l Message-
From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List [mailto:CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 5:11 PM
To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references
in PIPEs
> Perhaps
016 11:32 AM
To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references
in PIPEs
> Juxtapose. Beautiful!
>
> After that bit of processing, I'm left with records containing 6
> space-delineated words.
>
> Is it even possible
> Juxtapose. Beautiful!
>
> After that bit of processing, I'm left with records containing 6
> space-delineated words.
>
> Is it even possible to have PIPE append the record into a STEM where the
> stem's name is Word6 in the record?
Look at VARSET for that. Basically you create records that
Discussion List [mailto:CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:04 AM
To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references
in PIPEs
The reason your approach did not work is that REXX
The reason your approach did not work is that REXX substitutes the variable
before the PIPE command is issued. CMS Pipelines does not know there even
was a variable in your program.
As Mike points out, JUXTAPOSE is the way to do this with a multi-steam pipe.
PIPE (end \)
...
| v: find
You could code some complicated conditionals and use counters in Specs, but
much simpler: look into JUXTAPOSE.
--
Mike Harding
z/VM System Support
/sp
CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List wrote on
09/22/2016 07:47:03 AM:
> From: "Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM