Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs

2016-09-23 Thread Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability)
l Message- From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List [mailto:CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rob van der Heij Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 5:11 PM To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs > Perhaps

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs

2016-09-22 Thread Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability)
016 11:32 AM To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs > Juxtapose. Beautiful! > > After that bit of processing, I'm left with records containing 6 > space-delineated words. > > Is it even possible

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs

2016-09-22 Thread Rob van der Heij
> Juxtapose. Beautiful! > > After that bit of processing, I'm left with records containing 6 > space-delineated words. > > Is it even possible to have PIPE append the record into a STEM where the > stem's name is Word6 in the record? Look at VARSET for that. Basically you create records that

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs

2016-09-22 Thread Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability)
Discussion List [mailto:CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rob van der Heij Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:04 AM To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs The reason your approach did not work is that REXX

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs

2016-09-22 Thread Rob van der Heij
The reason your approach did not work is that REXX substitutes the variable before the PIPE command is issued. CMS Pipelines does not know there even was a variable in your program. As Mike points out, JUXTAPOSE is the way to do this with a multi-steam pipe. PIPE (end \) ... | v: find

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Not-always-directly-sequential record references in PIPEs

2016-09-22 Thread Michael Harding
You could code some complicated conditionals and use counters in Specs, but much simpler: look into JUXTAPOSE. -- Mike Harding z/VM System Support /sp CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List wrote on 09/22/2016 07:47:03 AM: > From: "Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM