On Jan 11, 2008 11:26 PM, Ted Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Lon Lentz wrote:
I read the not so happy comments following the Gizmodo article.
A lot of those comments have been made here on this list. Like the
repeated ones about the boot scroll being visible.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Shiloh wrote:
Neo FreeRunner press release and the CPU speed
--
The Neo FreeRunner press release that went out last week indicated a
500MHz CPU which, as many of you pointed out, is in conflict
year and calendar year, I suppose?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven **
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:09 PM
To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Community update, January 2, 2008
At my employer, 1st quarter
Hi Ian,
ian douglas wrote:
Although it would be nice to take advantage of this faster processor, 3
problems make this impractical
Michael,
If I'm reading your message correctly, the GTA02 will indeed have a
500MHz processor, but will not be running at 500MHz because of the three
Michael,
Are you aware of any online sites that might have done any video of this?
On Jan 10, 2008 4:20 PM, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
A brief status report from OpenMoko:
Consumer Electronics Show, Las Vegas
We've just
Hello everyone,
I'm going to ask possibly a simple question, but one that's quite
important to me and the company I work for.
FreeRunner is due for release at the end of Spring, but which Spring
is this? East Asia? US? Europe?
I'm in the UK and greatly looking forward to the FreeRunner, but
Hello Joseph,
The spring we're talking about is spring in North America, but please
note that this is an estimate, not a guarantee, and please note that the
software will not be consumer ready.
Michael
Joseph Reeves wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm going to ask possibly a simple question, but
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 09:35 -0500, Adam King wrote:
Hi Michael:
As I mentioned in a previous email to you, I'm in a 850Mhz _only_ area - so
I can test the handset for you - though I am in Canada. Provider is Rogers
and
the area is Ottawa. Also, would there be any possibility of
FreeRunner is due for release at the end of Spring, but which Spring
is this? East Asia? US? Europe?
I have to say, spring is a bad description of when FreeRunner will be
released, though from my knowledge East Asia, the US and Europe all have spring
at the same time +- 24 hours. I'm
Jeff Bailes wrote:
FreeRunner is due for release at the end of Spring, but which Spring
is this? East Asia? US? Europe?
I have to say, spring is a bad description of when FreeRunner will be
released, though from my knowledge East Asia, the US and Europe all have
spring
at the same
Thank you for the update. When do you expect to have results from the
850-MHz GTA01 testing?
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
On Thursday 03 January 2008 05:51:06 Michael Shiloh wrote:
Hello everyone,
Next week at CES we will formally preview GTA02 to the public. We are
doing this at an invitation-only media event, and not the general show
floor.
Any chance to see a video of that event? Maybe even in decent (i.e.
The bulk of the press release discusses the hardware features of GTA02,
of which you are all well aware.
Actually I do have one question coming from the press release -- it says:
FreeRunner will come in two versions: a 850MHz tri-band and a
900Mhz tri-band.
Does this mean that OpenMoko has
Hello everyone,
Next week at CES we will formally preview GTA02 to the public. We are
doing this at an invitation-only media event, and not the general show
floor.
To coincide with this we are sending out a press release tomorrow morning.
The bulk of the press release discusses the hardware
Thanks for the updates, Michael.
Any update on how the GTA02v5 evaluation is proceeding?
/Erland
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:42:53 -0700, Richard Reichenbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As long as there's the Equifax security certificate it'll support our
network. It would also be a huge move for cell phone wifi as it would be
the only phone that works with our network.
Richard
And
Richard Reichenbacher wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hessing
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 9:13 PM
To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Community update, Thursday, December 20 2007
Richard
Erland Lewin wrote:
Thanks for the updates, Michael.
Any update on how the GTA02v5 evaluation is proceeding?
/Erland
Hi Erland,
As mentioned on 12/06/2007 We are waiting for confirmation of Wifi and
a few other parts of the GTA02a4 hardware before we manufacture even a
small test run
Hello,
GTA01 850MHz Experiment
---
As mentioned in the last update, we modified a couple of GTA01 handsets
for 850MHz operation to test them in the USA. Due to the enthusiastic
response I received to my request for testing volunteers I've asked our
hardware group to modify
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Any idea about the wpa2 and peap authentication compatibility I had
asked you about during the previous community update?
Richard
GSM Firmware Update
---
We are still waiting for the signed agreement allowing you to update the
GSM firmware yourselves. Meanwhile, we have resolved the difficulties I
was having in performing the upgrade, and I am now able to upgrade your
handsets. Anyone interested in having
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Any idea about the wpa2 and peap authentication compatibility I had
asked you about during the previous community update?
Richard
I am currently porting
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hessing
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 9:13 PM
To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Community update, Thursday, December 20 2007
Richard Reichenbacher wrote:
Michael Shiloh
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia poniedziałek, 10 grudnia 2007, Richard Reichenbacher napisał:
I am a student at the University of Arizona and work for the IT
department. We have one of the worlds largest Cisco Radius wifi setups
in the world. Our main wifi network uses wpa enterprise with
On Monday 10 December 2007, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 12/9/07, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
GSM Firmware update:
We've been informed that everything legal has been agreed upon by all
parties, and all that remains is to get everything signed. Apparently
the process of
Michael,
I'm in an 850/1900 area as well. I live in eastern Pennsylvania (Lehigh
Valley) and often drive to/from New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. I
sometimes drive to the suburban Philadelphia area as well. My mobile
provider is ATT and my current phone's SIM chip is listed as working with
In regards to the 850MHz Issue:
It seems that very little effort was required to switch a phone board
to 850 for testing. So my question is what exactly is involved. Was
it simply switching which pin is attached to the antenna? If it is a
relatively simple circuit change and involving only a
Hi Michael:
As I mentioned in a previous email to you, I'm in a 850Mhz _only_ area - so
I can test the handset for you - though I am in Canada. Provider is Rogers and
the area is Ottawa. Also, would there be any possibility of releasing
the changes
made to the GTA01 to make it 850Mhz
-Original Message-
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
community@lists.openmoko.org
To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Community update: GSM firmware, 850MHz experiment, GTA02
progress
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007
I would also be very interested in re-work instructions for modifying
a GTA01 to support 850MHz as many of us are capable doing circuit
modifications.
Thanks,
Cliff
On Dec 10, 2007 9:32 AM, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regards to the 850MHz Issue:
It seems that very little effort was
workaround and almost nullify my no-quadband
issues.
-Jonathon
-Original Message-
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
community@lists.openmoko.org
To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Community update
As mentioned earlier, this requires replacing a number of components,
firmware changes, and recalibration.
Michael
Mark wrote:
In regards to the 850MHz Issue:
It seems that very little effort was required to switch a phone board
to 850 for testing. So my question is what exactly is involved.
Yes, but not the recalibration or the firmware changes.
One step at a time - let's see if these units work, and if so, we'll
look into if there is any way to tackle the other issues.
Michael
Cliff Brake wrote:
I would also be very interested in re-work instructions for modifying
a GTA01 to
Jason Joines wrote:
Is there any possibility of a future hardware version becoming quad
band?
As mentioned earlier, there is no chance that GTA02 will be quad-band.
There is certainly a possibility that future products will be quad-band.
Michael
I'm curious, since these 850 variants are most likely going to be an option,
when can we expect them? Are they going to be available at the same time as
the public offering of the GTA02, or are they going to be available way
after that?
On Dec 9, 2007 6:01 PM, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Tim,
OpenMoko does not predict when things will be ready; rather, we try to
communicate as much as possible on what we are doing and what we hope to do.
By the way, you say ... most likely going to be an option I'd
like to point out that we are still evaluating the possibility of
Wifi driver:
We're making very good progress, but it's still not finished.
GTA02 hardware:
Still waiting for the Wifi driver to verify the Wifi hardware, but so
far we're feeling quite good about this part. There are a couple of
other things to verify, and as mentioned before we will most
Richard Reichenbacher wrote:
Wifi driver:
We're making very good progress, but it's still not finished.
GTA02 hardware:
Still waiting for the Wifi driver to verify the Wifi hardware, but so
far we're feeling quite good about this part. There are a couple of
other things to verify, and as
On 12/9/07, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
GSM Firmware update:
We've been informed that everything legal has been agreed upon by all
parties, and all that remains is to get everything signed. Apparently
the process of getting things signed takes a few weeks!
850MHz
Michael Shiloh wrote:
Hi,
GSM Firmware update:
We've been informed that everything legal has been agreed upon by all
parties, and all that remains is to get everything signed. Apparently
the process of getting things signed takes a few weeks!
850MHz experiment:
As mentioned before we're
Hi,
I live in Southern Minnesota, in the area indicated by the blue spot on this
map: http://people.ku.edu/~cinema/wireless/cing-attws_800_850.html It would
seem that I would be a candidate for testing the 850mhz reception. Let me
know if I can help.
-Will
On Dec 9, 2007 8:46 PM, Richard
Dnia poniedziałek, 10 grudnia 2007, Richard Reichenbacher napisał:
I am a student at the University of Arizona and work for the IT
department. We have one of the worlds largest Cisco Radius wifi setups
in the world. Our main wifi network uses wpa enterprise with peap
authentication and the
Standard Precision Service (SPS) for GPS is open to the general public
and all information related to it should be unclassified, although some
is For Official Use Only (FOUO). Pres Bill Clinton made a Presidential
Decree, when he was in office, that gave undiluted precision of SPS to
the
Curiosity prevails:
I do see a few benefits to a device which is just a GPS radio, like what Ian
has stated. Would their be any legal ramifications to a reverse-engineered
open source binary interpreter for the GPS radio? I saw a few people
mention government concerns with having access to a
Michael -
Thanks for the update! Is there anything that we could do to help move
the wifi driver along? Or is the hold up somewhere inside Atheros or
the madwifi team?
Thanks!
Michael Shiloh wrote:
Pietro m0nt0 Montorfano wrote:
Michael Shiloh ha scritto:
The gating factor is still
Thanks for the offer, Chris. I will ask the Wifi guy, but I think most
of the work right now involves reading the data sheet which is under NDA
and writing the code.
I will check.
Michael
Chris Hessing wrote:
Michael -
Thanks for the update! Is there anything that we could do to help
Hi Community,
Some updates:
GSM Firmware fix for 3G ATT users:
Background: Until we figure out a way to let customers update their GSM
firmware, I was offering to do it.
Status: Unfortunately, I've not been able to connect reliably with the
GSM hardware debug serial port. I'm working on
Michael Shiloh a écrit :
As usual, questions, comments, and corrections are welcome.
And, as usual, thanks a lot for the Community Update!
--
Lucas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community
Thanks for the update! I'm relieved to hear that 850mhz is not a dead
duck. I'm keeping my hopes up for an 850 capable gta02.
Ben Burdette
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Wiadomość napisana w dniu Nov 26, 2007, o godz 8:41 PM, przez Michael
Shiloh:
Hi Community,
Hi Michael!
What about neccessity to make fifth revision of GTA02? Do you confirm
that ver. 4 of hardware is buggy?
Thanks!
Krzysztof
___
OpenMoko
Hi Krzysztof,
I did get a description but I didn't understand it. It has something to
do with the interface to the coulomb counter on the battery. At any
rate, I think they'll hold off on a5 until they get the confirmation
about the Wifi hardware.
Michael
Krzysztof Kajkowski wrote:
So the public launch of GTA02 might be delayed further?
mån 2007-11-26 klockan 13:56 -0800 skrev Michael Shiloh:
Hi Krzysztof,
I did get a description but I didn't understand it. It has something to
do with the interface to the coulomb counter on the battery. At any
rate, I think they'll
The gating factor is still the Wifi driver. We don't expect a5 to add
much of a delay.
Michael
Felix Andersen wrote:
So the public launch of GTA02 might be delayed further?
mån 2007-11-26 klockan 13:56 -0800 skrev Michael Shiloh:
Hi Krzysztof,
I did get a description but I didn't understand
Michael Shiloh ha scritto:
The gating factor is still the Wifi driver. We don't expect a5 to add
much of a delay.
Michael
Felix Andersen wrote:
[snip]
So what about to have a phisical switch for the 850Mhz issue in rev05 if
it's not so complicated? Or a partial solution to that? Also if
Pietro m0nt0 Montorfano wrote:
Michael Shiloh ha scritto:
The gating factor is still the Wifi driver. We don't expect a5 to add
much of a delay.
Michael
Felix Andersen wrote:
[snip]
So what about to have a phisical switch for the 850Mhz issue in rev05 if
it's not so complicated? Or a
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Michael Shiloh wrote:
Some updates:
GSM Firmware fix for 3G ATT users:
Background: Until we figure out a way to let customers update their GSM
firmware, I was offering to do it.
Status: Unfortunately, I've not been able to connect reliably with the GSM
hardware debug
Ian Darwin wrote:
Anything less will lead to this sort of frustration, over and over again.
It is not always possible.
The way I figured it out, the GSM module will always be closed. This is
not due to the hardware specs being unknown, but due to the fact that
the law requires a transmitter to
exactly accurate respose/analysis.
Hank
On Nov 14, 2007 4:18 AM, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Darwin wrote:
Anything less will lead to this sort of frustration, over and over
again.
It is not always possible.
The way I figured it out, the GSM module will always be
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Regarding the GPS, please pay attention to the fact that the GTA-02 did
not solve this problem. It merely moved the non open source component
from the software to the firmware. This solves the supporting
libraries problem, but does not allow openness.
It solved the
Shachar Shemesh
The way I figured it out, the GSM module will always be closed. This is
not due to the hardware specs being unknown, but due to the fact that
the law requires a transmitter to be approved by the FCC, and it is
impossible to get an approval for a transmitter that allows anyone
Mike Montour wrote:
A serial-attached GPS module with closed-source firmware is no worse
than the hard drive with closed-source firmware in everyone's desktop PC.
Just for the record - I agree. It is unrealistic to expect EVERYTHING to
be open source at this stage. I'm just stating that the move
In other words, pretty much nothing (except for your *very* generous
offer to update phones in person, for which thanks!!).
This is not an occasion for us all to vent frustration at Sean, Mike, et
al. However it is a very good occasion to restate something: everyone,
at all times, involved
I realize the 850mhz issue is complex and you can't give an answer
right away, but I'd like to know when we could expect one? I'm one of
the many North American's who needs the 850 band, and If I know it's
coming I'm going to start doing some software dev, if it's not I'll
start looking elsewhere.
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 03:36, Jon wrote:
I'd suggest everyone find their country on GSM World:
http://www.gsmworld.com/roaming/gsminfo/index.shtml and check their
providers. Unfortunately some of the maps don't differentiate between 850
and 1900 (for example Rogers Wireless in Canada).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The centered, 4.5 Diag *Finger Touch* screen with one thumb width of
grip space on either end of a basically rectangular device is a
Golden Form Factor.
Interesting, so we got it almost right ? Screen size is of course
different, but you could probably case-mod the
I was a little imprecise here. The circuit design, and thus board
layout, is what limits the handset to 3 bands. The components selected
(along with firmware and certification) select the 900/1800/1900MHz bands.
Michael
Randall Mason wrote:
Michael said above that it was a question of a
:17 -0800
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Community update: The 850 MHz issue
Agreed, I'm in California as well, and though I bought a pre-paid T
Mobile card, it doesn't work either because of the 3G issue.
It would seem the 850 issue plus the 3G issue has just 'bricked' my Neo
Man this royally sucks for me. We only get 100% coverage because of the
850 band where I live. 1900 is being added slowly, but not anywhere
close to full coverage.
Anybody want a neo? I sure wish this information would have been
provided _before_ the purchase.
Jae
discussion
community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Community update: The 850 MHz issue
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:37:15 -0600
Man this royally sucks for me. We only get 100% coverage because of the
850 band where I live. 1900 is being added slowly, but not anywhere
close to full coverage.
Anybody want
I too am on the must have 850 list.
Unfortunately not all companies provide their individual coverage maps
on that site, but the large PDFs
http://www.coveragemaps.com/gsmposter_americas.htm and
http://www.coveragemaps.com/gsmposter_world.htm look to be a composite
of all the GSM providers, some
]
Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
community@lists.openmoko.org
To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Community update: The 850 MHz issue
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:37:15 -0600
Man this royally sucks for me. We only get 100% coverage
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed. More interestingly, that it took
a trip from Michael to Taiwan to get anyone to focus on it. If this
substantially sets back the development effort, it really is a major
blow to the
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 03:36, Jon wrote:
I'd suggest everyone find their country on GSM World:
http://www.gsmworld.com/roaming/gsminfo/index.shtml and check their
providers. Unfortunately some of the maps don't differentiate between 850
and 1900 (for example Rogers Wireless in Canada).
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed. More interestingly, that it took
a trip from Michael to Taiwan to get anyone to focus on it. If this
substantially sets back the development effort, it really is a major
blow to the
On 11/6/07, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed. More interestingly, that it took
a trip from Michael to Taiwan to get anyone to focus on it. If this
substantially sets back the
On 11/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed. More interestingly, that it took
a trip from Michael to Taiwan to get anyone to focus on it. If this
substantially sets back the
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 17:06, hank williams wrote:
Yeah, I am pretty amazed at this one.
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed.
Frankly, i'm not that suprised, 850 really is a US thing. You are missing out
on lot of
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 04:13, Michael Shiloh wrote:
I would guess that if we make such a variant, we would offer both, but I
don't know for sure.
Please realize that I'm just asking the question in anticipation that
the information might be useful at some point. I'm not suggesting that
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 17:34, hank williams wrote:
On 11/6/07, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed. More interestingly, that it took
a trip from Michael to Taiwan to get
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 17:22:22 Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed. More interestingly, that it took
a trip from Michael to Taiwan to get anyone to focus on it. If this
substantially sets
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:37:39 -0800, Joshua Layne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I hate to add to the fire on this one, but no 850 is a definite deal
breaker.
No quad-band is a serious limitation, as it has been marketed since
inception as a quad-band phone.
I see now that the openmoko.com page
Howdy,
I'm in Vancouver too, just tested my phone (motorola L2) against the
850/1900 network and it works (registers with fido) while 900/1800
doesn't. You can only select them in those pairs but I'm not sure how
that will work on the neo.
Can anyone clarify some more?
Regards
Dave
On Mon,
Common, take a look outside of your own borders. It's hard to inmagine an Open
Source phone gaining any traction at all in the US, land of software patents,
closed standards and telco control. There are quit a few OSS projects doing
just fine despite being illegal in the US, an Open Source
Just curious, I don't know much about the hardware in question, but is it
just a firmware issue, or does the hardware have to physically change to
move between the 900 or the 850 frequency?
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
On 11/6/07, AVee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 17:06, hank williams wrote:
Yeah, I am pretty amazed at this one.
Its really hard to imagine a company building a phone that didnt think
through what frequencies were needed.
Frankly, i'm not that suprised, 850 really
Michael said above that it was a question of a physical hardware change:
The chipset is capable of quad band but the board was laid out to only
support 3 bands. So, 850Mhz is not supported on the GTA01 board. Instead
we support 900/1800/1900MHz.
Board layout is a hardware issue.
On 11/6/07,
=== ===
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 11:46:11 am Mike Hodson wrote:
I literally go to
www.au.kddi.com and cry.
Really? Literally? :p
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Actually, http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-00-stdkit.html and
http://openmoko.com/products-neo-base-03-hardware.html still state quad...
On 11/6/07, Joshua Layne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:37:39 -0800, Joshua Layne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I hate to add to the
On 11/6/07, Tim Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious, I don't know much about the hardware in question, but is it
just a firmware issue, or does the hardware have to physically change to
move between the 900 or the 850 frequency?
From what people are saying its firmware, hardware, and
On 11/6/07, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== ===
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 11:46:11 am Mike Hodson wrote:
I literally go to
www.au.kddi.com and cry.
Really? Literally? :p
I *have* shed tears looking at the amazing gorgeous super-huge-lcd
flips that are as thin as a matchbook
On Nov 6, 2007 6:39 PM, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Common, take a look outside of your own borders. It's hard to inmagine an
Open
Source phone gaining any traction at all in the US, land of software
patents,
closed standards and telco control. There are quit a few OSS
The facts don't matter a bunch in this discussion for me. I think that we
should vote for what we want and be grateful that ANYBODY is willing to put
this kind of backing for an open source project. I haven't been around in
the F/OSS community for long (maybe 8 years or so), but I really think
On 11/6/07, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. did I say it was not possible to exist as a company without the US? No.
What I said was that a plurality of smart phones are sold in the US.
It is a major market. And a huge amount of OS work is done in the US.
To design a phone that
This article compares smart phone adoption among
recent buyers as of the time of writing in different countries - US adoption
was pretty abysmal back in 2006. While I'm sure it's increased since then,
20-30% is still a very far stretch. I think 8% would be more accurate.
The problem is that
polz wrote:
[...]
Why were the phones shipped from the US, then ? Perhaps it would have made
more sense to ship them from the EU where they seem to work fine and help
many people save some dollars.
thats simple:
we had no shipping directly to customers at all before and we could get
that
n 11/6/07, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bottom line is that Nokia uses statistics to try to claim a larger
share of the smartphone market. But their symbian deployments are
mainly in non-smartphones, and any numbers based on symbian as a real
smartphone platform are deceptive.
I recently joined this list after looking at the OpenMoko project for a few
weeks now. I am a software engineer and a linux enthusiast, I planned on
actively developing for the project creating 3rd party applications.
I am now somewhat concerned with this thread. Am I to understand that
support
When you look at real smart phone sales - i.e. the 20m number, a
very significant number of those are sold in the US. This is just
I think Nkoli's point was that if you are going to say something like A very
significant number, it might be better to back it up with a reference to some
Hello Community,
I've just arrived in Taiwan and have figured out the quad band issue.
The chipset is capable of quad band but the board was laid out to only
support 3 bands. So, 850Mhz is not supported on the GTA01 board. Instead
we support 900/1800/1900MHz.
Anyone interested in more
Unfortunately, this also affects the GTA02, which is now far too close
to production to try to enable quad-band operation.
An 850/1800/1900MHz variant has been suggested but this is not yet
determined.
Michael
Randall Mason wrote:
Will the GTA02 have the quad band board (full working quad
101 - 200 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
