other concepts of family are regarded as
particular examples of E74 Group.”
From: athinak
Sent: 27 August 2019 09:40
To: Christian-Emil Smith Ore
Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr; Runa, Lucília; Barbedo, Francisco
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P7
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Franco
Niccolucci
Sent: 24 August 2019 19:45
To: Maria Jose de Almeida
Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr; "Runa, Lucília"; Barbedo, Francisco
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language
Dear Maria, all
the problem comes from the fact that the C
istian-Emil
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Crm-sig on behalf of Franco
> Niccolucci
> Sent: 24 August 2019 19:45
> To: Maria Jose de Almeida
> Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr; "Runa, Lucília"; Barbedo, Francisco
> Subjec
Sent: 24 August 2019 19:45
To: Maria Jose de Almeida
Cc: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr; "Runa, Lucília"; Barbedo, Francisco
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] EMAIL SUSPEITO: P72 has Language
Dear Maria, all
the problem comes from the fact that the CRM usually models what humans DO, not
what they ARE
Dear Maria, all
the problem comes from the fact that the CRM usually models what humans DO, not
what they ARE. To model the latter, it is therefore necessary to introduce an
event in which the person participates, as Thanasis suggested. What he proposes
is correct, but considering a language
Dear Maria,
I think the complexity is from the fact that Language in the CRM is
modelled as a Type, i.e. to be used for classifying things.
How about creating an E7 Activity to describe learning a language and
then use P16 used specific object → E56 Language?
Or create a separate authority
Dear all,
As some of you may know, I’m working in the Portuguese National Archives
an we are building a new data infrastructure using CIDOC-CRM for
archival description.
When describing biographical information it’s common to state that some
person was fluent in some language, or
