Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] The end of an era: shell access.

FWIW, I used my shell access to poke around the downloads area to find things in our massive collection of p2 repositories in the download area. sftp worked just fine for that. Except maybe for the manual 'find' you end up doing to find things in directory trees. Cheers, Doug.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel 2019-06 Release Candidate 2 (RC2) staging repo is complete

If that's the rule, it should really be captured here: https://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/2019-06/Simultaneous_Release_Plan Also interesting that the GA date keeps getting earlier. We're in mid-June territory now... Doug. From:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Java 11 recommendations

I've been considering AdoptOpenJDK, especially now that they have builds for all three major platform. Is that a road well travelled? https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html Doug. On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 21:38 +0100, Mikaël Barbero wrote: Ed, See https://wiki.eclipse.org/Jenkins#JDK to see what

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse.org timeouts for bugzilla, gerrit, git

I’m having trouble accessing download.eclipse.org. And I can throw a rock and hit the servers from here. Maybe I should . Doug. From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org On Behalf Of Daniel Megert Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 9:55 AM To: Cross project issues Subject: Re:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Opt-in announcements

CDT is participating, of course. We don’t know what release yet. At this point it’s very likely a maintenance release off the 9.5 branch. But as we are pushing those out on demand, we won’t know which one until the rampdown starts when we’ll lock it in. But, yes, at the very least can we

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [tools-pmc] [epp-dev] Photon RC4 EPP packages

for respin (if you also include my fix for the JavaEE EPP bundle [1]). :) [1] https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/124633/ Cheers, Nick On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Doug Schaefer mailto:dschae...@blackberry.com>> wrote: I’m on the PMC. Again, Alex, our rep, and the rest of the planning c

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [epp-dev] Photon RC4 EPP packages

Megert Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 11:39 AM To: Eclipse Packaging Project Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Photon RC4 EPP packages It's not about "watching". You have to go to your PMC and the PMC to the Planning Council. Dani From: Doug Schaefer mailto:dschae...@blackberry.com>> To

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for rebuild RC4 to pick up CDT

Any objections? From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018 1:14 PM To: Cross project issues Cc: Eclipse Packaging Project Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for rebuild

[cross-project-issues-dev] Request for rebuild RC4 to pick up CDT

Hey gang, I discovered a blocking bug when starting to write a CDT article about Photon. It breaks CDT's serial launching capability with the Terminal open on the same port. CDT does a pause and resume serial port so that the launch can get access to it. This feature is used when working with

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [cdt-dev] [tm-dev] TM Terminal and RSE releases for Photon (was: Correct repo for CDT to be referring to)

CDT users use TM regularly, especially for Arduino and other embedded targets. Haven’t seen anything drastically broken so we haven’t done anything to it. I am a committer as well if a patch comes in. Other than that it’s in deep maintenance mode. Doug. From: cdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Corrosion in Photon

You need to make that request through your PMC first and they will have to take it to the planning council. Doug. From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Bullen Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 11:20 AM To:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Migration from Hudson to Jenkins is complete

+1! Thanks Fred! > -Original Message- > From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project- > issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Denis Roy > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 11:42 AM > To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Committer for simrel

, see > https://wiki.eclipse.org/Simrel/Contributing_to_Simrel_Aggregation_Build#Push > ing_your_changes > > Best regards, > Zoltán > > -- Zoltán Ujhelyi > > Eclipse Technologies Expert > IncQueryLabs Ltd. > > > On 2018. Feb 20., at 15:55, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackbe

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled

; or +1 647 899 > 9879<tel:%2B1%20647%20899%209879> > > > On Feb 12, 2018 10:16 AM, "Lars Vogel" > <lars.vo...@vogella.com<mailto:lars.vo...@vogella.com>> wrote: > > I suggest to nominate Nick as TM committer > > Am 12.02.2018 16:06 schrieb "

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled

Nick, who specifically on that “team” do you think should get those changes in for you? To help, here is the commit log from the git repo. http://git.eclipse.org/c/tm/org.eclipse.tm.git/log/ Kaloyan Raev is the only active committer and from his note earlier in this chain, he has removed the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled

-issues-dev@eclipse.org Reply-to: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackberry.com<mailto:dschae...@blackberry.com>> wrote: Does

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Many projects have not yet opted in to participate in Eclipse Photon

I am purposely leaving RSE out on its own. Greg's org.eclipse.remote better suits our needs in CDT and will be going forward with that. RSE needs a new owner, or archive. Doug. From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Many projects have not yet opted in to participate in Eclipse Photon

That's the plan. Thanks Greg! Good to see PTP in the release. From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Greg Watson Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 4:12 PM To: Cross project issues

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can DTP join EGit in Oxygen.2 respin?

ks Web Tools (at least). I'm pretty sure that we have a volunteer to take over releng. Wayne On Dec 18, 2017 9:48 AM, "Doug Schaefer" <dschae...@blackberry.com<mailto:dschae...@blackberry.com>> wrote: We should probably start planning on the removal of DTP now. It’s not clear i

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Can DTP join EGit in Oxygen.2 respin?

We should probably start planning on the removal of DTP now. It's not clear it has the resources to even do builds going forward. Doug. From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Megert Sent: Monday, December 18,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Photon opt-in deadline is December 15.

CDT 9.5 in for Photon. We are offset +1. https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.cdt/releases/9.5.0 Doug. From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:19 PM To: Cross

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Asterisk shutdown, Jan 5th 2018

Thanks Matt, we're very much looking forward to this. On recent calls it appears the dial in numbers were not working to Asterisk. Is that working now? If not, for a lot of us, Asterisk is already shutdown. Thanks! Doug. -Original Message- From:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Bug tracker for Jsch

That's my biggest fear depending on projects like that. And we do have a huge dependency on SSH communication in Eclipse, not only for EGit but the SSH Terminal as well and future work CDT's planning for remote builds and launching. Would be good to get this or something like this under our

[cross-project-issues-dev] Build Schedule for Oxygen.1 RC4?

I was just wondering what the build schedule is for Oxygen.1 RC4. I have updated the CDT bits and I want to make sure they get in. They're not in the build that's currently running. Thanks, Doug. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Mac signing down?

. Apologies for the inconvenience. Denis On 11/09/17 01:16 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: I’m still not clear on what this means. Does that mean Mac signing is now a manual process? Do I need to create a bug for every build we do? Or is that now unrealistic? Thanks, Doug. From: cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Mac signing down?

 (+33) 642 028 039  mikael.barb...@eclipse-foundation.org<mailto:mikael.barb...@eclipse-foundation.org>  @mikbarbero Le 11 sept. 2017 à 18:34, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackberry.com<mailto:dschae...@blackberry.com>> a écrit : Hey gang, I’m getting a failure on CDT’s bui

[cross-project-issues-dev] Mac signing down?

Hey gang, I'm getting a failure on CDT's build. We have a product we build for debugging workflows and it failed during the Mac signing. I noticed Dani bring up something similar on the epp-dev list. Is there someone looking at this? Thanks! Doug 12:25:54 Server response has been saved to

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] LSP4E participation in Photon

(This time with text.) OK. That’s how we got away with CDT’s build cycle. Does point out a bit of a flaw with our offsets here. At the end of the day, we’ll build against your builds on Jenkins, not on what you post to the downloads area, to make sure we find out about changes early enough to

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] LSP4E participation in Photon

From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Mickael Istria Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:48 PM To: Cross project issues Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] LSP4E

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] LSP4E participation in Photon

Just curious, why +3? We are thinking of adding a component that uses it to CDT to access the clangd language server. From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Mickael Istria Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:05 AM To:

[cross-project-issues-dev] CDT in Photon

CDT will be participating in Photon with release 9.5 (9.4 is in Oxygen.2). We probably maintain our cyclical build with other projects that we use and that use us starting at +1 unless I can suck them all into CDT which I have an open action on. It's complicated... Doug.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen RC4 respin complete

ct-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of frederic.g...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: >Sorry. I misinterpreted your commit message then. > >On 20.06.2017 19:39, Doug Schaefer wrote: >> Actually, it doesn¹t include the Launch Bar fix. I am preparing a >>service >>

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen RC4 respin complete

Actually, it doesn¹t include the Launch Bar fix. I am preparing a service release for it and the CDT that will ship on day 0 via the CDT p2 site. On 2017-06-20, 1:35 PM, "cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Frederic Gurr"

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen RC4 staging repository is complete

project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> Date: Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 1:25 PM To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen RC4 staging repository is complete On Thu,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Oxygen RC4 staging repository is complete

We¹ve found a deadlock in the Launch Bar on startup. Would that warrant a respin? Not that many people use it and I can do a maintenance release to pick up the fix before we go live. Thoughts? On 2017-06-15, 8:45 AM, "cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Denis Roy"

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] simrel validate fails with error 13

Looks like EGerrit has gone missing. Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device - via the Rogers Network From: g.wat...@computer.org Sent: June 6, 2017 9:24 AM To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Reply-to: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev]

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] gdk_test_simulate_button

r RC3 . > >Regards, >Alex > >On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackberry.com> >wrote: >> And, yes, there is a bug open on this from Carsten. >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=511551 >> >> From: <cross-p

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] gdk_test_simulate_button

And, yes, there is a bug open on this from Carsten. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=511551 From: <cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org>> on behalf of Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackberry.co

[cross-project-issues-dev] gdk_test_simulate_button

Hey gang, I’m getting crashes on certain machines when running tests against Oxygen. This has been reported before, and it seems to have some relation to the GTK webkit library. Do we have documented somewhere how to properly set up a Linux machine to run Oxygen, or at least run tests so they

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Are restrictions on Bugzilla worse thanspam?

From: > on behalf of Denis Roy > Reply-To: Cross project issues

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Upgrading HIPPs to SLES12

cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Frederic Gurr" <cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of frederic.g...@eclipse.org> wrote: >Hi, > >Technically yes, but the Docker packages are not installed yet. > >Regards, > >Fred > &

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Upgrading HIPPs to SLES12

Does SLES12 give us the ability to use Docker containers for our build jobs? Thanks! Doug. On 2016-09-07, 1:35 PM, "cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Frederic Gurr" wrote: >Hi, > >The

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit is failing to connect to https://hudson.eclipse.org

Same here from build.eclipse.org. I use wget and am getting “No route to host” to hudson. From: > on behalf of Sravan K Lakkimsetti >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit is failing to connect to https://hudson.eclipse.org

Marketplace went down too. This a bigger than Gerrit. Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device - via the Rogers Network From:marc-andre.lape...@ericsson.com Sent:August 30, 2016 5:42 PM To:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Reply-to:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Graphiti participating in Oxygen

The +# days thing has never made sense, really. If you really chain dependencies I’m sure you’d get into double digits. In fact, CDT cycles on itself with a couple of other projects. Probably what would be better would be a better way to publicize API changes that affect downstream builds.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] org.eclipse.userstorage?

> >the USS plugins come from >http://download.eclipse.org/oomph/uss/updates/latest. > >See >http://git.eclipse.org/c/mpc/org.eclipse.epp.mpc.git/plain/org.eclipse.epp >.mpc-target/staging.target for details. > >Best, >Carsten > >On July 7, 2016 8:17:02 PM CEST,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] org.eclipse.userstorage?

g/c/mpc/org.eclipse.epp.mpc.git/plain/org.eclipse.epp >.mpc-target/staging.target for details. > >Best, >Carsten > >On July 7, 2016 8:17:02 PM CEST, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackberry.com> >wrote: >>Hey gang, >> >>I¹m cleaning up my commercial product build so

[cross-project-issues-dev] org.eclipse.userstorage?

Hey gang, I’m cleaning up my commercial product build so that it doesn’t build off of the simrel repo. I can’t seem to find what project repo contributes the org.eclipse.userstorage plug-in that the MarketPlace core plug-in depends on. Any ideas? Thanks, Doug.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] CodeEnvy continues to use deceptive wording that's harmful to Eclipse

Great words Max. Whole heartedly agree. I think the real issue started at EclipseCon where they presented themselves as “the next generation Eclipse IDE”, not “a next generation Eclipse IDE", or as I see now their web pages simply stating "Eclipse Che Next Generation Eclipse IDE” which implies

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] CodeEnvy continues to use deceptive wording that's harmful to Eclipse

I guess one question, is that really the Foundation’s role? Is it not up to us, the community, to make sure the messaging is clear? Though I’m not as worried about that at the moment. I gave a short talk to a local Ottawa IoT meetup and used the term “Eclipse” and they knew exactly what I was

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] New UUID in Eclipse Platform

I'm neither for or against this. I do agree the communication was late. It probably would have been better to not tell us at all :). I do see the need for recognizing individual installs though. Tracking IP address as we've done to date hides a lot of data behind corporate firewalls that present

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] New UUID in Eclipse Platform

I'll add to that. You say this is in the Platform. Do you mean that all products that build with the platform inherit this feature as well, not just Eclipse released product? On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir < alexmon...@voxpopuli.im> wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Sorry I will have

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon RC2 is complete

Ooops, wrong list. :) On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Doug Schaefer <cdtd...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for CPP. > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com > > wrote: > >> 10 out of 14 Eclipse Neon RC2 packages are

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon RC2 is complete

+1 for CPP. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Markus Knauer wrote: > 10 out of 14 Eclipse Neon RC2 packages are now available from > > https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index-developer.php > > We'll enable the remaining ones as soon as a +1 from a package maintainer

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Change 73676 insimrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build[master]: Update PTP to RC2

I wonder if you ran into Hudson glitches. It's been really flaky today. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Greg Watson wrote: > I would have though everyone is using Gerrit by now, but I guess not. > > In any case, I’ve submitted another changeset, so hopefully it will work

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Incubation versus Orbit

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote: > A project can consume components from another incubating project. > > The limitation is that you can only consume components from a release > version. > > Incubation is, however, viral. If a download includes bits from an

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Enforce Gerrit for Simrel?

You can call them being lazy, but I call it being understaffed/underfunded. While I agree with the technicalities of your argument Mickael, we have also been very careful on the planning council not to put too much burden on the projects. Forcing them to update all the versions they have in the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Enforce Gerrit for Simrel?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik < konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com> wrote: > -1 to forcing the use of refs/for/x > > > > The validation results are unreliable as the aggregation build is not > safely reproducible. A failed validation result is just as likely to be due >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Enforce Gerrit for Simrel?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Mickael Istria wrote: > On 01/07/2016 06:08 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote: > > -1 to forcing the use of refs/for/x > > The validation results are unreliable as the aggregation build is not > safely reproducible. A failed validation result

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse asked if I trust the Eclipse signing certificate, if I want to install something

It's all the chain of trust. The root certificate, the one at the bottom, should be in your JVM's collection of trusted certificates. Each one signs the one above until you get to the top one which is the one used to sign the jars. As long as the JVM can follow that chain to one it knows, it'll

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [tm-dev] Any RSE dependencies in Neon?

Currently I think CDT does. But we should really remove that if it¹s still there. Doug. On 2015-12-11, 1:13 PM, "tm-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Greg Watson" wrote: >Are there any projects that have a dependency on Remote

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eierlegende Wollmilchsau

0 nachm. schrieb "Ed Merks" <ed.me...@gmail.com<mailto:ed.me...@gmail.com>>: Doug, Comments below. On 09/12/2015 4:58 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: Thanks Ed! (and Michael for the picture). It was kind of entertaining. In any case, we generate this product along with the r

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eierlegende Wollmilchsau

ctionŠ item also looks bad. > >Best regards, Lars > >On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@qnx.com> wrote: >> As I mentioned, I turn off almost all the other buttons on every >> perspective. Only a few editor ones remain that have no equivalent in >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eierlegende Wollmilchsau

de Wollmilchsau I think that there's a bug open to make the tool bar button size dynamically, primarily to make them usable on hidpi monitors. Are this and the combo box size issue related? Wayne On 09/12/15 05:04 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: From: <<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bou

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] File server down?

Yeah, it’s a pain in the you know what right now as I try to get a build ready for my IoT meetup tomorrow. Finally getting a clean one. D From: > on behalf of Ian Bull

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 1000 line limit for contributions

We need to keep in mind the spirit of the rule which is as Pascal mentioned. I always thought the lines of code was a guideline and certainly doesn’t excuse the committer from taking a good look at the code and even if it’s less than 1000 lines, if it looks like a algorithm that could be taken

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Announcing Andmore participation in Neon

From: <cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org>> on behalf of Doug Schaefer <dschae...@qnx.com<mailto:dschae...@qnx.com>> Reply-To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-

[cross-project-issues-dev] Announcing Andmore participation in Neon

Andmore, the Eclipse for Android project, will be participating in Neon. https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.andmore/releases/1.0-neon Offset is + a bunch since it depends on at least one +3 project. Not we’ll also try and graduate at this point. Thanks, The Andmore Gang From:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Did I mess up our procedure for Neon? With respect to declaring, and enablement, and our "list of participants"?

A man after my own heart :). I can’t remember if CDT declared for Neon. It’ll be a sad day the release we don’t. Doug. From: > on behalf of Thomas Watson

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Did I mess up our procedure for Neon? With respect to declaring, and enablement, and our "list of participants"?

se.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org> [cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org>] on behalf of Doug Schaefer [dschae...@qnx.com<mailto:dschae...@qnx.com>] Sent: October 21, 2015 11:43 AM To: Cr

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Maintenance builds (was Announcing a one week slip in the Mars.1 release (from 9/25 to 10/2))

No, maintenance releases are still necessary. But you have to ask yourself, why are we synchronizing them. I think on another thread here we have the solution. Projects need to be free to release maintenance releases at any time. We have the technology to make Check for Updates work to find

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Announcing a one week slip in the Mars.1 release (from 9/25 to 10/2)

BTW, yes this is a consequence of moving to Mars.1. So is getting Gradle support into Eclipse now and not in 9 months. In the big picture, we figure it works out to a net benefit to our users and adopters. Doug. From:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Mars 1 RC4 issue with Buildship / workspace prompt

On 2015-09-23, 8:41 AM, "cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Ed Willink" wrote: >Hi > >[I'm not clear why a new product is a problem with a 'maintenance' >release; I guess I've become too

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Mars 1 RC4 issue with Buildship / workspace prompt

OK, I’m awake and have a coffee on the go. As the PMC rep to the planning council I’ll be +1’ing the request and passing it along to the planning council who are ultimately the ones who decide whether there’s a respin. But before they do that, I want to make a couple of points and ask for your

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] New components in Mars.1 (was Re: Eclipse Mars 1 RC4 issue with Buildship / workspace prompt)

therefore checked for updates. Personally I think that's the way to go for all packages. The fact that it is enabled in RCP/RAP gives us a chance to get some experience in order to roll it out for all packages in the Neon timeframe. Regards, Markus On 23 September 2015 at 21:31, Doug Schaefe

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] New components in Mars.1 (was Re: Eclipse Mars 1 RC4 issue with Buildship / workspace prompt)

the same :) On 15-09-23 02:54 PM, Mike Milinkovich wrote: > On 23/09/2015 1:49 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: >> if we could ever get Check for Updates working properly, this >> wouldn't have been such a big issue. > > Doug (or anyone) > > Is there a written proposal anywhere on how

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] jetty versions - Another issue to feed on the topic of semantic versioning

Can your code not depend on an older version of jetty. Or is only one version of jetty allowed in a given bundle stack? Doug. On 2015-09-16, 4:50 AM, "cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Max Rydahl Andersen"

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unannounced Changes Have Unforeseen Consequences

ss of how many projects are directly affected, a great many projects > are indirectly affected when EMF is affected, i.e., notification-based > updates of viewers will no longer work because of missing class exceptions. > So a good portion of Neon will simply not function. I wonder

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unannounced Changes Have Unforeseen Consequences

This affected CDT too. Luckily we were some what prepared and had one or our crack committers fix it but it did force us to make a change to continue on with Neon. So, I¹m not sure how this is not an API breaking change, deprecated or not. I believe the Platform is going to have to ask the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [aeri] Skipping UI freeze reports caused by OSGI class loading for Mars.1?

This has been a problem for many years. I’m not sure much can be done. Though there may be cases where whatever is triggering the plug-in loads could be moved to a background job. To help understand that, the logs would be interesting for those cases. How much of this is done by the platform UI?

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] CDT in Neon (was: Are *you* ready for M4?)

(was: Are *you* ready for M4?) I'm not sure if Doug's email below is enough, so, to be safe, CDT will be part of Neon with a 9.0 release with offset +1. Marc On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote: CDT will be in every simultaneous release from

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] PTP hudson page

You should raise a bug on that, not sure Denis and gang are watching this list. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. Original Message From: Greg Watson Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 5:42 PM To: Cross project issues Reply To: Cross project issues Subject:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Documentation and signing requirements for Mars

BTW, the new launch bar feature isn’t signed yet. I’ll work on that today. Doug. From: Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.orgmailto:wa...@eclipse.org Organization: The Eclipse Foundation Reply-To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Date:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very frustrated

-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:08 PM To: Cross project issues Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very frustrated Yeah, the key on Windows is to make sure the SSH2 home on the General tab points

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unable to contribute to Mars... very frustrated

Use the Gerrit workflow. The Hudson job watches Gerrit for change requests and fires off a job when it sees one. From: Konstantin Komissarchik konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.commailto:konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com Reply-To: Cross project issues

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] jdt.core move to Java 7 BREE

Our consensus has always been to not have a consensus. Each project moved to where they needed to be when they needed to be. Obviously the decisions of other projects affect yours, particularly the platform. And for that, I go by their project plan which has no mention of JRE 6 for Mars.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Joint NN page for the release train

Ideally, we have a product/project manager who puts all this together. Don’t let engineers do your marketing :). D From: Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.orgmailto:wa...@eclipse.org Organization: The Eclipse Foundation Reply-To: Cross project issues

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Joint NN page for the release train

train that isn’t managed by a single person will be a disaster. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote: Ideally, we have a product/project manager who puts all this together. Don’t let engineers do your marketing :). D From: Wayne Beaton wa

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson fails to access http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.4-M-builds

No, I think they're all broken. One I was using can't see the git repos. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. From: Marcel Bruch Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 1:28 PM To: Cross project issues Reply To: Cross project issues Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Patch updates, reboot

Ah, that's what's happening. Thanks Denis! Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. Original Message From: Denis Roy Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:17 PM To: Cross project issues Reply To: Cross project issues Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Patch updates, reboot

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Webtools JSDT considering new Bower integration

Same with CDT. In fact we have a lot of floating parts that we depend on and depend on us, almost cyclical. It's only an issue when APIs change and we just manage those cases carefully. But with the size of they simrel, the offset model is out dated, especially if the number is days. Sent

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects missing from Mars

I'm working with Greg Watson and the TM, PTP, and CDT teams to come up with a new target management system based on org.eclipse.remote. All signs point to that being available for Mars. Coding is underway but I'm just not ready to commit at this time. Let's see what January brings. Doug Sent

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects missing from Mars

BTW, I am going to take another look at the TM Terminal. Dropping should be considered on hold at the moment. It might have a place with our o.e.remote strategy and has some UX features that are actually better than the TCF Terminal, like multiple views. Again no commitments but I should have a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects missing from Mars

: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 9:03 PM To: Cross project issues Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Projects

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Are *you* ready for M4?

-project-issues-dev] Are *you* ready for M4? So what you're saying is that there really is no way that I could know what you mean without you explicitly stating it? ;-) Wayne On 04/12/14 01:41 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: We actually haven’t decided whether to do 8.7 or 9.0. We’ll decide that after we

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TM withdrawal from Mars

The fact of the matter is that RSE is an architectural nightmare. It has a history as a remote environment for IBM mainframes which was super overkill for what we use it for in the Linux and embedded space. Good riddance IMHO. To that end, I am currently working on removing our dependency on

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Limiting GTK versions supported by SWT or SWT call for help

+1 for dropping GTK3 and staying on 2. I'd like to jump on to JavaFX/SWT as soon as they fix some bugs in the web view. Sorry I missed the earlier note on Qt as well. Something I've been thinking about again as I start working with it more and more in the C++ space. Doug.

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] e(fx)clipse participating in Mars release

I guess this raises another question. What about the other way. e(fx)clipse doesn't get in the way, but does it help either? i.e. With e(fx)clipse on the release train, would it be possible to have an Eclipse EPP package use JavaFX? All the magic required to get this actually running really

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] What policy w.r.t. javafx package imports?

That's a really good question. It's easier as an external product since we already redist the Oracle VM and kinda cheat a little to get these jar files put into the right spot. I'm not sure how that's possible with the Eclipse IP rules. And, at the end if the day, these jar files only exist in

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext Contribution to SR1

I think that should be fine. I think the requirement is to have the release review completed by RC1. The bits can ship whenever. For CDT, for example, the SR is our release so we ship when it ships. HTH, Doug From:

  1   2   >