I think he should match this against the access level off the person who is
banned.
For exemple: You have level 200, I have level 300. Should you be able to
ban me @ level 74? I feel that whenever that happens X should unban any ban
in his internal list if the level off the user who entered the b
NicoS,
it could maybe explain why, but it's still not normal that X lets USP get
ops to then deop it cause it isnt allowed to be opped.
I think the code should be modified so X checks if theres a ban (lower than
75) matching the nick!user@host of the one requesting ops when X receives
the /msg X
At 14:58 08/08/2002, you wrote:
>After i started gnuworld i have a lot of postmaster proceses ( before
>starting it i had 3 ) how they keep increasing, had them over 20
>whats wrong ???
>i used the online howto from nighty
>
>NEW MOMENT: looks like apache is the reason
>becouse if i restart apache
I might be mistaken, but I think this has something to do with the bot's
own level.
If I would have 400 access for exemple, I would be able to suspend someone
with 200 access, but not someone with 450. If I would wanna ban the host of
someone who has 450 access, X would normally execute this ban,
