Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] News feed working with Java 11

first foray into E4 territory, I am sure you will find room for improvement. ;-) So, Lars, feel free to take over if you have time and interest; the codebase of the plug-in is not that big. Best wishes, Andreas -- Dr. Andreas Sewe | s...@cqse.eu | +49 152 56342856 CQSE GmbH | Centa-Hafenbraedl

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Participation

Hi Wayne, > After some churn, Eclipse Code Recommenders ended up in 2018-12, but is > now marked as disabled. What is the participation status for this > project in 2019-03? I think Code Recommenders is currently lacking the manpower to join the release train again. In fact, I'm afraid I will

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Errors when running 2018-12 RC2 on Java 11

Holger Voormann wrote: > Eclipse Code Recommenders and the RSS News feature were removed in > RC2  > [5] (which IMHO is a big loss) also use the javax.xml.bind package > (e.  > g. here [6] without 'Import-Package: javax.xml.bind' [7]). FYI, the Code Recommenders RSS News feature (not the rest of

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Withdrawing Code Recommenders from SimRel

Hi Mat, > Hi Andreas, > > Is there a bug with a summary of the situation so far? no, not yet. There's detailing my attempts to create a 2018-12 target platform and getting it to build against Java 11, but I am no longer being paid to work on Code

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Withdrawing Code Recommenders from SimRel

Wayne Beaton wrote: > AFAICT, Eclipse Code Recommenders has been removed from the packages. I > do, however, see references to what I think look like references to > org.eclipse.recommenders.news.rcp bundle (optional) and extension point > in a couple of plugin.xml and MANIFEST files. Should these

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Withdrawing Code Recommenders from SimRel

Wayne Beaton wrote: I believe that we have packages that include Eclipse Code Recommenders. We'll need to make sure that they adapt accordingly. Yes, if I can't make the build work, I will prepare a change for the org.eclipse.epp.packages project that removes Code Recommenders from the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Withdrawing Code Recommenders from SimRel

Wayne Beaton wrote: Starting when? i.e. is Eclipse Code Recommenders still in for 2018-12? not answering for the project lead, but just as a regular committer, who has ATM unfortunately very little time for maintenance work: I would like to contribute to 2018-12 *if* I can get Code

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel 2018-09 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is available

Hi, > The 2018-09 RC1 update repository is now available from: > > => http://download.eclipse.org/releases/2018-09/ do we have "Repo Reports from last successful CLEAN BUILD" available for 2018-09 builds as well? I couldn't find the link (or a CLEAN BUILD job) at

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [epp-dev] 2018-09 M3 EPP packages

Hi Martin, > When I download 2018-09-M3 JEE package for macOS and run it, I get massive > amounts of bundles being installed, but not resolved. > Most of these things seem to go back to: > > org.apache.lucene.queryparser_7.1.0.v20180828-2118 > > having issues to resolve a package import for

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Orbit Bundles To Be Removed From 2018-09 M3

Nick Boldt wrote: > * o.e.epp.logging.aeri.feature requires lucene.analysis 6.1 Nick, are you sure? I just checked and all I can see are Import-Packages on Lucene [7.1.0,8.0.0). Also, the update site [1] offers only Lucene 7. Can you please clarify? Best wishes, Andreas [1]

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Orbit Bundles To Be Removed From 2018-09 M3

Hi Ed, > IMHO this means that Code Recommenders must withdraw from SimRel. > > a) all SimRel contributions should use the latest Orbit version yes, but the emphasis is on *should*. > b) mismatch of Guava has been a long-running nightmare with Guava > classes in APIs a known no-no causing

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Orbit Bundles To Be Removed From 2018-09 M3

Nick Boldt wrote: > Possible impacts: > > As to Lucene removals: > > * org.eclipse.recommenders.models 2.5.3 requires lucene.core 3.5 Again, we can't switch because we need to parse an Lucene 3.x index downloaded from the model repository, which newer Lucene versions can't parse anymore.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Orbit Bundles To Be Removed From 2018-09 M3

Hi Roland, > I just wanted to give a heads-up that the following bundles (and > corresponding source bundles) are expected to be removed from the Orbit > build towards 2018-09, for M3 [1]. > > com.google.guava 15.0.0, 18.0.0 (use 21.0.0) Code Recommenders still uses Guava 15 and can't switch

[cross-project-issues-dev] Code Recommenders participates in 2018-09

Hi all, Code Recommenders will participate in the 2018-09 SimRel, with offset +3. The version contributed will be a 2.5.x bug fix release only [1]. Best wishes, Andreas [1] -- Codetrails GmbH The best code

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up: multiple HttpClient versions in simrel

Hi, > Looks like Code Recommenders also contributes 4.5.2.v20180410-1551 [1]. correction: We don't. Instead, we accidentally contribute 4.5.2.v20170210-0925 from [2], which takes Orbit's Oxygen.3 contribution as input. Normally, that would have been a bug, but in this case everything works out.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up: multiple HttpClient versions in simrel

Carsten Reckord wrote: > I’ve dug around a bit (for details, see > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535821), and the two > versions are contributed by the Platform > (org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient_4.5.2.v20170210-0925) and by JGit >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Deprecating the command line JAR signing service (aka /usr/bin/sign) - read if you use Buckminster

Hi Sam, > Actually, I am still not able to get this to work. It resolves the > plugin now but it doesn't seem to do anything. > > The documentation for eclipse-jarsigner is a bit lacking. I would assume > that if you invoke the plugin from a pom, it will replace all .jar files > in the directory

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Latest platform I-builds requiring Java 9?

Hi Jonah, > As far as I can tell this issue has re-appeared in Photon RC2, but > with Java 10 this time: > > 13:18:52 [ERROR] Cannot resolve target definition: > 13:18:52 [ERROR] Software being installed: org.eclipse.sdk.ide > 4.8.0.I20180524-0900 > 13:18:52 [ERROR] Missing requirement:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] HTTPS connections to Eclipse Marketplace time out

Andrey Loskutov wrote: > I believe we have problems with our servers - I saw sporadic 503 bugzilla > errors today and also my daily SDK download says it will be done in 10 hours > :-( You may be right. The HTML of https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/ is decorated with with "Unable to connect to

[cross-project-issues-dev] HTTPS connections to Eclipse Marketplace time out

Hi, I just noticed that marketplace.eclipse.org cannot be reached over HTTPS (Time Out). HTTP works fine, though. >> wget http://marketplace.eclipse.org/ > --2018-04-18 08:55:11-- http://marketplace.eclipse.org/ > Resolving marketplace.eclipse.org (marketplace.eclipse.org)... 198.41.30.197 >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Building with Tycho against Platform M5 products requires some effort

Hi all, > As you may have seen on some other thread, build with latest release of > Tycho with Platform M5 product (sdk, ide...) in target-platform can > result in the following error: > > [ERROR] Cannot resolve target definition: > [ERROR]   Software being installed: org.eclipse.platform.ide >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Photon opt-in deadline is December 15.

Hi Wayne, > If your project is not listed, or is missing release information, please > announce your intent soon. If you're dropping out let us know that as well. I have created a preliminary Code Recommenders 2.6.0 release record. Please link it from the participating projects list (as

[cross-project-issues-dev] Potential problems with the EPP packages for Oxygen.1 RCs

Hi cross-projects-issues-dev, hi epp-dev, I am afraid we *may* have a problem with the EPP packages for Oxygen.1. Here's the symptoms I have observed: - There have been no Oxygen.1 RC1 EPP packages produced by [1]. While RC1 is supposed to be "a warm-up RC" without acceptance testing [2], I

[cross-project-issues-dev] Code Recommenders will participate in Photon (offset +3)

Hi, Code Recommenders will be participating in the Eclipse Photon Simultaneous release with its usual offset of +3. According to our current plans, we will contribute Code Recommenders 2.5.0 [1] (or rather some maintenance release thereof, as we hope to get 2.5.0 in for Oxygen.1 or Oxygen.2

[cross-project-issues-dev] Nature autodiscovery broken! Blocker? - Was: [epp-dev] Oxygen RC4 EPP packages

Hi all, > the Oxygen RC4 packages are ready for testing at > > https://hudson.eclipse.org/packaging/job/oxygen.epp-tycho-build/318/artifact/org.eclipse.epp.packages/archive/ while testing the RC4 Java package, I discovered an issue related to the "nature autodiscovery" feature recently

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Guava versions in Oxygen

Zoltán Ujhelyi wrote: > the VIATRA project is not ready to move to Guava 21, as we still use > Java 7 as a minimum requirement, while Guava 21 requires Java 8. We > are now in the process of figuring out whether we can set up > dependency ranges and uses constraints in a way that we can work both

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [eclipse.org-planning-council] Neon.3 update problem status

Hi Fred, > The corresponding EPP repository can be found here: > > https://hudson.eclipse.org/packaging/job/neon.epp-tycho-build/599/artifact/org.eclipse.epp.packages/archive/repository/ as package maintainer, I did my usual round of tests with the Java EPP package: AFAICT, the package works

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 update problem status

Hi, >> I'd like to run the Neon.3 respin next week, if possible. So please >> provide test feedback!! > > I’m / we are not able to run deeper tests for Code Recommenders until > Tuesday (holidays). But we’ll report back on Tuesday morning CEST. I've tested that Code Recommenders works in each

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Guava 15/21 warning

Hi Ed, > Great, you sound like an expert who has demonstrated a solution. > > Can you contribute a wiki page on how you do it? I'll try, although the PDE tooling isn't that great [1, 2]. IMHO, bnd is far better at automatically identifying uses constraints (although you can still cheat it by

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Guava 15/21 warning

Hi, > If you have a technical solution that allows multiple Guava versions to > co-exist, please add it to Bug 437107. My current understanding is that > "uses" directives may be a solution but that no demonstration has been > performed and so the requirements for tooling are at best guesses and

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Guava 15/21 warning

Hi Ed, > Please read the > Bugzillas. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=427862 > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=437107 Reading through Bug 427862 comment 8 ff. [1], it seems like OSGi's uses constraints would solve your problem. > The problem never occurs for

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Guava 15/21 warning

Hi Ed, > We have been using Guava 15 for some time. > > The latest Mylyn snapshot (mylyn-3.22.0.v20170308-0427.zip) has moved to > Guava 21. > > When we changed to Guava 15 for Luna, it was all rather painful: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=427862 can you please point me to a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Bugzilla down? (Internal Server Error)

Denis Roy wrote: > Actually, it's 4:32 am:) Still, thank you! > A SELECT query against the downloads database created a deadlock tying > up all our db connections. > > I'm looking into why that happened. There's nothing like a good puzzle to boot your brain early in the morning. Anyhow,

[cross-project-issues-dev] Bugzilla down? (Internal Server Error)

Hi, Bugzilla seems to be down for me; I get an Internal Server Error. Is anyone else seeing this problem? Best wishes, Andreas -- Codetrails GmbH The knowledge transfer company Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt Phone: +49-6151-276-7092 Mobile: +49-170-811-3791 http://www.codetrails.com/

[cross-project-issues-dev] repo.eclipse.org down?

Hi, repo.eclipse.org seems to be down again; our Hudson jobs have slowed down to a crawl because of timeouts accessing it: > [WARNING] Could not transfer metadata > org.antlr:antlr-runtime/maven-metadata.xml from/to eclipse-cbi-releases > (https://repo.eclipse.org/content/groups/cbi/): Connect

[cross-project-issues-dev] Does anyone know an HttpCacheStorage implementation available in Orbit?

Hi fellow Eclipse committers, we at the Automated Error Reporting project are currently trying to make the client more RESTful. In particular, we want to implement support for HTTP's Cache-Control header. Now, Apache HttpComponents offers a CachingHttpClientBuilder [1], which produces a drop-in

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] setting mirror URL in the p2 repository

Hi Lorenzo, > as suggested here https://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/p2.mirrorsURL > we set the mirror property in our artifacts.jar when releasing. > > We do that by using org.eclipse.wtp.releng.tools.addRepoProperties > as done in other projects, e.g., >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Update your desktop versions of "cbi aggregator" (aka b3 aggregator)

Hi Eike, > Can you provide me with a patch or Gerrit review for the changes you > have in mind? It's all declared in this file: > http://git.eclipse.org/c/oomph/org.eclipse.oomph.git/tree/setups/interim/SimultaneousReleaseTrain.setup done:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Update your desktop versions of "cbi aggregator" (aka b3 aggregator)

Hi David, > Sorry, I gave wrong URL. The latest build is at: > > http://download.eclipse.org/cbi/updates/aggregator/ide/4.5/I20161027-1601/ will this URL make it into the "Simultaneous Release Train" Oomph setup file? ATM, it still refer to org.eclipse.b3.aggregator.editor.feature from

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Upgrading HIPPs to SLES12 (Part 2 - reloaded)

Markus Keller wrote: > It should work out of the box, see > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387721 Hudson users > should not have to start their own window managers > > But a centrally-managed workaround script would already be better > than nothing. Yes, in particular as the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Upgrading HIPPs to SLES12 (Part 2 - reloaded)

Frederic Gurr wrote: > PLEASE NOTE: all projects that are using UI tests need to adjust > their scripts to use "icewm" instead of "metacity" as window > manager. Is it worth to have a central start-window-manager script that everyone could use (and which would right now start icewm)? Kind of like

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Upgrading HIPPs to SLES12 (Part 2 - reloaded)

Frederic Gurr wrote: > I've started the recommenders HIPP for you. Thank you. Andreas -- Codetrails GmbH The knowledge transfer company Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt Phone: +49-6151-276-7092 Mobile: +49-170-811-3791 http://www.codetrails.com/ Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Upgrading HIPPs to SLES12 (Part 2 - reloaded)

Hi, > We are currently restoring the jobs data, once that's > finished(~2hours) you should be able to restart your instance and run > builds as normal. is it safe now to restart the recommenders HIPP? Best wishes, Andreas -- Codetrails GmbH The knowledge transfer company Robert-Bosch-Str.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit and Bugzilla down

On 22.09.16 15:55, Matthias Sohn wrote: > Both Gerrit and Bugzilla respond with internal server error Both work for me from our office in Darmstadt, Germany. Andreas -- Codetrails GmbH The knowledge transfer company Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt Phone: +49-6151-276-7092 Mobile:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Neon Looks Strange and Misbehaves

Hi, > One exception of them occurs for all packages. Why is this file > expected to exist at this location? > > java.io.FileNotFoundException: > D:\sandbox\USER-HOME\jee-latest\eclipse\introData.xml (The system cannot > find the file specified) FYI, this is tracked in Bug 487713 [1], which

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] A funny thing happened on the way to Mars.2 -- in Orbit

Hi, David M Williams wrote: > But since there is a "bad" one out there (in Orbit, at least) with the > same version, I was suggesting to verify if it was in your project > repositories to make sure you had the good one. > > If it is the good one, you get "jar verified" as above. > > If it is

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] JDK 9 Early Access with Project Jigsaw

Wayne Beaton wrote: > Include "-jdkinternals" in your invocation. > > e.g. > > for i in /c/develop/oomph/git/org.eclipse.oomph/plugins/*/bin; do jdeps > -jdkinternals $i; done >> deps.txt > > Note that jdeps is included in Java 8 as well, so you may need to give > it a complete path to the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Did I mess up our procedure for Neon? With respect to declaring, and enablement, and our "list of participants"?

On 21.10.15 16:01, David M Williams wrote: > Just today I realized I think I was supposed to "disable" everyone, > until they responded affirmatively that they were participating in Neon. > > Since so many have declared their intent already, I hate to start over, > by disabling everyone, but,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Proxy Testing Tool?

Hi all, a bit more info. To analyze the proxy issues plaguing Code Recommenders and the Automated Error Reporting, we have included a network communication test job in earlier RCs that just pinged a stats URI at download.eclipse.org using both Apache HttpComponents or ECF (through p2's

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Proxy Testing Tool?

Hi Scott, For everyone's info, there's been a long discussion of what appear to be HttpComponents-based proxy difficulties on this bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=422665 yes, I am aware of that discussion. AFAIK, we never arrived at real test scenarios, though, which

[cross-project-issues-dev] Frequent timeouts for download.eclipse.org

Hi all, does anyone else notice frequent timeouts for download.eclipse.org? Both we at our office and our HIPP instance have trouble fetching stuff from p2 update sites hosted on download.eclipse.org. :-( Best wishes, Andreas -- Codetrails GmbH The knowledge transfer company

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Frequent timeouts for download.eclipse.org

Hi again, does anyone else notice frequent timeouts for download.eclipse.org? Both we at our office and our HIPP instance have trouble fetching stuff from p2 update sites hosted on download.eclipse.org. :-( whatever the problem was, the server seems to have recovered now. :-) Best wishes,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Frequent timeouts for download.eclipse.org

On 08.06.15 13:32, Denis Roy wrote: For some reason, the build server seems to be pushing a lot of traffic.. we'll look into it. Thanks, Denis. Speaking of which, on our HIPP we use -Dtycho.disableP2Mirrors=true so not to cause outbound traffic. Of course, that means that all requests go

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Is it time to update to Guava 18?

Hi Ed, hi Wayne, See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=437107 in that bug report I frankly miss a clear analysis as to *why* different Guava bundles are a problem. Agreed, incorrect metadata is always a problem in OSGi, such as bundles exporting com.google.common packages without

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Is it time to update to Guava 18?

Hi Ed, The analysis is indeed unclear because nobody has invested the time to debug the problem or solution. My best theory seems to be all that there is: The problem seems to arise for a project that integrates the Guava-based facilities of A and the Guava-based facilities of B, and

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Is it time to update to Guava 18?

Hi Ed, On 25/03/2015 10:24, Andreas Sewe wrote: Possibly, but being open to third-party plugins, we cannot prevent the presence of multiple Guava versions in general. Anyway, I think the burden is on the developers of integration bundles C. You *can* shield yourself from this problem

[cross-project-issues-dev] Weird p2 install behavior: doesn't take mandatory attribute into account

Hi all, we've just noticed a weird behavior of p2 during installation. Here are the steps to reproduce: - Install the bare 4.5-M4 SDK [1]. Note that it does not contain any bundles from Eclipse Code Recommenders, Aether, or m2e. - Next, install the latest version of Code Recommenders for Java

[cross-project-issues-dev] Mars M3: Wiring problems with HttpClient/Core 4.2.x and 4.3.x both present

Hi, we at Eclipse Code Recommenders recently got a bug report [1] about a bundle resolution failure in Mars M3. Apparently, the fact that Mars M3 ships Apache HttpClient/Core 4.3.x rather than 4.2.x causes Eclipse Aether (which Code Recommenders uses internally) to not resolve properly:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Mars M3: Wiring problems with HttpClient/Core 4.2.x and 4.3.x both present

Hi Alexander, that looks similar to what we have been discussing at: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=437107. thanks for the pointer. From what I can tell, however, Bug 437107 is about an unwanted interaction between Require-Bundle and Import-Package. But in my case, both Eclipse

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Bug 438856 - Make Sonar a Foundation managed service

Hi, But if projects do care about the historical data then we'd have to think of a transition plan and keep the old instance running while projects switch over. Any thoughts? we at Code Recommenders also don't care very much about our sonar history, as it is rather spotty [1] due to

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Luna RC3 repository is available

Hi, ab bit more context: Marcel Bruch wrote: Might well be that this is due to a restructuring we did on our third-party dependencies. We had potential conflicts with Xtext and Guice. We removed the Guice inclusion in one of our features and rely on p2 that it pulls in the required Guice

[cross-project-issues-dev] Switch from Luna RC2 to RC3 fails all our Tycho run UI tests: Known issue?

Hi, hope cross-project-issues is the right list for this, but for us it's a huge issue (none of our builds pass) and I am wondering whether any other project has encountered this as well: We use http://download.eclipse.org/releases/luna/ as update site in our builds. Now, as of today, i.e., the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Switch from Luna RC2 to RC3 fails all our Tycho run UI tests: Known issue?

Hi Thomas, hi Igor, This is tracked as Tycho https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=436159 Either use Platform build with 435888 fixed or switch to Tycho 0.21 snapshot, which should be more tolerate to exceptions during test framework shutdown. thanks for the prompt reply. Really

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Update site content cannot be displayed in IE11

Hi, +1 for Sphinx and EATOP good to know that the script is useful for other projects as well. :-) If you want to start re-using our remote-resources bundle right now, you can grab it from repo.eclipse.org [1]. Please let me know if you have any problem with integrating this into your Tycho

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Update site content cannot be displayed in IE11

Hi, I don't know if there is a recommended format, but my 2 cents are: From a release engineer's point of view, I'd rather generate the index.html statically as part of the build than rely on runtime javascript. Bug 424691 may be of interest. At Code Recommenders, we use the solution

[cross-project-issues-dev] Weird wiring issue with Code Recommenders and m2e (affects Luna packages)

Hi all, we encountered a weird wiring issue which affects everyone who uses the latest version of Code Recommenders (2.1.0-SNAPSHOT) and m2e (1.5.0-SNAPSHOT) respectively, which will both be aboard the Luna release train. The issue was initially reported and described in [1]. It manifests itself

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Reminder to update your feature licenses for Luna

Hi Igor, With 60+ comments on the bug you linked, it's hard to understand what individual projects are expected to do. What license feature are we supposed to use now? Is it available from Luna symrel composite repo already? Here's what served us well at Code Recommenders. In our target

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Build server unavailable

Hi Mikael, The EMF Compare nightly build failed because it was not able to sign the plugins. The error I get is: Caused by: org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException: Connection to http://build.eclipse.org:31338 refused Anyone experiencing the same issue? Does the server need a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review

Hi Wayne, If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things: * Review documentation; * PMC approval of review documentation; or * An IP Team-approved IP Log. The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases should already be marked as FIXED and so

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Code Recommenders, Jubula, m2e-wtp and other users of org.slf4j.api and providers of ch.qos.logback.slf4j

Hi David, From the b3 aggregator log, it appears that Code Recommenders is the one pulling in version 1.6.4. Is that on purpose? That is, do you purposely constrain/include that older version? Any chance to move up to the latest? Sure. Will look into this straight away. Andreas --

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Code Recommenders, Jubula, m2e-wtp and other users of org.slf4j.api and providers of ch.qos.logback.slf4j

Hi, From the b3 aggregator log, it appears that Code Recommenders is the one pulling in version 1.6.4. Is that on purpose? That is, do you purposely constrain/include that older version? Any chance to move up to the latest? Sure. Will look into this straight away. made the move to

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Code Recommenders, Jubula, m2e-wtp and other users of org.slf4j.api and providers of ch.qos.logback.slf4j

Hi David, Thanks for your quick cooperation ... I bet you will be happier with the newest version anyway ... at least I hope! I bet we won't notice the difference: log.error(..) is still the same as always. Anyway, can you just double-check [1] that the other, SLF4J related plugins like

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] com.google.guava versions

Ed Willink wrote: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=401285 and https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=370651 give details on com.google issues. We at Code Recommenders also had some problems [1] with multiple Guava bundles being installed at the same time, but these could