Hi,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Naomi Dushay wrote:
> Bess Sadler put together a wiki page on the marc OSS efforts:
> http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/Working_with_MaRC
> Please add other relevant projects!
As an experiment of either cross-pollination or random glomping, I've
created a
I should add that as of 2009 release III now has a My Millennium api
product that gives access to the user info. Fines and other api
available as product for previous version.
http://www.iii.com/products/patron_web_services.shtml
The rest of the info I got in 2007 from asking in #code4lib. I gues
Ed, Eric, Bill, please confirm) to my knowledge ALEPH had API to BIB, AUTH,
HOLD, ITEM since version 16+
Ya’aqov
On 4/8/10 2:47 PM, "Bill Dueber" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ryan Eby wrote:
>> Unicorn
>> * Export
>> Built in. MARC21 or flat file formats. Unicode support is avai
Voyager, as of 7.0, does now have Bib and item level data through api
access.
http://voyager.tcs.tulane.edu:7014/vxws/GetHoldingsService?bibId=1840071
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ryan Eby wrote:
> It would probably be worth putting your findings on the code4lib wiki
> if you end up getting
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ryan Eby wrote:
> Unicorn
> * Export
> Built in. MARC21 or flat file formats. Unicode support is available as an
> extra.
"...as an extra"??? This is the saddest thing I've ready all day.
--
Bill Dueber
Library Systems Programmer
University of Michigan Library
It would probably be worth putting your findings on the code4lib wiki
if you end up getting very far.
I had started a list awhile ago but never got around to getting more
info/completing it. Here's what I have so far based on talking with
people. The information may be out of date:
Evergreen and
Hi Anna,
SirsiDynix Symphony (formerly Unicorn) provides API access to
bibliographic and item-level data.
Cheers,
Tim
Tim McGeary
Team Leader, Library Technology
Lehigh University
610-758-4998
tim.mcge...@lehigh.edu
timmcge...@gmail.com
GTalk/Yahoo/Skype: timmcgeary
Anna Headley wrote:
I a
On 4/8/10 11:14 AM, "Mike Taylor" wrote:
I want to run a simple repository on a Debian Stable box -- something
that lets me and other authorized people upload PDFs and create and
edit metadata describing them, and that lets anyone search the archive
and download the PDFs. In short, I want someth
I'm not on that conference list, so don't really know how much traffic it gets.
But it seems to me that, since these regional conferences are mostly being held
at different times of the year from the main conference, the overlap would be
minimal.
Or not. I don't know.
--Dave
=
On 4/8/2010 11:14, Mike Taylor wrote:
I want to run a simple repository on a Debian Stable box -- something
that lets me and other authorized people upload PDFs and create and
edit metadata describing them, and that lets anyone search the archive
and download the PDFs. In short, I want something
Mike Taylor writes
> I was surprised to find that there seems to be no package for DSpace,
> EPrints,
http://wiki.eprints.org/w/Installing_EPrints_3_via_apt_%28Debian/Ubuntu%29
> Fedora,
The problem there, as I understand it is that Fedora expects
everything to be in one directory. This s
Folks,
I want to run a simple repository on a Debian Stable box -- something
that lets me and other authorized people upload PDFs and create and
edit metadata describing them, and that lets anyone search the archive
and download the PDFs. In short, I want something like DSpace or
EPrints, althoug
On 8 April 2010, Walker, David quoted:
I think a good compromise is to have local meeting
conversations on the code4libcon google group.
That list is for organizing the main conference, with details about
getting rooms, food, shuttle buses, hotel booking agents, who can MC
Thursday afternoon
> I think a good compromise is to have local meeting
> conversations on the code4libcon google group.
this!
--Dave
==
David Walker
Library Web Services Manager
California State University
http://xerxes.calstate.edu
From: Code for Librarie
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> My question about WorldCat records has to do with whole v. parts -- I can
> understand that a full MARC record, with holdings, downloaded from WC could
> be considered a WC record. After that, there is a lot of distance between
> the full MARC a
*Red Letter Day!* :-)
I agree with Mike.
Ralph
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
> Mike Taylor
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:33 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Sub-mailing lists
>
> For whateve
Quoting Tim Spalding :
Does anyone know:
Is there a "what is a WorldCat record" section? I can't find it. Does
the "original cataloger" concept still apply, or has that gone away?
Tim
Tim, I asked this of one of the authors, and he said he'd take it back
to the group. I think there does n
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> I sort of felt as if it might "heard" as noise by others in Europe, Asia, or
> even the South in the United States.
As one from the South in the United States, I don't mind the extra
noise of (non-regional to me) Code4Lib local groups p
I think a good compromise is to have local meeting conversations on the
code4libcon google group. It keeps the conversations in a central place
initiallty created to faciliate face to face meetings.
/dev
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Ed Summers
Sent: Wed 4/7
Thanks for the heads up about this.
Was this announced on a code4libmdc list? If so, I'm having no luck
locating it (I did find the local group's wiki page at code4lib, but
that also does not mention tomorrow's mtg). Providing there is a list,
how might one get on it?
--Kevin
>>> Ed Summers
FWIW,
I totally agree with the two Eds.
It's interesting to see what a regional code4lib group up to even if I can't be
part of it. And it inspires similar activities from other regional groups.
/ Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu
For whatever little it may be worth, I'm finding that the (to me)
noise on this list is greatly outweighing the signal at the moment,
because of all the regional stuff. I'd welcome a splitting of the
list.
On 8 April 2010 13:28, Ranti Junus wrote:
> I have no preference whether the planning dis
I have no preference whether the planning discussions for regional
meetings would be conducted on code4lib or code4lib-[regional]. If the
regional group decides to have their own list, I do appreciate the
occasional shout-outs about it on the code4lib.
Moreover, discussions for regionals that are
On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Ed Summers wrote:
>> Details about the mailing list are there. Planning's going on and anyone
>> who's interested in giving a talk should drop a note and add themselves on
>> the wiki page.
>
> Kind of bummed that you had to create a new mailing list, but whatever
> I
24 matches
Mail list logo
