On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:54 AM Martin Doerr wrote:
> My argument about measuring non-physical things is that it does not
> constitute an observation process, but an abstraction from observable
> things. We can always use Attribute Assignment for such evaluations. So, we
> can assign the word
It's always comparison with something, we fix difference.
With kind regards,
Daria Hookk
Senior Researcher of
the dept. of archaeology of
Eastern Europe and Siberia of
the State Hermitage Museum,
PhD, ICOMOS member
E-mail: ho...@hermitage.ru
Skype: daria.hookk
Dear Robert,
Yes, exactly.
My argument about measuring non-physical things is that it does not
constitute an observation process, but an abstraction from observable
things. We can always use Attribute Assignment for such evaluations.
So, we can assign the word count to a text, without using
Martin wrote in particular:
Reduce in CRMbase Mesaurement , P40 observed dimension, to E18 Physical
Thing. Add 3 different properties “has dimension” in CRMBase to E70 Thing,
E53 Place, E4 Period (or E2 Temp Entity).
I agree with your argumentation, and believe that the changes in CRM Base
Dear All,
Let me take up this issue, after new considerations:
Background:
**
*Posted by Robert Sanderson on 9/9/2020*
Dear all,
I believe that there is an inconsistency in the model for measurements
and dimensions.
E54 Dimensions are associated directly with E70 Things using P43 has
