On 2013-08-15 02:05, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Anders writes:
Hi
Is there any way with Courier IMAP to implement server-side virtual
folders based on meta keywords, such as the Search Folders in
Thunderbird or Outlook?
The short answer is: no.
I guess one way to do this would be using
On 16/08/13 11:18, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Anders writes: Perhaps IMAP will one day evolve a little :)
Overall, IMAP has been withering, and in decline, and I'd be surprised
if the trend reverses.
That's fascinating comment Sam, coming from someone who would have a good
feel such a thing.
Mark Constable writes:
On 16/08/13 11:18, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Anders writes: Perhaps IMAP will one day evolve a little :)
Overall, IMAP has been withering, and in decline, and I'd be surprised
if the trend reverses.
That's fascinating comment Sam, coming from someone who would have
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 22:04 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I don't have any figures or stats. But everywhere I look, I see no signs of
life. On Usenet, comp.mail.imap used to carry respectable daily traffic a
while ago. It's a ghost town now, maybe a dozen posts a year, for the last
4-5
On 16/08/13 12:04, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I wish I could say otherwise, but that's what it is. The flip side of the
coin is that IMAP is a mature protocol. It does its job, and there is no
viable replacement for it. As long as there's still a need for a standardized
client/server mail
Lindsay Haisley writes:
I'm really distressed to hear this. I run a small mail hosting service
and recommend IMAP to my customers over POP3 all the time. My server's
spam management system relies on special IMAP mail folders which are
dumped into or routed out of SpamAssassin with various
Mark Constable writes:
On 16/08/13 12:04, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I wish I could say otherwise, but that's what it is. The flip side of the
coin is that IMAP is a mature protocol. It does its job, and there is no
viable replacement for it. As long as there's still a need for a
