David thanks for the report.
Mark
On Thu Sep 20 14:06:53 PDT 2007 David Doshay wrote:
SlugGo entered the first year as a 9 kyu and won 1 game. One other game
was clearly won on the board (more than 100 points) but the opponent
was clever enough to start playing very complicated moves that I
Good information. Thanks.
- Dave Hillis
-Original Message-
From: Jacques Basaldúa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 7:44 am
Subject: [computer-go] Random move selection (was) Crazystone patterns
Dave Hillis, wrote:
Suppose I can generate
I guess it really depends on what the point of the test is. I'm trying to
understand the performance gap between my AMAF bot(s) and Don's AMAF bots.
For comparison, here's the ratings and # of simulations:
ELO
1434 - ControlBoy- 5000 simulations per move
1398 - SuperDog - 2000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
I noticed from several emails that you are probably doing a lot of
little things differently and assuming they make no difference. For
instance you still haven't tried the same exact eye-rule we are using so
you can't really say with complete
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Jason House wrote:
Christoph Birk wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Jason House wrote:
My logic behind stopping at the first pass is that it's highly unlikely to
form life in the void from captured stones. Since capturing the stones
would increase the length of the game and
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Jason House wrote:
I guess it really depends on what the point of the test is. I'm trying to
understand the performance gap between my AMAF bot(s) and Don's AMAF bots.
For comparison, here's the ratings and # of simulations:
ELO
1434 - ControlBoy- 5000 simulations per
Two problems with the 19x19 server.
1) when I tried to click on a game for the 19x19 server, I got a 404 not found
error. The same process works
on the 9x9 links.
Example of broken link from the Standings page:
http://cgos.boardspace.net/19x19/SGF/2007/09/16/26970.sgf
2) my copy of GnuGo
On 9/21/07, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
I noticed from several emails that you are probably doing a lot of
little things differently and assuming they make no difference.
This thread has certainly helped highlight them. I now
On 9/21/07, Christoph Birk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be hard to compare your AMAF-bots with Don's since he
uses quite some tricks to improve their performance. I suggest
you compare with some plain-vanilla program I keep for comparison
on CGOS
myCtest-10k (ELO ~1050)
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Jason House wrote:
Are you using AMAF, UCT, or something else?
Nothing at all. Really pure random playouts.
I am working on an AMAF version for comparison ...
If it's no trouble to you, it
would be nice to see them running online while all of this AMAF stuff is
going on.
If the 19x19 CGOS is going to be retired due to lack of interest, I wonder if
there would be interest in trying out an ultra-blitz version for a while: games
as fast as the com. links would permit.?(Game storage would be an issue. Maybe
they just wouldn't get stored.) It could be a limited time
I'd only be interested in 19x19 games with enough time for reasonable
games. I'm ok with slow games. My biggest problem is that my bots are
simply too immature for 19x19.
On 9/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the 19x19 CGOS is going to be retired due to lack of interest, I
Le vendredi 21 septembre 2007 21:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
If the 19x19 CGOS is going to be retired due to lack of interest,
I wonder if there would be interest in trying out an ultra-blitz
version for a while: games as fast as the com. links would permit.?
(Game storage would be an
13 matches
Mail list logo
