Github badge

2017-07-05 Thread Nigel Horne
I know that the downside of suggesting anything is that someone will say "that's a great idea, why don't you do it", but has anyone thought of, or better still implemented, a Github badge of CPAN test results (like 90% if your module is 10% red on matrix.cpantesters.org) you can put into your R

Re: Github badge

2017-07-05 Thread James E Keenan
On 07/05/2017 02:56 PM, Nigel Horne wrote: I know that the downside of suggesting anything is that someone will say "that's a great idea, why don't you do it", but has anyone thought of, or better still implemented, a Github badge of CPAN test results (like 90% if your module is 10% red on matr

Re: Github badge

2017-07-05 Thread Jonas B. Nielsen
Hi James, That is the latest CPAN release, check: https://badge.fury.io/ Additional badges would be awesome. Like cpan-testers success rate, Perl::Critic score (???) and Kwalitee. The issue is that these primarily make sense to CPAN/Perl people. Code climate or similar

Re: Github badge

2017-07-05 Thread Jed Lund
Nigel, Many perl badges are available (including a kwalitee badge) ex. https://metacpan.org/pod/Log::Shiras but not a CPAN testers badge to my knowledge. However, with the release of a CPAN testers API; http://api.cpantesters.org/docs/?url=/v3#/Release and the Sheilds.io site https://github.

Re: Github badge

2017-07-05 Thread Doug Bell
"That's a great idea, is anyone interested in implementing it?" ;) I know of no such thing, but I'm willing to mentor anyone through the process of building it if they're interested. The easiest way is going to be to build an SVG using a Mojolicious template. I've created https://github.com/cpa

Removing/hiding data from CPAN Testers

2017-07-05 Thread Doug Bell
I've gotten a few requests to remove data from CPAN Testers. I don't know if that has ever been done, and I'm not sure if I'd like to start doing it, but there are some situations that I do not think can be fixed any other way: Chad Granum (Exodist) wants to see the latest releases of Test-Simpl

Re: Removing/hiding data from CPAN Testers

2017-07-05 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Doug How much change would result, and how difficult would it be, if you deleted data pertaining to version of Perl which are no longer supported? On 06/07/17 10:03, Doug Bell wrote: I've gotten a few requests to remove data from CPAN Testers. I don't know if that has ever been done, and I

Re: Removing/hiding data from CPAN Testers

2017-07-05 Thread Karen Etheridge
Define "versions of Perl which are no longer supported"? On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Ron Savage wrote: > Hi Doug > > How much change would result, and how difficult would it be, if you > deleted data pertaining to version of Perl which are no longer supported? > > > On 06/07/17 10:03, Doug B

Re: Removing/hiding data from CPAN Testers

2017-07-05 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Karen I paused over that statement, but I'm sure there are persons with the Perl 5 porters group, for example, who may be able to specify same, in a way I'm not qualified to do :-). On 06/07/17 11:50, Karen Etheridge wrote: Define "versions of Perl which are no longer supported"? On Wed,

Re: Removing/hiding data from CPAN Testers

2017-07-05 Thread Karen Etheridge
I'm not sure why you'd suggest it then? What Perl versions would *you* suggest be removed from cpantesters? I would contend that all results are valuable. Helping preserve backwards compatibility is one of the great things that the cpantesters network brings us. On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Ro

Re: Removing/hiding data from CPAN Testers

2017-07-05 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Karen Obviously I suggested as one mechanism to reduce the size of the disk space used. As for versions, perhaps zap 5.10.0 and older? And yes, I'm aware there may be older versions running in the wild, but the point is to manage the CPAN (Tester) infrastructure within the capabilities o

fast matrix v.s. matrix

2017-07-05 Thread Jean-Damien Durand
Hello, I was expecting fast-matrix web page to always show at least the same number of tests than non-fast matrix web-page, or more (i.e. fast-matrix includes the results from log.txt not yet digested into non-fast matrix result). Today if I compare e.g. http://fast-matrix.cpantesters.org/?

Re: fast matrix v.s. matrix

2017-07-05 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Jean-Damien Long-time no-see on #marpa :-). I think you'll simply have to wait for the fast-matrix to catch up. On 06/07/17 15:24, Jean-Damien Durand wrote: Hello, I was expecting fast-matrix web page to always show at least the same number of tests than non-fast matrix web-page, or more (

Re: Removing/hiding data from CPAN Testers

2017-07-05 Thread Doug Bell
Disk space is not a concern, and as long as ServerCentral is donating the database server, likely won't be: 80,000,000 records are taking up about 500G, and we've got twice that available on SSD, and 8x that available on NAS, and that was just hardware we had lying around and could toss together

Re: fast matrix v.s. matrix

2017-07-05 Thread Doug Bell
Slaven would have to answer definitively, but fast-matrix isn't necessarily guaranteed to be accurate. It's not supposed to be. It's supposed to be fast. Matrix uses the fully-processed CPAN Testers data, which has been built to ensure that no data is lost between the Metabase and the website. F