Re: [dbutils] Opinions on 1.1 RC1

2006-11-18 Thread David Graham
Henri, I haven't been keeping up with DBUtils lately but it would be great to get an official 1.1 released so we don't have to use the nightlies. The API diff you posted looked fine to me. The website hasn't been updated in a long time though. I can drop in the RC1 jar at work on Monday for

Re: [DbUtils] Generic BasicRowProcessor toBeanList

2006-07-19 Thread David Graham
Not only do you lose compatibility you also ugly up the code with generics and introduce a bunch of complexity. I have heard from many dbutils users that they like the package because it's simple and easy to use. If people would like to use another library because dbutils doesn't have

Re: [dbutils] toMap conversion (bug)

2006-02-24 Thread David Graham
We don't use LinkedHashMap because we depend on Java 1.3 not 1.4. Nobody really uses 1.3 anymore so it wouldn't be so bad to use LinkedHashMap in a future release. David --- Tomáš Procházka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I found some problem with toMap conversion, it use HashMap, but

Re: [all][POLL] What JDK Version are you using?

2006-01-23 Thread David Graham
Niall, I code to the 1.4 API but deploy on 1.5 when possible. Moving off 1.3 is safe because: 1. 1.3 is not supported by Sun anymore. 2. Struts requires 1.4 and Validator is primarily used by Struts folks. Sure there are some that use it standalone but the percentage of total users is

Re: [validator] New routines package and plans

2006-01-22 Thread David Graham
Re the ORO dependency: It can be avoided if we use the Java 1.4 java.util.regex package. It's much faster than ORO in the testing I did a year ago. I would love to drop the ORO dependency to make the Validator distro lighter. David --- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/22/06,

Re: [DbUtils] Dynamic wrappers for JDBC interfaces

2005-09-28 Thread David Graham
I think this task is already completed. Take a look at the ProxyFactory class: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbutils/xref/org/apache/commons/dbutils/ProxyFactory.html David --- Neeraj Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The DbUtils website mentions one of the tasks as Dynamic

Re: [validator] Towards a release

2005-08-18 Thread David Graham
If I remember right, 1.2 (HEAD) includes form inheritance which wasn't widely tested. Niall might remember more details. I think releasing 1.2.0 from HEAD would be fine so we don't have to go through the error prone process of maintaining two branches. Thanks for picking up the Validator torch!

Re: [dbutils] SystemDataSource

2005-08-07 Thread David Graham
For some reason the website is distributed with the C3P0 download. It contains great docs on how to setup the parameters. I've been using it in production with Hibernate for over a year and it works great. David --- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/4/05, David Graham [EMAIL

Re: [dbutils] SystemDataSource

2005-08-03 Thread David Graham
Why not just use a real DataSource from C3P0 or Proxool? They're fully featured and easy to setup. Also, we should not use properties named jdbc.* as they are potentially used by drivers. http://sourceforge.net/projects/c3p0 http://proxool.sourceforge.net/ David --- Henri Yandell [EMAIL

Re: need help from a commons committer

2005-07-28 Thread David Graham
some dbutils enhancements accepted. Unfortunately it looks like there is no one activily developing / supporting DBUtils. There doesn't look like there has been an update to the code since 02/19/2005 from David Graham. I originally submitted this enhance 02/09/2005. The release 1.0 came

RE: SVN From Eclipse is too slow

2005-04-23 Thread David Graham
I can top that one. Subclipse deleted a file from the repository when all I tried to do was commit a change. It was lucky I noticed the delete and recommitted the file. I also have the horrible performance problems. David --- Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello: I see an even

Re: [all] External and Internal API's

2005-02-15 Thread David Graham
Eclipse also has a special way of sharing classes with other plugins. You can prevent outside plugins from using internal packages by tweaking the export definition in plugin.xml: runtime library name=something.jar export name=*/ /library /runtime That seems to be the primary benefit to

Re: [validator] Most tests are failing

2005-02-14 Thread David Graham
Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 8:52 PM Thanks Niall. Once all the tests pass I can commit some minor changes I'm working on. David --- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is may be because I rolled back

[validator] Most tests are failing

2005-02-12 Thread David Graham
Most of Validator's JUnit tests fail with the stack trace below. Is it just that I am missing a classpath setting or is the code actually broken? They fail when running from Eclipse and 'maven dist'. Thanks, David java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1 at

Re: [validator] Most tests are failing

2005-02-12 Thread David Graham
to using SVN for Validator yet. Niall - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 8:02 PM Subject: [validator] Most tests are failing Most of Validator's JUnit tests fail with the stack trace

Re: concurrency and starting a synchronized block

2005-02-11 Thread David Graham
--- Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regarding the FastHashMap: since the use is more or less discouraged ...why not deprecate it? Because it works on everything that its been tried on. It's more like no one has ever noticed it breaking.

Re: concurrency and starting a synchronized block

2005-02-10 Thread David Graham
A call to Map.get() may depend on state that can be corrupted by a concurrent call to Map.put(). You don't know without learning the implementation details of get(). So, you need to synchronize around both operations: synchronized(map) { Object o = map.get(key); if (o == null) {

Re: DBCP

2005-02-10 Thread David Graham
--- Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Calling BasicDataSource.close() will only close the connections still in the pool -- not the ones that have been checked out. It is designed to be called only when your app is ready to shut down. For normal usage, the best approach is

Re: [dbutils] Stored Procedure Runner and Bean Reuse Handler code submission

2005-02-09 Thread David Graham
Open a new bugzilla ticket then attach the files to that. You can't attach files when you create the ticket so you'll need to save and go back to it to attach the files. Thanks, David --- Kyle Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I attached the files but they did not make it to the list. How do

Re: [dbutils] Stored Procedure Runner and Bean Reuse Handler code submission

2005-02-09 Thread David Graham
Also, make sure the Apache 2.0 license header is in the source files like the other files in cvs. Thanks, David --- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Open a new bugzilla ticket then attach the files to that. You can't attach files when you create the ticket so you'll need to save and go

Re: [dbutils] component proposal

2005-02-01 Thread David Graham
DbUtils is a small JDBC helper library. We don't implement features that already exist in the standard Java distro. David --- Anaximandro (Woody) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I dono if you are open for this idea or if this topic was already discussed but let me explain: I´m working

Re: [all][VOTE] svn migration

2005-01-23 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright a sufficient amount of time has passed for public comments and testing. This is a vote thread for migrating commons to SVN. If this vote passes, I'll contact Justin and schedule the least disruptive migration time possible.

Re: Distributions to include dependencies?

2004-12-27 Thread David Graham
It would certainly be helpful to our users to include the dependencies in the distro. Otherwise, it's like trying to drive a car without the wheels. David --- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but for other things like

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread David Graham
--- Matt Sgarlata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Graham wrote: --- Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW: Another advantage of this approach would be that imports would indicate which version of the component is in use. I had a lot of trouble to find out, which version of jdom

Re: [dbutils] Problem with common DBUtil Bean

2004-12-20 Thread David Graham
First, you need to alias the column names in the sql to avoid having to use the horrible underscore in your java method names: select index_id as indexID, document_type as documentType, date_entered as dateEntered from MyTable DBUtils 1.0 didn't contain very intelligent column to bean property

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-19 Thread David Graham
--- Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW: Another advantage of this approach would be that imports would indicate which version of the component is in use. I had a lot of trouble to find out, which version of jdom was in use by some libraries as this was not indicated by the name of

Re: Commons Mapper: scope/roadmap?

2004-12-18 Thread David Graham
--- Max Rudman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 17, 2004, at 8:52 PM, David Graham wrote: There aren't any reusable implementations that I can think of. What do you picture the Hibernate mapper implementation looking like? Well, I am not too familiar with other O/R implementations

Re: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-17 Thread David Graham
Auftrag von David Graham Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Dezember 2004 02:26 An: Jakarta Commons Developers List Betreff: Re: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares Struts uses the deprecation cycle I described and so did the commons components spawned from Struts the last I knew (validator

Re: Jakarta Commons Structure rehashed

2004-12-17 Thread David Graham
Option B doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Most people are interested in only a few commons projects so each having their own trunk, tags, and branches makes sense. Struts lays out its subprojects using Option A: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/struts/ David --- Tim O'Brien [EMAIL

Re: Commons Mapper: scope/roadmap?

2004-12-17 Thread David Graham
There aren't any reusable implementations that I can think of. What do you picture the Hibernate mapper implementation looking like? The idea is that your app talks to the Mapper API which is implemented as sql, hibernate, etc. However, each implementation will be very specific to your app.

Re: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-16 Thread David Graham
components standard tests. Stephen - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] All the jakarta projects I've worked on have a deprecation cycle of one minor point release. For example, you deprecate a method for the 1.1 release and can remove it for the 1.2 release

Re: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-16 Thread David Graham
All the jakarta projects I've worked on have a deprecation cycle of one minor point release. For example, you deprecate a method for the 1.1 release and can remove it for the 1.2 release. This gives users time to see the deprecation warning and update their code appropriately. IMO, requiring a

Re: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-16 Thread David Graham
would like to hear the real world example. Thanks, David --- Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:09:11 -0800 (PST), David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only time I've seen versioning problems is when commons components depend on each other and one of them

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-16 Thread David Graham
--- Richard Sitze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/15/2004 10:18:44 PM: On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 13:53, Matt Sgarlata wrote: Simon Kitching wrote: I think this demonstrates a major issue. When using logging in an enterprise situation, the

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-16 Thread David Graham
--- Richard Sitze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/16/2004 11:47:46 AM: snip/ The current proposal is: - configuration is always manditory. Doesn't mandatory configuration relieve us from needing to split commons-logging.jar

RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-11 Thread David Graham
What you're seeing is the natural result of design conversations held outside of the mailing list. No one here had the benefit of participating in the localized logging design so naturally we're asking questions and making suggestions. Additionally, it might have helped all of us if the

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-09 Thread David Graham
Enterprise is marketing speak for expensive. It has no technical meaning so including that word in class names is rather confusing. It looks like the new functionality is related to i18n of messages so naming the classes something like I18NLog or GlobalizedLog would be more appropriate. David

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-09 Thread David Graham
--- simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Regarding the addition of entry/exit logging APIs, I'm also in favour. The code seems trivial, and it can be mapped to TRACE level for logging implementations that don't provide FINER equivalents. It also seems to me that: log.enter(MyClass,

Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-03 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +0 I support this release but am unable to help On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:35:36 + (UTC), Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: [chain] add expression evaluation?

2004-12-02 Thread David Graham
I've never used JEXL but the Mozilla Rhino javascript engine is pretty keen. Maybe this feature could start in contrib and move to the core if people find it useful? David --- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a discussion on the struts-user list, I got around to describing a

RE: Migrate to SVN?

2004-11-29 Thread David Graham
It's true that the svn tools aren't as good as the cvs tools yet. However, Struts recently moved to svn and it's amazing how easy it's been to refactor and rearrange the code base after the switch. The change has really livened up that project. Also, I was able to use Subclipse to work with the

RE: Migrate to SVN?

2004-11-29 Thread David Graham
I doubt Eclipse will ever have built-in svn support because there are several third party plugins available. Since adding a plugin update site is so trivial in Eclipse I wouldn't think this would be a big deal. The plugin I use with Struts svn is http://subclipse.tigris.org/. It works largely

Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.1.4

2004-11-23 Thread David Graham
+1 Actually, HEAD contains 1.2 work so far. David --- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The release candidate has been available for a week now with no problems reported. This is a very minor maintenance release (adding four missing getters/setters missing from Version 1.1.3) . The

Re: [VOTE] Release Chain 1.0

2004-11-21 Thread David Graham
+1 If the beanutils and digester dependencies are updated, it looks like commons-collections can be removed as a dependency from the project.xml file. David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe Chain is now sufficiently complete and stable to warrant an official 1.0 release.

Re: [VOTE] Promote Resources to Commons Proper

2004-11-21 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Resources project has been in the sandbox for quite some time, and is essentially complete and almost ready for a release. Several projects are using it already, and others are ready to pick it up once it is released. Therefore

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-15 Thread David Graham
+1 This project looks well maintained. It would be good to state the minimum Java version required on the home page. David --- Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, as described in previous posts and inspired by the fine proposal for email promotion I would like to see the

Re: [Validator] Next Release

2004-11-12 Thread David Graham
the website. David Niall - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [Validator] Next Release --- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I decided

Re: [Validator] Next Release

2004-11-12 Thread David Graham
that comes after 1.1.3. This is a bugfix release so it shouldn't be surprising that the dtd is the same as the last version. David Niall - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11

Re: [transaction] Promotion possible?

2004-11-12 Thread David Graham
Sandbox components can not have any official releases. The way to get out of the sandbox is to start a VOTE thread and have it pass. Several commons projects started with just the committers from the source project (ie. Struts) but have grown a bigger community once out of the sandbox. If

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread David Graham
Can we change getMessageObject() to getMessage() ? Most everything in Java is an object so it's redundant. Also, getMsgs() doesn't read very well; what about getMessages() ? It would be good to add @since javadoc tags so people don't assume this functionality was there from the beginning.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread David Graham
Thanks Niall! David --- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK I'll do that. Niall - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:37 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons

Re: [Validator] Next Release

2004-11-11 Thread David Graham
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I decided to have a go a resolving a couple of Struts bugs to do with bundles/resources and validator: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18169 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21760 Currently theres an

Re: [collections] Java5.0 - Runtime exceptions or assertion errors. What's your preference?

2004-11-04 Thread David Graham
The main reason not to use assertions is that they can be disabled at runtime, rendering them fairly useless IMO. Personally, I would remove the null parameter checking entirely and let the code throw a NPE. The caller will see their offending method in the stack trace. David --- Chris Lambrou

Re: Validator inside of Email.java (RE: [email] Dumbster failing)

2004-10-26 Thread David Graham
As a validator committer I'd thought I'd share my 2 cents. I agree that validating the email address should be done by the user of [email]. If the address passed to [email] is invalid, the user will receive a MessageException just as they would expect from using JavaMail. Unfortunately,

RE: [email] Anyone interested?

2004-10-26 Thread David Graham
--- Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bases on the release early, release often criteria, maybe it makes sense to get the rest of Corey's unit tests patches in, and spend a bit of time verifing all the javadocs etc. Then do a 1.0 of whats there. That way we don't have to be quite as

Re: [dbutils] Anyone working on this project?

2004-10-21 Thread David Graham
What does MapMapHandler do? David --- Norris Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I made a MapMapHandler and wanted someone to look at it to see if it is worth submitting. = Norris Shelton Software Engineer Sun Certified Java 1.1 Programmer Appriss, Inc. ICQ# 26487421 AIM

Re: [feedparser] Getting Brad Neuberg CVS commit

2004-10-21 Thread David Graham
It might be helpful to look at the Warning Signs portion of this page: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html Several of them seem to apply to feedparser. David --- Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:00:56 -0700, Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [validator] bug id 30686

2004-10-10 Thread David Graham
There isn't a javascript url validation yet. I'm not concerned at all about the performance of the regex. We just need it to work in all cases and tune it if there's a performance problem later. David --- Tim Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you used the proposed patch for your

Re: [lang] Each Mutable Number class declares Serializable

2004-10-08 Thread David Graham
Just like any other interface child classes inherit it from their parent. You can remove the implements Serializable from all Number subclasses. They're already Serializable since their parent class is. David --- Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I see that java.lang.Number

Re: [lang] Code clean up of return (value);?

2004-10-08 Thread David Graham
This shows up in Struts quite a bit and I think Craig uses this convention. I don't personally care for it because Java needs less syntax rather than more :-). David --- Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I've noticed in [lang] the use of extraneous parentheses in return

Re: XML Im-/Ex-porter into Commons Sandbox

2004-10-07 Thread David Graham
This will create bloat problems for clients that use Digester. For example: Struts uses Digester for xml parsing. In the future Struts may want to use the new i18n component. However, if i18n uses XML Im-Exporter then Struts must drag that along too despite already having a perfectly fine xml

Re: [dbutils] QueryRunner.query with no replacement params

2004-10-01 Thread David Graham
--- jon gold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i notice that QueryRunner.query always prepares a statement -- even if there are no replacement parameters. why is this? You don't need replacement parameters to benefit from caching and reusing PreparedStatement instances. the reason i ask is that

Re: [validator] ISBNValidator

2004-09-30 Thread David Graham
Validator uses the standard Java coding conventions. Considering I don't know anything about ISBN numbers I would need a JUnit test case proving it works and some javadoc describing the ISBN rules before I would commit anything. Add the Apache 2.0 license to the top of your .java files before

Re: [DbUtils] QueryLoader

2004-09-09 Thread David Graham
Please open a bugzilla ticket and attach a cvs diff -u formatted patch if you have one. Thanks! David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem using QueryLoader when deployed in a .war file to weblogic. The properties file cannot be located on the classpath. QueryLoader uses

Re: [DBUtils] additional DBUtils class helper methods request

2004-09-03 Thread David Graham
Done. This will be in the next nightly build. David --- Kyle Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please add the following two methods to the DBUtils helper class: rollbackAndClose(...); rollbackAndCloseQuietly(...); to mimic the commit and close methods. Thanks, Kyle

Re: Moving from Bugzilla to JIRA

2004-09-03 Thread David Graham
-1 on moving to JIRA. Martin Cooper has indicated there are people in infrastructure are willing to do a bugzilla upgrade. Just because bugzilla's UI is ugly and JIRA's is pretty is not a valid reason to switch to proprietary software in an OSS community. Regardless, many other bugzilla

Re: [DBUtils] BeanProcessor enhancement request

2004-09-01 Thread David Graham
BeanProcessor.newInstance() is now protected. The change should show up in the next nightly build. David --- Kyle Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a JavaBean that needs to be populated from 3 different select statements, unfortunately DBUtils BeanProcessor doesn't support the reuse of

Re: [lang] Interpolation

2004-08-29 Thread David Graham
--- matthew.hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that it's bad news. But, I think the worst offense is this: try { // ... } catch (Exception e) { return null; } (shudder) I've seen plenty of this to; it's truly horrifying :-). try { // ... } catch

Re: Worst offence in Java :) Re: [lang] Interpolation

2004-08-29 Thread David Graham
--- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, matthew.hawthorne wrote: IMO, copy-paste reuse is the worst offense that a programmer can commit. I agree that it's bad news. But, I think the worst offense is this: try { // ... } catch (Exception e)

Re: [lang] Interpolation

2004-08-28 Thread David Graham
--- Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Potentially, we could use the digester version to start from. (In new commons style, there would be copy-paste with reference to original, not dependency) That is not the new commons style. That was a temporary solution to removing

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator project.xml

2004-08-27 Thread David Graham
Welcome aboard James! I noticed you misspelled your email address so I saved you some time and added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to some lists I thought you might enjoy :-). David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jmitchell2004/08/27 09:17:28 Modified:validator project.xml Log: Volunteer

Re: [general] logging

2004-08-26 Thread David Graham
DbUtils intentionally does not use logging but it is rather small and doesn't really need it. Validator has very little logging usage and that dependency could probably be removed. Most of what it used to log was better handled by throwing an exception out to the framework to the users. I like

Re: [lang] Interpolation

2004-08-26 Thread David Graham
Interpolation is well understood by Perl programmers. It's probably a good idea to use a term that many other people already know. Of course, if it doesn't really do interpolation in the Perl sense of the word an alternate name would be a good idea to prevent confusion. David --- Gary Gregory

Re: [Validator] Completing the 1.1.3 GA release

2004-08-25 Thread David Graham
before uploading the validator site. David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, David Graham wrote: I checked in release notes for 1.1.3 and 1.2.0-dev in changes.xml for all the bugzilla tickets I could find. I set the 1.1.3 release date as the 25th; please

Re: [Validator] Completing the 1.1.3 GA release

2004-08-24 Thread David Graham
be all set. -- Martin Cooper PS - Sorry this is taking so long! On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, David Graham wrote: --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that we don't seem to have a Release Notes file for 1.1.3 as we did for 1.0.2, so the release notes on the site

Re: [Validator] Completing the 1.1.3 GA release

2004-08-24 Thread David Graham
up at the moment, so I'm not in a position to fix this. If someone else could please regenerate the site and upload it, then we'll be all set. -- Martin Cooper PS - Sorry this is taking so long! On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, David Graham wrote: --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Validator] Completing the 1.1.3 GA release

2004-08-20 Thread David Graham
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that we don't seem to have a Release Notes file for 1.1.3 as we did for 1.0.2, so the release notes on the site are still the old ones. If someone would like to come up with a Release Notes file for 1.1.3, please let me know.

Re: [DBUtils] Oracle 9.2.0 JDBC Timestamp Problem

2004-08-18 Thread David Graham
Thanks for finding this! It would be best to open a bugzilla ticket so the issue isn't lost or forgotten. Thanks, David --- Rolf Moser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I just run into a Timestamp problem with the Oracle 9i (9.2.0) JDBC Driver When calling rs.getObject(index) on a DB field,

Re: [DBUtils] Oracle 9.2.0 JDBC Timestamp Problem

2004-08-18 Thread David Graham
out of DbUtils I think. Not a negative to the patch by the way, just an info dump having seen this problem before. Hen On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, David Graham wrote: Thanks for finding this! It would be best to open a bugzilla ticket so the issue isn't lost or forgotten. Thanks

Re: [Validator] Completing the 1.1.3 GA release

2004-08-16 Thread David Graham
That sounds like a good plan to me Martin. Thanks, David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We voted on this a while back, and the outcome was positive. As far as I'm aware, all that needs to happen to complete the process is: * Notify the PMC of the successful vote. * Move the

Re: [VOTE] release beanutils 1.7.0

2004-07-30 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the release candidate has been available for a week now with no problems reported. there have been a number of small improvements to the documentation since then but no major changes to the code base. i would therefore like to

Re: [PATCH] DBUtils : workaround for Oracle NUMBER datatype

2004-07-14 Thread David Graham
java.math.BigDecimal; 28,32c82,83 * * p * This class is thread-safe. * /p * --- * This class is a thread-safe Singleton. * 33a85,89 * * @author Henri Yandell * @author Juozas Baliuka * @author David Graham * @author Yoav Shapira 38,39c94,113 * The default

Re: [PATCH] DBUtils : workaround for Oracle NUMBER datatype

2004-07-14 Thread David Graham
the BeanListHandler to run a query, the account will always be set to zero regardless of the data stored. The patch I wrote fixed this ; I realize that the number datatype is not ideal for account, this is just an example... On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:24:54 -0700 (PDT), David Graham [EMAIL

RE: [VOTE] [codec] Release 1.3-RC1

2004-07-07 Thread David Graham
--- Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ Unsure if we've standardised on the Maven Feather logo or not. I thought I'd use the same one as the Maven site. The feathery one doesn't look too hot to me, it also jumps out too much IMHO since it has a white background and the bg for

Re: [VOTE] [codec] Release 1.3-RC1

2004-07-06 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: This vote is to approve the public release of commons codec 1.3-RC1. [X] +1 Go ahead and release 1.3-RC1 [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Don't release 1.3-RC1, because...

Re: [chain] Deploying new website

2004-07-01 Thread David Graham
--- Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I moved the chain cvs from sandbox to commons proper (long story) and have updated the build and doc files such that the website builds and is ready for deployment. I have not modified the site source for the jakarta website pending deployment of the

Re: [Validator] 1.1.3 ALPHA release available

2004-06-24 Thread David Graham
I downloaded the binary distro and everything looked in order. David --- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've tagged the 1.1.2 branch, and rolled the Validator 1.1.3 alpha release. It is posted in my Apache home directory for review: - http://www.apache.org/~husted/validator/v1.1.3/

Re: [DbUtils] ClassCastException

2004-06-21 Thread David Graham
What does your DbUtil line 143 look like? When you set a breakpoint at that line and inspect it in your debugger what is the class being returned? David --- Anderson, James H [IT] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting a ClassCastException that I don't understand. I hope someone can help with

Re: [DbUtils] What's about protected QueryRunner.prepareConnection()?

2004-06-16 Thread David Graham
Replacing calls to ds.getConnection() with prepareConnection() sounds reasonable. Please open an enhancement ticket. Thanks, David --- Mikhail Krivoshein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Currently QueryRunner has prepareStatement() method that is used to create a new statements. I

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Commons Chain to Commons Proper

2004-06-09 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 6:40 PM -0400 6/9/04, Don Brown wrote: I propose Commons Chain should graduate to Commons Proper. I'm not sure what justification I should give other than Struts is planning on including it in future releases, and I personally am, as

Re: [Validator] Collections dependencies

2004-06-08 Thread David Graham
--- Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, the removal of collections classes from validator will take a bit longer. We still have protected FastHashMap variables that need to be replaced with Maps. the collections packaged FashHashMap and it's dependencies are

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/test/org/apache/commons/validator validator-bsf.xml

2004-06-08 Thread David Graham
I thought we agreed to add BSF and JXPath validators to a contrib directory so we wouldn't bloat the dependencies needed to distribute the core validator? I'm -1 on adding dependencies in the core distro. David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: husted 2004/06/08 07:53:12 Added:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator GenericValidator.java

2004-06-08 Thread David Graham
The new methods need @since javadoc tags. David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: husted 2004/06/08 08:22:29 Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator GenericValidator.java Log: Apply #29015 Add support for min or max numeric values

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator project.xml

2004-06-08 Thread David Graham
:-) Thanks for getting validator moving again! I've been absolutely swamped lately. David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: husted 2004/06/08 08:12:12 Modified:validator project.xml Log: Add Ted Husted to list of developers [before David yells at me again :)] Revision

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/test/org/apache/commons/validator validator-bsf.xml

2004-06-08 Thread David Graham
to complete the release. I'm away most of next week, so it looks like we may be stalled for another fortnight :( -Ted. On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:45:27 -0700 (PDT), David Graham wrote: I thought we agreed to add BSF and JXPath validators to a contrib directory so we wouldn't bloat

Re: [Validator] 1.1.3 release plan

2004-06-08 Thread David Graham
If I recall correctly, there's a 1_1_2 branch that 1.1.3 should be released from. HEAD was for 1.2.0 development and has had some deprecated items removed. Sorry if you already knew this, I just didn't want the release cut from the wrong branch. David --- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Validator] Ted Husted as Committer

2004-06-07 Thread David Graham
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 To Ted. David Graham wrote: --- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 but please don't roll a release before the upcoming beanutils dependency hell fix is released. this will allow the problematic validator dependency

Re: [Validator] Ted Husted as Committer

2004-06-06 Thread David Graham
I thought you were already a Commons committer so I invited you to add yourself to the project.xml file a while back. Regardless, here's my +1 :-). David --- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The few remaining issues against Validator seem to have fixes and patches that I could apply. I'd

Re: [Validator] Ted Husted as Committer

2004-06-06 Thread David Graham
--- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 but please don't roll a release before the upcoming beanutils dependency hell fix is released. this will allow the problematic validator dependency on commons collections to be removed by upgrading to the next beanutils release.

Re: [Validator] Field class

2004-06-06 Thread David Graham
I think this has been brought up before but nothing came of it. Feel free to open a bugzilla enhancement ticket with patches and we'll apply them. Thanks, David --- Rich Wertz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Recent validator DTDs indicate that each field element may have any number of child msg

  1   2   3   4   >