tis 2008-10-21 klockan 17:48 +0200 skrev Didier Raboud:
> Cédric Berger wrote:
> You have to grant your copyright to Google...
This is because of yow copyright works, it's the same with GNU so _that_
part really shouldn't hurt if Google had chosen a FOSS style license ...
/ Fredrik
signature.as
Cédric Berger wrote:
> Here we are
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-open-source-cell-phone.html
>
> time to port to Neo !
>
At last maybe we will get a stable, usable O/S for the Neo (which I have
shelved until such a thing
exists). I was using Qt but
Tarandeep Gill wrote:
> What my belief is that the Linux license means that anyone who obtains
> a copy of the Linux Kernel in binary form, irrespective of how they
> obtained that copy, has a right to the source code used to build that
> exact Linux kernel binary. Derivative works of the Linux ker
, Daniel Benoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2008 11:33:40 you wrote:
>> Here we are
>> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-open-source-cell-phone.html
>>
>> time to port to Neo !
>>
>>
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 11:33:40 you wrote:
> Here we are
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-open-source-cell-phone.html
>
> time to port to Neo !
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> comm
ernel patches. Note that
both of those licenses are also considered to be "free software"
licenses by FSF (see
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses). Do you
have some other definition of "free software" in mind?
> http://code.google.com/android/
> Hey... it says "open-source" (you can read the code) not "free software"
> (you can do whatever you want)...
I don't know why when some people read "open-source" they understand "open
to read" but not "open to modify". Android is
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 17:48, Didier Raboud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cédric Berger wrote:
>
>> Here we are
>>
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-open-source-cell-phone.html
>>
>> time to port to Neo !
>
> Hey... it says &q
Quoting a mail we received sometime ago from Koolu
"Koolu presently supplies other distributors globally for Openmoko
Freerunners. Due to this volume we can provide lower prices and value add.
In November 2008 we start shipping Freerunner with Android pre installed and
supported as an o
Cédric Berger wrote:
> Here we are
>
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-open-source-cell-phone.html
>
> time to port to Neo !
Hey... it says "open-source" (you can read the code) not "free software"
(you can do whatever you want)...
WHO :)
Let the games begin!
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Sam Kuper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/21 Cédric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> time to port to Neo !
>
>
> I'm going to be watching this with interest!
>
> ___
> Openmoko c
2008/10/21 Cédric Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> time to port to Neo !
I'm going to be watching this with interest!
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Cédric Berger wrote:
> Here we are
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-open-source-cell-phone.html
>
> time to port to Neo !
>
Now that would be cool...
Paul
--
Time's fun when you're having flies.
-Kermit the Frog
http://www.nlpagan.net
Here we are
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/10/android-open-source-cell-phone.html
time to port to Neo !
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
not just a recompile away. Probably not an
> insane amount of work though either, but this is from a guy not doing
> it.
>
Hmm. It does sound like a fair bit of work. Essentially, I like the idea of
developing my own mobile apps. I'd want them to be available to both
Android, OpenMoko a
su, 2008-10-05 kello 06:01 -0700, sampablokuper kirjoitti:
> On a different front, will it be possible to port Android applications (not
> the whole OS, just the apps) to distros running on Neo phones? For instance,
> if I had a FreeRunner, could I run http://scan.jsharkey.org/ Scan on
Cédric Berger wrote:
>
> Porting android should be possible, but only when its sources are
> released (should be when first android phones are available)
>
The first Android phones are due to be available on
http://www.t-mobileg1.com/g1-learn-faqs-phone.aspx 22 Oct 2008 in
abatrour wrote:
> Many news sources state it is being released on September 23rd.
> I watched one video on youtube where they showed it on test hardware running
> a 300mhz cpu and it ran very smooth. I'm excited to see how it will run on
> the Free Runners when its ported over to arm4.
Who knows..
No, I think you're right about the Java. According to the website the
only way to create android apps is java, compiled down to their
special bytecode format.
Dan
2008/9/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm glad I was wrong about the Java :-)
> Free software fo
I'm glad I was wrong about the Java :-)
Free software for me is what described on the gnu philosophy page -
free as in speech, not free as in beer. That's why I have Freerunner,
and not nokia n95 or iPhone.
But this is of course my personal view.
___
Ope
2008/9/16 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK, Java is the "de-facto" standard programming language for the
> Android SDK. What is or not Free Software isn't yet known (again AFAIK)
> although it was rumoured to be about 20% non-free.
Hi,
AFAIK, Java is the "de-facto" standard programming language for the
Android SDK. What is or not Free Software isn't yet known (again AFAIK)
although it was rumoured to be about 20% non-free.
But what wouldn't be Free Software? Drivers? User land applications?
Low level i
I have no intention to install Android, even if it was possible.
I think it will not be opensourced(parts written by google).
AFAIK the only language to use will be java.
On 9/16/08, abatrour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Many news sources state it is being released on Septemb
ntext:
http://n2.nabble.com/Google-Android-tp1091908p1091908.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
arne anka wrote:
> sure? i expected the embeddedubuntu people to embrace the freerunner as
> first really available device -- but they still do their stuff for armv5
There seems to be a lot of interest in running Android on other
platforms (see the android-internals group[1] and this
> Correct! My guess is that once Google releases the source, Freerunner
> will be among the first non-partner platforms that Android runs on.
sure? i expected the embeddedubuntu people to embrace the freerunner as
first really available device -- but they still do their stuff for
s the source, Freerunner
will be among the first non-partner platforms that Android runs on.
Jim
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 15:30 +0200, Mike Baroukh wrote:
> > Somebody already had a look into this:
> >
> > http://benno.id.au/blog/2007/11/21/android-neo1973
>
> Ok. I gave up.
> I would need at least 10 years to make the samething.
>
> > We have two option
> Somebody already had a look into this:
>
> http://benno.id.au/blog/2007/11/21/android-neo1973
Ok. I gave up.
I would need at least 10 years to make the samething.
> We have two options: either wait for Dalvik to be open-sourced and
> recompiled on ARM4, or wait for android
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 10:59 +0200, Cédric Berger wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:08, Mike Baroukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi all.
>
> > But instead I wondered If I could not try to make Android running ?
> > I saw that like for OpenMoko, there is and androi
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:08, Mike Baroukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all.
> But instead I wondered If I could not try to make Android running ?
> I saw that like for OpenMoko, there is and android git repository
> available (http://git.android.com/).
Android is not yet
Somebody already had a look into this:
http://benno.id.au/blog/2007/11/21/android-neo1973
Basically the problem is that android is compiled for
ARMv5 whereas the neos have got an ARMv4 processor.
Cheers,
Markus
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 10:08 +0200, Mike Baroukh wrote:
> hi all.
>
>
romScratch from start to create my
own learning distribution on my Neo.
But instead I wondered If I could not try to make Android running ?
I saw that like for OpenMoko, there is and android git repository
available (http://git.android.com/).
As I understood, Android is similar to FSO : On
more work that it seems at first glance. Yes,
Android is VM platform and yes it runs linux at the bottom, but AFAIK
its native libs (libc for example) is not taken from gnu/linux as they
are. I read that libc is BSD based and is tuned/modified/completely
rewritten (depending where you read it fro
lance.
Yes, Android is VM platform and yes it runs linux at the bottom, but
AFAIK its native libs (libc for example) is not taken from gnu/linux
as they are.
I read that libc is BSD based and is tuned/modified/completely
rewritten (depending where you read it from) by google... what does
this mean,
On pe, 2008-05-30 at 11:47 +0200, NeoSleg wrote:
>I'm hust wondering if it would be possible to install Android on
> freerunner when they will be out ... I don't really know if Google
> plan to give their system to the public or only distributed with new
> devices ...
A
Hi all,
I'm hust wondering if it would be possible to install Android on
freerunner when they will be out ... I don't really know if Google
plan to give their system to the public or only distributed with new
devices ...
Does anyone have more infos on this ? Any date of Andro
Arnout Engelen pisze:
[...]
Hmm, do you have any references to support that claim? That'd suck,
Dalvik looks pretty interesting (also for Openmoko).
IIRC, it was promised by Google to be open... Im not following Android very
carefully, so Im not up to date with this... maybe it is al
pretty interesting (also for Openmoko).
There are a few indications at least
http://www.retrodev.com/android/dexformat.html
http://code.google.com/android/kb/licensingandoss.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalvik_virtual_machine
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_t
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 12:25:26AM +0400, t3st3r wrote:
> as far as I understand, Android just a java-based crap which ONLY uses
> Linux as low-level engine, without any native apps or UI frameworks like QT
> or GTK.
Let's not start a language war yet again :). Indeed it looks li
> If you look at the Android software stack, you will notice that they
> basically only use the Linux kernel and a few traditional 'helper'
> libraries, written in C (jpg, png, etc).
> But the bulk of the system is written from scratch. They even have
> their own lib
Marcus Bauer wrote:
For all those who have missed it out, there is a company named Koolu
which is going to sell the Neo with Android. [1] CTO of Koolu is Jon
'maddog' Hall, quite a well known personality.
As another note, they just changed availability for developers from
March to Jun
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 01:25 +0800, Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
> Let me use this opportunity to talk a bit about Openmoko and Android.
> First of all we really like Android! We don't see Android as
> competition, it is complementary to what we are doing and may help us
> in ma
On 4/4/08, Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> If you look at the Android software stack, you will notice that they
> basically only use the Linux kernel and a few traditional 'helper'
> libraries, written in C (jpg, png, etc).
> But the bulk of the sy
Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear khang,
>
> Let me use this opportunity to talk a bit about Openmoko and Android.
> First of all we really like Android! We don't see Android as
> competition, it is complementary to what we are doing and may help us
>
Dear khang,
Is OpenMoko CPE a good choice for niche or special
applications or not ???
Any ideas ?
If not , many of the developers will go for Android .
That is not good .
Let me use this opportunity to talk a bit about Openmoko and Android.
First of all we
Lorn Potter wrote:
> Zeth Green wrote:
>> Back to the topic, I am interested in OpenMoko for two reasons. Firstly, and
>> most importantly, as has been previously expressed, the current Android
>> platform proposals and similar Linux phones such as motorola's own Linux
Zeth Green wrote:
Back to the topic, I am interested in OpenMoko for two reasons. Firstly, and
most importantly, as has been previously expressed, the current Android
platform proposals and similar Linux phones such as motorola's own Linux
platform are thoroughly uninteresting to me s
> And in particular, regarding Lorn's point below, how do you feel
> about the different APIs?
>
> By the way, this is not meant to start an "us vs. them" battle.
> I'm not out to prove that one is better than the other.
>
> Android, Qtopia, and OpenMoko
This is what I've currently got on my OM:
i would dearly love to have pyglet, personally ..
;
--
Jay Vaughan
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> hardware (no rush). I imagine there are many people in that position.
>
> Back to the topic, I am interested in OpenMoko for two reasons. Firstly, and
> most importantly, as has been previously expressed, the current Android
> platform proposals and similar Linux phones s
For myself I like scripting languages, Python being my favourite,
and I am
hoping the OpenMoko will either come with some kind of scripting
language or
let me get one via the package manager. (I'm sure you guys have a
plan for
this - as I said I am just a lurker so do not know all the details
ed in OpenMoko for two reasons. Firstly, and
most importantly, as has been previously expressed, the current Android
platform proposals and similar Linux phones such as motorola's own Linux
platform are thoroughly uninteresting to me so far, there are already a
million phones that let you
For one, if I understand correctly, android is all java...no thanks.
With the whole openmoko "build your app package fast" tutorial (dev
kit), certainly makes it more appealing.
Brandon Kruse (bkruse)
On Jan 16, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Michael Shil
with the hardware that truly makes the neo 1973 and openmoko such a
powerful tool. I have worked with the Openmoko's API and I have looked at
the android api and they both seem to offer advantages. The Android API
seems to be easier to use but less powerful. If you really need control
tures make you choose one over the other?
And in particular, regarding Lorn's point below, how do you feel about
the different APIs?
By the way, this is not meant to start an "us vs. them" battle. I'm not
out to prove that one is better than the other.
Android, Qtopia, and O
So, to get Android running, you need a processor with ARM v5 ISA. I.e. A
gumstix with its XScale processor (Both PXA255 & PXA270 should work).
Anyone fancy having a go at putting Android on their MyPhone?
Hi All,
I am trying to get Android running on my motorola A1200E (based on
PX
from the faq:
Where can I find the open source components of Android?
You can find the kernel at http://git.android.com and the other
mirrored GPL and LGPL'd components at
http://code.google.com/p/android/downloads/list.
Notices for other licenses can be found within the SDK.
On Nov 27,
>Let's look at this as a great opportunity. Presumably, all of these
>phones will have a working linux kernel and drivers that are available
>for them, whither the Android platform is truly open or not, surely
>this is a big with for the OSS-phone community.
This is exactly how
Let's look at this as a great opportunity. Presumably, all of these
phones will have a working linux kernel and drivers that are available
for them, whither the Android platform is truly open or not, surely
this is a big with for the OSS-phone community.
-Will
On Nov 22, 2007 2:50 PM, Rod W
pany to use the
> same code like the official manufacturer do.
>
> Or do i miss something?
Yes, you missed the vital step of not accusing GPL violation until you
determine whether the code in question is actually licensed under the
GPL. The Android system is an aggregation of thi
hey have no choice, its GPLv2) so I'd wait and see what
> > happens,
>
>
> It's not GPLv2 until they actually release it under that license, until now
> they seem to release only the part they absolutely have to.
> I am pretty sure Google is not going to release a
> happens,
It's not GPLv2 until they actually release it under that license, until now
they seem to release only the part they absolutely have to.
I am pretty sure Google is not going to release anything allowing anyone to
run Android on a actual phone until the first official Android p
On 22/11/2007, Stefan Lischke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Isn't google violating GPLv2 when it does not release the Code now?
> I could use some GPL'ed code, change it, give it to manufacturer and say
> i'll release it to public when the product is finish.
> Thats totally against GPL, ca
Hi,
Isn't google violating GPLv2 when it does not release the Code now?
I could use some GPL'ed code, change it, give it to manufacturer and say
i'll release it to public when the product is finish.
Thats totally against GPL, cause it prevents other company to use the
same code like the official m
What a great "opensource-project"...
On 11/22/07, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Shaul Kedem wrote:
> > One of his ways out of this is "Google releasing the source and
> > someone else compiling for ARMv4." now google said they will open the
> > source (they have no choice, its GPLv2)
Shaul Kedem wrote:
> One of his ways out of this is "Google releasing the source and
> someone else compiling for ARMv4." now google said they will open the
> source (they have no choice, its GPLv2) so I'd wait and see what
> happens,
It is also reported that Google has said that the source won't
> There has been some serious effort trying to get Android to run on the
> Neo:
>
> http://benno.id.au/blog/2007/11/21/android-neo1973
>
> It was at the point where he started writing code to emulate ARMv5
> instructions on an ARMv4 that I was thinking "If anyone can get it
&g
There has been some serious effort trying to get Android to run on the
Neo:
http://benno.id.au/blog/2007/11/21/android-neo1973
It was at the point where he started writing code to emulate ARMv5
instructions on an ARMv4 that I was thinking "If anyone can get it
running, it's going to b
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 18:13:15 Lorn Potter wrote:
> > First Qtopia is not open enough,
>
> I guess you didn't read that Qtopia Phone is completely GPL, lock,
> stock and barrel.
I guess you didn't read AVee's mail very closely. Seems to me that he was
mocking that complaint, not making i
AVee wrote:
> On Monday 19 November 2007 14:54, Marcelo Lira wrote:
Free software is worth encouraging. Status quo closed source is not.
>> So, this is a problem, but it is ok to use free software to help the growth
>> of a company that profits in selling licenses for closed source software?
On Monday 19 November 2007 14:54, Marcelo Lira wrote:
> >>Free software is worth encouraging. Status quo closed source is not.
>
> So, this is a problem, but it is ok to use free software to help the growth
> of a company that profits in selling licenses for closed source software?
>
> >>Trolltech
On Monday 19 November 2007 14:54:09 Marcelo Lira wrote:
> Yes, GPL guarantees that, but a library in GPL is not that useful for a
> developer that sometimes have to do closed source apps. And please don't
> start with the "I will not help anyone developing closed source" discourse,
> since a numbe
Hi,
Lorn Potter wrote:
> If you look at the development, both Nokia and Openmoko 'runs the show'
> and has the last say on their respective platforms, not the community.
It is perfectly reasonable to me that Nokia and FIC get to decide the
software that's installed on their hardware. But that do
>From my POV, when people at OpenMoko decided on GTK for its paltform they
are giving developers the ability to participate and influence *directly* on
its development, and create great apps, both opensource and proprietary,
without paying any license fees. The Nokia decision when build the Maemo
p
>>License fees for Qtopia (and Qt) are a pittance compared to the fees of
>>even one engineer for one year for any company
Yes I agree with you before you said it:
> Look that the pricing is not the most importante issue
>>You can influence directly the development of Qtopia very easily.
It appear
>>Free software is worth encouraging. Status quo closed source is not.
So, this is a problem, but it is ok to use free software to help the growth
of a company that profits in selling licenses for closed source software?
>>Trolltech GPL's most of the code it develops, which guarantees that
>>softw
Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Lorn Potter wrote:
If you look at the development, both Nokia and Openmoko 'runs the show'
and has the last say on their respective platforms, not the community.
It is perfectly reasonable to me that Nokia and FIC get to decide the
software that's installed on their hard
Marcelo Lira wrote:
>>License fees for Qtopia (and Qt) are a pittance compared to the fees of
>>even one engineer for one year for any company
Yes I agree with you before you said it:
> Look that the pricing is not the most importante issue
>>You can influence directly the development of Qto
Marcelo Lira wrote:
>From my POV, when people at OpenMoko decided on GTK for its paltform
they are giving developers the ability to participate and influence
*directly* on its development, and create great apps, both opensource
and proprietary, without paying any license fees. The Nokia decisi
-.- ok another flamewar... lets participate.
> Hi! Actualy those are not operating systems. Operating system is for
> example Linux. It is used for OpenMoko and Qtopia (I'm not sure for
> Android but I think also).
Don't feed the troll... ... ... ... Oh, I really have to!
Linux
Michael Schmidt wrote:
Hi
If I understand it right, the neo phone has now three options for an
operating system
- the current openmoko GTK operating system
- Qtopia from Trolltech
- Android linux from google.
Not an option at this time.
Android (the VM) looks like it is another java platform
Wiadomość napisana w dniu Nov 16, 2007, o godz 4:42 PM, przez Enno
Gottox Boland:
-.- ok another flamewar... lets participate.
Hi! Actualy those are not operating systems. Operating system is for
example Linux. It is used for OpenMoko and Qtopia (I'm not sure for
Android but I think
Very true. An extremely small amount of actual source code, none of it
especially useful, was released with Android. The core libraries, as
well as the Dalvik virtual machine, the tools, etc., were only released
in binary form. The only sources provided were
- the kernel
- WebKit
- the QEMU-based
Wiadomość napisana w dniu Nov 16, 2007, o godz 2:30 PM, przez Michael
Schmidt:
Hi
If I understand it right, the neo phone has now three options for an
operating system
- the current openmoko GTK operating system
- Qtopia from Trolltech
- Android linux from google.
Hi! Actualy those are
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:59:33 +0100, Michael Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So make a poll for GTK-OS versus Qtopia.
maybe it is not only a technical question. Is there an emulator to
test both systems on my windows machine? then i can give a vote based
on the stomach. If not, then I vote f
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 14:59 +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
[...]
> So make a poll for GTK-OS versus Qtopia.
> maybe it is not only a technical question. Is there an emulator to
> test both systems on my windows machine? then i can give a vote based
> on the stomach. If not, then I vote for Qtopia,
2007/11/16, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 14:30 +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> > If I understand it right, the neo phone has now three options for an
> > operating system
> > - the current openmoko GTK operating system
> > - Qtopia f
Hi
If I understand it right, the neo phone has now three options for an
operating system
- the current openmoko GTK operating system
- Qtopia from Trolltech
- Android linux from google.
It is right that a the community is devided between Qt and GTK, and
that additionally the community is
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 14:30 +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> If I understand it right, the neo phone has now three options for an
> operating system
> - the current openmoko GTK operating system
> - Qtopia from Trolltech
> - Android linux from google.
Last time I looked, the ful
On a related note, the J2ME from Sun is now open source
https://phoneme.dev.java.net/
"The project scope includes a focus on the mainstream feature
phone segment with phoneME Feature software, and the emerging
advanced phone segment with phoneME Advanced software."
Regarding Andro
On Monday 12 November 2007 20:52, Dean Collins wrote:
> Android videos available here
> http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/googles-android-os-early-look-sdk-now
> -available
These video's do show what it is all about, according to google. Ofcourse
there is internet access (with t
hey friend
MS got in trouble with Sun for doing something a little bit similar,
but they had a licensing agreement in place that put MS in hot water.
I wonder if on a technical level it rules out cool stuff like jruby...
> > - Android code is written to a unique dialect of Java (super/
William Weinberg wrote:
Dear OpenMoko Friends
See the following blog about the "neat tricks" that Google performed to
sidestep Sun Java licensing requirements.
http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/
The short of is
- Android code is written to a unique dialect of J
Dear OpenMoko Friends
See the following blog about the "neat tricks" that Google performed to
sidestep Sun Java licensing requirements.
http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/
The short of is
- Android code is written to a unique dialect of Java (super/subset)
th
Superb. Their SDK kind of reminds me of the differences in getting to
work with GTK and Qt.
Jon
Dean Collins wrote:
Android videos available here
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/googles-android-os-early-look-sdk-now
-available
Regards,
Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL
Also spracht Ted Lemon (Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:57:05 -0700):
> On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:39 -0600, William Voorhees wrote:
>> I hope they do it soon, I just downloaded the Android (google) SDK, and
>> I must say I'm rather impressed.
>
> The demos are great. But it lo
Android videos available here
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/12/googles-android-os-early-look-sdk-now
-available
Regards,
Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1-212-203-4357 Ph
+61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney i
the "viral infection" problem
> often associated with other licenses.
>
>
>
> On 06/11/2007, Florent Delvaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The good thing is that OpenMoko and Android are OpenSource.
> > Then maybe the Androiddevelopers could take some basis/idea
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The good thing is that OpenMoko and Android are OpenSource.
> Then maybe the Androiddevelopers could take some basis/ideas to OpenMoko ,
> and OpenMoko to Android.
>
> Ok the goal of OpenMoko is not the same as Android. Android is based on a
> lot of socie
701 - 800 of 806 matches
Mail list logo
