Braden Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are missing the point. The point isn't whether they are hard to enforce but the
>ability of us
> to use them. There should of been an Fline created for them enabling or disabling
>them. They
> shouldn't of ripped them out of the code altogether.
You are missing the point. The point isn't whether they are hard to enforce but the
ability of us
to use them. There should of been an Fline created for them enabling or disabling
them. They
shouldn't of ripped them out of the code altogether. Entropy, if you had a problem
with them,
then y
Braden Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I concur. I hardly believe the code size for them was enough to warrent their
>destruction. I
> would think modeless channels would be used. I did not before know they existed,
>but now I know
> they do (or did) I would miss them. I think they shou
I concur. I hardly believe the code size for them was enough to warrent their
destruction. I
would think modeless channels would be used. I did not before know they existed, but
now I know
they do (or did) I would miss them. I think they should be brought back.. Shouldn't
be too
hard... Jus
