Note taken. It is good to know that there is concern
with list polution.
--- Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 04:10, Luis Ortega wrote:
> > I would if I knew what bothered you. I am very
> much
> > interested in this package being promptly packaged
> as
> > I am
On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 04:10, Luis Ortega wrote:
> I would if I knew what bothered you. I am very much
> interested in this package being promptly packaged as
> I am testing it.
For this kind of central package you can take it as read that the
packager will be aware of releases as soon as they happ
I would if I knew what bothered you. I am very much
interested in this package being promptly packaged as
I am testing it.
--- Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The announcement is at:
> >
> >
>
http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0beta.h
Luis Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The announcement is at:
>
> http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0beta.html
Could you please refrain from sending messages like this? Thanks.
# Han
--
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html
On Sat Jun 07, 2003 at 08:55:46PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
> Releasing means supporting. supporting a product requires an
> organisation and knowledge being available. It also needs to be
> worthwhile --> bring some $$$ to the company. For the alpha, mips,
> pa-risc and sparc the ma
The announcement is at:
http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0beta.html
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
Le Samedi 07 Juin 2003 16:01, R.I.P. Deaddog a écrit :
> On 2003-06-07(Sat) 05:14:47 +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > Is it possible to have an automatic macros in rpm which make:
> > %exclude %_libdir/debug
> >
> > Somes specs have in %files:
> > %_libdir/*
> > and rpm stupidly include debug file
Le Samedi 07 Juin 2003 20:55, Stefan van der Eijk a écrit :
> Jaroslaw Zachwieja wrote:
> >>But, we might be getting to the point where we actually need a cooker
> >>extranet. For example, I would like to be able to remove build output on
> >> an automated build host to get a package rebuilt, but w
Hey i have been toying with antivirus and spam filtering with postfix,
and have made some packages for mandrake, think this would make things
much easier to setup and make Mandrake more "Enterprise ready",
amavis-new scales quite well(10+ msg/day), and is running at several
large companies.
y
Hi,
Tried to load kdepim today - rpmdrake says needs libpisock8-devel,
readline-devel. Is it normal for a non-devel package to require two devel
packages?
V.
Jaroslaw Zachwieja wrote:
But, we might be getting to the point where we actually need a cooker
extranet. For example, I would like to be able to remove build output on
an automated build host to get a package rebuilt, but we wouldn't want
anyone to be able to remove build output ...
Well, SP
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> No ... but I do want to see more configuration
> stored (possibly) in LDAP.
That is the way to go, no doubt in my mind.
Originally, when I checked the wiki page on libconf I
felt that it would be more interesting if the config
information was stored in XML. That
En/na Buchan Milne ha escrit:
magic wrote:
Luca Olivetti wrote:
Actually my thought was (from a systems administrator point of view) the
less I have to do the better, (at the same time, trying to make life
easier).
I agree. At present, uw-imap and (IIRC this was done for 9.1)
courier-imap, if y
> :-)
>
>> OK, then I will stop working on a libconf
>>
> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/LibconfProject)
>> backend for OpenLDAP
>
>
> What you are working on, is it a way of storing the
> configuration in LDAP instead of PERL? If that is the
> case it is a very cool concept.
>
No
On Sat Jun 07 2:10 +0200, Thibaut Fernagut wrote:
> And most of all .. will the symlink from automake be to automake-1.4 or automake1.4
> . You can imagine that this will cause confusion .
Uh...
Renaming the rpm has absolutely nothing to do with changing the symlink.
--
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PRO
:-)
> OK, then I will stop working on a libconf
>
(http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/LibconfProject)
> backend for OpenLDAP
What you are working on, is it a way of storing the
configuration in LDAP instead of PERL? If that is the
case it is a very cool concept.
Or maybe I am total
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-06 18:14 ---
Another request about numlock :
If numlock is required [ -f /var/lock/subsys/numlock ] then numlock sould be set in
mdkkdm
After the boot, this is not true.
Duri
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3840
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-06 17:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=515)
--> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=515&action=view)
Screenshot of KUser
In this screenshot of KUser the names appear corr
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
Product: mdkkdm
Component: mdkkdm
Summary: mdkkdm doesn't warn when capslock is turned on
Product: mdkkdm
Version: 9.1-24mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCON
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2984
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-06 17:20 ---
There is a bug filed in KDE Bugzilla:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You ar
Luca Berra wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:12:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I DO agree with you in that the user should be able to check the
> checkbox, if you leave me the possibility of modifying what the checkbox
> does, that is.
Well, you would then probably want to be able to m
On 2003-06-07(Sat) 05:14:47 +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> Is it possible to have an automatic macros in rpm which make:
> %exclude %_libdir/debug
>
> Somes specs have in %files:
> %_libdir/*
> and rpm stupidly include debug files !
Of course, automatic exclusion would be nice too, but badly pa
Hi!
I was wondering if it was a good idea to make rpms of the different
styles and fonst. etc the latex packages
from CTAN.
My idea was to make a sort of tetex-contrib package with different
styles, fonts etc taken from the CTAN misc and contrib
archive.
Many of the packages have missing insta
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4034
Product: urw-fonts
Component: documentation
Summary: changes to internal font names in urw-fonts vs original
ghostscript versions
Product: urw-fonts
Version: 2.0-9mdk
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Jaroslaw Zachwieja wrote:
> At the moment, to my knowledge we have the following machines _dedicated_
> to non-intel cooker development (please, developers, fill in all blanks):
>
> PPC
>
> - 1 x ?? - Olivier Thauvin
> - others?
>
I've let Olivier take over cooker P
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:12:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's just another checkbox when creating the user in Active
Directory (or maybe if you give them an email address). I am not saying
that we *need* to auto-create, but why must a user write scripts, instead
of being able to c
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:20:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> only because noone has already scripted for him something that is
> functional?, I am positive m$ exchange does not auto create a mailbox
> for every user on w
Luca Berra wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:20:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> yes and you get mail for mister rpcuser actually delivered :(
>>
>>Which can easily be prevented, especially when using courier+ldap.
>
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:20:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
yes and you get mail for mister rpcuser actually delivered :(
Which can easily be prevented, especially when using courier+ldap.
I was only meaning that /etc/passwd != l
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> yes and you get mail for mister rpcuser actually delivered :(
Which can easily be prevented, especially when using courier+ldap.
>
>>> By taking advantage of an LDAP environment, and using PAM, if I
>>> create an LDAP account, v
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:18PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Actually my thought was (from a systems administrator point of view) the
less I have to do the better, (at the same time, trying to make life
easier).
I agree. At present, uw-imap and (IIRC this was done for 9.1)
courier-imap, if you add
1) is there a way to upgrade 7.1b -> cooker on a running system?
This _should_ be possible. Grab a copy of the mirror, put it local on
the box, remove all possible 7.1b packages from the machine, upgrade the
rest to cooker. Should work, but it may be hairy at times... :-/
Wouldn't a rp
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:50:48PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait David Walser :
Shouldn't the perl package just provide perl(strict) so that a whole bunch
of packages don't have to do that requires exception?
Perl modules are supposed to begin with an uper case, while pragmas are
su
33 matches
Mail list logo
