Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The command adds the journal to the filesystem as a hidden file
without bringing it on line. I've done this on countless systems
live without problems.
the point is that if you enable journaling on a journal that *may*
have already errors, since you will
Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tune2fs -j /dev/hdaX
i would do this only in single mode after having fully checked the fs
with fsck to be sure to rely on journal protection for new operations
whereas some errors were still there in the fs.
On Monday 14 October 2002 10:40 am, J. Greenlees wrote:
well, when I went ext3 I started getting major shutdown problems, where
the system can't unmount device, like eth0 and /dev/fd0 ( thelast is
really wierd the device is busy and no such device on the computer )
it is faster, and
On Monday 14 October 2002 05:03 pm, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tune2fs -j /dev/hdaX
i would do this only in single mode after having fully checked the fs
with fsck to be sure to rely on journal protection for new operations
whereas some errors were
B == Biagio Lucini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
B Seriously, you have given a partial view of what ext3 is. There
B are serious reasons to choose it in my view
This is a naive question and my first-guess is that it is not
possible, but is there any way to 'upgrade' a live file-system to
Silly Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
becomes daring and writes:
B == Biagio Lucini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
B Seriously, you have given a partial view of what ext3 is. There
B are serious reasons to choose it in my view
This is a naive question and my first-guess is that
On Monday 14 October 2002 08:43 am, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
This is a naive question and my first-guess is that it is not
possible, but is there any way to 'upgrade' a live file-system to
ext3? I have some older machines that could benefit, but it's not
worth doing a complete re-install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yeah, and the good news with ext3 as opposed to another fs is that if the
kernel for some reason can't mount it as ext3 it can still mount as ext2.
On Sunday 13 October 2002 22:40, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Monday 14 October 2002 08:43 am, Gary
Vox wrote:
Silly Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
becomes daring and writes:
B == Biagio Lucini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
B Seriously, you have given a partial view of what ext3 is. There
B are serious reasons to choose it in my view
This is a naive question and my
Jason Straight wrote on Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:19:15PM -0400 :
For me the problem was that files which weren't even being written to would
get fragged with data from other files ending up mixed in with them. This
I make it a point to use notail for reiser. I don't like the tail
packing.
Dave Fluri wrote on Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:35:03AM -0400 :
I've never had a lick of trouble with either ext3 or ReiserFS. After a couple
of years of trouble-free use of ReiserFS, I installed Debian on this same
machine. I wanted to share a partition between Mandrake and Debian. At the
vendredi, le 11 octobre, 2002 18h21, Todd Lyons a écrit:
Dave Fluri wrote on Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:35:03AM -0400 :
I've never had a lick of trouble with either ext3 or ReiserFS. After a
couple of years of trouble-free use of ReiserFS, I installed Debian on
this same machine. I wanted to
On Thursday 10 October 2002 04:42, Buchan Milne wrote:
Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
In the 9.0 installer, during the Setup filesystem stage, when you
create a new partition, by default its filesystem type is tset to ext3fs.
Now I have to tell all the newbie converts that install Linux to
In the 9.0 installer, during the Setup filesystem stage, when you
create a new partition, by default its filesystem type is tset to ext3fs.
Now I have to tell all the newbie converts that install Linux to
manually change it to ReiserFS, because it is a more advanced filesystem.
After all,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
In the 9.0 installer, during the Setup filesystem stage, when you
create a new partition, by default its filesystem type is tset to ext3fs.
Now I have to tell all the newbie converts that install Linux to
manually change it to ReiserFS,
ReiserFS is still not to be trusted..
I have experienced this for myself and alot of other people are
complaining too...
oh well, back to work*sigh*
Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
In the 9.0 installer, during the Setup filesystem stage, when you
create a new partition, by default its
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
Now I have to tell all the newbie converts that install Linux to
manually change it to ReiserFS, because it is a more advanced filesystem.
After all, ext3 is just ext2 with a journal strapped-on. ReiserFS is a
new vision to filesystem
Biagio Lucini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seriously, you have given a partial view of what ext3 is. There are
serious reasons to choose it in my view, among which:
a) back compatibility with ext2 (conversion to and fro on the fly and
possibility of mounting clean ext3 partitions as ext2)
b)
Per ?yvind Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ReiserFS is still not to be trusted..
reiserfs can write up to 30 seconds after a program do some writing,
so if something happens before the end of these 30 seconds (power
outrage, hard lock, disk disconnection, reset, ...), all the
metadata'll be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Aleksander Adamowski
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] Why ext3fs is a default fs, not ReiserFS?
In the 9.0 installer, during the Setup filesystem stage
On Thursday 10 October 2002 10:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
Now I have to tell all the newbie converts that install Linux to
manually change it to ReiserFS, because it is a more advanced filesystem.
After all, ext3 is just ext2 with a
Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Thursday 10 October 2002 10:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
Now I have to tell all the newbie converts that install Linux to
manually change it to ReiserFS, because it is a more advanced filesystem.
After all,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:12:12 +0200
Per ?yvind Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ReiserFS is still not to be trusted..
I have experienced this for myself and alot of other people are
complaining too...
It seems everyone has the same bad experiences with reiser. My experiences are
different
Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
In the 9.0 installer, during the Setup filesystem stage, when you
create a new partition, by default its filesystem type is tset to ext3fs.
Now I have to tell all the newbie converts that install Linux to
manually change it to ReiserFS, because it is a more
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
d) ext3 has a much better fsck suite :
- currently, reiserfs / is never fcsked on boot if needed because
of broken fsck that refuse to check ro mounted fs (thought it
seems to have recently be fixed)
- reiserfsck don't handle std fsck's option set
ext3
Aleksander Adamowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ReiserFS people have an excellent vision of next-gen plugin-based
filesystem, but it turns out it's not quite ready yet.*
a reiserfs4 snapshot is expected soon for linux-2.5.x.
as for production usage, you can wait ...
When (if) it becomes
Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
d) ext3 has a much better fsck suite :
- currently, reiserfs / is never fcsked on boot if needed because
of broken fsck that refuse to check ro mounted fs (thought it
seems to have recently be fixed)
- reiserfsck don't handle
[snip]
ReiserFS people have an excellent vision of next-gen plugin-based
filesystem, but it turns out it's not quite ready yet. When (if) it
becomes ready, however, it will replace ext?fs without doubt (my doubt,
anyway ;-) ).
Mmm, that's what they keep telling about translators on the
andre wrote:
On Thursday 10 October 2002 14:32, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
btw. reiserfs does not *support* bad blocks marking yet, that's kinda
annoying too...
Isn't that done today in the harddisk itself? Don't think you need it
Not really, as I recently found the hard way on my IBM
On Thursday 10 October 2002 14:32, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
btw. reiserfs does not *support* bad blocks marking yet, that's kinda
annoying too...
Isn't that done today in the harddisk itself? Don't think you need it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If I had a nickel for every file reiserfs fragged on a busy server it still
woudln't come close to paying for the downtime - ext3 is rock solid.
On Thursday 10 October 2002 09:20 am, andre wrote:
On Thursday 10 October 2002 14:32, Per Øyvind
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Michal Bukovjan wrote:
Not really, as I recently found the hard way on my IBM DTLA-xxx 60GB.
another victim of this IBM series.
It is done in the hardware, untill you reach a certain maximum (no backup
sectors are available anymore for the bad ones).
That said, the
Jason Straight wrote on Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:45:45AM -0400 :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If I had a nickel for every file reiserfs fragged on a busy server it still
woudln't come close to paying for the downtime - ext3 is rock solid.
cool
reiserfsck --check
reiserfsck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For me the problem was that files which weren't even being written to would
get fragged with data from other files ending up mixed in with them. This
would happen on machines that had been running for long periods of time with
uptimes nearing 200+
On Friday 11 October 2002 08:19 am, Jason Straight wrote:
On Thursday 10 October 2002 07:17 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
Jason Straight wrote on Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:45:45AM -0400 :
If I had a nickel for every file reiserfs fragged on a busy server it
still woudln't come close to paying for the
jeudi. le 10 octobre 10, 2002 04h12, Per ?yvind Karlsen a crit:
ReiserFS is still not to be trusted..
I have experienced this for myself and alot of other people are
complaining too...
oh well, back to work*sigh*
Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
In the 9.0 installer, during the Setup
36 matches
Mail list logo
