Jonathan and others who use Shibboleth access to First Search - access
looks up and normal so if anyone has any problems - email us at
shibbol...@oclc.org.
Don
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Don Hamparian wrote:
> Jonathan, I'll check this out this morning.
> Don Hamparian
> OCLC
>
>
> On Mon
Jonathan, I'll check this out this morning.
Don Hamparian
OCLC
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> I _believe_ that the OCLC FirstSearch shibboleth server is still down, for
> anyone who tries to send their users to FirstSearch via Shibboleth.
>
>
> Simon Spero wrote:
Kyle Banerjee wrote:
Is there even a C webapp framework available?
C is for wussy. Real hombres only need assembly.
...and assembly is for people who can't face a row of toggle switches,
which are in turn a crutch for people who can't handle a single toggle
switch and an input button, wh
http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt#/src/hello
From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew
Hankinson [andrew.hankin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 6:49 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OCLC Service Outage U
>
>
> Oh wow, want a shovel to help dig you out of the gross generalisations
> hole?
>
>
Nah -- I'm totally secure in my idiocy.
If I really step in it, I'll get loads of hate mail. If I'm really unlucky
and it takes on a life of it's own, I may even be forced to issue a
groveling public apology.
ations hole?
Chris
>
> But this is a big tent where all are welcome :)
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Lynne Lysiak wrote:
>
>> ahem, y mujeres sir!!
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Kyle Banerjee
>> Date: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:1
y mujeres sir!!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kyle Banerjee
> Date: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:18 pm
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OCLC Service Outage Update
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>
> > > Is there even a C webapp framework available?
> >
> &
ahem, y mujeres sir!!
- Original Message -
From: Kyle Banerjee
Date: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:18 pm
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OCLC Service Outage Update
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> > Is there even a C webapp framework available?
>
>
> C is for wussy. Real hombres only need assembly.
>
> Is there even a C webapp framework available?
C is for wussy. Real hombres only need assembly.
Michael J. Giarlo wrote:
> ... people took Simon's comment seriously?
Language is a funny thing ; some times the things that are being said
is taken seriously. And the script-haters are spread far and wide, so
there was no reason not to take him seriously. Should the default be
not to take anyone
... people took Simon's comment seriously?
C'mon, failsters. Stop making it so easy.
-Mike
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:49, Andrew Hankinson
wrote:
> Writing code in "energy efficient" languages is the funniest thing I've
> heard in a while. It ranks up there with setting my desktop wallpaper
Writing code in "energy efficient" languages is the funniest thing
I've heard in a while. It ranks up there with setting my desktop
wallpaper to black because "it uses less energy."
More servers are required because more people are writing webapps
because Ruby and PHP make it easier for mor
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 06:59, stuart yeates wrote:
> No, the real problem is with trolls sending flamebait.
Friggin' AMEEN!
Alex
--
Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
--- http://shelter.nu/blog/ --
Simon Spero wrote:
Of course, the real problem is that too many people are writing unoptimized
code in energy-inefficient languages like ruby and PHP, which require far
more servers, and far more cooling, to do the same work as properly written
code.
No, the real problem is with trolls sendi
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> I _believe_ that the OCLC FirstSearch shibboleth server is still down, for
> anyone who tries to send their users to FirstSearch via Shibboleth
>
Are you sure you're saying it right?
Simon
The unix hackers at the Technion did that to the Vaxen 11/7XXes; didn't
trust the walk-in UPS, because the mainframe and Vax 9000 would drain it to
the dregs. Couldn't do the same thing for the Sun 4/XXX because no source
license.
Up hill, both ways, in the sand.
Simon
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4
I _believe_ that the OCLC FirstSearch shibboleth server is still down,
for anyone who tries to send their users to FirstSearch via Shibboleth.
Simon Spero wrote:
At least it wasn't a "totally transparent" UPS test scheduled for the
Thursday of Thanksgiving weekend. My personal philosophy is
Or be like Google, give up on UPSs, and just attached a battery to the DC side
of each server's power supply.
http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/04/the-beast-unveiled-inside-a-google-server.ars
On May 10, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Simon Spero wrote:
> At least it wasn't a "totally transparent"
At least it wasn't a "totally transparent" UPS test scheduled for the
Thursday of Thanksgiving weekend. My personal philosophy is that every rack
should have its own UPS separate from the data center one, with enough
capacity to keep going through blips,and handle a clean shutdown if
necessary.
Since this topic came up on the list yesterday, here is an official update.
Roy
Service outage update
On Sunday, May 9, the primary OCLC data center in Dublin lost power during
required internal facilities maintenance activity. OCLC staff worked
diligently to restore services as quickly as possi
20 matches
Mail list logo
