Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Eric S. Sande
Most businesses, large and small, continue to use landline phones extensively, in many cases almost exclusively, for incoming and outgoing business calls. Ditto for all governmental agencies nationwide. We are quite professional. No reason for worry. Thanks for your concern, The Phone

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread John Emmerling
Some definition of terms may be in order. Can the person (or business) having their phone service provided by Comcast be described as a landline user? Or does landline == twisted pair? With regard to user experience, there's not much difference (until the power goes out!). On Fri, Jan 1, 2010

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:55 AM, John Emmerling jpemmerl...@gmail.com wrote: Some definition of terms may be in order.  Can the person (or business) having their phone service provided by Comcast be described as a landline user?  Or does landline == twisted pair?  With regard to user

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
At 01:08 AM 1/1/2010, Eric S. Sande wrote: I've never made a secret of the fact that an all-optical carrier network is what is desired. That has a downside in terms of edge device reliability, but in overall maintenance overhead it is way superior (read more profitable) than a copper based

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Constance Warner
To quote Ernestine, the telephone operator on Laugh-In, We don't care. We don't have to! We're the telephone company. --Constance Warner * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** **

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Constance Warner
I wonder if anyone has considered the political component of all this. What reactions will the proposal to kill landline service do to various voting blocks in the electorate--some of whom will protest, write their congresspersons, sign petitions, and generally make life unpleasant for

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Sue Cubic
At 10:31 AM 1/1/2010, you wrote: Example: we finally got my mother to buy a small cellphone for which you buy service with little phone cards, because we didn't want her to get stranded on the road somewhere, far from help. She keeps it turned off, most of the time. She's not a Luddite; she

Re: [CGUYS] Here we go again....

2010-01-01 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 8:52 AM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote: On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:43 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote: I'm pretty close to where you were in Vienna. When the switch over happened we lost the OTA digital signals for 5, 7 and 9. Now 7 is solid, 5 is spotty and 9 is

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Constance Warner
Well, if this is a nonstory, I'll be happy. Killing landlines would be a nuisance for most of us, a real hardship for some of us, and a bonanza for the phone companies. But while we're at it, we might ask why the cellphone service in this country mostly sucks, why you can't use iPhones

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
At 11:13 AM 1/1/2010, Tony B wrote: In fact there's really no news here. As the articles state, we're down to 1 in 5 households that only have a landline, and that number is dropping all the time. When, not if. Because of the word only in the above statement, it's not an interesting statement.

Re: [CGUYS] Dock placement: [Was: Re: [CGUYS] Consternation...]

2010-01-01 Thread b_s-wilk
YMMV. Try the locations and see which works best for you, but consider how each program works. Does this help? Excellent! I propose that whether one keeps the Dock visible or not depends on one's style of working. I often have many apps open at once and frequently switch among them. I usually

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Mike Sloane
I usually avoid this kind of discussion, but I will comment on Constance' rhetorical question about why US wired/wireless telephony is very different from other parts of the world. Up until the turn of the last century, the US had a HUGE investment in copper technology, while most of rest of

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Chris Dunford
Verizon is helping out on their end. In Baltimore, MD, 3 people I've talked to last week have found their landlines have been cut by Verizon over the last couple of months even though they were still being used. When Verizon finally owned up to the fact, it still took two weeks for the

Re: [CGUYS] Here we go again....

2010-01-01 Thread Richard P.
Really great site, thanks. Richard P. I found an interesting source from the FCC for transmission maps. http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/ * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote: This is one of the worst trolls I've seen on the list in a while. Not quite as bad as Tom's RAID rants, but right up there. ATT hasn't petitioned anyone to do anything, they were just answering an FCC query. Even when you were

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
I live in one of those areas Verizon sold off their pots service. Many of the folks in this area are considered rural. The only options we have are pots or cell. No local VOIP offered here. Right now I am working with my pots service to get a 6mps DSL service. Looks like I will be sticking

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Eric S. Sande
- Original Message - From: Eric S. Sande esa...@verizon.net To: Computer Guys Discussion List COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 1:08 AM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!! Verizon is helping out on their end. Interesting. We still have a significant revenue

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Tony B
No, you're thinking of the old landlines of the 50's and 60's. Today they're over-shared the same as everything else and are probably about as reliable in an emergency. I mean, there are different types of emergencies. A 9/11 event will clog all the services. But an accident in your bathroom can

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread mike
We rarely even lock our doors when we go out, makes coming back in so easy. On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote: No, you're thinking of the old landlines of the 50's and 60's. Today they're over-shared the same as everything else and are probably about as reliable in

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread t.piwowar
OMG. RAID and POTS. Some of us are not aging well. I'm really surprised at the high degree fear of change on what is supposed to be a discussion for techies. I think anyone who is tech aware has to to admit that the days of POTS (a switched telephone network) are numbered. It just does not

Re: [CGUYS] Dock placement: [Was: Re: [CGUYS] Consternation...]

2010-01-01 Thread t.piwowar
On Jan 1, 2010, at 12:11 PM, b_s-wilk wrote: I use the Dock to open programs, to set which apps are loaded at startup, and to get to the home folder for the app without switching to the Finder and digging for it. I rarely use it for switching apps. Depends on how many apps you have open.

Re: [CGUYS] Here we go again....

2010-01-01 Thread t.piwowar
On Jan 1, 2010, at 11:03 AM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote: Apparently the FCC didn't test many if any digital VHF broadcasts when they were running both analog and digital. VHF has some nice propagation properties with requard to longer ranges that they wanted to keep but significant downsides in

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Bringing up ATT again? Stewart At 03:55 PM 1/1/2010, you wrote: Digital does not have to mean poor quality. Analog POTS lines support a frequency domain from 200 to 2000 Hz at best. Transmitting that digitally is no big deal. It is true that some crappy carriers try to push quality below

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Tony B ton...@gmail.com wrote: No, you're thinking of the old landlines of the 50's and 60's. Today they're over-shared the same as everything else and are probably about as reliable in an emergency. I do not disagree with you on this. However, should there

Re: [CGUYS] Dock placement: [Was: Re: [CGUYS] Consternation...]

2010-01-01 Thread Roger D. Parish
At 4:58 PM -0500 1/1/10, t.piwowar wrote: On Jan 1, 2010, at 12:11 PM, b_s-wilk wrote: I use the Dock to open programs, to set which apps are loaded at startup, and to get to the home folder for the app without switching to the Finder and digging for it. I rarely use it for switching apps.

[CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Robert Carroll
In the 2010 February issue of Consumer Reports, there are tests of 15 items sold on TV infomercials that use hard-sell language. As one may suspect, most items did not live up to the claims made therein. But one got a favorable review, the MagicJack for connecting to VoIP. The review

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Judy Cosler
does one have reliable 911 with VoIP? thought one needed a landline for reliable, available 911. Pls. help me with this issue! On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Robert Carroll carrollcompu...@gmail.comwrote: In the 2010 February issue of Consumer Reports, there are tests of 15 items sold on TV

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Marcio
I have been using it for two plus years. Although I am in Brazil I have a Los Angeles phone number. Call and am called by my daughters and son there. Works very well. Sometimes it skips a word or something. But otherwise, great. Marcio -Original Message- From: Robert Carroll

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
There was a FCC directive on this some time ago that required VOIP providers to give reliable 911 service. Check with the provider to make sure. I am pretty certain Vonage and them had to do so, or shut down. This even came up with Cell phone this year locally when it came out that some of

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
In answer to your questions: Whenever you sign up for a VOIP service you are assigned a phone number. They will give you (A.) a number based on the closest local exchange they offer. or (B.) a number based in an area code you choose, again based on the closest local exchange they offer.

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!...FUD

2010-01-01 Thread b_s-wilk
In fact there's really no news here. As the articles state, we're down to 1 in 5 households that only have a landline, and that number is dropping all the time. When, not if. The 1 in 5 stat looks like FUD to me. That's B.S. The United States doesn't have the broadband or cellular capacity

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!...FUD

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Most of those statistics take into account young people who are very mobile and do not have land lines. (Plus metropolitan areas) My two oldest children fall into that category. My daughter and son-in-law own a house but have no land line. MY son lives in an apt. and has no land line.

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!...FUD

2010-01-01 Thread mike
We'd be cell only but DSL is the only thing that is available here and adding a landline decreases the total cost of service for the DSL so we keep it. I couldn't bring myself to pay full price for DSL nightmare. On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall revsamarsh...@earthlink.net

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
At 03:50 PM 1/1/2010, Tony B wrote: A 9/11 event will clog all the services. But an accident in your bathroom can likely be handled via cell/voip as reliably as a landline. Maybe better if you have your cell phone with you and don't have to crawl to the nearest phone. But then, how many of us

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
At 04:55 PM 1/1/2010, t.piwowar wrote: I think anyone who is tech aware has to to admit that the days of POTS (a switched telephone network) are numbered. I believe that POTS is entirely digital once the copper wire gets to the junction at the TELCO. No longer switched, except perhaps

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
At 04:55 PM 1/1/2010, t.piwowar wrote: We know how to perform this function much better and at lower cost. Better is in the eye of the beholder. My opinion is that it is accomplished at lower cost by cutting corners. I want the good stuff and am willing to pay for it.

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
I use MagicJack as a second phone line for making outgoing calls. It works fine for me most of the time, but sometimes the call breaks up like some cell phone calls do. Not as reliable as POTS. It also requires a running computer to connect to the Internet. If you leave your computer on

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack

2010-01-01 Thread Tourbus Rider Stuart Carlow
I've used one for a couple of years now. Generally it works very well although occasionally the sounds is a little garbled or a syllable may be dropped or I'll hear an echo. On rare occasion I'll have to call the party again and get a cleaner connection. I have Fios for internet

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Fred Holmes f...@his.com wrote: At 04:55 PM 1/1/2010, t.piwowar wrote: That does not mean that twisted copper pairs are going away. In some areas twisted pairs will go away. In other areas that will be around for a long time. What will change is the signaling

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Actually a solar panel with a battery would keep you up about 95% of the time. Most highway departments have used this set up to run warning lights and sensors on highways for years. Stewart At 07:46 PM 1/1/2010, you wrote: A small solar panel would be nice to keep the system going or at

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
I have looked into all of these and at present it makes no sense to me. None of the major VOIP carriers offer a local number so it is of no use for incoming. As I already bundle my phone service and have unlimited dialing plus all the calling features plus have an international plan it makes

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
Yes and no. If you leave your VOIP (e.g. MagicJack) always at one specific premises and register that premises with that telephone number at 911 (there is a process for doing this), then you will have reliable 911 service, just as landline numbers are registered with 911 (but the registration

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
Cell phones with GPS can report their location exactly. Primitive cell phones can only report what tower they are currently connected to. The issue with 911 service is how to handle a phone that is mobile, i.e., is used away from home. MagicJack can be used away from home. Connect it to

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
At 06:39 PM 1/1/2010, Robert Carroll wrote: (1) Is there a source for info about VoIP in general, not just related to MagicJack. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOIP Google VOIP. Google whatever terms you don't understand when reading about VOIP.

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Fred Holmes
The most modern phone you have that works on POTS is a corded handset. I suspect one could also use a cordless handset, if one were to plug the base station into the MagicJack. (just as the base station is plugged into the RJ-11 wall outlet the same way that a corded handset is plugged into a

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack

2010-01-01 Thread Tourbus Rider Stuart Carlow
Stewart says: None of the major VOIP carriers offer a local number so it is of no use for incoming. As I already bundle my phone service and have unlimited dialing plus all the calling features plus have an international plan it makes no financial sense to me. Until a VOIP service offers

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack

2010-01-01 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
202 may be local, but mine is 334 which includes Montgomery (90 miles away) and a variety of other areas not even close. I can only dial 2 different exchanges and get a local call. Since my members all call my home # I need to keep it. Once the new cable company comes in this might change

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread Constance Warner
Before we trash the old, copper-wire (or even fiber-optic) landlines, I'd like to point out an inconvenient truth: in a lot of places and circumstances, cellphones will not work. Here are just a few cases where cellphones will fail: 1. Below ground, in parking garages, the below-ground

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Marcio
No, I have a cordless phone. Of course I must connect the base with the cord at the MagicJack USB Connection. But this is all. Also I believe it has 911 because it warns me that because I am out of the USA the 911 will not work. Marcio -Original Message- From: Robert Carroll

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Marcio
I have a Vtech cordless phone with two basis. Work fine. Marcio -Original Message- From: Fred Holmes f...@his.com Sent: Jan 1, 2010 9:21 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question The most modern phone you have that works on POTS is a corded

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Tony B
Actually, that's two questions. First, you may use your existing telephones with MJ, but you don't have to. It comes with an interface that easily switches to headset so any headset (or mic and speakers) can work. No, pulse dialing is ancient history. You could not dial a number from a rotary

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack

2010-01-01 Thread Marcio
I am here in Brazil, I have a Los Angeles number where mu daughters are and we can call each other without having to pay by minute. They justcall my Los Angeles number... and I call their numbers. All included. Marcio -Original Message- From: Tourbus Rider Stuart Carlow

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread Marcio
Yes, Fred I get the messages by e-mail and open them with Nero. I also cancall my number at MagicJack and listen to the messages and erase them. Marcio -Original Message- From: Fred Holmes f...@his.com Sent: Jan 1, 2010 8:59 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS]

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack: a VoIP question

2010-01-01 Thread t.piwowar
Don't forget that you can also get VOIP services like Skype at zero cost. * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/

Re: [CGUYS] Kill it!!!

2010-01-01 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 4:55 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote: OMG. RAID and POTS. Some of us are not aging well. I'm really surprised at the high degree fear of change on what is supposed to be a discussion for techies. I believe the only real fear of change as per this discussion is the

Re: [CGUYS] MagicJack

2010-01-01 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Tourbus Rider Stuart Carlow noodni...@aol.com wrote: As far as 911 is concerned, yes you can place 911 calls, but I don't believe that the 911 folks can trace the call to your specific address.  And of course (1) your computer has to be on at the time, and (2)