013-09-11 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/11/2013 10:35 AM, David Cole wrote: My main point being: if you're actively developing code in these source trees, then they're not really External, are they? If you want to take advantage of ExternalProject, then you have to make all your projects external even the main one you are

[cmake-developers] Module.GenerateExportHeader test is sloooow

2013-08-06 Thread Bill Hoffman
Anyone know why Module.GenerateExportHeader is so slow: http://open.cdash.org/testSummary.php?project=1name=Module.GenerateExportHeaderdate=2013-08-06 On the slowest build it takes 14 minutes to run. The kwsys test which builds a whole library and does a dashboard submission is faster...

[cmake-developers] Fwd: [Bug 1203786] [NEW] Invalid handling of linker flags during build

2013-07-22 Thread Bill Hoffman
Original Message Subject: [Bug 1203786] [NEW] Invalid handling of linker flags during build Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:31:47 - From: Rodney Dawes 1203...@bugs.launchpad.net Reply-To: Bug 1203786 1203...@bugs.launchpad.net To: cm...@packages.qa.debian.org Public bug

[cmake-developers] Fwd: Bug#717144: Remove workaround-gcc296-bugs from ctest -T MemCheck

2013-07-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
FYI.. Original Message Subject: Bug#717144: Remove workaround-gcc296-bugs from ctest -T MemCheck Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:45:01 + Resent-From: Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Modestas Vainius

Re: [cmake-developers] Peculiar issue for NMake Makefiles JOM

2013-06-18 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/10/2013 1:25 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Try commenting that out in Windows-GNU.cmake like this: #enable_language(RC) Then see if it works. Hi Bill: I was glad you could access the attachment from the list version. So I am putting this discussion back on the list so you can continue to

Re: [cmake-developers] Peculiar issue for NMake Makefiles JOM

2013-06-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
The CMakeError.log you requested was not too informative: bash.exe-3.1$ cat CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log Determining if the C compiler works failed with the following output: Next step is to try it by hand. Start with a clean build tree and your simple project. Then run cmake with

Re: [cmake-developers] Peculiar issue for NMake Makefiles JOM

2013-06-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/6/2013 9:44 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Assuming you confirm my finding that the NMake Makefiles JOM generator does not currently work properly with the MinGW suite of compilers is there some small change in language support that would make that work? I can confirm that I have never

Re: [cmake-developers] Peculiar issue for NMake Makefiles JOM

2013-06-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/6/2013 9:44 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: In this particular case I have specified gcc using CMAKE_C_COMPILER. That bombs with the message -- Check for working C compiler: z:/home/wine/newstart/MinGW-4.7.2/bin/gcc.exe -- broken Did you look in the CMakeError.log file to see why it fails?

Re: [cmake-developers] Questions concerning using MinGW Makefiles when MSYS (without sh.exe) is on the PATH

2013-06-06 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/6/2013 9:48 AM, Brad King wrote: It looks like Bill added that check here: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=14cbc957 Bill, the commit message doesn't say why. Do you remember? The SHELL=cmd was present at the time the commit was made. I am pretty sure it failed.

Re: [cmake-developers] Peculiar issue for NMake Makefiles JOM

2013-06-06 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/6/2013 6:35 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: http://releases.qt-project.org/jom/jom_1_0_13.zip). Are there known problems with that jom release and how it interacts with Makefiles produced by the NMake Makefiles JOM generator? You could try building cmake with your jom and running the regression

Re: [cmake-developers] Unix Makefiles under MSys

2013-05-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/17/2013 10:04 AM, Sean Farrell wrote: Hallo CMake developers, could somebody please explain to me the rationale why Unix Makefiles installs by default under MSys to %ProgramFile% ? If I selected the generator to be MinGW Makefiles I would have understood. I would have have remotely

Re: [cmake-developers] Unix Makefiles under MSys

2013-05-17 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/17/2013 12:54 PM, Sean Farrell wrote: This entire thing is basically just confusing. The obvious workaround is to call cmake with -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr/local. It would be nice if the behavior would be in line with real Unix makefiles. As a middle ground, the default could still

Re: [cmake-developers] Safe source list GLOBs

2013-05-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote: Globs simply do not work well for source files. GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake currently ;] No it does not. It is sloppy IMO. It will pick up junk files

Re: [cmake-developers] Safe source list GLOBs

2013-05-14 Thread Bill Hoffman
://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax

Re: [cmake-developers] Qt builds: module machine type 'x64' conflicts with target machine type 'X86'

2013-04-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
11.0.51106.1. Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved. I think that Microsoft (R) Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 Version 11.0.51106.1. is not VS 10, but rather 11. -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881

Re: [cmake-developers] Qt builds: module machine type 'x64' conflicts with target machine type 'X86'

2013-04-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 4/10/2013 12:22 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Yes, I think you're right. I've updated the patch with that information now. Seems a bit unstable to hard code the version. I wonder if you can detect the one that is being used somehow? -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware

Re: [cmake-developers] Determining version and arch for Visual Studio generators.

2013-04-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
useful for storing an arch triple on linux systems? Can 32 and 64 bit libs be mixed there? I don't think they can be mixed anywhere. This isn't for 2.8.11 obviously. Sure. -Bill -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http

[cmake-developers] Fwd: [CMake] get some trivial bug fixes into 2.8.11

2013-03-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
Original Message Subject:[CMake] get some trivial bug fixes into 2.8.11 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:27:34 +1100 From: Graham Menhennitt gra...@menhennitt.com.au To: cm...@cmake.org Guys, There are a number of fixes for 2.8.10 bugs in Mantis. I see that

Re: [cmake-developers] Ninja Windows dashboard regression

2013-02-21 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 2/21/2013 11:50 AM, Robert Maynard wrote: Looks like ninja needs to be patched to suppress warning C2220 inside version.cc I will report this back to the ninja list. -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518

Re: [cmake-developers] Creating Windows 7 manifests with mingw builds

2013-02-21 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 2/21/2013 5:08 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Bill, as the author of the current manifest support for MSVC what do you think? Sounds good to me. Alex, can you please post a link to the KDE implementation in C++? It's currently GPL licensed, if you are interested, I'll ask the authors

Re: [cmake-developers] Summer of code and Pascal

2013-02-11 Thread Bill Hoffman
of pascal compilers these days? Are they cross platform? Do they work in the traditional c model of .pas - .o? Is it more complicated? -Bill -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371

[cmake-developers] Fwd: Bug#699657: cmake: cmake -E touch truncates time

2013-02-04 Thread Bill Hoffman
FYI Original Message Subject: Bug#699657: cmake: cmake -E touch truncates time Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:21:01 + Resent-From: Arnaud Giersch arnaud.gier...@iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC:

[cmake-developers] Fwd: [Bug 894805] Re: QT_IMPORTS_DIR is not defined when no QML plugins are installed

2013-02-04 Thread Bill Hoffman
FYI Original Message Subject: [Bug 894805] Re: QT_IMPORTS_DIR is not defined when no QML plugins are installed Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:30:37 - From: Launchpad Bug Tracker 894...@bugs.launchpad.net Reply-To: Bug 894805 894...@bugs.launchpad.net To:

[cmake-developers] Fwd: Bug#691948: cmake: Insists on using non-existent (when cross-compiling) -rdynamic flag

2012-10-31 Thread Bill Hoffman
FYI Original Message Subject: Bug#691948: cmake: Insists on using non-existent (when cross-compiling) -rdynamic flag Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:09:02 + Resent-From: Sam Morris s...@robots.org.uk Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Modestas

Re: [cmake-developers] Regression in language support infrastructure for CMake 2.8.10-rc3

2012-10-30 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/30/2012 2:06 PM, Brad King wrote: Basically what you are saying is it's our current policy, and it sounds like your group has made the decision about what that current policy is going to be. Nevertheless, I still think you should advertise this limitation on your backwards compatibility

Re: [cmake-developers] Incomplete gfortran library link command sometimes mysteriously occurs with MinGW/MSYS on Wine-1.5.15 platform

2012-10-25 Thread Bill Hoffman
[${info}]) endforeach() Build the CMake test case into a.exe like this: gfortran CMakeFortranCompilerABI.F Then run cmake -P info.cmake, It should print this: -- [INFO:compiler[GNU]INFO:platform[]] If not it is broken and will not detect the compiler correctly. -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28

Re: [cmake-developers] Incomplete gfortran library link command sometimes mysteriously occurs with MinGW/MSYS on Wine-1.5.15 platform

2012-10-25 Thread Bill Hoffman
On Oct 25, 2012 11:15 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote: On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: On 10/25/2012 6:06 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: I have just discovered an extremely simple test case of the whole We have already found the problem and have an even

Re: [cmake-developers] Incomplete gfortran library link command sometimes mysteriously occurs with MinGW/MSYS on Wine-1.5.15 platform

2012-10-22 Thread Bill Hoffman
filling the list with this stuff. -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http

Re: [cmake-developers] Incomplete gfortran library link command sometimes mysteriously occurs with MinGW/MSYS on Wine-1.5.15 platform

2012-10-19 Thread Bill Hoffman
statements in the cmake code until you find out what is going wrong. -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open

[cmake-developers] Fwd: [Bug 1066939] [NEW] Cannot find postgres package

2012-10-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
I am on the debian bug alert list for cmake, and will forward bugs that look like they should go upstream to the cmake-dev list. Here is the first one: Original Message Subject: [Bug 1066939] [NEW] Cannot find postgres package Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:29:07 - From:

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] Added a generator for Sublime Text 2 project files.

2012-10-13 Thread Bill Hoffman
it to be specifically windows we call cmSystemTools::ConvertToWindowsOutputPath. -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other

Re: [cmake-developers] build error in cmGeneratorExpressionEvaluator.cxx on SunOS CC

2012-10-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/10/2012 5:07 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: I sent a patch last week to the maintainer of that system to try out, but he didn't tell me yet whether it worked or not. Thanks, Steve. Maybe just check it in and see if it fixes the problem. -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive

Re: [cmake-developers] Adding Qt5 Support

2012-09-19 Thread Bill Hoffman
: http://www.kdab.com/using-cmake-with-qt-5/ http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/5.0/cmake-manual.html -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573 -- Powered

Re: [cmake-developers] conditionals in generator expressions

2012-09-13 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/13/2012 12:44 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Thanks. I'm too used to everything being implicitly shared:). Valgrind didn't show the problem, interestingly enough. Odd, it does not show up in the coverage either? -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff

Re: [cmake-developers] conditionals in generator expressions

2012-09-13 Thread Bill Hoffman
\cmGeneratorExpressionEvaluator.h(49) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'uint' -Bill -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573 -- Powered

Re: [cmake-developers] Using the internal Code::Blocks builder

2012-09-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
the compile. -Bill -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http

Re: [cmake-developers] Using the internal Code::Blocks builder

2012-09-07 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/7/2012 12:13 PM, Benjamin Eikel wrote: Yes, I have seen that in the beginning when the generator did not work as expected. At the moment, it builds from the command line, but only if you give it access to a display (a window is opened by C::B, but that closes immediately after the build has

Re: [cmake-developers] Using the internal Code::Blocks builder

2012-09-05 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 9/5/2012 2:48 PM, Benjamin Eikel wrote: So, go ahead:-) Is it possible to build a CodeBlocks project from the command line ? I think this is necessary so all the tests can be executed. if the new CMake generator builds an XML project file like it is done at the moment, sure. Why shouldn't

[cmake-developers] ninja test failing again...

2012-09-04 Thread Bill Hoffman
/testDetails.php?test=156781454build=2522326 Any ideas? Maybe cmcldeps is not working for some reason? -Bill -- Bill Hoffman Kitware, Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065 bill.hoff...@kitware.com http://www.kitware.com 518 881-4905 (Direct) 518 371-3971 x105 Fax (518) 371-4573 -- Powered

[cmake-developers] Fwd: [cfe-dev] Warm Fuzzies

2012-08-24 Thread Bill Hoffman
Go CMake! - sent from my open source android phone. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jordan Rose jordan_r...@apple.com Date: Aug 24, 2012 4:28 PM Subject: [cfe-dev] Warm Fuzzies To: cfe-...@cs.uiuc.edu Developers cfe-...@cs.uiuc.edu Now that the mailing list is back up, I can share

[cmake-developers] FindX11 change breaks complex test

2012-08-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=97c338bac910d087eff9b160e3b68f2482a5 http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=156453780build=2517168 CMake Error at /export/home/kitware/Dashboards/My Tests-SunOSsnv_135.11i86pc-gcc/CMake/Modules/FindX11.cmake:329 (list): list

[cmake-developers] ninja on windows (cmcldeps)

2012-08-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
Looks like ninja on windows might natively have some sort of cmcldeps now. Will that cause trouble with the cmake one? Should we remove the cmake one if ninja has one of its own now. -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

Re: [cmake-developers] ninja on windows (cmcldeps)

2012-08-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 8/15/2012 11:36 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: ATM it only supports the English version of MS Studio, also the workaround for rc.exe is not available. In the long run we could try to move all needed functionallity into ninja's cldeps, but using our cldeps until then is no problem I think. OK, as

  1   2   3   >