You keep asking why, when their oppressors let them raise their heads
out of the water to take a breath of air, the Palestinians don't thank
the Israelis and immediately start acting like grateful citizens.
It might be useful to imagine how Americans would have reacted if we
had lost the Korean
Please remember who declared war upon whom, and who has chosen to
remain at war.
Israel accepted the UN partition plan - the bulk of the palestinian
arabs, backed by their arab neighbors, rejected the partition and
declared war. They lost the first phase of the war (1948) and every
Art Clemons
Peace is possible the day the Palestinian people want to
live in peace. To date the majority has not so chosen.
I do not support everything Israel does or has done, but
until all their neighbors, including the Palestinians,
accept its right to exist and live in peace, the war
Hamas was launching rockets as recently a week ago (I won't vouch for the
reliability of this NewsDaily site, so please corroborate for yourself):
http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre5100oy-us-palestinians-israel/
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Wayne Dernoncourt way...@panix.com wrote:
But
John Emmerling
Hamas was launching rockets as recently a week ago (I won't
vouch for the reliability of this NewsDaily site, so please
corroborate for yourself):
I was talking about the suicide bombers.
--
Take care | This clown speaks for himself, his job doesn't
Wayne D. | supply this,
Wayne Dernoncourt
But they do get rockets, mortars and explosives into Gaza and
the West Bank along with people who will kill themselves
with the explosives (hmmm, that hasn't happened recently has
it, at least I haven't seen it in the news). The focus of the
Israeli's seems to be to stop
The Israeli army forcibly evicted Israeli settlers from Gaza when
Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza.
The result was a violent Hamas takeover in Gaza, raids on Israeli
border posts, the kidnapping of a soldier, and indiscriminate rocket
fire from Hamas controlled Gaza into Israel.
If you're talking about the recent unpleasantness in Gaza, then there are no
disputed zones at issue. It is my impression that the rockets launched
from Gaza (the stated provocation for the Israeli incursions into Gaza) have
largely landed in neighboring parts of Israel e.g. Ashkelon. These
Peace is possible the day the Palestinian people want to live in peace. To
date the majority has not so chosen. I do not support everything Israel does
or has done, but until all their neighbors, including the Palestinians,
accept its right to exist and live in peace, the war those
I am not an authority, but I do know some of what is going on.
Part of the problem is that in the mind set of both parties neither
one belongs there.
Palestinians believe that the Israelis do not belong there, and the
Israelis do not believe that the Palestinians belong there.
Also note
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7875171.stm
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
One of my first posts likened tax cuts to spreading money around
randomly, with no purpose.
Not to worry Tom, I'm sure that Obama will soon appoint an economy
czar, who will determine what the correct number of turnips, tractors
From today's New York Times
Agency Says Hamas Took Aid Intended for Needy
JERUSALEM — The United Nations
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/united_nations/index.html?inline=nyt-org
agency that provides assistance to Palestinian
PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Resodding the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate Approves
Not if the laws of the jurisdiction mandate such up front. I also
never said there should not be adequate planning - I assume it is the
duty of the government to plan
703.783.1340 fax
From: Snyder, Mark (IT-EI) mark.sny...@ngc.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:42 AM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Resodding the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate Approves
In my small
Discussion List
[mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com] On Behalf Of Tom Piwowar
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:51 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Resodding the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate
Approves
Not if the laws of the jurisdiction mandate such up front. I also
For many small communities if it were not for state or federal
governments they would never be able to provide these services.
When I lived in WI, the local community had a water system. Worked
great until they found pout their source of water was being
contaminated by an underground source.
It seems to me that there was an actionable tort against the owners of
the land where the service station was, and the owners of the station
at the time of abandonment. Were they made to pay costs for
remediating the pollution they caused?
What did the municipality consider more important
And yet they do this because it is clear that their own publics would
not support paying market prices directly. And it also helps keep
third world farmers at starvation level because they can not compete
with European (and American) subsidized agriculture. Good job. Oh,
and then we
Not particularly true.
Statistics have shown there is enough food produced in the world to
feed everyone.
The problem is with distribution. Also very HUGE problem corrupt
governments that would rather their populace die than allow them the
needed food.
Case in point, Ethiopia in the
Try and track it down.
I am not sure if you know the history of many small gas stations, but
very frequently they were part owned by a local person and part by a
national corp. In this case paperwork disappeared and no one was
left holding the bag.
Probably a National Oil company long
On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Not particularly true.
What is not true?
Statistics have shown there is enough food produced in the world to
feed everyone.
Agreed
The problem is with distribution. Also very HUGE problem corrupt
governments that would
At 10:18 AM 2/4/2009, you wrote:
Agreed - with the caveat that part of the distribution problem is that
in some areas the locals can not price compete with subsidized
imported food, and so leave the farms and head for the cities.
Yes and no. Very often the government discourages the
Remember Sam Kinison? Get in the trucks - you live in a freaking
desert - we are taking you to where the food is I laughed so hard I
cried.
I remember this--it was very funny advice, but not real practical.
*
** List
Discussion List [mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com]
On Behalf Of Chris Dunford
Sent: 02/04/2009 12:07 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Resodding the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate Approves
Remember Sam Kinison? Get in the trucks - you live in a freaking
desert - we
At 11:09 AM 2/4/2009, you wrote:
Agreed - that one routine was funny though.
I did not find many of his routines funny.
I am sorry to see you are in Gaza enabling Hamas. Money is fungible
and I can not support Hamas.
Matthew
If people are in need people are in need. It does not matter
Not at all practical, but the routine was funny.
I found this link to three versions of the bit for those who don't
know what we are talking about.
Warning - he is quite profane.
http://bobsfunnies.blogspot.com/2008/03/sam-kinison-ethiopia-sketch.html
Matthew
On Feb 4, 2009, at 12:06 PM,
But by providing a support structure for Hamas, you help perpetuate
the suffering.
I know it is harsh, but sometimes you have to let people suffer until
they change the behavior that creates the suffering.
I would be all in favor aid programs to take people out of Gaza, or to
take Hamas
-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
]
On Behalf Of Chris Dunford
Sent: 02/04/2009 12:07 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Resodding the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate
Approves
Remember Sam Kinison? Get
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Resodding the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate Approves
Remember Sam Kinison? Get in the trucks - you live in a freaking
desert - we are taking you to where the food is I laughed so hard I
cried.
I remember this--it was very funny advice, but not real practical
You have that backwards. Foolish government offers subsidized flood
insurance program and property owner buys it (sometimes required to by
the lender). I hope people who buy insurance are not foolish to expect
to be paid for an insured loss.
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
And yet they do this because it is clear that their own publics would
not support paying market prices directly. And it also helps keep
third world farmers at starvation level because they can not compete
with European (and American) subsidized agriculture. Good job. Oh,
and then we send tons
But by providing a support structure for Hamas, you help perpetuate
the suffering.
I know it is harsh, but sometimes you have to let people suffer until
they change the behavior that creates the suffering.
I would be all in favor aid programs to take people out of Gaza, or
to take Hamas out of
, from tax to investments- we are
YOUR adjuvancy
-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com] On
Behalf Of b_s-wilk
Sent: 02/04/2009 3:20 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Resodding the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate
b_s-wilk wrote:
Medium-sized family-owned farms are the most efficient in the
long-run. They get fewer subsidies [by %] than the large factory
farms. Mid-sized farms not only have high yields, they also protect
the land, with farmers living on the farms, unlike corporate farms.
Corporate
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:52 PM, Ralph wrote:
But by providing a support structure for Hamas, you help perpetuate
the
suffering.
As opposed to the good done with the billions of dollars supplied by
U.S. taxpayers to kill Palestinians?
Peace is possible the day the Palestinian people want to
I am on the town council in a historic Virginia town of about 700. We
provide water and sewer services to in-town residents. In the 1970's,
the town built its sewer using state and federal grants to defray almost
all of the cost. Connection and availability fees were too low. When
we realized
I lived in a small town in WI. (350) that also had a sewer system and
water system.
The state came in and forced them to raise their rates to prevent
what you are talking about.
They dictated what type of reserve they had to keep and the minimum
they could charge to make sure they were
And I agree with the sentiment expressed (though not the supernatural
part). I just don't agree that we should use the force of government
to compel others to provide what should be voluntary charity. There
are things government does best (national defense, protection against
predation)
It reads to me that the problem was as you identified it: Connection
and availability fees were too low.
If you charge what it actually costs then polities have a greater
incentive to build only what they need, and users have an incentive to
be much more frugal in their use. If you
There should not be any church militias!!! (Separation of church and
state or in theological language kingdom of the left and kingdom of the right.)
However Canada's hospital systems belie your comments they are
efficiently run and well run. Though they are owned by the government.
One of
I have heard they are well run for emergency services. I have also
read that they are severely underfunded with resulting long waits for
operations that are not absolutely emergent. I also seem to recall
having read that at least one province is fighting hard to make it
illegal for
It is more complicated than that. Funding must be identified for future
capacity as well as current or new users will be shut out. So we added
a modest increase in the new capacity of the new plant. Also, when the
state and federal government shut down those grant funds, they left
municipal
I can tell you how it works as I have lived there and have
experienced it first hand.
One thing we know is that they are flat funded. In other words they
only get so many bucks a year, and do not collect from the patient any money.
Not all hospitals have MRI or CTScan machines or other high
That is normally done in most areas.
My mother has septic, but is surrounded by the city.
They have no intent on running lines into my mothers subdivision but
if they choose to sign on with the city they will charge them a large
hook up fee, and then the customer will have to pay to run the
That is a vastly over-simplified account. I never recoup the cost of my
water or sewer plants in your scenario.
You also ignore the disruption when the state or federal government
suddenly ignores these infrastructures.
Life sounds very simple in your world. Probably too simple.
Thank you,
How do you not recoup your costs if you charge appropriately for the
cost of service? Part of the cost is a reserve for predictable
maintenance and growth.
Why is a town relying on state funds to provide service to the town?
Why should the town not be providing all strictly local
For someone with so many criticisms of government, you know curiously
little about actually running one!
If I don't charge an amount proportional to the customer's use of the
system, when it comes time to replace those parts of that system, where
will the money come from? (Developers hate me
On Feb 3, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Snyder, Mark (IT-EI) wrote:
If I don't charge an amount proportional to the customer's use of the
system, when it comes time to replace those parts of that system,
where
will the money come from? (Developers hate me for charging this, but
eventually I will go
Not if the laws of the jurisdiction mandate such up front. I also
never said there should not be adequate planning - I assume it is the
duty of the government to plan for such eventualities. Are you
telling me you are not?
I think the cons/neocons describe this as passing debts on to
Obviously Mathew, you are a neocon. Just like Barney Frank had nothing to
do with the fall of fannie/freddie...even though you can read NYT stories
about it...all a neocon plot.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Matthew S. Taylor
taylorsmatt...@gmail.comwrote:
Tom,
Did you ever notice that
I don't know where you live, but here on the West Coast that's just
wrong. Many of those so called liberals do run some of the larger
cities. But as the neocons enjoy saying, most of the land in this
country is controlled by smaller cities and towns usually run by
mostly neocons. Here is
Tom,
Did you ever notice that most of the big urban areas, with the big
breaking water mains and such (and troubling schools, and pot hole
filled roads) are not run by your pet bogeymen, the cons/neocons, but
mostly by liberals / political machine Democrats? Could it be that
pandering
It's too bad those bridges fell down under lefties/socialists who were
running the city into the ground before they were led off to jail.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Not if the laws of the jurisdiction mandate such up front. I also
never said there should
Your suggestions are as practical to me as an instruction on driving
elephants that I might write for you. Sure, I've seen elephants at the
circus, zoo and on TV. Perhaps more than you've seen about actual
government budgeting, legislation and operations?
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original
You need to learn a lot before any of your positions will make any sense
or could be implemented in the real world. Your ideas are about as
practical as telling your doctor how to diagnose, prescribe for and
operate on you. You describe a fantasy world, not reality.
But they do tell doctors how
Did you ever notice that most of the big urban areas, with the big
breaking water mains and such (and troubling schools, and pot hole
filled roads) are not run by your pet bogeymen, the cons/neocons, but
mostly by liberals / political machine Democrats? Could it be that
pandering to
I am curious - why Wow?
1. I favor a limited government of enumerated powers (gov't may only
do what it is expressly permitted rather than everything not expressly
forbidden).
2. I favor free market economics.
3. I favor a robust foreign policy restrained by constitutional
'Re-read my earlier post. ;^)
And no, while he was much, much, closer, he does not hit on all of them.
Matthew
On Feb 2, 2009, at 11:24 AM, John Emmerling wrote:
Then why didn't you vote for Bob Barr? He supported all your views.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Matthew S. Taylor
Palin is great for the media because she's such a wacko. It seems to me
that if you aren't aware of that, then you just aren't paying attention.
Specifically, you mentioned small government. If you go here:
http://tinyurl.com/cyn3o5
and look for an article starting with Palin As Reformer, you
As far as Palin's religion goes, check out this article:
http://tinyurl.com/6rwm5y
It's called Palin's Movement Urges 'Godly' To 'Plunder' Wealth of The
'Godless'
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules,
And now you reference the Huff Po? Do you read anything that is not
an organ of the left?
Tell me, were they as critical of Obama's 20 year relationship with
Rev. Wright? Why do I think not?
Matthew
On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Jordan wrote:
As far as Palin's religion goes, check out
Talking Point Memo as a good source of impartial information on
Palin? Please ...
Oh, and yes, I read it all before during the campaign. If it was not
so sad, it would have been funny to see the left and the main stream
media (not that there is much difference between the two, its just
And speaking of the New Deal there is this interesting article in the
WSJ (yes, capitalist conservative):
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123353276749137485.html
The downturn of 1937-38 was preceded by large wage hikes that pushed
wages well above their NIRA levels, following the Supreme
Matthew S. Taylor wrote:
And now you reference the Huff Po? Do you read anything that is not
an organ of the left?
Everything I gave a link to had links to generally well researched
articles sighting points of fact. Research things down to the facts. The
fact speak for themselves.
Sounds
McCain was a tempting candidate for a short time. Then he opened
his mouth. Then he picked a running mate for VP. That pretty much
sealed the deal.
Before I get slammed,
Ha. No slamming here--you are one right-thinking dude. Check my little blog:
http://justweirdstuff.blogspot.com/.
Then why didn't you vote for Bob Barr? He supported all your views.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Matthew S. Taylor taylorsmatt...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am curious - why Wow?
1. I favor a limited government of enumerated powers (gov't may only do
what it is expressly permitted rather than
Matthew S. Taylor wrote:
McCain was never in the least bit tempting for me (due to his
attitudes toward mere free speech and such) until he picked Palin.
Then I seriously thought about voting for her for her small government
views in spite of her cultural conservatism.
All I can say is WOW!!
McCain was never in the least bit tempting for me (due to his
attitudes toward mere free speech and such) until he picked Palin.
Then I seriously thought about voting for her for her small government
views in spite of her cultural conservatism. In the end I went third
party (which in MD
Why? Were you under the impression I was a diest?
Choosing Gold over God is a good indicator of avarice.
False distinction. By definition excessive taxation would not be good
governance.
Then we clearly do not have good governance today, and throwing more
money at it won't create it. Case
What really gets me is people always seem to think government is
this nefarious bunch out to ruin our lives. In the US the government
is us. Self loathing isn't new. In fact I think a small amount of it
is healthy. It keeps a person focused.
The cons/neocons self-loathing gets me too. For
Really Tom, what is this analogy of sharing toys about? When you
share toys, it is with the understanding that 1. Some party owns the
toys and 2. that party expects them to be returned, undiminished, when
play time is over. How does this apply to taxation?
Taxes are the price we pay for
At 05:59 PM 2/2/2009, you wrote:
Choosing Gold over God is a good indicator of avarice.
I would agree wholeheartedly. Luther once said you God is where your gold is.
That's right we don't have good governance today. Due to the excessive
influence of the cons/noecons the public sector is
In what way is a parent giving assets to a child undemocratic? Has
any parent been denied the same opportunity, equal before the law? It
makes no sense that an individual is free to give their money away, so
long as they don't give it to their kin. I really do not understand
the
Ethically, I believe I am compelled to help my neighbor in time of
need. I reject any notion that I have the right to compel you to help
your neighbor. Its a freedom thing.
So you also reject the notion that your neighbor should be compelled to
refrain from murdering you?
Then why didn't you vote for Bob Barr? He supported all your views.
Bob Barr is a hypocrite. While in Congress he was constantly meddling in
the affairs of the local people and acting a bully. His favorite tactic
was to put holds on legislation important to the locals until they
capitulated
Now I would not want a whole military of
part-time/volunteer folks. It is best if it is done in tandem. (Oh
by the way you get more bang for your buck with the
Reserves/Guard. Studies have proven it.)
Of course. The problem is that the cons/neocons push voluntary as a means
of entirely
On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
Why? Were you under the impression I was a diest?
Choosing Gold over God is a good indicator of avarice.
Can't do the former if you don't believe the existence of the latter
is proven.
False distinction. By definition excessive taxation
Everyone serves a god.
Wether it be one from a formal religion or it be one of their own
making. It is a persons choice, but everyone serves a god.
Stewart
At 07:06 PM 2/2/2009, you wrote:
Can't do the former if you don't believe the existence of the latter
is proven.
Rev. Stewart A.
He was a politician - same thing. No doubt Tom Oh, that 140K in
taxes Daschel is your idol.
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
Then why didn't you vote for Bob Barr? He supported all your views.
Bob Barr is a hypocrite. While in Congress he was constantly
meddling in
the
Really Tom. When a neo-con, or trad-con, or blue-dog Democrat runs
into a burning building (an honor I have not had) are they opting
out? When vastly greater numbers of conservatives serve in uniform
than liberals, are they opting out? Are the service groups throughout
the land opting
Do you need a lecture on positive vs. negative liberties? There is a
big difference between what I must do, and what I must not do.
As said earlier, and you keep ignoring, protection from predation is a
key role of limited government.
Matthew
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Tom Piwowar
And completely fails to address your silly sharing toys analogy.
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
Really Tom, what is this analogy of sharing toys about? When you
share toys, it is with the understanding that 1. Some party owns the
toys and 2. that party expects them to be
Dynastic succession to power under law, to classic privilege (private
law is the root as I recall) is undemocratic. There is nothing
undemocratic about allowing a holder of wealth to give that wealth to
the party of their choice, be it their children, a homeless shelter,
the SDS, the
Now that is an interesting assertion. Also an interesting definition
of god? Could you elaborate please?
No one has ever told me I believed in God before, though many appear
to have assumed I was of their or similar faith based on our
association.
Matthew
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:15 PM,
Kind of what I was thinking. Though not surprised by the comment
considering it comes from a Reverend.
Jeff M
On Feb 2, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
Now that is an interesting assertion. Also an interesting
definition of god? Could you elaborate please?
No one has ever
Now of course I come from the belief in only one God.
But Luther stated that where ever you put your trust there is your god.
For some they have made the gathering of wealth their god, others
sports (do not get me started on that one) and still others politics.
Essentially whatever a person
One of the biggest problems in any society is what level of
regulation is proper.
You can under regulate and over regulate. DMA can be seen by many
(except for the RIAA and others) as over regulation. However the SEC
can be seen as under regulating (Along with the FDA and others.)
It is a
No, I think he meant that you shouldn't be prosecuted for violating the
Good Samaritan law for which the Seinfeld 4 were found guilty in the
last episode of the show.
Tom Piwowar wrote:
Ethically, I believe I am compelled to help my neighbor in time of
need. I reject any notion that I have
I agree. That's why this country is so great. It has the highest
turnover of the very rich than any other country. However, I don't like
the idea of the government determining excessive wealth. Is it Obama's
250K (salary), 1M, 5M, 10M, 50M, 500M?
Tom Piwowar wrote:
In what way is a parent
Actually it was the left which pushed for the all voluntary military. I
remember it well, as I was a leftie back in the early '70s, primarily to
keep my sorry ass from being sent to Nam. The Democratic Congress
recognized that we could maintain a voluntary army in peace time, with
the backing
I am not sure that there is anywhere that I put my trust. I have met
some of the gold is god congregation, as well as the temple of sports
types. I don't understand them. I know folks who live and breath
politics - they strike me as needing a life.
By your first and foremost maxim then
On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
One of the biggest problems in any society is what level of
regulation is proper.
Very true.
You can under regulate and over regulate. DMA can be seen by many
(except for the RIAA and others) as over regulation. However the
Forget Karl Marx and neocons. This is a good place for an appropriately
sensible quote from the Bible, like Matthew 25:31-46? [Matthew was a
kool dood]
...when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you
something to drink? ...When did we see you a stranger and invite you in,
Whoa! Way off topic!
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:50 PM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:
OK, now back to computers.
My PowerMac G5 had a BSOD yesterday. Painful, UGLY, until my husband told
me he installed a ca. 2002 utility that hasn't worked since Jagwire, and G5
has Leopard. Went into
Not only that the Con's with the help of others have tried to kill
the Guard and Reserve every chance they get.
The last Quadrennial review in the 90's wiped out many of the same
units that served with distinction in Desert Storm in the early 90's.
Stewart
At 07:36 PM 2/2/2009, you wrote:
Hey Betty never said you didn't.
Anyone can study the Bible and I encourage folks
to do so. You do not have to be religious to get something out of it.
Just like you everyone has their chosen
profession. Mine happens to be a minister.
(By the way in answer to Cain's question (Not Mc)
I'll go into the rest of your argument later, but for now, what the
hell does this mean? Maybe those willing to buy the product being
produced? Excuse me, but frack your PLATIUDES AND SNARK remark. I
won't throw the same.
Jeff M
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
You need to double check who you're replying to. And when replying to
more then one, make it obvious.
Jeff M
On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
It has everything with who the primary producer of wealth is.
You have to get
Here I'm going to violate DRY:
After reading the full Joe the Plumber quote, I am certain Obama only
intended to say that the economy works best when there is prosperity at all
levels. However, I think his choice of the phrase spread the wealth
around was ill-considered, and he probably regrets
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
