> On Jun 11, 2019, at 6:22 AM, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2019, at 5:56 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:45:27PM +0200, E. Choroba wrote:
>>
>>> I've just noticed one of my distribution failed in 5.28.1. When examining
>>> the report, I found it
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 5:56 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:45:27PM +0200, E. Choroba wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed one of my distribution failed in 5.28.1. When examining
>> the report, I found it failed under "strict hashpairs". I had no idea what
>> it was, so I
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:45:27PM +0200, E. Choroba wrote:
> I've just noticed one of my distribution failed in 5.28.1. When examining
> the report, I found it failed under "strict hashpairs". I had no idea what
> it was, so I Googled - and found it's a cperl thing. Reading the report
>
Thanks a lot, sounds like good news.
Ch.
==
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Doug Bell wrote:
For now, I'm just going to filter them out entirely: They will not appear in
test summaries, release summaries, or failure
For now, I'm just going to filter them out entirely: They will not appear in
test summaries, release summaries, or failure notifications. I will be holding
on to them, and they can be accessed via the reports API.
In the future, I'd like to populate a "language variant" field for those
