On Jul 2, 2014, at 10:05 PM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Welton dav...@dedasys.com wrote:
Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
uses.
Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source
Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
uses.
Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
it goes against the definition. You can't have it both ways: you
can't exclude people from using it because they are military, gay,
Illinois
Is it maybe possible not to exclude people or organisations, but concrete
usage scenarios instead?
Like cyber crime and/or spying
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2014-07-02 9:24 GMT+02:00 David Welton
*An:* community@apache.org
*Betreff:* Re: Government License
Is it maybe possible not to exclude people or organisations, but concrete
usage scenarios instead?
Like cyber crime and/or spying
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:24 AM, David Welton dav...@dedasys.com wrote:
Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
uses.
Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
it goes against the definition. You can't have it both ways: you
Op 2 jul. 2014, om 10:33 heeft Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:24 AM, David Welton dav...@dedasys.com wrote:
Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
uses.
Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open
Nope... Freedome #0 and OSD #6
On Jul 2, 2014, at 3:37 AM, Johannes Geppert jo...@apache.org wrote:
Is it maybe possible not to exclude people or organisations, but concrete
usage scenarios instead?
Like cyber crime and/or spying
. The special Java disclaimer is not present. (See
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/file/2df45ac1bf49/LICENSE.
- Dennis
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:di...@webweaving.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 01:46
To: community@apache.org
Cc: David Welton
Subject: Re: Government License
Op 2
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Welton dav...@dedasys.com wrote:
Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
uses.
Which is, once again, neither 'free software' nor open source because
it goes against the definition. You can't have it both ways: you
Closest I've seen in the 'free' area is licensing that forbids military
uses.
Hen
On Monday, June 30, 2014, McGovern, James james.mcgov...@hp.com wrote:
Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the
Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want
On 06/30/2014 09:40 AM, McGovern, James wrote:
Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the
Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want to
create a new encryption algorithm but for whatever reasons, don’t want
the NSA to have access to it.
If
That wouldn't be an open source license. Remember freedom #1 - free to
be able to use in any manner for any purpose.
That said there are actually a number of licenses that 'no evil'
clauses in them; and IIRC there are licenses that forbid use by the US
government; though a quick google failed me.
Sure. But then it wouldn't be either an Open Source nor a Free Software
license.
On Jun 30, 2014, at 10:40 AM, McGovern, James james.mcgov...@hp.com wrote:
Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the Federal
Government in using its software? For example, you may want
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:40 AM, McGovern, James james.mcgov...@hp.com wrote:
Has anyone ever explored creation of a license model that forbids the
Federal Government in using its software? For example, you may want to
create a new encryption algorithm but for whatever reasons, don’t want the
14 matches
Mail list logo
