Through some restructuring, I think I have solved my problem. If
anyone happens to have free time (ha ha ha) i'd love any thoughts on
bettering the structure. Thanks to all who looked.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456
In the process of messing with this so the issue in question is no
longer there I will update you all about this as I change it.
Hold off for now. Thanks to David and others for looking...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
is wrong.
I did put the image of the logo directly in the HTML as suggested, but
this made no difference and doesn't solve the stacking problem of
other elements.
Any other ideas?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 |
it??
http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/2012/
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
works
beautifully and also works on background images when applied to the
container.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@l
If only I could stay on this page long enough to inspect it, before
being redirected to lynneheller.com
> <http://t.cfaj.ca/table-blank-rows.html>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
about what is wrong? Thanks! Rory
>
>
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http
discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
_
io.com/
>> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
>> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-di
/www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic
s-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior I
Nevermind. I got it. That worked.
THanks again...
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:09 AM, "G.Sørtun" wrote:
>> Add "overflow: hidden" to the #sharingWrap styles, and it'll be fine :-)
>>
>> regards
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:09 AM, "G.Sørtun" wrote:
> Add "overflow: hidden" to the #sharingWrap styles, and it'll be fine :-)
>
> regards
> Georg
Adding overflow: hidden or an explicit width did not fix this for me
on my dev server. Any thou
>
> I am short on time but commenting this division out in the markup made the
> scrollbar go away on this end...
>
>
THanks David. I'll look into that.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.
In the latest official release of Opera (10.63), I get a huge
horizontal scroll on this site:
http://www.mlinc.com/
Can anyone see why?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
As usual, I see the issue AFTER I post here and look like an idiot.
Disregard. Problem solved. What I had to do was drink more coffee
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I cannot post a link at this time, so I hope I can explain this well...
&
s 100% trans as well.
Is there another way to get IE to play nice other than a
background-color? background-color: transparent; does not work either.
Help!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlin
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> I have the following in my stylesheet:
>> How can I fix this?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please provide a url. Thanks. ~d
> --
> :: desktop and mobile ::
> http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
>
>
I am unable to pos
to the page that
#header-sub.plansIndividual is for, the image doesn't show. If I
change the order of the above, the opposite occurs -
#header-sub.plansIndividual works, but #header-sub.plansEmp img
doesn't show. How can I fix this?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | M
tedd
>>
>>
>> I agree. The problem I have is I may not know when the 'better' is
>> available. It's so hard to keep up, and do my very demanding job, at
>> the same time.
>
>
> Sometimes being behind the bleeding edge can be a good thing for you mis
s
available. It's so hard to keep up, and do my very demanding job, at
the same time.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discus
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> List,
>
> Here's a theory question ( i think) for ya. I'm working on a layout,
> and am attempting to use and . Properly, I believe.
> But as I look at my layout, I'm thinking "ok, i'll put an ID on
quot;Uh
oh... it's the same as i've always done with etc. Am I
wrong? Is there still benefit to using ... I don't wanna just
substitute div for section... am I way off track already??
help...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
p
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Mark Richards wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 14:41, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Just another thought:
>>
>> www.cloudfour.com/css-media-query-for-mobile-is-fools-gold/
>>
>
> My 2 cents on this topic: designing something s
_
> css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.o
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Bill Braun wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anne McKinsey wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I'm setting up numerous web pages with a jquery photo gallery that
>>
that I've never used AP for an entire site. I have
sprinkled AP within a non-AP site w/o ill effects. Such as AP-ing a
logo in a header. Obviously being aware of the fact it is removed from
the flow and making sure nothing would crash into it upon text
scaling, etc.
I can imagine an entire
things I have yet to discover. I've also noticed
> little differences in Webkit browsers.
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css
}/* 4 IE/6 */
>
> Best,
> ~d
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-
; to #group2_a, I get my desired space
I want in IE6-7 (above "Live Photostream" area), but it then the space
is double everywhere else, because there is already a margin-bottom on
#group2Wrap. What am I missing for IE6-7???
THanks again all...
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Tom Livings
It appears I found the error. Thanks to anyone who took the time to look.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Can you tell I'm going completely nuts? The issue that remains is in IE 6 and
> 7.
>
> [slinks away in embarrassment]
>
>
>
> On Thu,
OMG. Time for more coffee I think...
Here's the missing link. Sorry guys/gals...
http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/testpages/clearing/
I now have only one issue left. I am missing some spacing above "Live
Photostream" area.
Thanks. Sorry!
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:17 AM,
UPDATE: I found a typo, and am now getting most spacing I need in IE
7, but it is still missing the same spacing as IE 6.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> List,
>
> I am attempting to use the famed "clearfix" for the first time, and on
> a rathe
Can you tell I'm going completely nuts? The issue that remains is in IE 6 and 7.
[slinks away in embarrassment]
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> OMG. Time for more coffee I think...
>
> Here's the missing link. Sorry guys/gals...
>
> http://
6.6 Mac is looking correct - for reference.
Help!
Thanks!!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
> css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help
Ah, auto correction. How I hate you...
..."Sticky FOOTERS always seem more trouble than they are worth"...
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> You could also add a min-height to the content wrap to define a minimum page
> height. Sticky copters always see
You could also add a min-height to the content wrap to define a minimum page
height. Sticky copters always seemed more trouble them their worth.
Sent from my iPod
On Jun 22, 2010, at 1:36 PM, David Laakso wrote:
> TriState Advantage, Kris Jacobson wrote:
>> I still have a negative margin on t
I use this and have had very good results. Add to your page with conditional
comments. Works for bg images!
Sent from my iPod
On Jun 21, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Duane Nelson wrote:
> I'm using the following to fix a PNG display bug in
> /* PGN Fix for img, div {
> behavior: url(../scripts/htc
possible to use the larger
(hovered) image size and reduce it for the "off" state. This would
possibly crisp up the hovered images a bit - of course, as long as the
reduced size looks good too.
Just a thought for anyone considering this...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Deve
and 7 show black not white.
Does this only work for background colors?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-d
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> I am back with the same problem. David pointed out the issue, however
>> I really don't understand WHY it's happening, and how to
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I am back with the same problem. David pointed out the issue, however
> I really don't understand WHY it's happening, and how to even things
> out.
>
> http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/testpages/6-10/index.html
>
it. In FF, it looks as desired (yes, i'll add a little
space in later) but in Safari 4.0.5 (current release) it has a gap.
Removing the box-shadow had no effect. What am I missing here?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4
clipped at the edge of #wrap in IE6. Adding them back fixed it. Small
price to pay i think.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss
ause both to
behave the same.
As far as many position: relative; being set, I have had a lot of
issues in the past that were solved simply by explicitly declaring
this, even though it is default, and in this case was the result of me
hunting for a solution to my problem.
--
Tom Living
Hello list,
Having an issue with Safari 4 Mac and a mystery space above the text
"Footer" on this page:
http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/testpages/6-10/index.html
Anyone see where it's coming from? It is not there in FF Mac.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Develope
Thanks all for the links on this.
Sent from my iPod
On May 17, 2010, at 11:41 PM, David Laakso
wrote:
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>> I have a sinking feeling that this approach is asking for trouble.
>
>
>
> Such is life. On or off the web.
> Explore some alter
ontent{position: relative; margin-left: 400px; background-color:
#fff;}
Thanks a lot.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4
List,
Can anyone see where the horizontal scrollbar is coming from in IE 6
and 7 at this address? I can't find it and i'm going nuts...
http://www.mlinc.com/products/zpache/
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 51
/), List Chaperone
Oh boy. Mr. Meyer. I feel like I got sent to the principal's office...
Thanks much for the explanation!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
___
Thank you everyone. I was aware of background shorthand, but was not
aware I could use it for just ONE property. Looks like I am gonna save
me some bytes!
:-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, David Laakso
wrote:
> In CSS this
>
> background: #fff;
>
> is more "lean" and "mean" than this
>
> background-color: #fff;
>
> Both are valid CSS.
>
> ~d
>
>
Thanks David. That says it all.
--
Tom L
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Bill Braun wrote:
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>> List,
>>
>> What is the reasons for using:
>>
>> background: #fff;
>>
>>
>>
>> instead of:
>>
>> background-color: #fff;
>>
>>
>>
) left top no-repeat;
Which is better or more correct?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
iscuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
To be honest, when I remove the white bg behind the text, it looks
completely fine to me. Can you just remove the white? I can send you a
screen shot if you need...
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:47 AM, andre petyan wrote:
> http://princesslimousine.net/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Inter
have done it quickly employing a
> table. Can anyone outline briefly for me, how that can be effected using CSS?
>
> Many thanks. Bruce
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
s.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer
ld have been
> much better to have done this site using more HTML and CSS?
>
> http://www.merfnyc.org/home.html
>
> Sincerely,
> Brian
Well, I guess it technically IS (x)html and css. But, IMHO, poorly
done. But we all started somewhere. It could definitely use an
overhaul...
ound images...
http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_belatedPNG/
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
>
>
> Fix me.
> <http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/doc.png>
> __
How did you get this display problem to occur??
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x2
ial;
background: url(../images/bgimage.jpg) repeat 0 0;
padding: 10px;
}
Again, maybe I am way off base here...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
m probably missing
> something simple...)
>
> http://green.harvard.edu/hbs/find-your-rep
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lis
hat works nicely. Now, I understand it's possible to do it with
> images...but how? How would they resize according to the size of the image
> around which they're framing, or be put in the background of those images?
> TIA,
> Victor
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive
x27;t use
them - use text. But seriously, we all know that's just 'perfect
world' stuff... 'round here, it usually "graphics rule". Got any
resources?
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media
importantly clients, don't want their body
copy at 16pt. So I am always setting a font-size on p's, etc. to .8 or
.85ems. Should someone who NEEDS larger text scale up these pages, the
layout may break. However, you are correct that proper use of ems
should prevent it from breaking in the
5.
Anyone wanna take a stab at why? Chalk it up to beta? Why would it
show once, and never again? Even after emptying the cache?
*PLEASE contact me off-list about this.*
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 |
On 3/30/07, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Here's the page:
> http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/06/news/
>
> Hit it in FF/Safari for desired layout for head/paragraph relation.
> Why won't it work in IE 6/7?
>
> Just can't
Hi list,
Here's the page:
http://proof.mlinc.com/mlinc.com/06/news/
Hit it in FF/Safari for desired layout for head/paragraph relation.
Why won't it work in IE 6/7?
Just can't see it.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.45
On 2/8/07, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm hoping that this message was sent to the list by mistake.
> >
> > Correct. My appologies.
> >
Off-list replies, if any.
Sorry again.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | M
Hi list,
Can anyone help me prepare for coding an HTML email for a Chinese
audience? I have never done anything with Asian characters before. I
am on a Mac using DW8.
Any help would be appreciated...
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
f next year. I think.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 infor
On 10/30/06, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Thanks. It does make a difference. Amazing. I will have to decide what to do
> >now. I think the red hover really help the user follow where they are in the
> >drop down so I might try to just give it for Safari
have to keep the
Flash and support users...
It's really a Safari/Flash plugin issue. Hope the next WebKit fixes it.
Glad I could help...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 51
Listers,
I am being asked for "ammunition" against pushing custom font families
to visitors of a Web site. Anyone have any references on this? I know
it has been discussed, but google has been fruitless as of yet.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media
On 10/24/06, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This gives a huge scrollbar.
> >
> > Disappointing.
> >
> > Ingo
> >
>
> Indeed. Now I have to figure out how else to get those links with the
> icons to work right w/o the text-indent
nks are too low on the page. They should line
>up with the red thumb on the far right - like every other browser. Any
>thoughts here? Of course, I could be going about the positioning is a
>less than optimal way...
>
>
>Thanks a bunch for looking.
OK, I solved the Safari problem
line
up with the red thumb on the far right - like every other browser. Any
thoughts here? Of course, I could be going about the positioning is a
less than optimal way...
Thanks a bunch for looking.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
added, the footer will push down
(with a nice amount of space between footer and copy). ;-)
Is this possible without permanently aligning the planets and
sacrificing small farm animals?
TIA!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
View this in WebKit browsers only (hence the subject line):
http://decaffeinated.org/archives/projects/multibg/background-image.html
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Hi list,
Is there a significant/any difference in rendering (for testing
purposes) between IE7RC1 under XP and IE7 under Vista RC x (or Beta 3
or whatever the latest incarnation is)?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
find something workable.
> >
Sorry, no time to peek...
Are you floating major sections of the content? Like a 2- or 3-col
layout? Try adding to (or adding period) your print style:
* {float:none;} <-- or a specific element instead of *
That solved similar things for me. Print is
I have to go punish myself now... I wonder if Dobby is done with that iron...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hello list,
Please take a peek at this page in FF and Safari. Why isn't Safari
putting all the main nav links in a nice line like FF (and even IE6!)?
Code validates.
http://66.155.251.18/joinmvp.com/
Thanks for your time.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic
Hi listers,
FYI, here's another one to test for!
http://www.getwebkit.org/
Interesting... even if it is only alpha at the moment...
;-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlin
> http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/
>
Scaling text down in FF (Mac) wreaks havoc. Secondary page loses it
after 2 clicks up in size...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mli
Don't know if this is old news. Thought I would share though. IE7 will
be available for XP...
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/07/26/678149.aspx
Good news in my opinion.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlin
; Here's a link to a simplified version www.kuroi.co.uk/testing/ITC.
>
> If anybody can tell me what's going on and how I can prevent this, I'd be
> eternally grateful.
just a guess. No time to peek.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html
HTH
--
Tom L
On 7/26/06, Dean Champeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Intel-based Macintosh running Parallel Workstations
YEAH BABY!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
Be advised that conditional comments get messed up, because the system
thinks all versions are the highest installed version - which would be
6.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | f
ext container - that you want the blue to be at the far right of.
Follow that one?! ;-)
Can you put the text in it's own container with the x ems width, and
float the blue right of the outer container?
Stabbing in the dark, sorry. No time to peek right now.
HTH
--
Tom Livings
the left side of the content, but when
using ems, it shifts to the right even though the blue box is in a
separate "calendar" div not contained in the "content" div:"
I'm confused. If you want the blue box all the way to the right like
the second listed
After the last floated
element, but within the container add:
Adjust accordingly, or make a class with that style. Also, see:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
or search the CSS-D wiki for clearing
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Log
On 7/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having trouble positioning the text inside the div. Maybe I have the
> wrong markup?
>
Where do you want it to be?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4
on this one, though I don't care about Mac IE anymore, and
would put the Win IE-specific stuff in a CC.
my 2¢ (and I now bow out of this up-and-coming Holy War)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x2
n-issue, and saves extra
> markup.
>
Hold on.
Adding overflow:auto; on a container will clear any and all floats
inside said container all by itself!?!? Cross-browser??!! And PIE's
Easy Clearing is 'so last year' too?!? Where have I been???
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Mul
On 7/14/06, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<http://public.softectra.com/130706_1/index.html>
Mark,
In Opera 9 Mac, I am getting a persistant vert scroll bar. No time to
peek, sorry. Otherwise, nice page!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Medi
> .vnav li a{
> width: 100%;
> }
>
> .vnav li a:hover {
> zoom: 1;
> width: 100%;
> }
>
> www.coalcreekcollision.com is the site.
Was this a typo or did you not add the zoom to the a as well? Not just
the a:hover.
Sorry if this isn't helping...
--
Tom Li
1001 - 1100 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo