enfants des dangers d'Internet en installant Sécurité Enfants, le
contrôle parental d'Alice.
http://www.aliceadsl.fr/securitepc/default_copa.asp
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
to serialize someValue back to
POJO.
-Borut
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
l'ATTIVAZIONE.
http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/sa/4flat_tc/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
contains too opions).
Regards
Pietro
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package, is there a workaround for
Outlook 2000 SP-3?
Andrew Liles.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
à conditions. Pour en profiter cliquez ici
http://abonnement.aliceadsl.fr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Initial Header ---
From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED],commons-user
commons-user@jakarta.apache.org
Cc :
Date : Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:52:24 +0200
Subject : Restart function by using Commons VFS
Hello
. It must verify the compatibility of
the lock or wait for the release when it is incompatible ?
I expect I am clear, if not ask me for details :o)
Thanks for your help,
Mel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Hi,
Selon Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I suppose you pass the interval as the resourceId, right?
Yes exactly.
The problem is that normally a single locks gets assigned to a resourceid. I
do not think there is an easy solution if your intervals are not
discrete
Hi,
Selon Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When a lock on an interval is tried you first will have ot check for
all other intersecting ones without actually acquiring locks on them.
Only if this works you can acquire the lock on the desired interval.
Otherwise you will wait for them
Hi,
Selon Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If so that's exactly what the read/write lock and then the read/write
lock manager does.
Thanks this seems to be what I need.
Mel
On Apr 1, 2005 6:30 PM, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Still not quite clear, most likely because I
locking requests.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Selon Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmmm, not quite sure that I get this all right, but to me it seems you
describe the simple read/write locks (without the upgrade step). Is
that possible? If so you could simply use the ReadWriteLockManager.
My lock manager has not exactly
Hi,
Selon Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Everything you describe seems to be right to me.
Ok.
Do you have an example where you use the ReadWriteUpgradeLockManager? It could
help me in my project.
Thanks,
Mel
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:30:59 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
,
Mel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
columnToProperty;
}
-- END modified --
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Hugo
--
Faites un voeu et puis Voila ! www.voila.fr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Hugo.
--
Faites un voeu et puis Voila ! www.voila.fr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
either. it was really hard to
track down with normal use. when throwing the exception don't you think
other cookies could get lost (this is not only specific to this security
check)?
why is the default cookie version 0?
thank you,
thomas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
to refactor what you're doing into a JUnit test case we
can add
to betwixt to help fix it (and keep it fixed)
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
- Original Message -
From: Johan Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:12 PM
Subject
20 matches
Mail list logo
