On 10/28/2013 10:03 PM, Michael Spacefalcon wrote:
* Most of the Openmoko community sees my FreeCalypso work as being
illegal, because they have voluntarily chosen to live and/or accept
citizenship in repressive countries which deem it to be so. I suspect
that the power-keepers of the Om Wiki
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Ian Stirling wrote:
There are separate issues around the IP that you do not have permission to
use.
This is the illegality that he is referring to, not any potential
spectrum/GSM/IMEI issues. I guess he would ignore the latter as well
as the former though.
On
Ian Stirling openm...@mauve.plus.com wrote:
However, once anyone has used your work to change the IMSI of their
phone
I assume you meant IMEI. Phones don't have IMSIs, those are numbers
stored in SIM cards.
and you are aware of this,
Yes, I will most likely be aware of it, as I will
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:07:09 AM Adrien Dorsaz wrote:
My QtMoko buildhost is the official one with Debian 6.0.7 and kernel 2.6.32
(IIRC, I've upgraded Debian with apt-get upgrade). Have you any hint to
find the error ?
I think it is out of memory. You need either big swap (1GB) or
[cut]
You can thus use either fc-loadtool or the original fluid.exe to flash
[cut]
Can't we just use dfu-util? It was used to write OS to NAND... and AFAIR
it was also used to flash GSM firmware?...
--
Patryk LeadMan Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html
El Tuesday 22 October 2013 09:51:07 Patryk Benderz va escriure:
cut]
You can thus use either fc-loadtool or the original fluid.exe to flash
[cut]
Can't we just use dfu-util? It was used to write OS to NAND... and AFAIR
it was also used to flash GSM firmware?...
The procces to flash GSM
Jose Luis Perez Diez jl...@escomposlinux.org wrote:
The procces to flash GSM firmware used linux, the serial port,
and the fluid binary see
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/GSM/Flashing#Manual_Update_.28GTA01.2C_GTA02.29_.2F_geek_way
Yes, and that exact same procedure should work just as well
For those following the FreeCalypso project, I have just put out a
packaged release of my GSM flash reading/writing etc tools:
ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/FreeCalypso/loadtools-r1.tar.bz2
Of course the source for these tools has been available all along in
my freecalypso-sw Hg repository on
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 17:19:18 +0200
joerg Reisenweber jo...@openmoko.org wrote:
In the last 50 years I've seen only _one_ truly modular concept for
electronic circuits that would basically meet the flexibility
requirements you are asking for:
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:24:51 +0200
Raphael Wimmer raphael.wim...@ifi.lmu.de wrote:
* The concept assumes that all components use a common communication
backplane. This is not feasible, as a variety of voltages and
communication protocols are in use in a typical phone (I2C, SPI,
UART, USB,
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 15:00:07 -0400
Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
And it would be bulkier and more expensive than a non-modular phone,
of course.
http://components.arrow.com/part/search/buglabs
The main cost in doing that is the plastic of the modules.
Denis.
Hello,
While reading a German computer magazin (c't 22/2013), I came across
this:
http://www.phonebloks.com/
Don't know if it makes sense for us to check if it could solve our case
problem...
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
On 14/10/13 20:23, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
My GTA02 has been sitting around for too long without attention.
Thanks for all the interest. My GTA02 now has a new home.
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Openmoko
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
While reading a German computer magazin (c't 22/2013), I came across
this:
http://www.phonebloks.com/
Don't know if it makes sense for us to check if it could solve our
case problem...
It was discussed on the list a couple
then flash into your GTA0x GSM modem
Wait, it works both on gta-02 and gta-04?
Also, did you test if data connection works? I don't use phone calls,
only encrypted ssl over tcp over 3g/wifi.
I am very interested if this can be flashed to gta-02 device,
(unfortunately I don't own gta-04). Also,
Norayr Chilingarian nor...@arnet.am writes:
Sorry if my questions are a little bit off topic. Anyway I am very
interested in free fw for my devices - OM gta-02 and n900.
^^^
Afaik the firmware in question won't meet the FSF free software
definition or OSI open source
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:49:30 +0300
Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote:
Norayr Chilingarian nor...@arnet.am writes:
Sorry if my questions are a little bit off topic. Anyway I am very
interested in free fw for my devices - OM gta-02 and n900.
^^^
Afaik the
On 10/16/2013 10:13 AM, Balint Szente wrote:
What is not clear for me is that can a software be FSF/OSI free but
illegal to use?
In principle, one can take osmocombb through your local approvals
process, and get it approved for use in your country.
It may also be legal to use in certain
Quoth Balint Szente:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:49:30 +0300
Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote:
Norayr Chilingarian nor...@arnet.am writes:
Sorry if my questions are a little bit off topic. Anyway I am very
interested in free fw for my devices - OM gta-02 and n900.
Hi Jefrey.
If it still actual. I'll be very glad to receive you GTA2.
Best regards, Evegniy
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Jeffrey Ratcliffe
jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com wrote:
My GTA02 has been sitting around for too long without attention.
The battery has discharged completely and I
Balint Szente bal...@szentedwg.ro writes:
Isn't the situation the same with osmocombb as well?
Based on what is written here:
http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/LegalAspects#Usingmodifiedphonesoncarriernetworks
can osmocombb considered free software in FSF's or OSI's definition?
What is not
Am 16.10.2013 um 19:31 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors:
Balint Szente bal...@szentedwg.ro writes:
Isn't the situation the same with osmocombb as well?
Based on what is written here:
http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/LegalAspects#Usingmodifiedphonesoncarriernetworks
can osmocombb considered
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 20:03 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 16.10.2013 um 19:31 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors:
Balint Szente bal...@szentedwg.ro writes:
What is not clear for me is that can a software be FSF/OSI free but
illegal to use?
Free is a term only considering
Norayr Chilingarian nor...@arnet.am wrote:
then flash into your GTA0x GSM modem
Wait, it works both on gta-02 and gta-04?
By GTA0x I meant GTA01 and GTA02. GolDeliCo' so-called GTA04 is
rather badly misnamed: GTA originally stood for GSM-TI-AGPS; thus a
device that does not use a GSM chipset
Afaik you can use it legally if you connect it directly to your own base
station.
If you connect it by shielded cable or if you place both in a big shielded
box.
I.e. if the spurious emissions stay below some defined level and don't
disturb
If you can demonstrate you know what you
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 14:30 -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Afaik you can use it legally if you connect it directly to your own base
station.
The other approach would be to start a kickstarter/selfstarter to buy some
spectrum licenses
That's not really necessary; GSM development
My GTA02 has been sitting around for too long without attention.
The battery has discharged completely and I can't get it to boot, even
with external power, even from the NOR menu.
I don't have spare batteries or the equipment for the other boot tricks,
and I had stopped using the Freerunner, so
Hi Jeff,
I would like to have another GTA02, but please feel free to give it to
anyone who need it more than i do.
Kind regards,
Ed
On 10/14/2013 08:23 PM, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
My GTA02 has been sitting around for too long without attention.
The battery has discharged completely and I
Am 09.10.2013 um 22:29 schrieb Raphael Wimmer:
Sounds interesting (in the long term):
Complete Verilog implementation of a 2D/ 3D graphics processor capable of
OpenGL and D3D w/ full test suite
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/725991125/open-source-graphics-processor-gpu
Oh, yes. That
On 10/12/2013 05:43 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
The main fear I have is that there is not enough funding because
nobody can really use it in daily work without investing another lots
of money (to integrate the FPGA with something). BR, Nikolaus
Speaking in generalities - FPGAs use
Am 12.10.2013 um 19:23 schrieb Ian Stirling:
On 10/12/2013 05:43 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
The main fear I have is that there is not enough funding because nobody can
really use it in daily work without investing another lots of money (to
integrate the FPGA with something). BR,
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:31:13 +0200
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com wrote:
Has anyone experience with the Zynq-7000? It has dual Cortex A9 with
VFP/Neon - but apparently lacks a GPU... Such a combination could be
comparable with OMAP3/4 in computation power.
Exactly, it has just a
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 21:49 +0300, Balint Szente wrote:
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:31:13 +0200
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com wrote:
Has anyone experience with the Zynq-7000? It has dual Cortex A9 with
VFP/Neon - but apparently lacks a GPU... Such a combination could be
Hello Om community,
I am very pleased to announce that after many years of searching, I
have finally found a copy of TI's firmware deliverable package for
their Leonardo development board, i.e., for their Calypso/Iota/Rita
chipset reference platform. It is the package which TI must have
given to
# settrans r...@settrans.net -f -R -S
Or,
The thread is very interesting, but it seems that's Bob will never
change is point of view. Nicolas is open to discussion, and is also
working on the Gta project, I don't think that Bob is ready to do one
step forward before having all the spec,
On 10/09/2013 08:10 PM, Bob Ham wrote:
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 08:42 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
1. you are talking about open SOURCE hardware (which I call free hardware)
No. I've explicitly refrained from distinguishing between such labels
because I'm aware that they are not as
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 08:42 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Can you agree on the following?
1. you are talking about open SOURCE hardware (which I call free hardware)
No. I've explicitly refrained from distinguishing between such labels
because I'm aware that they are not as well
On 10/09/2013 08:23 PM, Bob Ham wrote:
And the next day, when you've found an old definition that accords
with your view, suddenly that one definition would have obviated any
discussion.
The meaning of the words are defined by the communities that use it and
different communities can have
On Wed 09 October 2013 20:47:01 Fernando Martins wrote:
It is laudable to have more hardware open and it would be nice if
goldelico would release the schematics in source. But I don't see them
has having such obligation neither I see any inconsistence in their
actions or words. Goldelico has
Sounds interesting (in the long term):
Complete Verilog implementation of a 2D/ 3D graphics processor capable of
OpenGL and D3D w/ full test suite
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/725991125/open-source-graphics-processor-gpu
Should work with both Altera and Xilinx FPGAs
Goals: $200k for
Someone was talking about a modular phone, right?
Have a look at this (spoiler: it's not a phone ;) yet)
http://www.redsharknews.com/technology/item/1123-this-could-be-the-biggest-advance-in-camera-design-for-a-decade
Regards,
d
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Kai Lüke
Am 06.10.2013 um 08:42 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller:
Hi Bob,
Am 05.10.2013 um 12:12 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge, GTA04 are
open hardware - and never were intended to be.
That
Am 05.10.2013 um 08:28 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
You are mixing Free dom with Free Beer.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
But: some people are able to jump out of the window. So do you do as well?
I followed the FSF
Hello,
Your free hardware idon't use the Planned obsolescence concept isn't it ?
Thanks for your answer.
Best regards
mparchet
Le 5 oct. 2013 à 09:11, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com a
écrit :
Am 05.10.2013 um 08:28 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Dr.
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge, GTA04 are
open hardware - and never were intended to be.
That isn't what your OpenPhoenux page says:
Open Hardware Devices.
Letux 2804 / GTA04 Smartphone
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Bob Ham r...@settrans.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge, GTA04 are
open hardware - and never were intended to be.
That isn't what your OpenPhoenux page says:
Open
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 13:34 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
You're nitpicking about different meanings of open and free.
This is hardly nitpicking. If I had known what Nikolaus's position was
back in 2010, I doubt I would ever have bought a GTA04. There seems to
be (1) the meaning that
On 10/05/2013 01:34 PM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Bob Ham r...@settrans.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge, GTA04 are
open hardware - and never were intended to be.
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Bob Ham r...@settrans.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 13:34 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
You're nitpicking about different meanings of open and free.
This is hardly nitpicking. If I had known what Nikolaus's position was
back in 2010, I doubt I would
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
I can agree that the usage of free
hardware term may be a bit confusing.
Describing the GTA04 as Open Hardware on openphoenux.org is, I
believe, not just confusing but dishonest.
--
Bob Ham r...@settrans.net
for (;;) {
On Sat 05 October 2013 11:09:02 Parchet Michaël wrote:
Hello,
Your free hardware idon't use the Planned obsolescence concept isn't it ?
Thanks for your answer.
Best regards
mparchet
Now THIS is a good question!
And the answer is: of course NO planned osolescence, we build that stuff
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
--
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak, dos
http://dosowisko.net/
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
On 2013-10-05 11:06 AM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
What immediately jumps to my mind is the small number of pins for the
modules, forcing everything to be based on
On 10/05/2013 04:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin wrote:
While I understand the needs/wants of open hardware, the average
smartphone user really couldn't care less. That's the core of the
problem, lack of a large user base.
HOWEVER, what a *lot* people seem to be interested in, is an open
Am 05.10.2013 um 12:12 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge, GTA04 are
open hardware - and never were intended to be.
That isn't what your OpenPhoenux page says:
Open Hardware Devices.
In the last 50 years I've seen only _one_ truly modular concept for electronic
circuits that would basically meet the flexibility requirements you are asking
for:
http://makezine.com/2011/12/08/the-braun-lectron-system-retro-circuit-
dominoes/
/j
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html
Am 05.10.2013 um 14:14 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
I can agree that the usage of free
hardware term may be a bit confusing.
Describing the GTA04 as Open Hardware on openphoenux.org is, I
believe, not just confusing but dishonest.
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:06 schrieb Sebastian Krzyszkowiak:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
++
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:14 schrieb Pascal Gosselin:
On 2013-10-05 11:06 AM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com
wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
What immediately jumps to my mind is the small number of pins
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:04:24 +0200, Pascal Gosselin
pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
[...]
If technically feasible, this project I believe stands the best chance
of obtaining funding as the concept has wide appeal.
Interesting long-term vision: maybe.
Short-term replacement for GTA04: no.
I
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:19 schrieb joerg Reisenweber:
In the last 50 years I've seen only _one_ truly modular concept for
electronic
circuits that would basically meet the flexibility requirements you are
asking
for:
http://makezine.com/2011/12/08/the-braun-lectron-system-retro-circuit-
On 10/05/2013 02:14 PM, Bob Ham wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
I can agree that the usage of free
hardware term may be a bit confusing.
Describing the GTA04 as Open Hardware on openphoenux.org is, I
believe, not just confusing but dishonest.
When the
Am 05.10.2013 um 14:14 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
I can agree that the usage of free
hardware term may be a bit confusing.
Describing the GTA04 as Open Hardware on openphoenux.org is, I
believe, not just confusing but dishonest.
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:42 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller:
Am 05.10.2013 um 14:14 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
I can agree that the usage of free
hardware term may be a bit confusing.
Describing the GTA04 as Open Hardware on
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 17:17 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 05.10.2013 um 12:12 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge, GTA04 are
open hardware - and never were intended to be.
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 05:37:59PM +, Bob Ham wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 17:17 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 05.10.2013 um 12:12 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge,
On Sat 05 October 2013 19:37:59 Bob Ham wrote:
Hm, I wonder what you want to prove?
I want you to stop describing the GTA04 as open hardware. You seem to
be aware that there is a difference between what you describe as open
hardware and what others describe as open hardware and yet you
on a sidenote: Was KDE no open source software when Qt wasn't FOSS (for those
who still remember that time)?
In layout project files they might even be (C) non-free libraries for e.g.
component footprints, which would *forbid* disclosing them to the general
public. Is the hardware less open
Am 05.10.2013 um 19:37 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 17:17 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 05.10.2013 um 12:12 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the Openmoko, OpenPandora, Ubuntu Edge, GTA04 are
open hardware -
There are numerous threads on Reddit that explain very well why this is not
feasible [1,2,many]
This is bogus. It is feasible. Just not quite in the way those people
ask for it. E.g. you wouldn't have just a CPU module, and instead you'd
have a module that combines the CPU with many other
Am 05.10.2013 um 20:10 schrieb Martin Jansa:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 05:37:59PM +, Bob Ham wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 17:17 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 05.10.2013 um 12:12 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 07:50 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Neither the
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 20:10 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 05:37:59PM +, Bob Ham wrote:
I want you to stop describing the GTA04 as open hardware. You seem to
be aware that there is a difference between what you describe as open
hardware and what others describe as
But none of them is building modular devices. I wonder why.
For the same reason they don't make their hardware open, for the same
reason they don't make their software Free, for the same reason they
don't want you to have root access on your phone.
Stefan
On 05/10/13 18:37, Bob Ham wrote:
'Access to the *complete* design is precondition to this'
http://www.ohanda.org/ (My emphasis)
Long time has passed since I post to this list.
Dearest all,
open software is something quite easy do define - it's written in common
languages, so that it's
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 07:05:10PM +, Bob Ham wrote:
Your accusations sounds like if Nikolaus is using OHANDA clearly defined
label without fulfilling requirements defined by OHANDA.
Well, I'm not sure how you get that impression. It's not like it's a
matter of adherence to a
On Sat 05 October 2013 21:03:44 Stefan Monnier wrote:
But none of them is building modular devices. I wonder why.
For the same reason they don't make their hardware open, for the same
reason they don't make their software Free, for the same reason they
don't want you to have root access on
Hi,
GTAx is allready more extensible than normal smartphones because of usb
host mode. And any different fast data connector I think about might
allow an attacker to get access to your system, like the hacks with
firewire.
I also think it would be nice to have modular phone, but this is a huge
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 21:32 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 03.10.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Bob Ham:
I would note that the GTA04 is not a Free Hardware project.
Yes that is correct. It is not Free Hardware in the strict FSF definition
I don't think FSF has a definition of Free
On Fri 04 October 2013 19:48:19 Bob Ham wrote:
You've previously said that the reason you refuse to release the
hardware source files, making the device more open, is because you
expect money in return. Are you now saying restricting access to the
hardware source files is somehow a design
Am 04.10.2013 um 19:48 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 21:32 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 03.10.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Bob Ham:
I would note that the GTA04 is not a Free Hardware project.
Yes that is correct. It is not Free Hardware in the strict FSF definition
I
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 20:16 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 04.10.2013 um 19:48 schrieb Bob Ham:
I don't think FSF has a definition of Free Hardware. Possibly we're
ascribing different meanings to the phrase.
Yes they have one and even do a certification (which would not be
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
I already told you that the hardware source files are open and public.
I agree with Bob Ham on this. The source files are not public and even
the PDFs are not open, they are licensed under a non-commercial
license (CC-BY-NC-SA).
Am 04.10.2013 um 21:26 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 20:16 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 04.10.2013 um 19:48 schrieb Bob Ham:
I don't think FSF has a definition of Free Hardware. Possibly we're
ascribing different meanings to the phrase.
Yes they have one and even
Am 05.10.2013 um 05:09 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
I already told you that the hardware source files are open and public.
I agree with Bob Ham on this. The source files are not public and even
the PDFs are not open, they are licensed
Hi,
Am 03.10.2013 um 05:15 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
Production problems show almost immediately, even if there is only one
person. And they show after making let's say 20 units.
As you know, that has not been the experience with the GTA02, where
audio quality output (works fine for
On Thu 03 October 2013 08:56:43 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
I know. But I'm not talking about swapping the actual CPU or the
actual display. I'm talking about swapping the CPU module or the
display module. I.e. create a standardized module interface around
off-the-shelf (i.e.
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 23:15 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
It would have its own cost (in money and in size), but in the long run,
I hope the benefits of relying on standardized interfaces would make up
for it.
From what I can tell, Free Hardware projects don't benefit nearly enough
from
Am 03.10.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 23:15 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
It would have its own cost (in money and in size), but in the long run,
I hope the benefits of relying on standardized interfaces would make up
for it.
From what I can tell, Free Hardware
Production problems show almost immediately, even if there is only one
person. And they show after making let's say 20 units.
As you know, that has not been the experience with the GTA02, where
audio quality output (works fine for line-out but not for headphones),
GPS issues, and the 1024
Hi
There is an annoying problem in QtMoko when you try to connect to a WPA
protected network: the network manager fails to connect to the chosen
network and/or loses manual IP settings.
I don't remember if this issue was solved but I found a workaround by
chance. I noticed that if there is only
Hello,
Is there a device on production with witch I can choice the os I want install
or install several os (multi boot) ?
Best regards
mparchet
Le 25 sept. 2013 à 21:32, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com a
écrit :
Am 25.09.2013 um 20:45 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
I don't see
Am 26.09.2013 um 11:06 schrieb Parchet Michaël:
Hello,
Is there a device on production with witch I can choice the os I want install
or install several os (multi boot) ?
Almost. The GTA04A5 can go on production (again) as soon as we get enough
orders.
-- hns
Best regards
mparchet
Hello,
Can you send me the URL for GTA04A5 ?
Best regards
mparchet
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 26 sept. 2013 à 11:18, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com a
écrit :
Am 26.09.2013 um 11:06 schrieb Parchet Michaël:
Hello,
Is there a device on production with witch I can choice
Am 26.09.2013 um 11:42 schrieb Parchet Michaël:
Hello,
Can you send me the URL for GTA04A5 ?
https://shop.goldelico.com/wiki.php?page=GTA04
A5 is the board revision/variant:
http://projects.goldelico.com/p/gta04-main/page/Versions/
Best regards
mparchet
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Hello,
Is there a phone or tablet with GTA04A5 ?
Thanks for your answer ?
Best regards
mparchet
Le 26 sept. 2013 à 11:47, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com a
écrit :
Am 26.09.2013 um 11:42 schrieb Parchet Michaël:
Hello,
Can you send me the URL for GTA04A5 ?
Hi Stefan,
Am 25.09.2013 um 05:01 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
The main problem I see with such Free and/or Open phone is the small
production syndrome. Small productions mean high prices and low
reliability, whereas we need reasonable prices and reliability.
Yes, small production is the key
I don't see reliability as a problem because it depends on what type
of reliability you are thinking of: component, software, hardware,
production, or availability.
Small production runs means very few people have a chance of
discovering, let alone, fixing the various problems that can show
Am 25.09.2013 um 20:45 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
I don't see reliability as a problem because it depends on what type
of reliability you are thinking of: component, software, hardware,
production, or availability.
Small production runs means very few people have a chance of
discovering, let
On Wed 25 September 2013 21:32:13 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 25.09.2013 um 20:45 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
Production problems show almost immediately, even if there is only one
person. And they show after making let's say 20 units. I.e. it does not
need to produce let's say 1000 units
Hello everybody,
for those of you who are using openBmap on FreeRunner, there were issues
with uploading old files with scanned BTS and AP. To rescue all this
valuable data please read this:
https://sourceforge.net/p/myposition/discussion/785485/thread/7ed0d6e8/?limit=25
For the rest: sorry for
801 - 900 of 61735 matches
Mail list logo
