http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/30/droid-x-ad-pokes-fun-at-iphone-4-antenna-troubles/
Now Moto is going after Apple...
*It comes with a double antenna design. The kind that allows you to hold
the phone any way you like and use it just about anywhere to make crystal
clear calls.*
On Tue, Jun 29,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:54 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
*It comes with a double antenna design. The kind that allows you to hold
the phone any way you like and use it just about anywhere to make crystal
clear calls.*
Crystal clear calls? I have not as yet heard a crystal clear
call
Because it doesn't matter in normal use. It appears that it may matter in some
extreme cases. You are insisting that they must design their product for the
extreme case and make the rest of us suffer the consequences. You have not
explained why they must do such a silly thing. You just insist
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:17 AM, TJPA t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Because it doesn't matter in normal use. It appears that it may matter in
some extreme cases. You are insisting that they must design their product
for the extreme case and make the rest of us suffer the consequences. You
have not
On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:10 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
By extreme cases are you perhaps referring to emergency situations
where life or death or serious injury or even just a great
inconvenience may be the outcome?
Yep, your mommy can't be with you all the time.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:10 AM,
With ATT those extreme cases seem to matter much more than with
another carrier.
Stewart
At 01:17 AM 6/29/2010, you wrote:
Because it doesn't matter in normal use. It appears that it may
matter in some extreme cases. You are insisting that they must
design their product for the extreme case
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:11 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Well you have a silly notion. It is amazing how you fixate on a tiny
1/8-inch of its surface that causes a problem when the phone is operated at
the edge of its range. Your supposition is so extreme that it strongly
suggests you have
I suggest duct tape. Duct tape cures all ills.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 9:45 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Apple could have easily eliminated that 1/8 inch of problematic area
by applying an insulating material over it.
*
**
Saw the first of waht will probably be many iphone 4 case ads with the
tagline 'get better reception, buy an iphone 4 case!'
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:40 AM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
I suggest duct tape. Duct tape cures all ills.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 9:45 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:18 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Saw the first of waht will probably be many iphone 4 case ads with the
tagline 'get better reception, buy an iphone 4 case!'
This new iPhone will most likely be the first and last phone made by
Apple that uses an antenna of which
Good analysis and later confirmed by one of the commentators.
It is also interesting to note how many of the other commentators just
won't let go of the original story.
On Jun 28, 2010, at 1:26 PM, John DeCarlo wrote:
From Steve Gibson (and his recommendation of a reply to read):
The
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:07 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Good analysis and later confirmed by one of the commentators.
It is also interesting to note how many of the other commentators just won't
let go of the original story.
So, what is the original story? I only saw stories about how
Also troublesome was that Apple admitted the problem...
Spin that, Tom.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:07 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
Good analysis and later confirmed by one of the commentators.
It is also interesting to note how many of the other commentators just
won't let go of the
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:26 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Also troublesome was that Apple admitted the problem...
Did Apple admit to a problem? What was the problem that Apple Corp.
admitted to? I only know of Mr, Jobs mentioning the problem of
purchasers of the device not knowing how
Gripping any mobile phone will result in some attenuation of its antenna
performance, with certain places being worse than others depending on the
placement of the antennas. This is a fact of life for every wireless phone.
If you ever experience this on your iPhone 4, avoid gripping it in the
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:
Gripping any mobile phone will result in some attenuation of its antenna
performance, with certain places being worse than others depending on the
placement of the antennas. This is a fact of life for every wireless phone.
If you
Read Gibson's analysis and you will understand that this is really a
very marginal problem. If one has good signal strength it won't matter
how you hold the phone. If your signal strength is about to go over a
cliff, anything you do can potentially push you over. One of those
things is
I say tongue and cheek. Half of what Jobs says is spin or disingenuous. At
his heart, he's just a car salesman...good cars though.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:06 PM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:
You say spin, I'll offer disingenuous.
Steve
You are right, and for whatever reason Apple ignored the physics. I say it
was for form over function, you can deny all you want, but Apple has
admitted the problem.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
It is not magic, it is physics.
On Jun 28, 2010, at 6:06 PM,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:24 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
It is not magic, it is physics.
Well, then let us sum this thing up. In your view, is there
anything whatsoever that is problematic, in terms of the end user of
these phones, about how Apple decided to use an antenna system that is
On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:13 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, then let us sum this thing up. In your view, is there
anything whatsoever that is problematic, in terms of the end user of
these phones, about how Apple decided to use an antenna system that is
highly exposed to direct contact with
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:13 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, then let us sum this thing up. In your view, is there
anything whatsoever that is problematic, in terms of the end user of
these phones, about how Apple decided to use an
On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:45 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
A complete non-answer of the question as posed.
You just won't accept any answer except the one you are promoting. You
don't want reality to get in the way.
Experiences
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:02 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
...why is this just being noticed on the 4th generation iPhone, and seems
to have not been noticed by users of any other cell phone?
Good question! The issue exists for many, if not most, cellphones to varying
degrees. This
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:09 AM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
You clearly did not read 2/3s of my last post. Here is another quote...
I read it, the whole thing. I think that you understand the point
about why it is best not to have an antenna of any sort or for any use
coming into direct
25 matches
Mail list logo
