On 21 May 2013 23:47, Jagane Sundar jag...@sundar.org wrote:
I see one significant benefit to having Release Plan votes: Fewer releases
with more members of the community working on any given release.
In turn, fewer Hadoop releases implies less confusion for end users
attempting to download
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can create a branch, and propose release candidates from
+1
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Jonathan Eagles jeag...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently
we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev
+1
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can create a branch, and propose release
+1 (non-binding)
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Tom White t...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Chris Nauroth
cnaur...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Tom White t...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:10 PM,
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Chris Nauroth
cnaur...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On Wed, May 22,
Couldn't reply yesterday.
I will try to argue this is a useful action and that keeping it in Bylaws
does not change regular release process.
- Bylaws do not require to vote on every release plan.
If nobody complains then it is a routine process of building a RC and
voting on it.
- It is useful to
Hi Konstantin,
The amendment I've proposed actually leaves the Release Plan in place. In
fact, where one could say the current bylaws don't require a Release Plan
for every release, this amendment makes clear that it does. It just
doesn't have to be voted on.
I would think that a controversial
Hi Jagane,
My response to your concerns is that I hope the PMC will have enough wisdom
not to pass votes for a confusing number of releases -- if only to avoid
the kind of fragmentation you point out could happen.
To date, however, this does not seem to have been a major problem in our
community.
@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote
Hi Jagane,
My response to your concerns is that I hope the PMC will have enough wisdom not
to pass votes for a confusing number of releases -- if only to avoid the kind
of fragmentation you point out could
+1million
I completely agree with Chris D's separate email too about not
vote'ing about intentions, and voting on actual artifacts.
The fact of the matter at the ASF is that any PMC member; heck any
contributor can roll a release candidate. If that candidate receives
at least 3 PMC member +1s
+1
Thanks for taking care of this, Matt. -C
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can create a
+1
I've always found the Release Plan votes a bit bizarre, and the fact that
we've gone through many releases that did not have a corresponding Release
Plan vote suggest to me that we should just scrap them.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Chris
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can create a branch, and propose release candidates from
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.comwrote:
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently
we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the
+1
-Giri
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can create a branch, and propose release
+1
--
Arpit Gupta
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On May 21, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can
I see one significant benefit to having Release Plan votes: Fewer releases with
more members of the community working on any given release.
In turn, fewer Hadoop releases implies less confusion for end users attempting
to download and use an Apache Hadoop release.
If there are a dozen different
+1, thanks for taking the initiative on this Matt.
On May 21, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can create a branch, and
+1 thanks Matt.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any
committer can create a branch, and propose release
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 thanks Matt.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently
we
have an ambiguity. We have
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 thanks Matt.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently
we
have an ambiguity. We have a tradition
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jitendra Pandey
jiten...@hortonworks.comwrote:
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 thanks Matt.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
This has
+1.
thanks
mahadev
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jitendra Pandey
jiten...@hortonworks.comwrote:
+1
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 thanks Matt.
13/14 +1's. I think that constitutes consensus. Moving this to a VOTE
thread. Please repeat your +1s :-)
Cheers,
--Matt
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.comwrote:
+1.
thanks
mahadev
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
Why repeat just tally new ones?
Sent from my iPhone
On May 21, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote:
13/14 +1's. I think that constitutes consensus. Moving this to a VOTE
thread. Please repeat your +1s :-)
Cheers,
--Matt
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mahadev Konar
Ok, if no one complains I will phrase the vote to include +1's explicitly
cast in the discussion thread.
--Matt
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Why repeat just tally new ones?
Sent from my iPhone
On May 21, 2013, at 6:58 PM,
Hi Jagane,
since you did not explicitly cast a -1 or other numerical vote, please if
you wish go ahead and cast a vote in the VOTE thread.
Best regards,
--Matt
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Jagane Sundar jag...@sundar.org wrote:
I see one significant benefit to having Release Plan votes:
29 matches
Mail list logo
