Any suggestion how to handle that otherwise?
Continueing this topic in the other thread 'Handling compilation errors':
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11245564832r=1w=4
Joerg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Torsten Curdt tcurdt at apache.org writes:
(BTW, this use case shows a different lifecycle for the handler and
is another signal for removing lifecycle specific stuff from the handler
interface.)
Well, to me it's a clear example why a
lifecycle would make sense!
Of course, but it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36314.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36314.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36314.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36315.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36317.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At the moment it is just the CompilingListener as far as I see. And
it does not
even need a count, a boolean switch error occured would be
sufficient. The use
case of Don also does not need a count, it just needs a container
(probably a
list) for the compilation errors.
Well ...I think
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36317.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36317.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36315.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36212.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36114.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36077.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36061.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36047.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Oliver Heger wrote:
There was a question on the user list about a 1.1.1 release.
I think, this is a good idea, especially because there were some
problems in 1.1 with file based configurations and reloading strategies,
which (hopefully) have been fixed in the meantime. Making these
Torsten Curdt tcurdt at apache.org writes:
I think we are facing two questions:
1. Keep the ProblemHandler across compilations (and add a lifecycle) or
re-create the object
Hmm, this also depends :) For the error counter there is no problem to create
one on every compilation cycle. But
I think we are facing two questions:
1. Keep the ProblemHandler across compilations (and add a
lifecycle) or
re-create the object
Hmm, this also depends :) For the error counter there is no problem
to create
one on every compilation cycle.
You mean create counter object??
But
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36320.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36320.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Torsten Curdt tcurdt at apache.org writes:
1. Keep the ProblemHandler across compilations (and add a
lifecycle) or re-create the object
Hmm, this also depends :) For the error counter there is no problem
to create one on every compilation cycle.
You mean create counter object??
Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In this case I agree with Brett. An uncought exception will be no
problem in a unit test. The fact that junit distinguishes between
failures and errors should especially direct the developer's attention
to that problem.
It's okay with me. I was just
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36215.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36320.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
After attending to most of the qualms checkstyle had with the SCXML
code base, the remaining cruft is posted here [
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/scxml/checkstyle-report.html ] *time
sensitive URL*
The vast majority falls in three categories:
1) Missing header / line does not match expected
Oliver Heger wrote:
Sorry the commit was incomplete, this test assumes the configuration
defines its equals() methods. I added an equals() method in
AbstractConfiguration delegating to
StrictConfigurationComparator.compare() but I'm not sure it's worth
committing this. What do you think ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36320.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36325.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36325.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
Bugzilla ticket 36325 includes an updated version of FileSystemUtils that
addresses the two outstanding issues:
(1) It should now work on all Windows language versions, although I only
have an English version to test with... since it no longer looks for any
particular string I fully
Author: proyal
Date: Tue Aug 23 09:55:26 2005
New Revision: 239434
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239434view=rev
Log:
fix regression from JELLY-213 -- NPE and CCE
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/impl/StaticTagScript.java
Modified:
I've written a piece of code for working with matrices - oritinal
version was early 1989 in Fortran77. Since I've recently started
working with Java I tried converting some of my useful code (from my
rather large C++ template), but I've run into a snag or two with the
limited generics. The class
As I prepare to do so I realize it was on the Windows side with
procrun that I had the problem, not with jsvc. I apologize to anyone
who might have been trying to chase this down over there (unless, of
course, its there as well!).
As penance for this mistake I will see if the problem IS
Craig McClanahan wrote:
If we follow the path to fork those classes, it would be better to
just rename them back into the org.apache.commons.fileupload package
space, and dispense with any notion that the classes would remain in
sync. We couldn't do that with the beanutils/digester dependency
On 8/23/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After attending to most of the qualms checkstyle had with the SCXML
code base, the remaining cruft is posted here [
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/scxml/checkstyle-report.html ] *time
sensitive URL*
The vast majority falls in three
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[snip]
3) Method 'bar' not designed for extension - Outside the SCXML Java
object model (where the type hierarchies imply certain semantics of
execution for the state machine), I haven't chased these down.
I'd be tempted to disable this one,
On 8/23/05, rand huso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've written a piece of code for working with matrices - oritinal
version was early 1989 in Fortran77. Since I've recently started
working with Java I tried converting some of my useful code (from my
rather large C++ template), but I've run into a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23372.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi James,
Hi there,
can you tell me, what you are missing with proxytoys? You announced to have
a closer look , but did not write anything further.
It seems to be true that proxytoys and commons-proxy are quite similar
That's one thing that I could definitely use help with (mavenization).
I'm not at all familiar with what it takes to get a project set up with
Gump, Maven, and all the other stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Hohwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 4:21 PM
I didn't understand what you meant by your question:
why do you call the methods object there?
What methods are you talking about? Do you mean the getObject() method on
the ObjectProvider interface. Well, I thought about that. A provider isn't
a factory, because it doesn't necessarily create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
I didn't understand what you meant by your question:
why do you call the methods object there?
What methods are you talking about? Do you mean the getObject() method on
the ObjectProvider interface. Well, I
Phil, et alia,
Thanks for the response. This is the first time I've submitted any
code to any community for review and potential inclusion in any
open-source project, I usually just create stuff for my own use.
background
Matrix inverses in the traditional sense:
(A) * x = b
The inverse (~A) and
Brent Worden wrote:
36266 looks ok. J., you have this issue assigned to yourself. Are
you going to commit the changes?
Commit is prepared, unfortunately I've problems connecting
to svn.apache.org. I'll try again tomorrow.
Same for the other SoC code.
J.Pietschmann
See:
http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
SVN is down currently.
S.
On 23/08/05, J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brent Worden wrote:
36266 looks ok. J., you have this issue assigned to yourself. Are
you going to commit the changes?
Commit is prepared, unfortunately I've
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: polx
Date: Tue Aug 23 15:36:01 2005
New Revision: 239470
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239470view=rev
Log:
Enabling maven upload of snapshots.
paul
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/project.properties
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 8/23/05, rand huso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil, et alia,
Thanks for the response. This is the first time I've submitted any
code to any community for review and potential inclusion in any
open-source project, I usually just create stuff for my own use.
background
Matrix inverses in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34198.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31618.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36331.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36331.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36331.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36308.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: mrdon
Date: Tue Aug 23 20:48:03 2005
New Revision: 239517
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239517view=rev
Log:
Added support for datePattern on date validator
PR: 22384
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22384.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31790.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22384.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: rahul
Date: Tue Aug 23 20:52:02 2005
New Revision: 239518
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239518view=rev
Log:
Some more tests, clover reports 62.3% coverage for Commons SCXML.
Added:
Author: rahul
Date: Tue Aug 23 21:01:22 2005
New Revision: 239519
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239519view=rev
Log:
RootContext (used in the JSP environment) should override base class's boolean
has(String) method
Modified:
Author: mrdon
Date: Tue Aug 23 21:11:06 2005
New Revision: 239522
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239522view=rev
Log:
Added required check for single radio button
PR: 33047
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33047.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33328.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34730.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30955.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34730.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: mrdon
Date: Tue Aug 23 21:35:15 2005
New Revision: 239525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239525view=rev
Log:
Changing o.a.c.v.Field.validate() to public to be able to be called
indpendently of a form
PR: 35508
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35508.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31094.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Output is lost when using text attribute of core:parse tag
--
Key: JELLY-218
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-218
Project: jelly
Type: Bug
Components: core / taglib.core
Versions:
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
Oliver Heger wrote:
There was a question on the user list about a 1.1.1 release.
I think, this is a good idea, especially because there were some
problems in 1.1 with file based configurations and reloading
strategies, which (hopefully) have been fixed in the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31618.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
79 matches
Mail list logo
