Did that security hole ever get compromised? That's the argument from the
mac side, macs have big security holes that are never compromised so that
equals good security, I hadn't seen that this extension caused one security
problem. Perhaps it did and it didn't come up in my searches?
On Mon,
So Apple is guilty of some of the crimes that the Redmond Menace is
guilty
of. Both are sinners and deserve a time out for it.
Agreed, but that was in answer to Tom's assertion that Apple would NEVER do
such a thing, when, in fact, it already has.
The problem is that M$ did something that
Since we have pirate day, can we have l33t speak day...Jeff already has a
good start.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Jeff Wright jswri...@gmail.com wrote:
The web has
been largely a OMG!!! M$ hAx0red FF!!!1!
*
**
http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft_ad_campaign_cleans_apples_clock
The odd thing is that the Ad Age article that ComputerWorld references
appears to have disappeared. All the links to it, including the ones on Ad
Age's own site, come up with item not found. Maybe it's just a web site
error.
In light of the upcoming DTV transition, http://dtv.gov/ has a nice
signal reception map. The direct link is:
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/
Just plug in your address and it will let you know what kind of signal
strength should be available at your location. If you click on
station's
Thanks!
That's excellent!
Alvin Auerbach wrote:
I put houseofrepresentatives.gov into my browser, and OpenDNS came
up with this Sponsored Link:
Members of House of
Representatives
Compare prices on members of
house of representatives at
Smarter.com and shop smarter.
www.smarter.com
This
Note how blasé WFBs are about product defects.
But there is a big difference here. If M$ wants to have gross defects in its
own products that is their business, but when they go insert defects into
competitor's products that is something completely different. That's a
drive-by shooting.
I'm
A real example please. Bonjour is not what you claim it to be.
Actually, it is. I know, I know, your programming won't allow you to
admit that. I don't blame you personally.
Here, chew on these:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Chris Dunford wrote:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/
microsoft_ad_campaign_cleans_apples_clock
The odd thing is that the Ad Age article that ComputerWorld references
appears to have disappeared. All the links to it, including the
ones on Ad
Age's own site, come
On Jun 9, 2009, at 2:34 AM, mike wrote:
Did that security hole ever get compromised? That's the argument
from the
mac side, macs have big security holes that are never compromised
so that
equals good security, I hadn't seen that this extension caused one
security
problem. Perhaps it did
The links are dead because this is no longer current content.
You just love to make stuff up, don't you? It turns out that the Ad Age
piece is still there (and very current), but you have to pay to read it. All
you can see without payment is part of the first paragraph:
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) --
On Jun 9, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
You just love to make stuff up, don't you? It turns out that the Ad
Age
piece is still there (and very current), but you have to pay to
read it. All
you can see without payment is part of the first paragraph:
So, your statement about it
You keep trying to change the subject. The issue is that this vulnerability
was inserted into a competitor's product by M$.
Sorry, but you haven't established yet that there actually is a
vulnerability. Repeating it does not make it so.
By doing so it removed a
major advantage of using the
I have used it successfully to move PC's from one machine to another with
a clean install and the former install.
I t does want two machines though, but it works great, only draw back is
it is a once use program.
Must buy a separate license each tome you move it.
Limited and costly.
On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:
Then use what comes with Windows.
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E8E5CC039D51E3DB!23641.entry
And what about my applications? This does the easy part and leaves me
stuck with the hard part.
I've been googling (no bing for me) for a little bit but I haven't been able
to find a good number. While transcoding video on CPU in the subject line,
everest and cpuz reports that the temp is up over 70c. Is that possible?
I'm worried, should I be real worried as in not use the CPU for such
On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:28 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, Apple computers have always been seen
as pricey. Nothing ground breaking about that. I have been hearing
complaints about the cost of Apple machines for years, and also know
it to be a fact. How do I know?
On Jun 9, 2009, at 6:56 PM, mike wrote:
I've been googling (no bing for me) for a little bit but I haven't
been able
to find a good number. While transcoding video on CPU in the
subject line,
everest and cpuz reports that the temp is up over 70c. Is that
possible?
I'm worried, should I be
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Chris Dunfordseed...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, but the point of the article was the rather startling turnaround in
the perception of the MS and Apple brands in the 18-34 demo. Since late
winter, Apple's rating has dropped from 70 to 12, and MS's has increased
from
Now, MS is ahead 46-12.
So, what does all of that actually mean?
All it means is that the advertising campaigns appear to have been
effective, which is all that I said it meant. There was considerable talk
here that MS's ads were no good, but it seems that they were. No big deal.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Chris Dunfordseed...@gmail.com wrote:
All it means is that the advertising campaigns appear to have been
effective, which is all that I said it meant. There was considerable talk
here that MS's ads were no good, but it seems that they were. No big deal.
The
21 matches
Mail list logo
