At 03:39 AM 8/26/2003, David Reid wrote:
3. Apache Newsletter is one of the News from the ASF material,
which people who do not have much time to read all the websites in
the Apache.org have been eager to get in the past,
so it fit to the original usage of [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
and I
At 12:44 PM 8/26/2003, Danny Angus wrote:
If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to opposing
software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the demo.
I will say that I'm pleased the members were able to turn the ship so quickly
to support the initiative, it
At 05:47 PM 9/5/2003, David N. Welton wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NO ONE should be permitted to have IP rights over public
infrastructure standards, except for the body charged with
protecting them for the public. Open Standards must be just that:
OPEN.
Oh, I
At 09:12 AM 10/22/2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:31:20 -
(Subject: RE: The board is not responsible!)
Magnus ?or Torfason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the ASF Board ultimately responsible
This is just wrong. Responsibility lies with the individual
commiters,
At 07:00 AM 12/1/2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
*Maybe* resulted from good marketing effort :-)
BTW - realize that Apache is not only not-for-profit, but is a charitable
organization. Some folks might not be comfortable with the phrase
'marketing' although it certainly applies.
If you want to
At 12:02 PM 12/1/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 07:00 AM 12/1/2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
*Maybe* resulted from good marketing effort :-)
BTW - realize that Apache is not only not-for-profit, but is a charitable
organization. Some folks might not be comfortable
At 10:52 PM 12/23/2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hello,
I will take back my remarks upon this issue.
Sorry for the annoyance.
What remarks? What annoyance? I'm confused because I see what
looks like the middle of some conversation that didn't appear on
community, perhaps?
The entire
At 12:36 AM 1/13/2004, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
The Send button is near the close button. I missed.
Suggestion from an httpd/apr hothead to our community forum participants
[NOT specifically ACO]...
Delay sending messages: [30] (minutes)
is a really great option to enable, well worth the effort
At 02:29 PM 1/24/2004, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Everytime I see an open-source license coming out, I keep having the same
question: what is expected, what is known (and known to fail), in terms of
applicability of this license in other countries than the USA ?
Keep in mind that unlike some
I'm sending this out as a feeler to discover how large a community one of two
proposals might have for incubation, and eventual incorporation as subprojects
of the httpd top-level project.
First proposal, I'm in the process of ensuring that all of the I's are dotted
and
T's are crossed to offer
At 01:46 PM 3/18/2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
If you read the open letters there is clear they suggest an full GPL
license, because if not maybe it can end (intentionally) in a fork.
As Noel said already - GPL does not inhibit forking. The license does
prohibit adopting the same name for a
At 03:22 PM 7/21/2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
While your are right about the licenses cocktail. I think the comment is
OT. The main point to post the article to the list, was let the rest of us
know we are on target. That is all. Perhaps 2 years from now we will know
what is prepared for us. If
At 05:33 PM 7/21/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:10 PM -0600 Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you keep assuming it is for chit chat? If it were [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it was clear (community imposed/whatever) to be about Java @ ASF,
wouldn't that make
At 03:04 PM 11/19/2004, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
This may be completely inappropriate for this list... but this, is so,
*wrong*. And no matter what side of the political spectrum you sit on, I know
transparency and auditability and trust is important to you - that's why
you're here at Apache.
At 11:08 AM 11/20/2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The only result (if proved true) is the complete loss of faith
in any form of electronic voting by the general public for at
least the next 20 years.
You're kidding, right? Is there anyone here who has faith
At 08:30 PM 12/16/2004, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Concerning our decision making processes, I have a couple of
questions...
* What do you think is the role of a PMC in our decision
making process?
They have absolute decision making process within the board's
mandate for their project.
At 09:21 PM 12/19/2004, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Maybe this about making Apache a better place by identifying hypocrisy
here out in the open instead of behind the protection of private lists.
Maybe it's about dealing with the breach of procedure by the Chair of a
PMC and ensuring that this does
The deadline is tomorrow, so I suppose it might be late to ask
a foolish question;
conference/presentations are in English? Mein Deutch ist nicht
so gut.
At 07:14 AM 2/8/2005, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
If you'd like to give a presentation, please go to the Web site
http://www.openbrr.org/
Thought some here might be interested in participating the the public
comment period.
What is it?
Business Readiness Rating (BRR) is being proposed as a new standard
model for rating open source software. It is intended to enable the
entire community (enterprise
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
So I'd like to mail an informal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that all PMC member
know about that award.
As you've announced this to the public community@ list, to which all ASF
members and contributors are welcome at, I'd suggest you've already done
a perfectly
If there is anything on http://www.apache.org/ and across the foundation's
websites that ever bothered you, *docathon* is your answer. Committers with
site-wide access will be available to solve these issues and get suggestions
committed to the site(s). [Please don't assault the docathon team
Please note the Crypto/Export BOF at 9pm Thursday evening in the Leinster
room, Dublin. cliffs will be on hand to explain (and we can verify the
details of) the BIS notification process and the way the export rules
apply to our open source communities.
Once the final
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
here's the text I came up with. Edits/feedback before I resend this
to community, members and jobs @a.o?
proving once again 'reply-to munging considered harmful' has nothing to do
with the munging - it's all EBCAD (error between chair and desk). Anyways
Filip at Apache wrote:
but I have a question,
is community@apache.org the right place for this kind of solicitation?
Certainly - if community@ isn't about discussing and solicting to grow
a community, I'm not sure what it's here for :)
Unlike committers@, the community@ list is
Craig L Russell wrote:
I have a question about this part of the guidelines:
Project source code and documentation must be donated to the ASF under a
Contributor's License Agreement.
This just absolutely clarifies the intent of the author, it's the simplest
method of conveying your-code to
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Donated source code and
documentation must carry the ASF copyright and be placed under the
Apache License. Code and documentation donated to the ASF must be
maintained on ASF hardware. Obtaining a non-exclusive ASF copyright on
all
Henri - I grok what you are saying. This isn't a Code of Conduct,
it's a top-level description of our ethos.
Two more inline...
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/28/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the ASF Members have indicated a wish to draft a code of
conduct. A working draft of a
Ted Husted wrote:
The example project guidelines and cultural principles were added to
put the draft community guidelines into context. Though, we might not
want to post all three items together as a block.
Yea - I'm sort of confused. I'm looking to inject two more concepts,
reinforce that
Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Why is the use of author tags discouraged? I found these to be valuable
information when trying to understand a piece of code, simply by
recognizing the style of a certain author.
1. once committed, it isn't your code, it's the project's code. (Not from
a copyright
Survey Says GPLv3 Is Shunned
from the opinion-is-divided dept.
posted by kdawson on Tuesday September 25, @16:37 (GNU is Not Unix)
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/25/2011246
Scroll down to 'Other findings' :)
Bill
If your project's NEW technology needs exposure, if you are in
search of users for these new features or to recruit more committers
to a new code base, and you are in Amsterdam for ApacheCon/EU, this
last reminder message is for you. We will close the program and
print the final schedule on
David Welton wrote:
Not having gone to any of them lately, (too much $$$), I don't really
have much to say, but if there's to be a revolution, the first thing
to go out the window ought to be training as a noun.
As much as I agree that this is a perversion of the English language, our
Jukka Zitting wrote:
The process at .../security/ answers parts of that question, but I
find some steps like the suggestion to obscure the commit that fixes a
vulnerability a bit awkward. One idea I came up with is to have a
read-protected area in svn where (only?) security fixes can be
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Is it possible to regenerate my gpg key without losing all the signatures on
my existing key?
To bootstrap the new key, you could sign it with your old key.
Not sure if that should be enough
Shane Curcuru wrote:
Reminder for all: the ApacheCon group room rate discount ($169/night) is
scheduled to end TODAY, so if you're planning on staying at the hotel,
register your room RIGHT NOW!
http://www.us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/about/venue
Extended - through the 18th - you all have
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Seems that it's (mentioned) mailing list is open to the members only.
Correct, and please forgive Rich. Reflex response :)
Discuess here would be helpful for the participants (including commiters only)
don't you think?
No. Not really.
The mechanics of creating a
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
About Bali (Near Java, Jakarta) issue, I know intertnational conductors who
are
managing the big events at Bali island.
Then please, leave this discussion from this list, and introduce these people
to the concom folks, simply email concom at apache.org with a letter
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
About Bali (Near Java, Jakarta) issue, I know intertnational conductors who
are
managing the big events at Bali island.
Then please, leave this discussion from this list, and introduce these people
to the concom folks, simply email
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
I had longly thought that this is for the committers' relaxation room.
(Freely but with RESPECTs to each other)
Tetsuya, you have show the utmost lack of respect on this forum to the
chairman of the organization, who in the most friendly and forgiving way
attempted to
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
The Apache Software Fundation's rule - there is no relationships
between superior and inferior. I mean, hierarchy. (bureaucratism is
one of them)
Nope. There are those with merit, and those with increasing or
decreasing fractions of merit, and those with no merit.
Ryan Bloom wrote:
Any chance this will be recorded? It would be kind of fun to see this
for some of the old timers who can't be there.
Last I heard, we will have webcasts for downloads of the three keynote
sessions for this ApacheCon, so yes. Will update community/party etc
with news once
On 9/23/2010 10:37 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
At any rate, my motivation for asking is that I'm writing an article on some
thoughts in this area spurred by something a client told me (at a very old,
established company, mind you) about why they wanted to get the word out that
they were
On 9/23/2010 11:13 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
The other thing I'd say is that the answers to these questions are
going to depend a lot on the particular developers in question. A
couple of people have commented here on how great it is to be able to
dig in and find the root cause of a bug, and
On 9/23/2010 11:40 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 9/23/2010 11:13 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
The other thing I'd say is that the answers to these questions are
going to depend a lot on the particular developers in question
On 3/22/2011 7:19 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
I guess some might consider a solution like that no worse than any other but
I think
endorsing such a stack goes against a good policy. If you are going to make a
policy, you
should love the results it endorses. That is all I was trying to
On 3/22/2011 10:24 PM, Keith Curtis wrote:
I try to be pragmatic as well but free software is better and cheaper and so
these worthy
goals and reasons should be reflected in the policies on a topic.
the policies, hmmm. Those would be 'your policies'. Which may or may not
be what Marvin is
On 3/29/2011 5:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
In my opinion, it's important that the Policy make only one major distinction:
between open source software and proprietary software.
As a practical matter, advocating for particular technologies seems likely to
alienate people at companies
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:01:38 -0500
Ryan Baxter rbaxte...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
A while ago all committers were offered MSDN subscriptions from
Microsoft. Mine has expired, so I went back and filled out the
form[1] to apply for a subscription earlier this week. I have yet to
hear anything
48 matches
Mail list logo
