, February 20, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Dependency question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On that note, how about a Lang sub-project for
core-language helpers.
Number/Date/String/Url/File helpers etc.
This is basically what I see Util as, a little bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On that note, how about a Lang sub-project for core-language helpers.
Number/Date/String/Url/File helpers etc.
This is basically what I see Util as, a little bit of java.lang,
java.util, and perhaps java.text.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Dependency question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On that note, how about a Lang sub-project for
core-language helpers.
Number/Date/String/Url/File helpers etc.
This is basically what I see Util
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Dependency question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On that note, how about a Lang sub-project for
core-language helpers.
Number/Date/String/Url/File helpers
Developers List
Subject: RE: Dependency question
Yes and no. I'm in favour with it as a general idea, though
it seems a bigger step than just moving Utils into main cvs
and cleaning shop. There would still need to be a util package though.
Some of the components in Utils are real
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:10 PM
Subject: RE: Dependency question
+1 from me. I've been using the style of mapping my own generic components
to the Java structure for a year
-1 on the Apache-Commons-Core concept though, if I understand the idea
correctly. I'd rather see the truly interested parties managing the release
cycles of individual components, rather than everyone trying to ride herd
over the whole enchilada. It may be a nice convenience to release a
