Am 11.06.2012 um 22:57 schrieb Jon maddog Hall:
> After a while Linus said "I do not care what you call it as long as you
> use it." and things settled down for a while.
I didnt know that yet.
We should do the same with the Openphoenux :)
Nikolaus
_
Hi
I think the group should be more concerned about the "ugs" part,
Absolutely, ugh. And the eee also sounds alarming to me.
I hear "eeek-yuck!" :-)
I feel sort of idiot trying to emphasize how important
I think this is. But I do. Here I go again.
It's the first impression. All the connotati
>
> I concede that you're right about Linus and Linux. The fact remains
> for phoenux would still hold since it's pronounced with the same long
> e sound as in Linus' name. So fee-nəks (or fee-nux) and not phon-ugs.
I think the group should be more concerned about the "ugs" part, since
the word
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jon "maddog" Hall wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 15:30 -0500, Harley Laue wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
>> wrote:
>> > Linux is pronounced in english as "Line-ugs" (/ˈlɪnəks/ [1]). I.e. it
>> > should be "phon-ugs".
>> > [1]
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 15:30 -0500, Harley Laue wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
> wrote:
> > Linux is pronounced in english as "Line-ugs" (/ˈlɪnəks/ [1]). I.e. it
> > should be "phon-ugs".
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux
>
> Just as an FYI from a nat
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
wrote:
> Linux is pronounced in english as "Line-ugs" (/ˈlɪnəks/ [1]). I.e. it should
> be "phon-ugs".
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux
Just as an FYI from a native speaker, /ˈlɪnəks/ would be lin-əks With
"lin" which sounds like
Hi
If we were voting, I'd go for OpenPhonux
+1 again. Well, OpenPhonix :-)
The name is derived from:
Open-Phoen(ix)-(Lin)ux
so its openphoenux.org
Linux is pronounced in english as "Line-ugs" (/ˈlɪnəks/ [1]). I.e. it should be
"phon-ugs".
"Phoen" is not going to be pronounced as "f
Am 03.06.2012 um 16:02 schrieb Christoph Pulster:
If we were voting, I'd go for OpenPhonux
>
> I vote for Openmoko2. The idea is still the same, why change
> the well-known brand name ?
Well, because we (the community) do not own the brand
name and therefore can't use it.
And, if you goog
On 11/06/12 07:15, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
it should be "phon-ugs".
That's what I should have asked about - pronunciation rather than
spelling. Because (as an English speaker) I've been pronouncing
OpenPhoenux as open-fee-nux (like the legendary phoenix, fee-nix or
fii-nix i
Am 05.06.2012 um 22:30 schrieb Boudewijn:
> On Monday 04 June 2012 14:49:48 Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Nick Sheppard wrote:
>>> On 31/05/12 16:36, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
4. Nomenclature OpenPhoneux/GTA04
>>> This was a really inform
Am 02.06.2012 um 18:03 schrieb Nick Sheppard:
> On 31/05/12 16:36, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> ...
> >
> > 4. Nomenclature OpenPhoneux/GTA04
> >
> > There may be some confusion what "GTA04" and "OpenPhoneux"
> > are and what makes them different.
> >
> > We define:
> > * GTA*: the next gene
:)
2012/6/5 Boudewijn
> On Monday 04 June 2012 14:49:48 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Nick Sheppard wrote:
> > > On 31/05/12 16:36, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > 4. Nomenclature OpenPhoneux/GTA04
> > > This was a really informative p
On Monday 04 June 2012 14:49:48 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Nick Sheppard wrote:
> > On 31/05/12 16:36, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > 4. Nomenclature OpenPhoneux/GTA04
> > This was a really informative post - thanks! But how are you going t
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Nick Sheppard wrote:
> On 31/05/12 16:36, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> ...
> >
> > 4. Nomenclature OpenPhoneux/GTA04
> >
> > There may be some confusion what "GTA04" and "OpenPhoneux"
> > are and what makes them different.
> >
> > We define:
>
Am 02.06.2012 18:36, schrieb pike:
Hi
If we were voting, I'd go for OpenPhonux, because it's roughly equal
parts Phone, Phoenix and Linux which seems about right.
From the domain name: www.openphoenux.org
Which is really too bad. We arent voting,
but if we were, Phonix would be my #1
(phone,
Hi
If we were voting, I'd go for OpenPhonux, because it's roughly equal
parts Phone, Phoenix and Linux which seems about right.
From the domain name: www.openphoenux.org
Which is really too bad. We arent voting,
but if we were, Phonix would be my #1
(phone,unix,phoenix), and Phonux #2
(phone,
On 31/05/12 16:36, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
...
>
> 4. Nomenclature OpenPhoneux/GTA04
>
> There may be some confusion what "GTA04" and "OpenPhoneux"
> are and what makes them different.
>
> We define:
> * GTA*: the next generation motherboard(s), i.e. electronics
> * OpenPhonux: the future
17 matches
Mail list logo