Re: [Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

Hi, Please count on me as well for the Persian version. Kind regards, Massoomeh > On 9. Mar 2021, at 10:30, Дарья Юрьевна Гук via Crm-sig > wrote: > >  Count me in as well for Russian version. > > > With kind regards, > Daria Hookk > > Senior Researcher of > the dept. of archaeology of

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue:530 Bias in the CRM

Dear Thanasis, all, I would be happy to join the discussion. Another useful reading other than the already cited ones, is ["Cataloguing Culture: Legacies of Colonialism in Museum Documentation”](https://www.ubcpress.ca/cataloguing-culture) by Hannah Turner. Regarding the name and the

Re: [Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

Count me in as well for Russian version. With kind regards, Daria Hookk Senior Researcher of the dept. of archaeology of Eastern Europe and Siberia of the State Hermitage Museum, PhD, ICOMOS member E-mail: ho...@hermitage.ru Skype: daria.hookk

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue:530 Bias in the CRM

Thank you Erin. We are using Zotero already for the CRM so this is a good idea. I can check if a new folder can be created for issue 530. T. On 08/03/2021 19:01, Erin Canning wrote: I would also like to be involved in this discussion, please! I too have a reading list on the subject that I

Re: [Crm-sig] Bias in the CRM

Happy to join as well. I'm co-chair for the Bias Awareness and Responsibility Committee for Cultural Heritage at Yale University, and happy to share our experiences in that work. This is especially relevant to our work as we move to adopt CIDOC-CRM (via Linked Art) as our baseline ontology. Some

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue:530 Bias in the CRM

I would also like to be involved in this discussion, please! I too have a reading list on the subject that I would be happy to share; I have been meaning to pull everything into a Zotero library and this is a good excuse to do so. For a single article to start things off, I would recommend

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue:530 Bias in the CRM

Fantastic! Thank you for sharing and you are first in the list. For the rest in list and if you did not attend today's sessions, following discussion for issue 530, a working group is being formed to discuss bias in the CRM. Please let me know if you wish to contribute to the discussion.

Re: [Crm-sig] Bias in the CRM

Dear Thanasis, all, Some digital humanists work and publish on this question of bias in digital humanities: here is an example of very a propos publication: https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425 I gathered myself bibliography about decolonizing

Re: [Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

Count me in as well. Cheers, Anais On Mon, Mar 8, 2021, 17:44 Franco Niccolucci via Crm-sig < crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote: > Please count me in > > Franco > > Prof. Franco Niccolucci > Director, VAST-LAB > PIN - U. of Florence > Scientific Coordinator ARIADNEplus > Technology Director 4CH > >

[Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

Please count me in Franco Prof. Franco Niccolucci Director, VAST-LAB PIN - U. of Florence Scientific Coordinator ARIADNEplus Technology Director 4CH Editor-in-Chief ACM Journal of Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) Piazza Ciardi 25 59100 Prato, Italy

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 519: Homework to propose deprecation of P48, P54

Hi All, (Sorry send key accidently) This may well be the right approach, but I had a general point about these areas. It would be useful to know the rationale behind them in the first instance. It occurred to me that perhaps the CIDOC-CRM needs to have some kind of associated knowledge base

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 519: Homework to propose deprecation of P48, P54

Hi All, This may well be the right approach, but I had a general point about these areas. But it would be useful to know the rationale behind them in the first instance. It occurred to me that perhaps the CIDOC-CRM needs to have some kind of knowledge base around it that points to the

Re: [Crm-sig] Propose New Issue: Guidelines and Protocols for Translating CIDOC CRM

Dear All, Thank you George for proposing this issue. I totally agree with this proposal. Due to our experience with translating the Model into Persian, Omid Hodjati and I answered to your questions. Please follow this link to see the slides of our

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 388 measuring position

Dear Martin, thanks for the feedback and pointing me to P196 relating the E18 to E92. I missed that one, now the Presence works fine for E18. Looking forward the discussion, Best, Gerald From: Martin Doerr Date: Monday, 8. March 2021 at 09:39 To: "Hiebel, Gerald" , crm-sig Subject: Re:

[Crm-sig] recording of the 49th meeting for checking the minutes

Dear all, The 49th meeting zoom meeting will be recorded for the purpose of taking minutes. The recordings will be deleted as soon as the minutes are completed and checked against the recordings. Best, Christian-Emil Ore deputy chair, CRM-SIG ___

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 388 measuring position

Dear Gerald, Yes, this should be subclass of O21 Measurement. We need further elaboration about how measurements relate to the approximation of things of interest. I found this to be quite diverse, and adding to this class a repetition of all topological relations confusing. E18 still has a

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 388 measuring position

Dear Martin and all, thanks for taking this forward and the suggested proposition, which defines the process very well. One question I have is how to relate the Position Measurement to the measured object (E18 or S10). I believe the E93 Presence is the correct way for it, but we may run into a