There is a free one built into windows also...not sure how good/bad it is, I
always install winrar first thing on new windows installs.
It's not very good, but it's enough to unzip. But I must have missed something
in the problem description. The files will still be read-only in the zip file,
Windows won't tag the files inside the zipped file, just the zipped
file itself.
Well, any decent zip utility will store the attributes of the files it zips,
and restore them on extract, so they really should remain read-only. I would
think that even Windows's built-in zip support
does this
*Can anyone recommend an article, workshop, book, website, etc. that is a
good, current one-stop guide to getting started blogging for serious or
professional purposes? Looking for capacity to be able to expand to
multiple blogs and/or set up topic categories on a single blog. Trying to
optimize
I never said it wouldn't store the attributes. That's exactly what it is
doing. If you zip the file and then burn it to cd, it only locks the zip
file.
Windows xp and vista/7 seem to decide that since you are moving a file to a
cd, it will lock the file from being changed. Tom's problem is
Thew reason Windows changes the flag when you move a file to a
writable media, is that when you write it to a CD/DVD it becomes readable only.
Once it is put on a media it must change the flag otherwise it would
error out all the time when you try to change or write a file to your CD/DVD
I
As far as web hosts/blogging backends go, squarespace.com has received rave
reviews from mac and windows people.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Ranbo ran...@gmail.com wrote:
*Can anyone recommend an article, workshop, book, website, etc. that is a
good, current one-stop guide to getting
The full version of what happened surrounding GV being rejected (so says
google) or not rejected (so says apple) was finally released. Google
released a redacted version of their side earlier but now the full version
has been released and it says clearly that Apple rejected the app
completely.
That is what I do all the time. Only CD's in special, special situations.
Stewart
At 11:34 AM 9/18/2009, you wrote:
I think at this point I'd just keep some cheapo thumb drives around. You
can get 8 gig drives that size of chiclets. Format them in a manner that
can be read by any system.
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Chris Dunford wrote:
Windows won't tag the files inside the zipped file, just the zipped
file itself.
Well, any decent zip utility will store the attributes of the files it
zips, and restore them on extract, so they really should remain
read-only. I would think that even
This is the theory. Haven't tried it myself, it was suggested by a friend
on IRC.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Vicky Staubly vi...@steeds.com wrote:
The problem was, as I understood it, files marked read/write were
being copied to a CD, where they became read-only. Then, on being
copied
It's not going to do much good to keep discussing this, because as I
pointed out yesterday Vista does not normally behave this way. Yes, if
you view the properties on the disk it will show as read only, but
after copied back to the hard drive they don't.
Rather than discuss a non-existent issue,
Um...it's not a non-existent issue if it happened.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not going to do much good to keep discussing this, because as I
pointed out yesterday Vista does not normally behave this way. Yes, if
you view the properties on the disk it
Not for the one machine, no. But look at some of the ridiculous
comments in this thread. Instead of trying to reproduce the issue and
solve it, people are jumping all over the place with wild opinions.
One person even gave a lengthy explanation of why Windows does this on purpose!
On Fri, Sep
Chris Dunford wrote:
I hope they know more about intellectual property law than they do about
science. They recently advocated using a courtroom to decide whether or not
scientists are right about global warming.
Well,
Courtrooms were used a couple of times to settle the evolution
Are you sure this was meant for this thread?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote:
Not for the one machine, no. But look at some of the ridiculous
comments in this thread. Instead of trying to reproduce the issue and
solve it, people are jumping all over the place
There's plenty of information on-line.
Here are a couple examples:
http://www.becomeablogger.com/
http://www.masternewmedia.org/independent_publishing/blogging-how-to-blog/guide-to-publishing-first-blog-20071104.htm.htm
--
From: Ranbo
On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Chris Dunford wrote:
Saying that this isn't a positive review, now that is truly
delusional. It's practically psychotic.
It is not a positive review. It cites many positive features, but
concludes that these are insufficient. That is not a positive
conclusion.
On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:37 PM, mike wrote:
The full version of what happened surrounding GV being rejected (so
says
google) or not rejected (so says apple) was finally released. Google
released a redacted version of their side earlier but now the full
version
has been released and it says
My wife I are looking for a new home/small business copier. It needs
to be able to copy legal size documents. We'd prefer a laser copier and
one we could use as a backup printer with our Macs. Any recommendations?
Thanks
Steve
You can spend high and you can spend low.
Many brands fit your bill.
One of the first things you need to determine is what all is needed.
You have already determined, both letter and legal.
Does it need to have ADF? (auto Document feed?)
2 paper trays?
You said laser are you familiar with
Low level munchkin...oh I didn't mention, Phil Schiller himself rejected the
app.
I'm sure it's not just silly cause it's apple under attack, couldn't be
that.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:06 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:37 PM, mike wrote:
The full version of what
It is not a positive review. It cites many positive features, but
concludes that these are insufficient. That is not a positive
conclusion.
You're dreaming.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,
I stayed out of the last fight over RAID. I have no great love for it,
and have had more than one oops with RAID, but I also know that lots of
folks especially those in IT desire it. Apparently it's not just those
using Reiserfs who suddenly find that an Array has to be rebuilt or that
something
To be clear the conclusion was:
*It’s an outdated joke; the Zune HD player isn’t perfect, but it’s every bit
as joyful, polished and satisfying as its rival. The question is whether
Microsoft will stick it out long enough to close the catalog gap, the
ecosystem gap and the image gap.*
None of
I guess when I posted the original, I left out the URL that attracted my
attention. I noticed it on Slashdot so no, I don't normally read said
publication:
http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/technology/features/article.php/3839636
Art Clemons wrote:
I stayed out of the last fight over RAID. I have no great love for it, and
have had more than one oops with RAID, but I also know that lots of folks
especially those in IT desire it. Apparently it's not just those using
Reiserfs who suddenly find that an Array has to be
26 matches
Mail list logo
