Many other open source projects, including Debian, the Linux Kernel
developers, and Mono, are aggregating the RSS feeds of their blogging
contributors and putting them up on a web site. This is something that
would be good for the ASF to do as well, as all we have now is the wiki
page
On 8 Jan 2004, at 7:21, Ted Leung wrote:
Many other open source projects, including Debian, the Linux Kernel
developers, and Mono, are aggregating the RSS feeds of their blogging
contributors and putting them up on a web site. This is something
that would be good for the ASF to do as well, as
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Leo Simons wrote:
Many other open source projects, including Debian, the Linux Kernel
developers, and Mono, are aggregating the RSS feeds of their blogging
contributors and putting them up on a web site. This is something that
would be good for the ASF to do as
Many other open source projects, including Debian, the Linux Kernel
developers, and Mono, are aggregating the RSS feeds of their blogging
contributors and putting them up on a web site. This is something
that would be good for the ASF to do as well
We have so far voted to not create an ASF
If we want an apache blog aggregator that is clearly NOT apache.org,
the apacheblogs.* domains are still available and the
[foo]blogs.[com|org|net] naming convention for aggregators is pretty
common.
-Brian
On Jan 8, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Ben Hyde wrote:
Cool.
Krell already scraps the rss feed
On Jan 8, 2004, at 8:26 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
all we have now is the wiki page
The difference is that the Wiki page simply lists personal pages for
members. If there is an implied coupling, it is a much weaker
coupling that
aggregating the content.
I think that this is a bogus argument.
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We have so far voted to not create an ASF blog because we do not want the
perception of the ASF approving the content of the blogs. This does not
seem any different to me. I understand that some people feel that we are
just syndicating content from
On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
Next someone will insist that this has to go through the incubator.
It will be easier to just do it at planetapache.org and offer to
aggregate people's blogs. Apache is made up of
On Jan 8, 2004, at 8:01 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
Next someone will insist that this has to go through the incubator.
It will be easier to just do it at planetapache.org and offer to
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
+1
Would the Foundation handle that, and host it, or would that have to be a
private initiative?
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 20:11, Sander Temme wrote:
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
+1
Would the Foundation handle that, and host it, or would that have to be a
private initiative?
Didn't thom already do it?
Sander
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Sander Temme wrote:
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
+1
Would the Foundation handle that, and host it, or would that have to be a
private initiative?
Eh - the question is more - does the Apache community want the Foundation
to handle
Thom already registered planetapache.org and volunteered to host if.
If the ASF changes is mind and wants to host it, I'm sure that could be
arranged.
On Jan 8, 2004, at 11:11 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Let's just register planetapache.org and be done with it.
+1
+1
Would the Foundation handle
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We have so far voted to not create an ASF blog because we do not want
the
perception of the ASF approving the content of the blogs.
I missed out on that vote, but FWIW, I have no problem with an aggregator,
or even a hosted blogger for ASF
Many other open source projects, including Debian, the Linux Kernel
developers, and Mono, are aggregating the RSS feeds of their blogging
contributors and putting them up on a web site. This is something
that would be good for the ASF to do as well
Everything that has to do with
Ok, I'm quite happy to register and host planetapache.org; whether or
not we want to point it at minotaur is more or less irrelevant I think,
but I'm open to argument either way.
:-)
Personally, a useful application of this technology would be to provide
projects with a means to publish news
I like the planetapache.org approach. It mimize the coordination costs
of getting something up and running.
I'd encourage putting any stuff into the committer repository so you
can parasite on the infrastructure to allow everybody to pitch in who
cares to and just publish the results to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El jueves, 8 ener, 2004, a las 21:41 Europe/Madrid, Ben Hyde escribió:
I like the planetapache.org approach. It mimize the coordination
costs of getting something up and running.
I'd encourage putting any stuff into the committer repository so you
On Jan 8, 2004, at 12:40 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ok, I'm quite happy to register and host planetapache.org; whether or
not we want to point it at minotaur is more or less irrelevant I
think,
but I'm open to argument either way.
:-)
Personally, a useful application of this technology would be
Ted Leung wrote:
Um, there's lots of standard technology for blogs.
I did not volunteer to be a guinea pig for another
let's (re)invent a CMS project.
We can switch over when something is working, but I want
to have something that works today.
Well, of course. The second paragraph was
20 matches
Mail list logo
