On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:46:42 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations:
> a/the, an?/an?, the/the…
>
> It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of
> the code.
This pull request has now been integrated.
On Tue, 24 May 2022 15:28:27 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
>> `VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds
>> conditions.
>> While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory
On Fri, 20 May 2022 21:05:07 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add documents
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/InputStream.java line 75:
>
>> 73: * @return the byte array.
> @jmehrens what about this then?
> I think it safe now(actually this mechanism is learned from Reader)
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
rename function skipBufferReference to skipBuffer
-
Changes:
- all:
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Tue, 24 May 2022 09:26:44 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> This patch tweaks the foreign API to use the newly added
> `WrongThreadException` instead of `IllegalStateException` to report
> confinement errors.
Marked as reviewed by mchung (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 21:15:23 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add documents
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/InputStream.java line 78:
>
>> 76: SoftReference ref =
> @jmehrens what about this then?
> I think it safe now(actually this mechanism is learned from Reader)
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
invert if; refine javadoc.
-
Changes:
- all:
On Tue, 24 May 2022 16:09:54 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemFactory.java
>> line 155:
>>
>>> 153: // There are some controllers (such as freezer) that
>>> Java doesn't
>>> 154: // care about. Just ignore
On Tue, 24 May 2022 16:15:03 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> This PR fixes a bug found on an Ubuntu host that's mostly running with
>> cgroupv2, but there's a controller (freezer) that is mounted in cgroupv1
>> mode.
>>
>> The container support code in the VM and JDK checks if we have
>>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 19:34:16 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> This is not a fall-through because the previous line ends with a `break`.
>
> My bad. How about `Intentional incomplete switch. There are ...`? Anyway, why
> is the empty `default` case needed other than for the comment?
To me, the
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:43:52 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemoryLayout.java line 374:
>>
>>> 372: *
>>> 373: * Additionally, the provided dynamic values must conform to some
>>> bound which is derived from the layout path, that is,
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:53:38 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Indices start at zero. The ceilDiv operation is needed so that the operation
>> returns the first index outisde the range (it's a bit subtle, sorry, but I
>> don't know how else to express).
>
> Here's a concrete example:
>
>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 21:08:51 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add documents
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/InputStream.java line 72:
>
>> 70: *
>> 71: * @param size
On Tue, 24 May 2022 18:15:45 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
>> `VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds
>> conditions.
>> While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory
On Thu, 5 May 2022 16:49:07 GMT, Mark Powers wrote:
> JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 6cc4bb11
Author:Mark Powers
Committer: Bradford Wetmore
URL:
> as title.
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
add test for newHashSet and newLinkedHashSet
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8302/files
- new:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 22:18:42 GMT, liach wrote:
>> Simplify opcode handling, use `final` in `PrimitiveTypeInfo`, and replace
>> the hash map with a simple lookup, similar to what's done in
>> [JDK-8284880](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284880) (#8242)
>
> liach has updated the pull
Need to use proper synchronization.
The CyclicBarriers might move the thread to WAITING state but not BLOCKED. So
it should not confuse existing checks.
-
Commit messages:
- 8287200
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8874/files
Webrev:
> @jmehrens what about this then?
> I think it safe now(actually this mechanism is learned from Reader)
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
refine javadoc, remove The "notice..." statement
-
Changes:
- all:
> as title.
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
revert much too changes for newHashSet
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8302/files
- new:
On Wed, 18 May 2022 23:20:45 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>>> Need to add apiNote documentation section to capacity-based constructors
>>> like for maps.
>>
>> @liach done.
>
> @XenoAmess oops, sorry for the delay. I think it would be good to get these
> into 19 as companions to
On Tue, 24 May 2022 16:23:52 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Maurizio Cimadamore has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Tweak javadoc for ValueLayout::arrayElementVarHandle
>
>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:55:13 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Here's a concrete example:
>>
>> Consider a sequence layout with 6 elements. Then:
>>
>> element count = 6
>> valid indices 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
>>
>> Now consider a var handle that is obtained by calling the path element
>> method, passing
On Tue, 24 May 2022 18:00:46 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> The terms `x_1, x_2, ... x__n` are defined, but `x_0` is not.
>>
>> I think you can refer to the first index out of bounds as the exclusive
>> upper bound of the range?
>
> Sorry i misread the text, we are talking about the same thing. I
On Tue, 24 May 2022 16:20:10 GMT, Mark Powers wrote:
> Mach5 tier1 and tier2 completed without any failures. I don't know what to
> make of the pre-submit failures - lang and hotspot?
IIUC, these are due to Loom failures in some of the other platforms supported
by OpenJDK but not by Oracle.
> Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
> `VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds conditions.
> While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory segment will
> protect against "true" OOB access), it is still possible for
On Tue, 24 May 2022 18:02:50 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Sorry i misread the text, we are talking about the same thing. I think it
>> would be clearer to refer `x_i` being in the range of `0` (inclusive) and
>> `b_i` (exclusive), otherwise an is thrown. That way in subsequent doc
On Sun, 22 May 2022 16:45:11 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> It might be GCC bug...
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
>>
>> This issue is for integer literal, but [Comment
>> 29](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578#c29) mentions address
>> calculation (e.g.
On Sun, 22 May 2022 08:40:28 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>> I saw some compiler warnings when I tried to build OpenJDK with GCC 12.0.1
>> on Fedora 36.
>> As you can see, the warnings spreads several areas. Let me know if I should
>> separate them by area.
>>
>> * -Wstringop-overflow
>>
> This is an early review of changes to better model JVM access flags, that is
> "modifiers" like public, protected, etc. but explicitly at a VM level.
>
> Language level modifiers and JVM level access flags are closely related, but
> distinct. There are concepts that overlap in the two domains
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:35:48 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> This is an early review of changes to better model JVM access flags, that is
>> "modifiers" like public, protected, etc. but explicitly at a VM level.
>>
>> Language level modifiers and JVM level access flags are closely related, but
>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 22:18:42 GMT, liach wrote:
>> Simplify opcode handling, use `final` in `PrimitiveTypeInfo`, and replace
>> the hash map with a simple lookup, similar to what's done in
>> [JDK-8284880](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284880) (#8242)
>
> liach has updated the pull
Generally add apiNote's to map from Java library methods to particular IEEE 754
operations. For now, I only added such notes to java.lang.Math and not
java.lang.StrictMath.
-
Commit messages:
- Add floor and ceil.
- JDK-8273346: Examine use of "rounding mode" and "rounding
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:26:52 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Did you consider switch (class) {...} in PrimitiveTypeInfo.get?
I don't think we can switch on class instances yet. Even with preview enabled,
best I can get is (for type incompatibility of `Class` and `Class`,
etc.)
On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:37:52 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> as title.
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> add test for newHashSet and newLinkedHashSet
test/jdk/java/util/HashMap/WhiteBoxResizeTest.java line 354:
>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:37:52 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> as title.
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> add test for newHashSet and newLinkedHashSet
test/jdk/java/util/HashMap/WhiteBoxResizeTest.java line 360:
>
> 8262889: Compiler implementation for Record Patterns
>
> A first version of a patch that introduces record patterns into javac as a
> preview feature. For the specification, please see:
>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 22:18:42 GMT, liach wrote:
>> Simplify opcode handling, use `final` in `PrimitiveTypeInfo`, and replace
>> the hash map with a simple lookup, similar to what's done in
>> [JDK-8284880](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284880) (#8242)
>
> liach has updated the pull
On Tue, 24 May 2022 04:58:44 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Commit
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/655500a4f5e3abcff176599604deceefb6ca6640
>> for issue [JDK-8286654](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286654)
>> added an optional description accessor on the `ToolProvider`
On Tue, 24 May 2022 04:50:58 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Christian Stein has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/spi/ToolProvider.java
>>
>> Co-authored-by: Anthony
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 19:47:33 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This PR addresses the performance issue that is described in JDK-8287162.
>
> With this fix, the ZipFileSystem methods: initOwner, initGroup, and
> initPermissions will not be invoked unless
On Mon, 23 May 2022 12:27:40 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> Bring in changes from the panama-foreign repo
>
> These changes pertain to explicitly rejecting unsupported call shapes on
> macos-aarch64.
>
> Original PRs:
> 1. https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign/pull/676
> 2.
On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:10:29 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Just FYI. There is a mistake in this changeset. The JDK ProblemList already
> contained:
>
> `java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LargeMapTest.java 8286980 windows-all`
>
> and this change then added:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Patch adds the planned support for new vector operations and APIs targeted
> for [JEP 426: Vector API (Fourth
> Incubator).](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280173)
>
> Following is the brief summary of changes:-
>
> 1) Extends the scope of existing lanewise API for
On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:37:52 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> as title.
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> add test for newHashSet and newLinkedHashSet
I looked at all the use sites and they look fine. Some look like
On Wed, 25 May 2022 03:02:45 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add test for newHashSet and newLinkedHashSet
>
> test/jdk/java/util/HashMap/WhiteBoxResizeTest.java line 360:
>
>> 358:
> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations:
> a/the, an?/an?, the/the…
>
> It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of
> the code.
Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last
On Mon, 23 May 2022 22:11:47 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This PR fixes a bug found on an Ubuntu host that's mostly running with
> cgroupv2, but there's a controller (freezer) that is mounted in cgroupv1 mode.
>
> The container support code in the VM and JDK checks if we have simultaneously
>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 09:26:44 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> This patch tweaks the foreign API to use the newly added
> `WrongThreadException` instead of `IllegalStateException` to report
> confinement errors.
Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Tue, 24 May 2022 07:01:52 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Please approve, @AlanBateman, @mcimadamore and others?
Okay with me.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8843
On Mon, 23 May 2022 13:11:29 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 428: Structured Concurrency (Incubator).
>>
>> This is a non-final API that provides a gentle on-ramp to structure a task
>> as a family of concurrent subtasks, and to coordinate the subtasks as a unit.
On Mon, 23 May 2022 21:09:24 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 428: Structured Concurrency (Incubator).
>>
>> This is a non-final API that provides a gentle on-ramp to structure a task
>> as a family of concurrent subtasks, and to coordinate the subtasks as
On Tue, 24 May 2022 04:18:44 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 428: Structured Concurrency (Incubator).
>>
>> This is a non-final API that provides a gentle on-ramp to structure a task
>> as a family of concurrent subtasks, and to coordinate the subtasks as a unit.
>
>
On Wed, 18 May 2022 13:27:24 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations:
> a/the, an?/an?, the/the…
>
> Also, I fixed a couple of spelling mistakes.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e0d361ce
Author:Alexey Ivanov
On Tue, 24 May 2022 09:52:29 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations:
>> a/the, an?/an?, the/the…
>>
>> It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of
>> the code.
>
> Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull
On Sun, 22 May 2022 05:58:25 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Commit
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/655500a4f5e3abcff176599604deceefb6ca6640
> for issue [JDK-8286654](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286654)
> added an optional description accessor on the `ToolProvider`
> This is the implementation of JEP 428: Structured Concurrency (Incubator).
>
> This is a non-final API that provides a gentle on-ramp to structure a task as
> a family of concurrent subtasks, and to coordinate the subtasks as a unit.
Alan Bateman has updated the pull request with a new target
On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:41:59 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 428: Structured Concurrency (Incubator).
>>
>> This is a non-final API that provides a gentle on-ramp to structure a task
>> as a family of concurrent subtasks, and to coordinate the subtasks as a unit.
On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:44:39 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Alan Bateman has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional
>>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:47:15 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> src/jdk.incubator.concurrent/share/classes/jdk/incubator/concurrent/StructuredTaskScope.java
>> line 1110:
>>
>>> 1108: * invoked {@link #join() join} (or {@link
>>> #joinUntil(Instant) joinUntil}).
>>> 1109: *
This patch tweaks the foreign API to use the newly added `WrongThreadException`
instead of `IllegalStateException` to report confinement errors.
-
Commit messages:
- Merge branch 'master' into wrong_thread_ex
- Initial push
Changes:
On Tue, 24 May 2022 09:26:44 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> This patch tweaks the foreign API to use the newly added
> `WrongThreadException` instead of `IllegalStateException` to report
> confinement errors.
javadoc:
On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:48:02 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> More generally, I see that you used `{@code ... }` in a lot of places where
>> `{@link ... }` could also be used. In some of those places (like this one)
>> where there is a clear cross-reference, I think `@link` could be
>>
On Wed, 18 May 2022 13:58:22 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations:
> a/the, an?/an?, the/the…
>
> I tried to avoid changing external libraries, there are quite a few such
> typos.
> Let me know if I should revert any files.
This
> Extend the range of Random.doubles(double, double) and similar methods.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
8202449: overflow handling in Random.doubles
-
Changes:
- all:
On Tue, 24 May 2022 05:36:30 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> liach has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> Move the try catch block as it doesn't throw checked exceptions
>
>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:52:07 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Alan Bateman has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional
>>
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:10:55 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> No need to separately perform `HashMap.containsKey` before `HashMap.remove`
> call. If key is present - it will be removed anyway. If it's not present,
> nothing will be deleted.
Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer).
-
On Mon, 23 May 2022 12:27:40 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> Bring in changes from the panama-foreign repo
>
> These changes pertain to explicitly rejecting unsupported call shapes on
> macos-aarch64.
>
> Original PRs:
> 1. https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign/pull/676
> 2.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:10:55 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> No need to separately perform `HashMap.containsKey` before `HashMap.remove`
> call. If key is present - it will be removed anyway. If it's not present,
> nothing will be deleted.
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
-
> This is the implementation of JEP 428: Structured Concurrency (Incubator).
>
> This is a non-final API that provides a gentle on-ramp to structure a task as
> a family of concurrent subtasks, and to coordinate the subtasks as a unit.
Alan Bateman has updated the pull request incrementally
> Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
> `VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds conditions.
> While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory segment will
> protect against "true" OOB access), it is still possible for
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:25:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
>> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
>> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
>> we can problemlist the
On Mon, 23 May 2022 12:28:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> [JDK-8284161](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284161) broke a lot
> of x86_32 code. The x86_32 porting is done under
> [JDK-8286642](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286642). Meanwhile,
> we can problemlist the
Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
`VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds conditions.
While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory segment will
protect against "true" OOB access), it is still possible for an
On Tue, 24 May 2022 14:51:10 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
>> `VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds
>> conditions.
>> While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory
On Tue, 24 May 2022 14:40:56 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
> `VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds conditions.
> While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory segment will
On Mon, 23 May 2022 19:47:33 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This PR addresses the performance issue that is described in JDK-8287162.
>
> With this fix, the ZipFileSystem methods: initOwner, initGroup, and
> initPermissions will not be invoked unless
On Tue, 24 May 2022 09:26:44 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> This patch tweaks the foreign API to use the newly added
> `WrongThreadException` instead of `IllegalStateException` to report
> confinement errors.
Marked as reviewed by darcy (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:12:31 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Ioi Lam has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> @jerboaa comments
>
> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemFactory.java
> line 155:
>
>>
> This PR fixes a bug found on an Ubuntu host that's mostly running with
> cgroupv2, but there's a controller (freezer) that is mounted in cgroupv1 mode.
>
> The container support code in the VM and JDK checks if we have simultaneously
> mounted v1 and v2 containers. If so, we revert to
On Mon, 23 May 2022 18:58:34 GMT, Mark Powers wrote:
>> JDK-6725221 Standardize obtaining boolean properties with defaults
>
> Mark Powers has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:
>
> - Alan and Jamil comments
On Tue, 24 May 2022 15:28:27 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Constructing indexed var handles using the `MemoryLayout` API produces
>> `VarHandle` which do not check the input indices for out-of-bounds
>> conditions.
>> While this can never result in a VM crash (after all the memory
On Thu, 19 May 2022 19:13:12 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8281682: Redundant .ico files in Windows app-image cause unnecessary bloat
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 45180633
Author:Alexey Semenyuk
URL:
87 matches
Mail list logo
