And this is comparable to visually spying on children in their bedrooms
how? I think you're trying to compare apples with oranges here.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:28 AM,
Sure, but this ignore the discussion in the Ars article of the penalty:
RMW (read, modify, write). Quoting from the Ars article:
And so it was that last September (and it's this that makes it a little
surprising that the BBC and other outlets are talking about the issue
now, but it's one that
This kind of deceit is a problem if software tries to write less than
4096 bytes at a time.
Yes, but NTFS uses 4K clusters. To the best of my knowledge, it never writes
512-byte sectors. (And even if it did, the vast majority of writes in typical
use would tend to be large--only the last,
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Art Clemons artclem...@aol.com wrote:
If the lawyers involved haven't already gotten all of the pictures
involved, I'ld be heartily shocked. Discovery is a tricky thing, but
somehow something as major as the webcam photo wouldn't be missed in a
suit, no
Chris, you misunderstand RMW. Your jumper setting does not get around
it. Bliss-based ignorance.
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List
[mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com] On Behalf Of Chris Dunford
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 7:26 AM
To:
Read what I wrote.
1.5 are at that price level. I never said 2 TB are not here. But
right now they are at a premium price.
I saw a 1.5 TB drive advertised for $99.00 so I expect 2 TB drives to
be at that price by next year.
There is a price mark that determines how much those drives will
Chris, you misunderstand RMW. Your jumper setting does not get around
it. Bliss-based ignorance.
I understand RMW perfectly well, thank you. You are not paying attention,
apparently.
There are two issues.
1. There is a performance penalty for writes of 4K due to RMW. But, as the
very
Okay, you are talking pricing. Got it. My posts were a bit more
general, so I was not thinking (or writing) about prices.
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
Read what I wrote.
1.5 are at that price level. I never said 2 TB are not here. But
right now they are at a premium
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:56 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
You have a point but only because Apple has made the old hardware
obsolete.
Macs stay in service far longer than PCs. You know that. Why introduce
a red herring? Please stay honest and don't go for debating points.
This is a
On Mar 11, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
The 512-byte sectors are emulated. That's what the OS sees.
Physically, they're 4K sectors.
And you can't see that this is an awful kluge? Hardware vendors should
not have to go Rube Goldberg to work around a mess created my the
operating
On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:35 AM, mike wrote:
I thought macs stayed in service longer than PC's?
They do, but Mac users keep their OSs up to date because Apple charges
a reasonable upgrade fee and the upgrade is easy to install. Mac
owners are never faced with formatting their drives just to
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:40 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, okay then. If you prefer the UNtinyurl, here it is. I was
just trying to be helpful.
I feel better getting the full URL.
This is not a brilliant move by the FCC. It is just ordinary
smartness. It only looks brilliant because
Except much of that money shows up in zip codes or counties that don't
exist. No, not all of it...but a lot.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:10 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:40 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, okay then. If you prefer the UNtinyurl, here it is. I was
And you can't see that this is an awful kluge? Hardware vendors should
not have to go Rube Goldberg to work around a mess created my the
operating system vendor.
Did I see something moving out of the corner of my eye? Ah, yes, it's the
goalposts again.
Your post was about what a horrible fix
Except much of that money shows up in zip codes or counties that don't
exist. No, not all of it...but a lot.
Mike, can you quantify this? How much is much? You're sorta making it sound
like most of the money shown on the site is bogus. I'm not clear on your
thinking here--are you saying that
I'm not blasting the Obama government on this, just government waste in
general. Kinda like the 70k? plus in debit cards that disappeared during
katrina. You can google zip codes don't exist recovery.gov and hit multiple
sites about the problem. Some is probably simple paperwork etc...but if we
With all the protections I have these days (UAC, Spybot immunize, safe
browsing warnings, etc), I don't feel the need for this, but if you must you
can see where these shortened links go before you click on them.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8636 . Equivalents available
in other
On 03/12/2010 04:13 AM, Jeff Miles wrote:
And this is comparable to visually spying on children in their bedrooms
how? I think you're trying to compare apples with oranges here.
You are assuming something here, something which none of the parties in
the legal dispute seem to be
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:09 PM, mike wrote:
I'm not blasting the Obama government on this, just government waste
in
general. Kinda like the 70k? plus in debit cards that disappeared
during
katrina. ...but if we are honest there are pallets of money
literally (remember
iraq) that disappear.
Quoting Art Clemons artclem...@aol.com:
On 03/12/2010 04:13 AM, Jeff Miles wrote:
And this is comparable to visually spying on children in their
bedrooms how? I think you're trying to compare apples with oranges
here.
You are assuming something here, something which none of the
The difference is I think they are all wingnuts, you only think half are.
On Mar 12, 2010 11:29 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:09 PM, mike wrote:
I'm not blasting the Obama government on this, just government waste in
general. Kinda like t...
katrina. ...but if we
Wingnuts of any kind are still wingnuts.
Let them just fly away.
Stewart
At 12:22 PM 3/12/2010, you wrote:
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:09 PM, mike wrote:
I'm not blasting the Obama government on this, just government waste
in
general. Kinda like the 70k? plus in debit cards that disappeared
Today, I think anybody can be excused for being paranoid. _Esp._ with
respect to wide-open domains like .tv.
What real purpose does tinyurl really serve nowadays? Don't
up-to-date mail readers handle URLs of any arbitrary length with no
problem?
On 3/12/10, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:
Twitter and rick-rolls!
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John Emmerling jpemmerl...@gmail.comwrote:
Today, I think anybody can be excused for being paranoid. _Esp._ with
respect to wide-open domains like .tv.
What real purpose does tinyurl really serve nowadays? Don't
up-to-date mail
===
Register for this FREE Event via e-mail to bc...@cpcug.org
===
Capital PC User Group (CPCUG)
Entrepreneurs and Consultants Special Interest Group (EC SIG)
I am looking for some icons to use on a web page to designate pdf
formatted documents and word formatted (RTF) documents.
Stewart
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy,
At 3:06 PM -0500 3/12/10, John Emmerling wrote:
Today, I think anybody can be excused for being paranoid. _Esp._ with
respect to wide-open domains like .tv.
What real purpose does tinyurl really serve nowadays? Don't
up-to-date mail readers handle URLs of any arbitrary length with no
Actually I think it came about to ease the problem of urls breaking in
emails.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Roger D. Parish rogerd.par...@gmail.comwrote:
At 3:06 PM -0500 3/12/10, John Emmerling wrote:
Today, I think anybody can be excused for being paranoid. _Esp._ with
respect to
www.wincustomize.com
try there
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Stewart Marshall
revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
I am looking for some icons to use on a web page to designate pdf formatted
documents and word formatted (RTF) documents.
Stewart
Yup it is a little older than Twitter.
It came about when url's tended to be a little wordy.
Stewart
At 04:11 PM 3/12/2010, you wrote:
Actually I think it came about to ease the problem of urls breaking in
emails.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Roger D. Parish
John Emmerling wrote:
What real purpose does tinyurl really serve nowadays? Don't
up-to-date mail readers handle URLs of any arbitrary length with no
problem?
I'm using Mozilla Thunderbird for email. Very long web addresses are
broken when they wrap around to the next line.
On Mar 12, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Chris Dunford wrote:
Well, now that this turns out to be wrong, suddenly the real issue
isn't that XP users are screwed, it's that it's a kluge.
The real issue has been in the subject line all along. It is still true.
On 03/12/2010 03:06 PM, John Emmerling wrote:
What real purpose does tinyurl really serve nowadays? Don't
up-to-date mail readers handle URLs of any arbitrary length with no
problem?
No, they don't, in fact many wrap at 72 characters. Actually tinyurls
and similar services can be safer with
Does I'm a Mac mean I'm less expensive to manage? An Enterprise
Desktop Alliance survey says Macs cost a lot less than PCs to manage --
yet Macs come with special challenges for enterprise IT admins.
By Tom Kaneshige
March 08, 2010 — CIO —
Macs in the enterprise aren't just cheaper to
Please define burned. What happened? Did your hard drive melt?
How is this burned experience different from the supposedly innocent
URL you sent this week, http://tinyurl.com/X ?
No, they don't, in fact many wrap at 72 characters. Actually tinyurls
and similar services can be safer
35 matches
Mail list logo
