Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-07-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Phil Steitz wrote: +1 - need to do this anyway. On 6/29/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, it seems that I spoke too soon. We need a place in subversion to put the tagged release. Since the pom is currently in sandbox-trunks there simply is no tags directory to put the release

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-29 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The results are in: +1 Dennis Lundberg Torsten Curdt Niall Pemberton -0 Rahul Akolkar I will proceed with the release. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-29 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 from me Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I have changed the artifactId to commons-sandbox-parent, to have a

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-29 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hmm, it seems that I spoke too soon. We need a place in subversion to put the tagged release. Since the pom is currently in sandbox-trunks there simply is no tags directory to put the release in. I propose that we move the sandbox parent out of sandbox-trunks and into a commons-sandbox-parent

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-29 Thread Martin van den Bemt
This is not a Jakarta thing anymore :) Mvgr, Martin Dennis Lundberg wrote: The results are in: +1 Dennis Lundberg Torsten Curdt Niall Pemberton -0 Rahul Akolkar I will proceed with the release. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-29 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 - need to do this anyway. On 6/29/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, it seems that I spoke too soon. We need a place in subversion to put the tagged release. Since the pom is currently in sandbox-trunks there simply is no tags directory to put the release in. I propose that

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-24 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the sandbox at all. Sure, reproducibility is a good thing, but I doubt the builds are radically

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-24 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 6/24/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the sandbox at all. Sure, reproducibility is

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-24 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will be the first release and is important because it enables reproducible

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/24/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the sandbox at all. Sure, reproducibility is

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-24 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 6/24/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the sandbox at all.

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 6/24/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23.06.2007, at 18:59, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-24 Thread Torsten Curdt
On 23.06.2007, at 18:59, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I

[VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I have changed the artifactId to commons-sandbox-parent, to have a consistent naming scheme (compare it

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I have changed the artifactId to

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will be the first release and is important because it enables reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox components. Since you have a policy against releasing sandbox

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will be the first release and is important because it enables reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox components. Since you have a policy against releasing sandbox components, why not just deploy snapshots of the

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and locking down the versions

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and locking down the versions for plugins. Note that

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the sandbox at all. Sure, reproducibility is a good thing, but I doubt the builds are radically irreproducible without this

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-sandbox-parent 1

2007-06-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/23/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will be the first release and is important because it enables reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox components.