On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Yeah, and you shouldn't even mention these TLDs in your email, apparently.
Otherwise, Google thinks your account has been hacked, and you just sent a
phishing email; so it gets displayed with a red banner warning.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
wrote:
On 25.03.15 17:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have tried with debian wheezy 7.8, courier 0.68.2, openssl 1.0.1e
and I can confirm the same Gerald encountered - ssl3, tls1, tls1_1 and
tls1_2 are allowed by
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Lindsay Haisley writes:
3: Patch doesn't support IPv6. Which reminds me that I need to write
some code to fix other IPv6 handling deficiencies with smtpaccess.
That's very true. A couple of points on this, as
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmouse-cour...@fmp.com
wrote:
Spamming engines using IPv4 addresses frequently cycle through IP
addresses in order to defeat rate limiting filters. These are all
generally within the same /24 block.
We've seen variations in size between /30
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
On Fri 27/Feb/2015 15:26:03 +0100 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it
wrote:
but would it be worth?
Use case 1:
Hi, this is $customer,
could you please
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.html
Rebuild of: courier-unicode, courier, courier-imap, sqwebmail, maildrop,
courier-authlib, and cone packages.
Changes:
- Renamed the header files and the library
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
How about users deploying Tor?
Judging from their somewhat cute, naive paranoia, yes, they would be very
interested in that kind of data. :-)
No disrespect was ever intended.
No problem, and sorry for blowing up.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
On Fri 27/Feb/2015 10:28:12 +0100 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
I hoped I could, by using e.g. less to view the debug log (debug level 1)
The debug log is useful for debugging, but lines get garbled if there are
concurrent
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jan Ingvoldstad frett...@gmail.com wrote:
If not the IP address, it would be nice to have some sort of unique
session ID or similar for the logs, so that you could do single or dual
pass parsing of logs.
As it is now, log parsing is somewhat tedious
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
I don't know what that means. A webmail service does not need a back-end.
Yes, it does. But perhaps the back-end is something that you don't think is
there.
In this case: the file store, in Maildir/Maildir+ format.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Mark Constable ma...@renta.net wrote:
On 14/02/15 12:47, Zachary Grafton wrote:
On my mobile at least, with Chrome, the menu is extremely tiny and
practically impossible to use without zooming in about 15 times.
Yep, that was my main problem too. And
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Ángel González an...@16bits.net wrote:
Jeff Potter wrote:
(I don’t understand why Apple doesn't use SRV records — when you
enter an email address, they make an HTTPS connection to their
servers with the domain to see if they can auto-setup the results
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
That's true only if properly-signed SSL certificates are used. Since too
many small to medium sized organizations (rightfully) don't feel like
paying for a valid certificate for their mail server, too many mail
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Lindsay Haisley fmouse-cour...@fmp.com
wrote:
What's the current status of port recommendations for courier for SSL
and TLS (STARTTLS)? It may be my legacy configuration, but SSLPORT=465
in esmtpd-ssl here. Online resources are confusing about this, the
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure about conversion issues as I haven't done so in the past.
You're likely to lose things like message tags and search indexes, as
well as some features that Dovecot provides which Courier IMAP does not
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Mark Constable ma...@renta.net wrote:
On 31/01/15 18:52, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
Imagine being a recipient of this, and trying to make the flood stop.
Do you know how the courier mailbot program works?
I was unfamiliar with it, and RFC 3834 seems
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Mark Constable ma...@renta.net wrote:
I've been meaning to do this for the past decade...
#!/bin/bash
# autoreply 20150130 (C) Mark Constable ma...@renta.net (AGPL-3.0)
#
# A simple vacation autoreply script for courier-mta based mailservers.
I'm not sure
Imagine being a recipient of this, and trying to make the flood stop.
And imagine forgetting the last lines of the message!
Unix systems usually come with, or at least have a package for, a program
for autoresponses.
This program is called vacation, and it does it just right. It's been
.:
foo.com with a CNAME of “bar.com”
foo.com with an MX of “some-good-mailserver.example.com”
On 22.01.15 19:23, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
Well, this is in direct violation of the DNS specification for CNAME. When
foo.com is a CNAME, it CANNOT have any other records, so the behaviour of
that MX
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Jeff Potter jpotter-cour...@codepuppy.com
wrote:
...
My understanding of why CNAMEs are prohibited for MX hosts is that they
can
introduce loops. The last paragraph of Section 5.1 explains how a sender
should attempt to locate itself in the list of MXes,
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
I'll confirm that a HELO check blocks a lot of junk.
The default settings do not enable SPF checking at all; so the default
configuration does not check the HELO.
But, if someone wants to do that, this setting is
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Jan Ingvoldstad writes:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik URL:mailto:
mr...@courier-mta.commr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
At some point, I suppose that the junk senders will wise up
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org wrote:
I don't say that this rule is bullshit or it must be changed. I just
wonder why most of the folks out there managed to handle it the other
way and courier does not.
I think you're wrong about your most of the folks out
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Lisa Muir 34.24...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Hi Lisa!
GOing to be decommisioing a bunch of email accounts for an organisation
today as we migrate them from an old courier server to a new one. All the
accounts were accessed as IMAP accounts.
Told them I
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Zenon Panoussis ora...@provocation.net
wrote:
An iphone that was working flawlessly with courier imap, suddenly
can't connect any more. The user did nothing, so the problem likely
stems from some automatic update on the phone.
This has been happening on and
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Matthias Wimmer m...@tthias.eu wrote:
Hi Anders,
El 2013-09-11 09:41:42, Anders escribió:
A side note, I wonder why courier doesn't use IPv6 by default?
+1 (Me and others already asked for that as well.)
As I remember, Sam doesn't like this idea very
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
I still see no sane reason for removing SPF record from DNS.
Adding support for a new, optional record type is always a hassle.
Supporting the TXT record that SPF was designed for in the first place is
easy, no
I know I said I would shut up, but this is a bit of a nit I have to pick.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.comwrote:
The general idea here is to limit your customer to some reasonable limit,
say a hundred email messages per hour. A typical customer will never
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
At my former job (an ISP), I recommended users to use SMTP service from
they
e-mail providers, because
- if someone gets paid for mail service, they should provide SMTP too and
not leave the expense from spam
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
On Mon 26/Aug/2013 10:00:52 +0200 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
One reason for this is that compromised computers can then effectively
be
taken out of circulation by the ISP.
Not for local networks using NAT. The ISP can
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Hello,
Greetings. I've been using the courier suite for some time and I really
like it. The imapd outbox feature comes a real handy some times. I also
use spamassassin to filter incoming email. However, some spam does get
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Kristian Duus Østergaard krist...@duus.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi there!
I'll just start with noting that I come from a different school of MTA
administration than Matus Uhlar, so I've learned things differently.
My smtp server is currently using identlookup and
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
This is not what I was saying. I have said that if someone provides IDENT
lookups, the response will be used and the client is rewarded with avoiding
the timeout when waiting to timeout.
I'm sorry for
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Lindsay Haisley fmouse-cour...@fmp.com wrote:
Second, is Courier unique in exciting this particular config bug?
Surely many or most sending SMTP servers attempt to use STARTTLS if the
receiving server advertises support for it, and the mail admins of the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Lucio Crusca lu...@sulweb.org wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
For example, Lucio's server could have matched the bad MX 20
of domain.com, unable to recognize its own IP address because it sits
behind a NAT, and unable to recognize its own name since the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.comwrote:
There are no prescribed means for handling bad DNS data. If DNS is wrong,
one cannot have any expectation that it will work in any particular way,
even if some parts of it are correct.
That's not quite correct,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
On Tue 26/Jun/2012 13:14:34 +0200 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Sam Varshavchik
mr...@courier-mta.com mailto:mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
There are no prescribed means for handling bad
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 13:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
I guess that for imap, only mail= is used. I guess the home= is not
used in such case. But I advise you not to change this schema.
In the virtual account setup we use at $orkplace, a typical userdb
entry does NOT
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 06:00, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Well, where exactly do you expect to find a $HOME/Maildir, in that case.
After all, that's where you'll find your mailbox, in a real account. So,
that's exactly where you'd logically find it in a virtual account, then.
39 matches
Mail list logo
