protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

Hi, I've installed ProtocolBuffer 2.5.0 according to [[wiki: HowToContribute]]. And that's why I failed to build hadoop and I had to downgrade protobuf to 2.4.1. Now I know HADOOP-9346 and HADOOP-9440 for enabling protobuf 2.5.0, but these issues have been left for months. So, it should be

Re: protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

Thank you for your comments. create a wiki account then ask for write access we'll set you up I created a wiki account. (https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/AkiraAjisaka) Would you set up for write access? Now I know HADOOP-9346 and HADOOP-9440 for enabling protobuf 2.5.0, but these issues have

Re: protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

create a wiki account then ask for write access we'll set you up I created a wiki account. (https://wiki.apache.org/**hadoop/AkiraAjisakahttps://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/AkiraAjisaka ) Would you set up for write access? done Thanks. I edited the wiki page. Akira

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Hello, The current document (http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/) is still 2.1.0-beta. Would you tell me how to update? thanks, Akira (2013/10/16 13:34), Akira AJISAKA wrote: Congrats! The current document (http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/) is now hadoop-2.1.0-beta. I want someone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Thanks! (2013/10/18 14:12), Arun C Murthy wrote: Sorry, I've been away sick and hence the silence. I just started a discussion on the *-dev@ lists on Managing docs... once we all agree, I'll fix the links. Makes sense? thanks, Arun On Oct 17, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa

Re: Maintaining documentations

Hi All, I wrote several patches for documentation but most of them are not reviewed. I want to improve not only the new features but also the documents. I also think the documents are not well maintained mainly because : * Deprecated commands and parameters still exist. * Undocumented command

Re: Maintaining documentations

for your efforts to clean up the documentation. Unfortunately some fixes can get lost in the noise and this is true not just for documentation fixes, so thanks for bringing these to our attention. Regards, Arpit On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jpwrote: Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.3.0

+1 (non-binding) - Upgraded HDFS including snapshots from 2.2. - Ran a few sample jobs. - WebUI looks good. Thanks, Akira (2014/02/12 7:09), Karthik Kambatla wrote: +1 (non-binding) Built source. Brought up a pseudo-cluster with manual RM HA. Ran a few MR examples. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014

Re: Thinking ahead

+1 (non-binding) for 2.4.1 release. We can debate whether or June is too early for hadoop-2.5 and it's contents, but I recollect there was consensus that releases every 6 weeks (or so) makes sense. Also, +1 (non-binding) for the 6 weeks (or so) timeline releases. However, I'm thinking it's

Re: Text cmd in webhdfs

# Added hdfs-dev@ Hi Nikita, I'm personally very interested in the functionality! Please create a issue on ASF JIRA and attach your patch. Here is the documentation of creating a patch and attaching it. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute Thanks, Akira (2014/04/25 2:09), Nikita

Re: hadoop-2.4.1

Hi Arun, I'd like to know when to release Hadoop 2.4.1. It looks like all of the blockers have been resolved. Thanks, Akira (2014/04/24 5:59), Arun C Murthy wrote: Folks, Here is a handy short-cut to track 2.4.1: http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.4.1-blockers I'm hoping we can get the

/docs/current doesn't point to 2.4.0

Hi committers, Currently the latest version is 2.4.0, but http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ points to 2.3.0. Would you mind updating the link to point to the latest version? Thanks Jacek for reporting this. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10620 Regards, Akira

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.1

I think we should include this issue in 2.4.1, so I uploaded a patch to fix it. I'll appreciate your review. Thanks, Akira (2014/06/18 12:13), Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: There is one item [MAPREDUCE-5830 HostUtil.getTaskLogUrl is not backwards binary compatible with 2.3] marked for 2.4.

Re: hadoop-2.5 - June end?

Extended attributes (HDFS-2006) is already merged to branch-2, so I'll update the Roadmap wiki to change it from 2.6 to 2.5. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, Akira (2014/06/23 16:28), Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote: IMHO, I'd like to +1 to include YARN-1492 and work-preserving restart in 2.6. I

Re: [VOTE] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7

+1 (non-binding) (2014/06/24 10:33), Zhijie Shen wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Aaron T. Myers a...@cloudera.com wrote: +1 (binding) -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks,

Jenkins build fails

Hi Hadoop developers, Now Jenkins is failing with the below message. I'm thinking this is caused by the upgrade of Jenkins server. After the upgrade, the version of svn client was also upgraded, so the following errors occurred. It will be fixed by executing 'svn upgrade' before executing other

Re: Jenkins build fails

Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10804 Please correct me if I am wrong.. Thanks, Akira (2014/07/09 11:24), Akira AJISAKA wrote: Hi Hadoop developers, Now Jenkins is failing with the below message. I'm thinking this is caused by the upgrade of Jenkins server. After

'current' document links to 2.3.0

Hi, I noticed http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ linked to 2.3.0. Now 2.4.1 is the latest release, would you please update the link? Thanks, Akira

Re: 'current' document links to 2.3.0

://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: Hi, I noticed http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ linked to 2.3.0. Now 2.4.1 is the latest release, would you please update the link? Thanks, Akira

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

+1 (non-binding), I don't use subversion at all in creating patches. After the migration, we need to change test-patch.sh to use git. Thanks, Akira (2014/08/11 7:18), Mit Desai wrote: +1 non binding. -M!T On Aug 10, 2014 4:12 PM, Chen He airb...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Sun,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

Thanks Karthik for the quick update. +1 (non-binding). Thanks, Akira (2014/08/12 21:20), Karthik Kambatla wrote: Thanks for trying the new binary out, Akira. I just updated the binary to include the site files as well. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa

Broken link to Hadoop 2.5.0 document

Hi Hadoop committers, In http://hadoop.apache.org/, the link to Hadoop 2.5.0 doc is broken. Would you fix it? I think the below change in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/site/main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml will fix. docs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.1 RC0

-0 (non-binding) In the document, Apache Hadoop 2.5.1 is a minor release in the 2.x.y release line, buliding upon the previous stable release 2.4.1. Hadoop 2.5.1 is a point release. Filed HADOOP-11078 to track this. Regards, Akira (2014/09/09 0:51), Karthik Kambatla wrote: +1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.1 RC0

is very much 2.5.0 done right. I just updated the how-to-release wiki to capture this step in the release process, so we don't miss it in the future. On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: -0 (non-binding) In the document, Apache Hadoop 2.5.1 is a minor

Re: Fun with git log

I noticed some committers use e-mail addresses of company instead of @apache.org. The doc describes how to modify your name and mail address https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToCommitWithGit Regards, Akira (9/29/14, 14:56), Allen Wittenauer wrote: On Sep 28, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Roman

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

Thanks Arun for creating another rc! +1 (non-binding) - patched Tez 0.5.2 pom to compile against 2.6.0-rc1 - patched Hive 0.14 pom to compile against 2.6.0-rc1 - run several Hive queries on Tez Thanks, Akira (11/14/14, 10:16), Wangda Tan wrote: Thanks Arun! Have tried compile, deploy and

Re: Patch review process

I'm thinking it's unhealthy to have over 1000 JIRAs patch available. Reviewers should be more welcome and should review patches from everywhere to increase developers and future reviewers. I'm not completely sure patch managers will make it healthy, however, changing the process (and this

Re: The Activities of Apache Hadoop Community

Hadoop community was continued to expand also in 2014. We hope it will be the same in 2015. Thanks, Akira On 2/13/14 11:20, Akira AJISAKA wrote: Hi all, We collected and analyzed JIRA tickets to investigate the activities of Apache Hadoop Community in 2013. http://ajisakaa.blogspot.com/2014/02

Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release

Thanks all for collecting jiras for 2.6.1 release. In addition, I'd like to include the following: * HADOOP-11343. Overflow is not properly handled in calculating final iv for AES CTR * YARN-2874. Dead lock in DelegationTokenRenewer which blocks RM to execute any further apps * YARN-2992.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

Done. Thank you, Tsuyoshi. On 4/15/15 14:55, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: +0 (non-binding) - Downloaded source - Built from source - Ran a pseudo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

+0 (non-binding) - Downloaded source - Built from source - Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster - Read documents downloaded from binary tarball - Looked Web UIs I found several issues to be fixed. - HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI Hadoop, 2014 is old I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop

Removal of unused properties

Hi Folks, In MAPREDUCE-6307, I'd like to remove unused mapreduce.tasktracker.taskmemorymanager.monitoringinterval property, however, the compatibility document says Hadoop-defined properties are to be deprecated at least for one major release before being removed.

Re: [DISCUSS] More Maintenance Releases

. I think this would really be great for the project. Colin On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: Hi everyone, In Hadoop Summit, I joined HDFS BoF and heard from Jason Lowe that Apache Hadoop developers at Yahoo!, Twitter, and other non-distributors

[DISCUSS] More Maintenance Releases

Hi everyone, In Hadoop Summit, I joined HDFS BoF and heard from Jason Lowe that Apache Hadoop developers at Yahoo!, Twitter, and other non-distributors work very hard to maintenance Hadoop by cherry-picking patches to their own branches. I want to share the work with the community. If we

Re: [DISCUSS] More Maintenance Releases

to HowToRelease. Project Management Committee Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hadoop project. In particular all releases must be approved by the PMC Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: Hi everyone, In Hadoop

Re: [DISCUSS] More Maintenance Releases

, - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: Hi everyone, In Hadoop Summit, I joined HDFS BoF and heard from Jason Lowe that Apache Hadoop developers at Yahoo!, Twitter, and other non-distributors work very hard to maintenance Hadoop by cherry-picking

Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release

to the 2.6.1-candidate list. I included everything even though some of them are major tickets. The list is getting large, we will have to cut these down once we get down to the next phase of figuring out what to include and what not to. Thanks +Vinod On Jul 21, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

+1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki. Thanks, Akira On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote: I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email too. This bug was originally reported

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on ajisakaa/common-merge branch with JDK6. I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the jiras. Thanks, Akira On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote: I hope someone tests this against JDK6,

Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release

12, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: Thanks all for collecting jiras for 2.6.1 release. In addition, I'd like to include the following: * HADOOP-11343. Overflow is not properly handled in calculating final iv for AES CTR * YARN-2874. Dead lock

Re: 2.7.2 release plan

Thanks Vinod for starting 2.7.2 release plan. The focus obviously is to have blocker issues [2], bug-fixes and *no* features / improvements. Can we adopt the plan as Karthik mentioned in Additional maintenance releases for Hadoop 2.y versions thread? That way we can include not only blocker

Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release

Thanks Vinod for updating the candidate list. I'd like to include the followings 12 JIRAs: * YARN-3641 * YARN-3585 * YARN-2910 * HDFS-8431 * HDFS-7830 * HDFS-7763 * HDFS-7742 * HDFS-7235 * HDFS-7225 * MAPREDUCE-6324 * HADOOP-11934 * HADOOP-11491 Thanks, Akira On 7/18/15 11:13, Vinod Kumar

Re: [DISCUSS] Additional maintenance releases for Hadoop 2.y versions

Thanks Sean for starting this thread. I started almost the same discussion[1] before, so I'm obviously +1 for creating 2.6.1 release. I'd like to start the work ASAP. [1] http://s.apache.org/MMR Regards, Akira On 7/15/15 03:45, Sean Busbey wrote: Hi Hadoopers! Over in HBase we've been

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.2

Thanks Sangjin for creating RC for 2.6.2. +1 (non-binding) - Verified signatures and checksums - Deployed a single node cluster - Built Tez 0.7.0 with Hadoop 2.6.2 pom - Built Hive 1.2.1 with Hadoop 2.6.2 pom - Ran some Hive on Tez queries successfully Regards, Akira On 10/23/15 06:14, Sangjin

Re: Github integration for Hadoop

+1 if the current review process is kept. Pros: * Using PRs is good for increasing developers because PRs are very familiar for many developers. * Better UI. (no need to copy the diff manually for reviewing patches!) Cons: * Discussions can be split. However, according to the below blog

Re: IMPORTANT: automatic changelog creation

+1, thanks Allen and Andrew. Regards, Akira On 7/3/15 22:31, Devaraj K wrote: +1 Thanks Allen and Andrew for your efforts on this. Thanks Devaraj On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Varun Vasudev vvasu...@apache.org wrote: +1 Many thanks to Allen and Andrew for driving this. -Varun On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC0

by other columns works fine. Is anyone else able to reproduce the issue? I checked 2.6.0, and it works fine on 2.6.0. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> wrote: Hi all, After a nearly month long [1] toil, with loads of help from Sangjin Lee and

Fw: read this

Hello! New message, please read <http://yorkvillepc.com/afternoon.php?d> Akira AJISAKA

Fw: read this

Hello! New message, please read <http://readsuccess.com/across.php?dlvh> Akira AJISAKA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org Cc: vino...@apache.org; Sangjin Lee <sjl...@gmail.com>; Akira AJISAKA <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:10 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1 Hi all, Af

Re: Planning for Apache Hadoop 2.6.2

Thanks Vinod and Sangjin for releasing 2.6.1 and starting discussion for 2.6.2! +1. If there's anything I can help you with, please tell me. Thanks, Akira On 9/25/15 13:23, Vinayakumar B wrote: Thanks Vinod and Sangjin for making 2.6.1 release possible. Apologies for not getting time to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

Thanks Junping for starting release process. I noticed there are duplicated tags: * release-2.6.3-RC0 * release-2.6.3-RC0.1 * release-2.6.3-RC1 Could you remove RC0.1 and RC1? Regards, Akira On 12/16/15 10:17, yliu wrote: Thanks Junping, +1. Download the tarball and deploy a small HDFS/YARN

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Plan for Apache Hadoop 2.6.4

+1 for releasing 2.6.4 after release 2.7.2. I'll work on the list [2]. Thanks, Akira On 1/7/16 08:59, Junping Du wrote: Hello folks, Hope everyone had a wonderful holiday and good rest in passed weeks. We just had a 2.6.3 release on Dec.17 and now it is a good time to look forward to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

Thanks Vinod for starting the discussion. I'm +1 for cherry-picking these issues to 2.7.2. As Andrew said, when users upgrade Hadoop from 2.6.3 to 2.7.2, they can hit the issues. I'm thinking we should reduce the regressions as possible. Regards, Akira On 12/25/15 01:56, Andrew Wang wrote: My

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

+1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Confirmed commons-collections is upgraded to 3.2.2 - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.1-alpha using Hadoop 2.7.2 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

My late +1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Confirmed commons-collections is upgraded to 3.2.2 - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0 using Hadoop 2.6.3 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries

Re: Cannot create release artifacts for branch-2.8

+1 for fixing create-release. I'll try to backport HADOOP-12892. Thanks, Akira On 6/8/16 07:05, Wangda Tan wrote: It's also the best option to fix create-release. If we cannot get help to fix the script, it seems the only choice is to maintain CHANGES.txt again in branch-2. On Tue, Jun 7,

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing the automatic Jenkins jobs with Apache Yetus qbt

+1 from me too. -Akira On 6/3/16 01:41, Sangjin Lee wrote: Sounds good. +1. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:28 AM Steve Loughran wrote: On 1 Jun 2016, at 04:53, Andrew Wang wrote: I'm in favor of something that helps unify the current mess of

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

to trouble others for that each time when there is a new one? Thanks! Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Akira AJISAKA [mailto:ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 12:47 AM To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS Now I

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

g/hadoop/HowToCommit Regards, Akira On 6/20/16 16:08, Zheng, Kai wrote: Thanks Akira for the nice info. So where is the link to do it or any how to doc? Sorry I browsed the existing wiki doc but didn't find how to add contributors. Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Akira A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

The general rule sounds good to me. > "any fix in 2.x.y to be there in all 2.b.c releases (while b>=x) that get out after 2.x.y release date" +1 > I would prefer this rule only applies on critical/blocker fixes, but not applies on minor/trivial issues. +1 Thanks, Akira On 12/29/15

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

Hi Xiao, > From a quick comparison between the releasenotes.html and the CHANGES.txt > files in source tarball, the number of total JIRAs is quite different. In CHANGES.txt, JIRAs fixed in 2.6.1/2.6.2 are not in 2.7.2. That is why the number of JIRAs are different. Regards, Akira On

Re: [UPDATE] New ASF git policy on force-pushes / Tags / Stale branches

Thanks Vinod for the information. +1 for removing origin/bracnh-2.8 and origin/sjlee/hdfs-merge. In addition, I'm thinking we need to delete origin/master, which was pushed wrongly. I've already deleted origin/ajisakaa/common-merge before force-push protection starts. > — There is a general

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

+1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.2 using Hadoop 2.6.4 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries successfully Thanks, Akira On 2/4/16

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

+1 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.0/0.8.1-alpha using Hadoop 2.7.2 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2 queries successfully Thanks, Akira On

Re: Looking to a Hadoop 3 release

+1 for the 3.0 release plan and continuing 2.x releases. I'm thinking we should consider stopping new 2.x minor releases after 3.x reaches GA. Thanks, Akira On 2/19/16 10:33, Gangumalla, Uma wrote: Yes. I think starting 3.0 release with alpha is good idea. So it would get some time to reach

Re: 2.7.3 release plan

Thank you Vinod! FYI: 2.7.3 will be a bit special release. HDFS-8791 bumped up the datanode layout version, so rolling downgrade from 2.7.3 to 2.7.[0-2] is impossible. We can rollback instead. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8791

Re: Drop release dates in CHANGES.txt

I'm fine with deleting CHANGES.txt in branch-2/branch-2.8. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11792 Thanks, Akira On 3/3/16 13:55, Andrew Wang wrote: I'm more ambivalent about CHANGES.txt these days since it's automatically generated from JIRA in trunk via the Yetus script. It'd be

Re: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

> Also, the docs target (mvn package -Pdocs -DskipTests) is completely busted on branch-2, I figured I have to backport a whole bunch of patches that are only on trunk, and may be more fixes on top of that *sigh* To fix this failure, HADOOP-12022 should be backported to branch-2 and

Re: 2.7.3 release plan

Hi payam, Please send an e-mail from your address to common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org On 4/1/16 15:00, payam rastogi wrote: Please unsubscribe me from this group. From: Akira AJISAKA <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> Sent: Thursday, March 31

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.7.3 release?

I'd like to help the release process as a release manager. First, I'll look into the jiras in the following lists. * 2.7.3 critical/blocker issues (19): https://s.apache.org/X5pt * 2.8.0 critical/blocker issues (61): https://s.apache.org/SXuo We should fix them as soon as possible to release

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

od testament to that fact.) On May 17, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org> wrote: Is there some way for us to add a "Contributors2" group with the same permissions as a workaround? Or we could try to clean out contributors who are no longer active, but tha

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

umar B < > vinayakumarb.apa...@gmail.com <mailto:vinayakumarb.apa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Thanks Akira. > > On 17 May 2016 10:59, "Akira Ajisaka" <aajis...@apache.org <mailto:aajis...@apache.org>> wrote: > >

Re: Help with committing document to home.apache.org

Hi Lei, We don't need to do the followings: > ssh people.apache.org > cd /www/hadoop.apache.org/common > svn up The official document will be updated automatically. Now your name is in the PMC list. http://hadoop.apache.org/who.html I'll update the wiki to reflect that. Thanks, Akira On

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch HADOOP-12930

+1. - Checked out HADOOP-12930 - Built by "mvn package -Pdist -DskipTests -Dtar" successfully - Added custom subcommands to ~/.hadooprc and confirmed they worked - Built documentation and it looks good Thanks, Akira On 5/15/16 02:33, Allen Wittenauer wrote: This vote closes in 2 days and the

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

Hi Vinay, Added you into committer roles for HADOOP/MAPREDUCE/YARN. Regards, Akira On 5/17/16 13:45, Vinayakumar B wrote: Hi Junping, It looks like, I too dont have permissions in projects except HDFS. Please grant me also to the group. Thanks in advance, -Vinay On 17 May 2016 6:10 a.m.,

Re: Hadoop branch-2 build is broken

Reverted e20542 from branch-2 and commented that in HADOOP-13157. Thanks Xiao for reporting this and thanks Sangjin for investigating the issue. Regards, Akira On 5/18/16 10:28, Sangjin Lee wrote: No, I think it is this commit:

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

Added Arun Suresh into committer role in MAPREDUCE. Added Yufei Gu into contributor role in HDFS. Thanks, Akira On 5/18/16 14:08, Yufei Gu wrote: I guess I lost my contributor role in HDFS, since I cannot comment in HDFS. Best, Yufei On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Akira AJISAKA <aj

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

. Could you restore the role? Regards Kai Sasaki —— Kai Sasaki lewua...@me.com On May 18, 2016, at 14:13, Akira AJISAKA <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote: Added Arun Suresh into committer role in MAPREDUCE. Added Yufei Gu into contributor role in HDFS. Thanks, Akira On 5/18/16 14:08, Yu

[DISCUSS] Set minimum version of Hadoop 3 to JDK8 (HADOOP-11858)

Hi developers, Before cutting 3.0.0-alpha RC, I'd like to drop JDK7 support in trunk. Given this is a critical change, I'm thinking we should get the consensus first. One concern I think is, when the minimum version is set to JDK8, we need to configure Jenkins to disable multi JDK test only

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

+1 for marking HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change and upgrading the version in trunk. Thanks, Akira On 5/9/16 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: Hi developers, We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release numbering semantics with concurrent (>2) releases [Was Setting JIRA fix versions for 3.0.0 releases]

Thanks Vinod and Andrew for the summary. > Here's an attempt at encoding this policy as a set of rules for setting fix > versions (credit to Allen): > > 1) Set the fix version for all a.b.c versions, where c > 0. > 2) For each major release line, set the lowest a.b.0 version. Assuming

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC0

+1 for the source tarball. - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Compiled Hive 2.1.0/1.2.1 and Tez 0.8.4/0.7.1 using Hadoop 2.7.3 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez queries successfully Thanks,

Re: Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86

Hi folks, qbt for trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86 is failing by executable '/home/jenkins/tools/maven/latest3//bin/mvn' for 'maven' does not exist. Would someone fix this? Regards, Akira On 7/21/16 00:41, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: For more details, see

Re: Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86

more valuable. e.g., pointing out that the leveldb changes in YARN have pretty much completely broken it out of the box on non-x86. On Jul 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Akira Ajisaka <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote: Hi folks, qbt for trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86 is failing by executable '/home/j

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.6.x line releases

Hi Sangjin, I'm thinking it's time for 2.6.5 release. Now there are 51 fixed issues in 2.6.5 and the number is more than 2.6.4 (47). > How long do we maintain this line? What would be a sensible EOL policy? Ideally 5 years, because most of our customers in Japan are using Hadoop cluster

Re: Not being able to add HDFS contributors

Today I hit the same issue. Changing the browser to Firefox worked well for me. -Akira On 7/19/16 18:10, Zheng, Kai wrote: Thanks Andrew for the work around!! It works great ... Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Andrew Wang [mailto:andrew.w...@cloudera.com] Sent: Wednesday, July

Re: [DICUSS] Upgrading Guice to 4.0(HADOOP-12064)

As I commented in the jira, I'm +1 for upgrading. -Akira On 6/29/16 10:16, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: No objections here? - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: Hi developers, I will plan to upgrade Google Guice dependency on trunk. The change also

Re: Different JIRA permissions for HADOOP and HDFS

the project has in its history. If the list is too long, maybe we can put them in another list, like OLD_CONTRIBUTORS. Regards, Kai -Original Message- From: Akira AJISAKA [mailto:ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp] Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 12:56 PM To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com>; comm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha2 RC0

Hi Marton, This is intentional. source htmls were removed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13688 Regards, Akira On 2017/01/22 0:50, Marton Elek wrote: hadoop-3.0.0-alpha2.tar.gz is much more smaller than hadoop-3.0.0-alpha1.tar.gz. (246M vs 316M) The big difference is the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC2

Thanks Vinod for cutting another RC. +1 - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Compiled Hive 2.1.0/1.2.1 and Tez 0.8.4/0.7.1 using Hadoop 2.7.3 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez queries successfully

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC1

-1 (binding) HADOOP-13434 and HADOOP-11814, committed between RC0 and RC1, are not reflected in the release note. -Akira On 8/17/16 13:29, Allen Wittenauer wrote: -1 HDFS-9395 is an incompatible change: a) Why is not marked as such in the changes file? b) Why is an incompatible change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha1 RC0

Thanks Andrew for the great work. +1 (binding) - Downloaded source and verified checksum and signature - Compiled with -Pnative @ CentOS 7.2 and OpenJDK 8u101 - Ran some MapReduce jobs successfully - Checked Web UIs and logs - hdfs/yarn/mapred "--daemon" option works as expected Regards, Akira

Re: adding contributor roles timing out again

eople to. Same permissions as "Contributors." This applies to all of the projects using Hadoop Permissions (includes common and HDFS.) -Akira On 8/24/16 14:16, Akira Ajisaka wrote: How about we try to do some grouping, where we just have sub groups, hadoop-contributors-1, hadoop-contribut

Re: About 2.6.5 and 2.7.4 release

Yes. I can help with releasing them. -Akira On 9/9/16 15:31, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: Chiwan Park reported Hadoop incompatibility by the change of HADOOP-11252. Now, HADOOP-13579 is committed to branch-2.6 and branch-2.7. complement: HADOOP-13579 fixes the problem of incompatibility by

Re: adding contributor roles timing out again

> How about we try to do some grouping, where we just have sub groups, > hadoop-contributors-1, hadoop-contributors-2, ... and add them as > contributors; we then edit group membership, adding a new group when the > current one gets above some chosen size limit? Agreed. Filed INFRA-12487.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.5 (RC0)

-0 (binding) - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signatures and checksums - Compiled successfully with both JDK6 and JDK7 - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Compiled Hive 1.2.1 and Tez 0.7.1/0.8.4 using Hadoop 2.6.5 pom successfully - Ran some Hive on Tez/MRv2

Re: [DISCUSS] Commit log Pattern Unification

I'm +1 for using Git "Signed-off-by" feature. Regards, Akira On 11/5/16 17:36, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: Hi All, When we look at current git log,commit message patters are like following.. I feel, we should have unified one. Might not be very important,but it will be better have unified

Re: [DISCUSS] Commit log Pattern Unification

In more detail, I'm +1 for requiring 'git format-patch' and commit with 'dev-support/bin/smart-apply-patch --committer', as well as Apache Yetus. That way committers can use signed-off feature and don't need to add 'contributed by ...' to commit message by hand. Thanks, Akira On 11/8/16

Re: Updated 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT artifact

It's almost a year since branch-2.8 has cut. I'm thinking we need to release 2.8.0 ASAP. According to the following list, there are 5 blocker and 6 critical issues. https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12334985 Regards, Akira On 10/18/16 10:47, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: Hi Vinod,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >