Final Cut is scalable and has been used in feature films in addition to small
scale docs and ads.
Michael Moser
From: Rev. Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net
Date: March 8, 2010 12:02:28 AM EST
Subject: Re: CNET News.com: Final Cut Pro the Apple of Oscar's eye - CNET News
Yes I have seen the tag lines in a number of movies.
However they have not made the inroads with those as they have with
the small scale movie developer.
Stewart
At 12:31 PM 3/8/2010, you wrote:
Final Cut is scalable and has been used in feature films in addition
to small scale docs and
This reminds me of the stories surrounding Red cameras, making products that
are better and substantially cheaper and pissing off the companies that have
been doing the products for years making buckets of cash and not innovating
much.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall
Well they seem to have a winner here with FCP.
It will not revolutionize the industry, but it sure is making a dent.
Enabling budding producers to make movies that will get noticed.
Stewart
At 01:02 PM 3/8/2010, you wrote:
This reminds me of the stories surrounding Red cameras, making
On Mar 7, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Rev. Stewart A. Marshall wrote:
Many filmmakers at Sunday's Academy Awards used Apple's Final Cut
Studio to edit their movies.
Tom will like this story.
And Adobe will be pissed off. Apple's FCP entered the market late and
quickly shoved all the incumbents off
The only other one mentioned was Avid.
Stewart
At 07:19 PM 3/7/2010, you wrote:
On Mar 7, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Rev. Stewart A. Marshall wrote:
Many filmmakers at Sunday's Academy Awards used Apple's Final Cut
Studio to edit their movies.
Tom will like this story.
And Adobe will be pissed off.
What a laugh. The story reads like an ad for FC Studio, not surprising
since it's in Cnet's Apple section. But in fact what it says is that
most of the nominees did *not* use FCP.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:19 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
And Adobe will be pissed off. Apple's FCP entered the
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
What a laugh. The story reads like an ad for FC Studio, not surprising
since it's in Cnet's Apple section. But in fact what it says is that
most of the nominees did *not* use FCP.
What other computer section would an article
Right. That's 9 out of how many movies nominated? Or eligible for
nomination? I'm not going to count them all, but I'll just remind you
that Documentaries are only a small part of the Oscars.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:40 PM, phartz...@gmail.com
phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at
I think the key is that it did say.
Final Cut Pro has almost 50 percent market share in the nonlinear
editor space, outperforming competitors like Avid.
Many of the big studios and editors may not use it, instead using
dedicated expensive editing suites. (They were pretty specific to
state
That's one area of film making.
*
Of course, Final Cut Pro isn't the only product available for filmmakers,
but it is the most popular now. According to market research firm SCRI
International, Final Cut Pro has almost 50 percent market share in the
nonlinear editor space, outperforming
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. That's 9 out of how many movies nominated? Or eligible for
nomination? I'm not going to count them all, but I'll just remind you
that Documentaries are only a small part of the Oscars.
The article focused solely on those
Exactly.
This article mentioned that they did this on a budget of less than
15K for computer, hardware, and software.
Professional studios used dedicated workstations and computers
costing much more money. (add 000s to whatever figure)
They are dedicated machines and specialized software.
13 matches
Mail list logo
