Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-21 Thread Scott Talbert
Yeah, I think we may be trying to push the 300 beyond what it can do. :-) On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Demetrio wrote: 1st of all: Thanks 4 all, Scott. I tested your latest release, but nothing changed. I won't delete the remote to insert in the right order, because I don't want to loose all my prefe

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-21 Thread Demetrio
1st of all: Thanks 4 all, Scott. I tested your latest release, but nothing changed. I won't delete the remote to insert in the right order, because I don't want to loose all my preferences about buttons (they are too much). About input source, it doesn't seems to work, but I don't know exactly bec

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-20 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi Demetrio, Did the change to allow you to choose the input for your TV work for you? I went and did some testing with the power on order and found it to be as you described - it seems to always use the order in which the devices were added to the account, and completely ignores the PowerOnOr

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-09 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi Demetrio, No need to send the log for the TV input - I know that works with the back end. The question is whether it works with the remote and your devices. OK, yes, that makes sense about the power on order. I guess I never noticed that it lights up the source buttons. :) As far as c

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-09 Thread Demetrio
Hi Scott. About the TV input, I'll try it again and I'll send to you the log. About the power on order, I see the order because remote source buttons have a backlight, and they lights on when I send a command on the device (if you watch at the remote picture, you'll understand immediately what I m

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-08 Thread Scott Talbert
Actually, thinking more about the power on order issue -- how can you really tell what order it is powering on/off the devices? I assume the remote is issuing the power on commands one right after another anyway, so there isn't much time in between to be able to notice the order? On Tue, 8 Oc

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-08 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi Demetrio, Thanks for sending the capture, it was very helpful. On the input selection issue, your TV appears to be using a different input type that I haven't seen before. I made a change and you should be able to select an input for your TV now. Can you give it a try and see if it actua

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-08 Thread Demetrio
I'll do it ASAP D. 2013/10/8 Scott Talbert > Hi Demetrio, > > Do you mind capturing some debug information? First, pull down the latest > changes from the congruity git - I added a command line option > '--suds-debug' which will dump out a bunch of information. > > Run mhgui with --suds-debug

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-07 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi Demetrio, Do you mind capturing some debug information? First, pull down the latest changes from the congruity git - I added a command line option '--suds-debug' which will dump out a bunch of information. Run mhgui with --suds-debug and redirect the output to a file. Then, go to the 'C

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-05 Thread Scott Talbert
OK, after I thought about it, I figured you must have, otherwise you wouldn't have had the GUI for changing the power-on sequence. :) I'll take a further look at your questions later. On Sat, 5 Oct 2013, Demetrio wrote: sorry, you're right, I didn't specify exactly what I did. :P And you're

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-05 Thread Demetrio
sorry, you're right, I didn't specify exactly what I did. :P And you're right again: I downloaded, configured and ran harmony_link branch from git :) bye Demetrio 2013/10/5 Scott Talbert > Hi Demetrio :) > > Just to make sure - you are using the mhgui from git, right? (And not a > release? T

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-05 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi Demetrio :) Just to make sure - you are using the mhgui from git, right? (And not a release? The 'harmony_link' branch is the latest code. I haven't done a release in a while. I'll probably do one after the next concordance release. Scott On Sat, 5 Oct 2013, Demetrio wrote: Hi. I'm

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-10-05 Thread Demetrio
Hi. I'm back to test latest releases. :) I'm trying to test the GUI that should give us the ability to change power on sequence. well, I downloaded latest version of congruity (mhgui v17) and concordance source code, compiling them. The power on sequence seems to be not working, it looks like it

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-28 Thread Chain von den Keiya
Will keep my eyes open! Richard Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2013, 20:05:23 schrieb Scott Talbert: > Well, the remotes that are supported by myharmony.com are: > Harmony Ultimate, Harmony Touch, Harmony Smart Control, Harmony One+, > Harmony 700, 650, 600, 300, 200 and Harmony Link. > > Of those, the Ul

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-28 Thread Scott Talbert
Well, the remotes that are supported by myharmony.com are: Harmony Ultimate, Harmony Touch, Harmony Smart Control, Harmony One+, Harmony 700, 650, 600, 300, 200 and Harmony Link. Of those, the Ultimate and Touch are the new models, I think, and are probably pretty high end. Other than that, pro

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-28 Thread Chain von den Keiya
Hi Scott, Okay but... which higher end remote IS supported by that page? I don't know of a single one (correct me if I'm wrong). I am definitely often at second hand stores and such, and might see one for a low price and could simply buy it as some alternative or so. So, input very much appreci

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-28 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi Richard, Yes, I would say that the 1100 is pretty close to the highest end. :) Thanks for the offer - unfortunately, the 1100 isn't supported by the newer myharmony.com website, which is what we're trying to work on. Scott On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Chain von den Keiya wrote: > Hi, > > I still

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-28 Thread Chain von den Keiya
Hi, I still have my 1100 (and am planning to not change that in near future) and if I remember well, it doesn't get any more "high end" than that. So if I can somehow help you guys out, feel free to ask :) However, if I remember well, some delays and changes can only be changed by Logitech the

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-28 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Sancho wrote: >> Very interesting. Well, that is good to know. Unfortunately, I haven't >> seen the Logitech software issue any sort of changes to the devices, ie, a >> "SetDevices" message, so therefore I don't know how to do it (yet). >> Additionally, we haven't reverse en

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-28 Thread Sancho
Scott Talbert writes: > It looks like this was the issue. I hadn't seen this 'IRDelayAction' > before so it wasn't in the XSD. This must be something else that Logitech > just added to your account, because I don't think it was in the previous > capture you sent. I pushed another commit - l

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-26 Thread Scott Talbert
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Sancho wrote: > I have now tested your latest correction. It works, but now I get an exception > on a different unknown info element of the GetUserFeatureResult message > (namely "ActionId", sub-element of "AbstractIRAction" ?). > Here is the full Python traceback: > > suds.Ty

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-26 Thread Sancho
Scott Talbert writes: > OK, I pushed a change (to the harmony_link branch) that should fix the > exception that you were getting when you clicked the "Setup Watch TV" > button. First of all, sorry for the delayed response ;-) I have now tested your latest correction. It works, but now I get a

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-23 Thread Demetrio
Workaround to add a delay: setup another fake device and choose it in "Setup Watch TV" where you need delay. It's clear, delay duration depends of device you choose... Demetrio 2013/7/23 Scott Talbert > On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Sancho wrote: > > > There are a few specialties about my currently con

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-22 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Sancho wrote: > There are a few specialties about my currently configured devices, which I > should explain: > - the Sony TV (KDL-40L4000 is programmed twice, once on the TV button and > once on the AUX button. Prupose of this was to have the Sat Receiver be > powered on befor

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-22 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Sancho wrote: > I have tried to investigate this a little bit by adding a "print content" > command in the "process" method of the "Core" class of python-suds in file > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/suds/umx/core.py. > > Whith this change I can now see some XML-like structu

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-22 Thread Sancho
Scott Talbert writes: > It is complaining that it can't find AbstractIRAction in the XSD, which is > defined in user_feature.xsd. Can you confirm that you have a > user_feature.xsd in the directory where you installed congruity (probably > /usr/local/share/congruity based on what I see abov

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-21 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Sancho wrote: > I just noticed that I forgot to call mhgui with the "--use-local-wsdl" > option in my last test. Therefor I retried and got a different exception > this time: > >> mhgui --use-local-wsdl > No handlers could be found for logger "suds.umx.typed" > Traceback (most

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-20 Thread Sancho
Sancho writes: > > Hi Scott, > > your latest changes to mhgui provide almost exact the functionality that I > would like to have for my Harmony 300: I would lie to modify the behaviour > of the "Watch TV" activity (macro) and add a delay of 5 seconds between the > PowerToggle commands sent to

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-20 Thread Sancho
Scott Talbert writes: > > Hi Demetrio, > > At long last I think I've finally got the "Watch TV" button functionality > implemented. :) It supports the ability to change the power on order of > the devices, but I haven't seen a way yet to implement your other request > - being able to add a

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-19 Thread Demetrio
Great! I'm back today from a short holiday, than I need a couple of days to manage something at home and at work. I'll try new features as soon as possible (within next week). Demetrio 2013/7/18 Scott Talbert > Hi Demetrio, > > At long last I think I've finally got the "Watch TV" button functi

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-17 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi Demetrio, At long last I think I've finally got the "Watch TV" button functionality implemented. :) It supports the ability to change the power on order of the devices, but I haven't seen a way yet to implement your other request - being able to add arbitrary commands. I will keep lookin

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-05 Thread Scott Talbert
Okay, thanks - that's the same as I'm seeing in the English version with my devices. On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Demetrio wrote: I think by default it's linked to TV power (i.e., if it's empty), you need to use another sub-menu to enable power-on for all devices. (sorry for translation, I see italian

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-04 Thread Scott Talbert
Nah, no need to test. I can see there is a power-on order field in the message, but the app isn't setting it to anything. On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Demetrio wrote: No it doesn't. It just let me flag devices to power up or down, I cannot choose the command, that is "power toggle" by default, and nor

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-04 Thread Demetrio
No it doesn't. It just let me flag devices to power up or down, I cannot choose the command, that is "power toggle" by default, and nor other commands. In other terms, I choose devices and the app creates one "power toggle" sequence, stop. Now I was thinking about ... may be I can choose order whi

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-04 Thread Scott Talbert
Okay, I see how the Silverlight app is doing it. It looks like it uses "activities" like I have been working on for the Harmony Link, so it should not be too hard to add. It looks like it should be possible to specify the power-on order, but I'm not sure about adding arbitrary commands and pa

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-04 Thread Demetrio
Thanks so much :) About "boot sequence", the remote powers up TV for first and mediaplayer for last. But mediaplayer is slower, because it has got an OS that needs to boot or wake up from standby, etc. Then it would be useful if I can choose to power up mediaplayer for first. I'll wait for news De

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-03 Thread Scott Talbert
I will have to look into this. If it is possible to program the yellow button with the silverlight app, then it should be possible for me to do it with mhgui. Let me take a look at it. What do you mean by "change boot sequence?" On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Demetrio wrote: WOW, GREAT!!! It works ..

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-03 Thread Demetrio
WOW, GREAT!!! It works ... but. All this work I did, I did it to manage my remote in an extended way. My main goal is to program the yellow button, high-left corner, the only one programmable button. But I didn't found how to do it. I find for every device the ability to match a "power" button and

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-07-02 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Demetrio wrote: > I'm trying to use concordance with Harmony 300 on Ubuntu 13.04 64bit > I correctly made the bin, and it should works but... and now? > I tried to get info about my remote, and it worked. I tried to dump firmware > and configuration, but it didn't work, so I do

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-04 Thread Scott Talbert
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > Dumping the config worked nicely. Got a zip file with Description.xml > and a 59K Result.EzHex looks OK. > Then tried to write this file back using sudo concordance --no-web > --write-config config.zip > Requesting identity: 100% done > Initi

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-04 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > >>> New version uploaded that should apply. >>> >>> Man, I hate CVS! >> I'm sorry, I still can't get this to apply. But my unfamiliarity with >> CVS (It's older than my first computer FFS) might be th

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-03 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: >> New version uploaded that should apply. >> >> Man, I hate CVS! > I'm sorry, I still can't get this to apply. But my unfamiliarity with > CVS (It's older than my first computer FFS) might be the reason. Okay, I uploaded yet another rev of the patch. Thi

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-03 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > >> I'm sorry, I still can't get this to apply. But my unfamiliarity with >> CVS (It's older than my first computer FFS) might be the reason. >> >> I'm checking out the zwave work branch (as far as I c

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-03 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > I'm sorry, I still can't get this to apply. But my unfamiliarity with > CVS (It's older than my first computer FFS) might be the reason. > > I'm checking out the zwave work branch (as far as I can tell) using a > command in comment to the feature tracker

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-02 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > >>> OK, I've uploaded another config dumping patch to the Harmony 300 Review >>> tracker, if you want to check it out, Bart. As best as I can tell, it is >>> good to go. Note that you'll need to ins

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-02 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: >> OK, I've uploaded another config dumping patch to the Harmony 300 Review >> tracker, if you want to check it out, Bart. As best as I can tell, it is >> good to go. Note that you'll need to install libzip, if you don't have it >> already. > > Reporting:

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-02 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: >> OK, I've uploaded another config dumping patch to the Harmony 300 Review >> tracker, if you want to check it out, Bart. As best as I can tell, it is >> good to go. Note that you'll need to install libzip, if you don't have it >> already. > > Reporting:

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-01 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > Well, I think I figured out how they are doing the checksum, so I can > > calculate it myself. I think I have all the data needed to write the XML > > file. Now, I have to figure out how to w

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-04-01 Thread Scott Talbert
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Scott Talbert wrote: > Well, I think I figured out how they are doing the checksum, so I can > calculate it myself. I think I have all the data needed to write the XML > file. Now, I have to figure out how to write out a zip file containing > the binary and XML. At first gl

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-29 Thread Scott Talbert
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote: >> I moved congruity's SF project to git and it's been...fine. I mean, it's >> standard git. They also provide gitweb for the web interface. Of course, >> congruity isn't like a super active project or anything. :) >> >> The main thing I don't like abo

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-29 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 03/29/2013 03:18 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > >> I'm going to be moving a smaller project to git on SF and see how I like >> their implementation... but I don't want my projects split across too >> many different configurations, so I wanna make sure I

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-29 Thread Scott Talbert
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > I'm going to be moving a smaller project to git on SF and see how I like > their implementation... but I don't want my projects split across too > many different configurations, so I wanna make sure I like something > before I move everything to it.

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-29 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 03/25/2013 07:34 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: > Unfortunately, no. I was thinking about doing that, though, because > maintaining my own CVS "branches" is becoming a nightmare. Hopefully we > can convince Phil (the official maintainer) to move to git soon, but he > has been quiet for a while.

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-28 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Scott Talbert wrote: >> Just tried it out and indeed get a nice 64 KB binary file. To bad this >> can't be used for flashing without the XML. For my use case I >> currently just want to get the data from an already configured remote >> and use it to flash others. Does the XML

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-27 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > Just tried it out and indeed get a nice 64 KB binary file. To bad this > can't be used for flashing without the XML. For my use case I > currently just want to get the data from an already configured remote > and use it to flash others. Does the XML have

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-27 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > Just tried it out and indeed get a nice 64 KB binary file. To bad this > can't be used for flashing without the XML. For my use case I > currently just want to get the data from an already configured remote > and use it to flash others. Does the XML have

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-27 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Scott Talbert wrote: > >> There are still a couple of challenges, though: >> a) There isn't a way (that I know of) to get the length of the config in >> advance. This means we'll probably have to do what I did with >> us

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-26 Thread Scott Talbert
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Scott Talbert wrote: > There are still a couple of challenges, though: > a) There isn't a way (that I know of) to get the length of the config in > advance. This means we'll probably have to do what I did with > usbnet/zwave and read the config twice (first time to get the le

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-25 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Scott Talbert wrote: > Writing a config to the remote works, but I did not implement reading a > config from the remote (yet). I can take a stab at doing that. OK, so I took an initial stab at it - my working patch is attached to the same Harmony 300 feature request. (Sorr

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-25 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > Did a quick hack to test, certainly not as easy as it sounds. Is the > 300's config max 1KiB? USB HID response package is 64 bytes right? > But it's actually the internal API that is the trickiest bit, > certainly without the documentation. > In CRemoteM

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-25 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > >> I see the LC_ERROR_UNSUPP in CRemoteMH::ReadFlash() but I guess >> implementing this is a little much to jump into? While I'm familiar >> with HID at a high level, I have not worked directly with

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-25 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > I see the LC_ERROR_UNSUPP in CRemoteMH::ReadFlash() but I guess > implementing this is a little much to jump into? While I'm familiar > with HID at a high level, I have not worked directly with it in > userspace and the harmony remote's protocol is compl

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-25 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > >> I can identify the remote with -i, but what I would really like to do >> is dump the configuration. >> concordance -wb --dump-config=remoteconfig.bin failed with error 3: >> Requesting identity:

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-25 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Bart Cerneels wrote: > I can identify the remote with -i, but what I would really like to do > is dump the configuration. > concordance -wb --dump-config=remoteconfig.bin failed with error 3: > Requesting identity: 100% done > Failed to dump config: Error while re

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2013-03-25 Thread Bart Cerneels
I see good progress has been made on supporting the 300. I've build the branch and patch attached in http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3559622 I can identify the remote with -i, but what I would really like to do is dump the configuration. concordance -wb --dump-config=remoteconfig.

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-10-22 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Phil Dibowitz wrote: >>> Here is an updated Harmony 300 patch (updated so it will apply cleanly since >>> you applied my other patch to operationfile.cpp, which this patch had also >>> previously included). >> >> I sent this to the list but the attachment was too big and the f

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-10-21 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 10/01/2012 06:47 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Scott Talbert wrote: > >> Here is an updated Harmony 300 patch (updated so it will apply cleanly since >> you applied my other patch to operationfile.cpp, which this patch had also >> previously included). > > I sent this to th

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-10-01 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Scott Talbert wrote: > Here is an updated Harmony 300 patch (updated so it will apply cleanly since > you applied my other patch to operationfile.cpp, which this patch had also > previously included). I sent this to the list but the attachment was too big and the filter ate

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-09-29 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Phil Dibowitz wrote: >>> If anyone wanted to try this against their 300, that would be helpful too. >>> Mainly just to see if the GetIdentity and Reset functions work. >> >> Did a quick run through. I need to spend some time parsing this code, but at >> a >> glance it looks r

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-09-29 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 09/29/2012 04:58 PM, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > On 08/19/2012 02:52 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: >> Review/comment appreciated. >> >> If anyone wanted to try this against their 300, that would be helpful too. >> Mainly just to see if the GetIdentity and Reset functions work. > > Did a quick run throug

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-09-29 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 08/19/2012 02:52 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > Review/comment appreciated. > > If anyone wanted to try this against their 300, that would be helpful too. > Mainly just to see if the GetIdentity and Reset functions work. Did a quick run through. I need to spend some time parsing this code, but at

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-08-19 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Scott Talbert wrote: > I'm making some progress on the Harmony 300, albeit slow. So far, I have > been able to a) implement a connectivity test with the remote and b) do > some basic communications with the web services. The main challenge so > far is that the web service se

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-07-14 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Scott Talbert wrote: >>> Yep. I have done a bit more investigating, though. It looks like the >>> plugin is using some SOAP messages to communicate with the website. It >>> might be possible to do something, but we'd probably have to make our own >>> GUI. All, I'm making s

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-06-04 Thread Scott Talbert
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Phil Dibowitz wrote: >>> The silverlite and browser plugin is a problem though. :( >> >> Yep. I have done a bit more investigating, though. It looks like the >> plugin is using some SOAP messages to communicate with the website. It >> might be possible to do something, but w

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-06-04 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 06/03/2012 09:13 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > >> Based on the files sent in by other Harmony 300 users, the protocol is >> at least somewhat similar or at least, consnoop is able to parse the >> files and make some sense out of them. But I haven't

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-06-03 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Based on the files sent in by other Harmony 300 users, the protocol is > at least somewhat similar or at least, consnoop is able to parse the > files and make some sense out of them. But I haven't looked at those > files that closely. Consnoop thi

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300

2012-06-03 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 04/26/2012 05:58 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > I recently picked up one of these as they are relatively inexpensive (30 > USD) as compared to other Harmony remotes. > > Unfortunately, the prognosis for Concordance support does not look good: > a) the remote appears to use a protocol that isn't si

Re: [concordance-devel] Harmony 300 support

2010-12-12 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > > I'll be happy to contribute the necessary information gathering to > support this one on Linux ;) > Disappointing. Seems like this cheapo model uses a very different method, including a different site and credentials to provide

Re: [concordance-devel] harmony 300

2010-06-05 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 05/28/2010 07:49 PM, Paul S wrote: > I recently purchased a harmony 300 from walmart (target also has) for > $39.95 .. great price, and should result in more harmony users on linux. The bug to track this is: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3005694&group_id=201579&atid=978130

Re: [concordance-devel] harmony 300

2010-05-30 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On 05/28/2010 07:49 PM, Paul S wrote: > Do you think linux support for the 300 is possible? Anything is possible. We'll need a lot of data though - see the recent thread, "Logitech Harmony 700" - we'll need all the data requested in that thread to start trying to figure out the 300. Basically, usb