I can only agree on the pointers given in the wiki. However, I'd like to
reiterate the low significance of database portability in a CI server. I
think speed matters but not really portability.
Andy seems to be willing to help solve the database problems Continuum is
experiencing.
Just my 2 cen
+1
Vincent
2008/2/5, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
> Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
> PMC to apply for graduation.
>
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> Cheers,
> Emmanuel
>
>
> Establi
LOL. I mixed my lists, as this happened over on Tapestry, but here's
the thread. Looks like Cayenne might be an option depending on how
far they're going, but it's not there yet, though I have done a bit of
open-source work with Andrus (who heads that project) a long time ago,
and he's go
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
+1
--
Trygve
ya I would agree with erik on this one...its a great idea that it would work
that way but in reality...its hard enough to switch out databases much less
the layer between your goop and the databases
jesse
On Feb 6, 2008 1:51 PM, Erik Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, JPA TCK has very lo
FYI, JPA TCK has very low coverage over the spec itself, that said being
compliant is certainly not a portability label.
You will only get portability if you test your jpa code against all
implementations and find the lowest common denominator.
-Message d'origine-
De : Thierry Lach [mailt
I am trying to run the Sample Client, not familiar with Maven or Java for that
matter I am having some difficulties. I am able to 'mvn clean install' the
entire continuum application from the root and then invoke the webapp and that
all runs fine.
But how would one invoke the Sample Client for
If everyone is happy to keep the history till date on codehaus wiki, I
can help copy stuff across to Apache wiki :-)
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
We can create such a wiki any time - the challenge is converting
existing content. If someone is happy to lose history and do it by
hand, it can be
On Feb 6, 2008 6:52 AM, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LOL. I'm so out of date. I used to work with TopLink way back in the
> earliest days, and tracked it up to the Oracle buyout. After that I
> didn't pay attention, and it's clearly changed direction. Never knew
> the co
well, if you want to have a plugin based architecture, what better
that OSGi? and it may help too for distributiion of build machines
On Feb 6, 2008 2:08 AM, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you thinking what I am thinking - an OSGi based runtime underneath
> and plugins/extensions t
+1
~nakees
"Emmanuel
+1
-Vincent
On Feb 6, 2008, at 12:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the
Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Establish the Apache Co
We can create such a wiki any time - the challenge is converting
existing content. If someone is happy to lose history and do it by
hand, it can be done straight away.
On 06/02/2008, at 9:25 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
Some good points emerging from this discussion! :-)
Would it be a nice idea
Some good points emerging from this discussion! :-)
Would it be a nice idea to put following on wiki:
1) State goals/philosophy for C2 in light of lessons learnt from 1.x
development - lean, mean, extensible (~add any other here~)
2) Document *all* features/requirements we want to see in C2 on
Hi,
This looks very exciting (I love the plugin idea).
As all of this features can be long to implement, I agree with Brett
to separate into different millestones releases. (IMHO a full "big
bang" will be very long).
And currently they are some blocking issues in the 1.1 release.
--
Olivier
2008
Are you thinking what I am thinking - an OSGi based runtime underneath
and plugins/extensions that could be loaded runtime?
:-)
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Some comments
Database vs xml: definitely database. Throwing away the db access api
(JDO/JPA/...) now that it's already there doesnt make much
Definitely, +1
Congratulations!
On Feb 5, 2008 3:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
> Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
> PMC to apply for graduation.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ]
> Its seems TopLink can do Criteria Queries (using Expressions and
> ExpressionBuilders, correct me if I am wrong). It seems quite a few JPA
> implementations provide some sort of Criteria Query API extension.
Hibernate does that too !
Damien
+1
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Establish the Apache Continuum Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Dir
+1
-john
On Feb 5, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to
the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Establish the Apache Contin
20 matches
Mail list logo
