Integrated: 8203359: Container level resources events

2021-05-21 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:57:12 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: > With this change it becomes possible to surface various cgroup level metrics > (available via `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics`) as JFR events. > > Only a subset of the metrics exposed by `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics`

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v14]

2021-05-20 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additio

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v9]

2021-05-20 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 19 May 2021 17:21:26 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: > I think you need to add the hook, for the event metadata to be correct. > Otherwise, the "period" setting will not show up. Yes. The failed test log would indicate also the rest of the metadata not being in a good shape. But with the hook

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v9]

2021-05-19 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:38:32 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and >> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show >> differences compared to the previous content of the PR. > > I won

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v12]

2021-05-19 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:11:40 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: >> With this change it becomes possible to surface various cgroup level metrics >> (available via `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics`) as JFR events. >> >> Only a subset of the metrics exposed by `jdk.i

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v13]

2021-05-19 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previou

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v12]

2021-05-19 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v11]

2021-05-19 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 19 May 2021 10:00:04 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 10 commits: >> >> - Small fixes >> - Remove trailing spaces >>

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v11]

2021-05-03 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v10]

2021-05-03 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:40:01 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request cont

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v10]

2021-05-03 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:20:57 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request cont

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v9]

2021-04-22 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:38:32 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Fix event metadata > > I wonder if something similar to below could be adde

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v10]

2021-04-22 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v7]

2021-04-21 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:49:10 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Ok. So what would be a good rule-of-thumb for when one should introduce a >> flag? > > I think we want to limit the number flags/options There are already too many, > preferably we would have none, but some of the ones we have today, like

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v8]

2021-04-21 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:21:32 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: >> How does it look in proc? > > This was based on > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/da860290c2657c0fb1de8c77c8dffdb35f1cf938/src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupV1Metrics.java#L149 > >

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v8]

2021-04-21 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:50:25 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> I guess we could fit those events under `Operating System/Memory` and >> `Operating System/Processor` categories. >> What about I/O? Currently, there is only `Operating System/Network` >> category. The options are: >> * Add `Operating

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v8]

2021-04-21 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:26:44 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits: >> >> - Roll back conditional registration of container events >&

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v9]

2021-04-21 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v8]

2021-04-21 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:55:48 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> I don't see this event field being set anywhere? Which Metrics API call is >> this using? > > How does it look in proc? This was based on

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v8]

2021-04-14 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:25:09 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request cont

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v8]

2021-04-14 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:17:14 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request cont

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v8]

2021-04-14 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request with a new target base due to

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v7]

2021-04-14 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:53:07 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote: >> Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Remove trailing spaces > > src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/internal/inst

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v7]

2021-04-02 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additio

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v6]

2021-04-02 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one addi

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v5]

2021-04-02 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additio

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events

2021-04-02 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:55:59 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: >>> Does each getter call result in parsing /proc, or do things aggregated over >>> several calls or hooks? >> >> From the looks of it the event emitting code uses `Metrics.java` interface >>

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events

2021-04-01 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:05:56 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >> Does each getter call result in parsing /proc, or do things aggregated over >> several calls or hooks? >> >> Do you have any data how expensive the invocations are? >> >> You could for example try to measure it by temporary making

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v4]

2021-04-01 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with two additiona

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v3]

2021-03-24 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additio

Re: RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events [v2]

2021-03-24 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
> By using these values the emitted events seem to contain useful information > without increasing overhead (the metrics values are read from `/proc` > filesystem so that should not be done too frequently). Jaroslav Bachorik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional

RFR: 8203359: Container level resources events

2021-03-22 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
With this change it becomes possible to surface various cgroup level metrics (available via `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics`) as JFR events. Only a subset of the metrics exposed by `jdk.internal.platform.Metrics` is turned into JFR events to start with. * CPU related metrics * Memory related

Re: [PING] Potential infinite waiting at JMXConnection#createConnection

2016-01-04 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
Hi Yuji, On 4.1.2016 15:14, KUBOTA Yuji wrote: Hi all, Could you please review this patch? Sorry for the long delay. Shanliang has not been present for some time and probably this slipped the attention of the others. However, core-libs mailing list might be more appropriate place to

Re: [PING-2] RFR 6425769: jmx remote bind address

2015-12-09 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On 9.12.2015 14:55, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 14:19 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote: Hi Jaroslav, On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 12:33 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 1.12.2015 11:17, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 10:32 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Wed, 2015-11

Re: [PING] RFR 6425769: jmx remote bind address

2015-12-01 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
, Severin Cheers, Severin On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 15:45 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 2.11.2015 19:06, Severin Gehwolf wrote: Hi, Thanks Jaroslav and Daniel for the reviews! Comments inline. On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:54 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: Hi, On 2.11.2015 16:19, Daniel Fuchs wrote

Re: [preview] Adding java.lang.Runtime.getVMArguments() method

2015-11-26 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On 26.11.2015 12:48, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: On 25.11.2015 04:11, Mandy Chung wrote: > On Nov 24, 2015, at 6:24 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 25/11/2015 10:06 AM, Mandy Chung wrote: >> >>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 3:45 PM, Peter Levart

Re: [preview] Adding java.lang.Runtime.getVMArguments() method

2015-11-26 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On 25.11.2015 04:11, Mandy Chung wrote: > On Nov 24, 2015, at 6:24 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 25/11/2015 10:06 AM, Mandy Chung wrote: >> >>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 3:45 PM, Peter Levart <peter.lev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>

[preview] Adding java.lang.Runtime.getVMArguments() method

2015-11-24 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
Hi, while working on an issue to clean up a code in java.base module using reflection to access RuntimeMXBean (from java.management module) in order to get hold of the VM arguments (yes, this won't work with module boundaries in place) it was pointed out that this functionality should be

Re: jmx-dev RFR 6425769: jmx remote bind address

2015-11-03 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
On 2.11.2015 19:06, Severin Gehwolf wrote: Hi, Thanks Jaroslav and Daniel for the reviews! Comments inline. On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:54 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote: > Hi, > > On 2.11.2015 16:19, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> Hi Severin, >> >> Adding servicea

Re: RFR 6425769: jmx remote bind address

2015-11-02 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
Adding core libs. On 2.11.2015 11:38, Severin Gehwolf wrote: Hi, Here is a patch addressing JDK-6425769. The issue is that the JMX agent binds to the wildcard address by default, preventing users to use system properties for JMX agents on multi-homed hosts. Given a host with local network

Re: jmx-dev RFR 6425769: jmx remote bind address

2015-11-02 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
Hi, On 2.11.2015 16:19, Daniel Fuchs wrote: Hi Severin, Adding serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net into the loop - that's a better alias than hotspot-dev for this kind of changes - maybe someone from serviceability-dev will offer to sponsor :-) I will let serviceability team members comment

Re: RFR(S): 6977426: sun/tools tests can intermittently fail to find app's Java pid

2014-12-16 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
Hi Katja, This request should probably go to core-libs as well. Other than that I have just a few nits: test/java/util/logging/TestLoggerWeakRefLeak.java L57: if (Logger.contains(args[0])) - Logger.equals(args[0]) ? L127: // in LogManager.loggers that *arebeing* properly managed - *are

Re: RFR(S): JDK-8033911 Simplify instrumentation of FileInputStream and RandomAccessFile

2014-02-07 Thread Jaroslav Bachorik
Looks good. Additional benefit is the compliance with the secure coding guide. -JB- On February 7, 2014 11:46:07 AM CET, Staffan Larsen staffan.lar...@oracle.com wrote: A few of the public read and write methods in FileInputStream and RandomAccessFile are declared native. This means that it is

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 6987597: ManagementFactory.getGarbageCollectorMXBeans() returns empty list with CMS

2013-11-28 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 4afe1281c837 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-11-28 09:10 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/4afe1281c837 6987597: ManagementFactory.getGarbageCollectorMXBeans() returns empty list with CMS Reviewed-by: mchung !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8027163: sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/CustomLauncherTest.java should be updated for jdk8 removal of solaris-32bit support

2013-11-18 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: d842131d12d8 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-11-18 15:25 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/d842131d12d8 8027163: sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/CustomLauncherTest.java should be updated for jdk8 removal of solaris-32bit support Reviewed-by: sla !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8028433: [TESTBUG] add -XX:+UsePerfData to some sun.management tests

2013-11-18 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 0298ebbaf3b8 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-11-18 16:20 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/0298ebbaf3b8 8028433: [TESTBUG] add -XX:+UsePerfData to some sun.management tests Reviewed-by: sla, egahlin !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8004126: TEST_BUG: com/sun/jdi/BadHandshakeTest.java fails intermittently

2013-11-13 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 680ef14a2cc0 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-11-13 13:12 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/680ef14a2cc0 8004126: TEST_BUG: com/sun/jdi/BadHandshakeTest.java fails intermittently Reviewed-by: dholmes, ykantser ! test/com/sun/jdi/BadHandshakeTest.java

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 6523160: RuntimeMXBean.getUptime() returns negative values

2013-11-10 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 0c75cc07d264 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-11-10 20:05 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/0c75cc07d264 6523160: RuntimeMXBean.getUptime() returns negative values Summary: RuntimeMXBean.getUptime() should be based on HR timers rather than on the OS time

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8007984: Null pointer dereference in jdk/linux-amd64/democlasses/demo/jvmti/heapTracker/src/java_crw_demo.c

2013-11-07 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: b5748857ef42 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-11-08 08:47 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/b5748857ef42 8007984: Null pointer dereference in jdk/linux-amd64/democlasses/demo/jvmti/heapTracker/src/java_crw_demo.c Reviewed-by: dholmes !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8027058: sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/RmiBootstrapTest.sh Failed to initialize connector

2013-10-30 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 5d1bda6c1fe3 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-30 14:50 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5d1bda6c1fe3 8027058: sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/RmiBootstrapTest.sh Failed to initialize connector Summary: Dynamically discover the first available port

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8020467: Inconsistency between usage.getUsed() and isUsageThresholdExceeded() with CMS Old Gen pool

2013-10-30 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 2a714dabb624 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-30 17:54 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2a714dabb624 8020467: Inconsistency between usage.getUsed() and isUsageThresholdExceeded() with CMS Old Gen pool Reviewed-by: mchung, brutisso !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8027358: sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/LocalManagementTest.java failing since JDK-8004926

2013-10-29 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: a3ac9c0b19a9 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-29 21:49 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a3ac9c0b19a9 8027358: sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/LocalManagementTest.java failing since JDK-8004926 Reviewed-by: alanb, egahlin !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7112404: 2 tests in java/lang/management/ManagementFactory fails with G1 because expect non-zero pools

2013-10-23 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: f4970c7abe93 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-23 15:03 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/f4970c7abe93 7112404: 2 tests in java/lang/management/ManagementFactory fails with G1 because expect non-zero pools Reviewed-by: mchung, sjiang !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7197919: java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadBlockedCount.java has concurency issues

2013-10-21 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 30c46debdf0f Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-21 10:40 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/30c46debdf0f 7197919: java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadBlockedCount.java has concurency issues Reviewed-by: sla, mchung !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8024613: javax/management/remote/mandatory/connection/RMIConnector_NPETest.java failing intermittently

2013-10-21 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: d8694ad1ed2d Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-21 10:54 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/d8694ad1ed2d 8024613: javax/management/remote/mandatory/connection/RMIConnector_NPETest.java failing intermittently Summary: RMID needs a varying amount of time to

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7140929: NotSerializableNotifTest.java fails intermittently

2013-10-21 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 698baf22e081 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-21 13:57 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/698baf22e081 7140929: NotSerializableNotifTest.java fails intermittently Reviewed-by: sjiang, alanb !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 6804470: JvmstatCountersTest.java test times out on slower machines

2013-10-15 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: abe8d432f714 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-10-15 10:26 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/abe8d432f714 6804470: JvmstatCountersTest.java test times out on slower machines Summary: Increasing the default timeout to cater for the slower machines

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 6815130: Intermittent ThreadMXBean/Locks.java test failure

2013-09-06 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: da9de6f5cd6f Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-09-06 10:03 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/da9de6f5cd6f 6815130: Intermittent ThreadMXBean/Locks.java test failure Summary: Preventing stale reads from ThreadExecutionSynchronizer.waiting flag Reviewed-by:

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8023464: test/closed/sun/tracing/ProviderProxyTest.java failing

2013-09-05 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: af1b08ff48ae Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-09-05 13:04 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/af1b08ff48ae 8023464: test/closed/sun/tracing/ProviderProxyTest.java failing Summary: Don't rely on assertions when an Exception suits better Reviewed-by: alanb,

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8004179: Few of test/java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/* tests don't clean up the created threads

2013-09-05 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 9522b5e836d3 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-09-05 14:34 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9522b5e836d3 8004179: Few of test/java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/* tests don't clean up the created threads Summary: Just run those tests in othervm mode.

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 4 new changesets

2013-08-19 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 8e098a29ecd8 Author:egahlin Date: 2013-08-16 17:02 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8e098a29ecd8 6417702: Graph in Memory tab is not redrawn immediately if changed via 'Chart' combo box Reviewed-by: alanb, jbachorik, sjiang !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8020875: java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ResetPeakThreadCount.java fails intermittently

2013-07-26 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 952476b80fa7 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-07-26 10:12 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/952476b80fa7 8020875: java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ResetPeakThreadCount.java fails intermittently Reviewed-by: dfuchs, chegar !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8019826: Test com/sun/management/HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean/SetVMOption.java fails with NPE

2013-07-11 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: a46982a212e0 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-07-11 09:21 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a46982a212e0 8019826: Test com/sun/management/HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean/SetVMOption.java fails with NPE Reviewed-by: sjiang, dholmes, mchung !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8010285: Enforce the requirement of Management Interfaces being public

2013-07-11 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: f3211af79339 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-07-11 21:11 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/f3211af79339 8010285: Enforce the requirement of Management Interfaces being public Reviewed-by: sjiang, dfuchs, mchung !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8015627: test/com/sun/jmx/remote/NotificationMarshalVersions/TestSerializationMismatch.java fails in agentvm mode

2013-05-30 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: dc22b7241a70 Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-05-30 13:58 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/dc22b7241a70 8015627: test/com/sun/jmx/remote/NotificationMarshalVersions/TestSerializationMismatch.java fails in agentvm mode Reviewed-by: alanb, chegar !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8005472: com/sun/jmx/remote/NotificationMarshalVersions/TestSerializationMismatch.sh failed on windows

2013-05-28 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 7d9fab5d86cd Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-05-28 15:57 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7d9fab5d86cd 8005472: com/sun/jmx/remote/NotificationMarshalVersions/TestSerializationMismatch.sh failed on windows Reviewed-by: chegar, smarks, dfuchs !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7199324: Connection ID for IPv6 addresses is not generated accordingly to the specification

2013-05-03 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 470f19b6bfdd Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-05-02 13:21 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/470f19b6bfdd 7199324: Connection ID for IPv6 addresses is not generated accordingly to the specification Summary: RemoteServer.getClientHost is returning a String

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8005791: Remove java.beans.* imports from com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.Introspector

2013-02-05 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 3119f0ebb58d Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-02-05 12:36 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/3119f0ebb58d 8005791: Remove java.beans.* imports from com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.Introspector Reviewed-by: rbackman !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7170447: Intermittent DeadListenerTest.java failure

2013-02-05 Thread jaroslav . bachorik
Changeset: 9ffcd758e2be Author:jbachorik Date: 2013-02-05 12:28 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9ffcd758e2be 7170447: Intermittent DeadListenerTest.java failure Summary: Due to asynchronous nature of processing server notifications it may happen that an