Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

Yeah, I hear ya Philippe. No, not confusing with scripts. I ended up having to in one of my projects. I used the visibility trick. CSS in header.. #main {visibility:hidden;} Then at the end of the page, I toggle the opacity. ... other styles ... #main {visibility:visible;} This

Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

> On Sep 21, 2017, at 3:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Some put theirs in the footer to get a better page load score. That seems … weird. Unless you know that **nothing** in that stylesheet will be used before the page has fully loaded. Otherwise the page will start

Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

Incorrect. Some put theirs in the footer to get a better page load score. It's up to you. The most commonly used method is in the header. Best, Karl Sent from losPhone > On Sep 20, 2017, at 8:22 AM, John J wrote: > > And nowhere else, correct? I'm referring to external

Re: [css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

To the best of my knowledge, it is the recommended place. That's not to say it won't work elsewhere. You would most likely see odd things in rendering. I've seen blocks of styles in the body. I, personally, wouldn't do it. On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:22 AM, John J wrote: > And

[css-d] CSS must be called in the head?

And nowhere else, correct? I'm referring to external CSS Thank you. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies --

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid: Can I flow content around blocks?

Thanks for pointing me to the docs, I hadn't looked there, (my bad, I know). I wondered about the figure + p option, but it's imperfect, because sometimes the first p will be short, (content is coming from a CMS). It's better than nothing, but I might go and re-think my strategy for this part of

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid: Can I flow content around blocks?

> On Sep 16, 2017, at 3:05 AM, John Beales wrote: > > On the blog I'm coding each post is a container with a 12-column grid. Most > of the things that appear in each post, (paragraphs, blockquotes, etc), > span 8 columns: 3 - 10. However, I want to be able to pull them out

[css-d] CSS Grid: Can I flow content around blocks?

Hi List! I'm diving into the CSS grid, and there's something I thought I could do, but I'm having trouble. On the blog I'm coding each post is a container with a 12-column grid. Most of the things that appear in each post, (paragraphs, blockquotes, etc), span 8 columns: 3 - 10. However, I want

Re: [css-d] OT: What to do now Webdesign-l is gone

On 17 Aug 2017, at 17:50, Felix Miata wrote: Maybe list-mom Eric would accept an expansion of this list's role, given the low traffic level it's had for quite some time? This is an interesting question. css-d has been moderately more active than WD-L, but the traffic level is definitely

Re: [css-d] OT: What to do now Webdesign-l is gone

>> comp.infosystems.www.authoring.*, e.g.: >> >> & >> >> and many more. comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html comp.infosystems.www.authoring.misc comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets OK I have

Re: [css-d] OT: What to do now Webdesign-l is gone

Jay Tanna composed on 2017-08-17 21:14 (UTC): > > > Probably you need webdev - 2nd link. You also need a newsreader like > Thunderbird. > If not then perhaps we can decide a

Re: [css-d] OT: What to do now Webdesign-l is gone

List, Call me old - and old fashioned - but I like using lists like CSS-D and Webdesign-l. For non-css things that came up I used webdesign-l, but it is now dead. Is there a substitute list for all things non-css-d? How about these:

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

Please unsubscribe me from the list lister...@gmail.com > On 3 Aug 2017, at 10:38, Gautam Sathe wrote: > > On Thursday 03 August 2017 02:12 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: >> td:not([colspan=2]):nth-child(2) {} > > I missed the "=2" in the colspan :) Good to learn

Re: [css-d] Basic questions about the box model

Den 13.08.2017 23.04, skrev Ezequiel Garzón: What a treat, Georg! THIS kind of insight is what I was hoping for. I'll try to accept the standards more as a given and not to think too much about foundational issues, though sometimes these aspects intrigue me. I get that. Curiosity is good ...

Re: [css-d] Basic questions about the box model

What a treat, Georg! THIS kind of insight is what I was hoping for. I'll try to accept the standards more as a given and not to think too much about foundational issues, though sometimes these aspects intrigue me. For instance, and as an aside, while it's commonly claimed that floats were not

Re: [css-d] Basic questions about the box model

Den 12.08.2017 20.52, skrev Ezequiel Garzón: Georg, while I haven't gone over the standard in depth, I assumed the rendering I saw in all browsers was compliant, and in that sense logical and expected. I was shooting for something along the lines of why you think it was defined this way. Well,

Re: [css-d] Basic questions about the box model

Thank you Georg and Jay for your replies, and my apologies for not saying anything until now. Georg, while I haven't gone over the standard in depth, I assumed the rendering I saw in all browsers was compliant, and in that sense logical and expected. I was shooting for something along the lines

Re: [css-d] Basic questions about the box model

You can avoid all the problems of box model by using box-sizing. I suggest read this Mozilla (MDN) article: After using this, I don't have to worry about something not fitting in a DIV. This is what original Microsoft IE6, IE7 and

Re: [css-d] Basic questions about the box model

Den 07.08.2017 01.41, skrev Ezequiel Garzón: Wouldn't it make more sense for the word "Red" not to be visible at all, considering it comfortably fits its hidden box? I'm sure the specs dictate this behavior, but I'm looking for some rationale, specially given that overlaps and hidden stuff are

[css-d] Basic questions about the box model

Greetings to all! I can see I'm not understanding the box model correctly considering this basic example: #green { background-color: green; width: 100px; height: 100px; float: left; } #red { background-color: red; width: 100px; height: 100px; } Green Red I can understand that

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

On Thursday 03 August 2017 02:12 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: td:not([colspan=2]):nth-child(2) {} I missed the "=2" in the colspan :) Good to learn a new trick. Thanks Philippe. -- Gautam Sathe __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Gautam Sathe wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 August 2017 08:54 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote: >> I confess to being a little bit confused here, because I read this as you >> asking about a 'td' that's a child of another 'td' and I don't think that's

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

On Wednesday 02 August 2017 08:54 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote: I confess to being a little bit confused here, because I read this as you asking about a 'td' that's a child of another 'td' and I don't think that's a thing. Could you provide some markup samples to illustrate cases where you do and

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

On 28 Jul 2017, at 2:46, Felix Miata wrote: Can a :not be used to make td:nth-child(2) not applicable if the element that the td is a second child of is a td subjected to a colspan? If so, how? I confess to being a little bit confused here, because I read this as you asking about a 'td'

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

On Friday 28 July 2017 12:16 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Can a :not be used to make td:nth-child(2) not applicable if the element that the td is a second child of is a td subjected to a colspan? If so, how? Hi Felix, I have not tested this extensively for compatibility with all browsers - but I

[css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

Can a :not be used to make td:nth-child(2) not applicable if the element that the td is a second child of is a td subjected to a colspan? If so, how? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg.

Re: [css-d] Flex item inside css grid

Thanks Philippe. I'll dig in to this. On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:59 PM Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > > On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > > > I'm still new to grid (and flex, for that matter). I have a sample > > page where an

Re: [css-d] Flex item inside css grid

> On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > I'm still new to grid (and flex, for that matter). I have a sample > page where an individual flex item squeezes responsively as I want, > but when it is inside a css grid container, it stops. > >

[css-d] Flex item inside css grid

Listers, I'm still new to grid (and flex, for that matter). I have a sample page where an individual flex item squeezes responsively as I want, but when it is inside a css grid container, it stops. https://tomliv.com/flex-in-grid/ Why do they not squeeze up inside the grid? TIA -- Tom

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

Howdy Tom, ~~~ Friday, July 21, 2017, 12:18:41 PM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'), you wrote the message that appears below. My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message. ~~~ > List, > Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid itself? > I

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

Ow, my head. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM Eric A. Meyer wrote: > On 21 Jul 2017, at 14:18, Tom Livingston wrote: > > > Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid > > itself? > > There's no way to say something like '@column[2] {border:

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

On 21 Jul 2017, at 14:18, Tom Livingston wrote: Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid itself? There's no way to say something like '@column[2] {border: 1px solid;}' and thus directly style the grid components. You have to assign some sort of element into

Re: [css-d] CSS Grid Question

Sure Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Jul 21, 2017, at 1:18 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > List, > > Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid itself? > > I have an upcoming layout that uses what looks like a

Re: [css-d] Recommendation

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Sansan Ngo wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to learning CSS and was wondering if there were any free webhosting > sites that you can recommend to run my CSS coding on? > > Many thanks in advance for your help jsfiddle.net and codepen.io are ones

[css-d] Recommendation

Hello,  I am new to learning CSS and was wondering if there were any free webhosting sites that you can recommend to run my CSS coding on? Many thanks in advance for your help Kind regards, Sansan  __ css-discuss

[css-d] CSS Grid Question

List, Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid itself? I have an upcoming layout that uses what looks like a tic-tac-toe board - complete with the vertical and horizontal lines of said tic-tac-toe board - with text/icon in each grid cell. Not experienced with Grid

Re: [css-d] Animating text

Hi Tom, Don't know of a css way, but I would say jQuery is your friend on this one. jQuery + Super Scrollorama is really neat! Does a lot of what you're talking about already and can be based on the users scroll position if desired. http://johnpolacek.github.io/superscrollorama/ Learning curve

[css-d] Animating text

This may not be CSS related, so I apologize if the appropriate answer has nothing to do with CSS... I am looking for a way to animate text for a web page. I am looking for the ability to do things like reveal a word as if it were growing out of a rule on the page, roll from one line of text to

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 23, 2017, at 5:28 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > @Phillippe - > I can't find the source where I found the unset now, but did find this note > on developer.mozilla which may be why the other site didn't list "none" and > why none did not work for the OP. I could

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

@Mi B, Just saw this reply. The use of !important would do the trick just fine I guess from my tests, but I choose to use the unset so I didn't have to put !important on everything. background, borders, text, shadows, etc. Also, I hate using !important, so it was also a personal choice.

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > >> On Jun 21, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: >> >> Again, I didn't see a -webkit-appearance:none in the specs. I may have >> looked right past it. Not sure. > > Which spec did

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Again, I didn't see a -webkit-appearance:none in the specs. I may have looked > right past it. Not sure. Which spec did you look at? https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#propdef-appearance Value: auto | none

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

My replies within yours below. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:17 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > >> On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: >> >> I chose to go with -*-appearance:

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it back on > say on an individual page. > With !important, I have to override and override and override and can't just > simply remove the

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

On 6/18/2017 9:21 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Jun 18, 2017, at 7:56 PM, william drescher wrote: The original problem was that firefox sized the radio buttones and checkboxes very small and ignored the "html {font-size 2.2 rem}" for them. I am writing this for

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> 20 juni 2017 kl. 12:05 skrev Karl DeSaulniers : > > I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it back on > say on an individual page. > With !important, I have to override and override and override and can't just > simply remove the !important.

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it back on say on an individual page. With !important, I have to override and override and override and can't just simply remove the !important. Well, not that I have found. Is there a way to remove original !important

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Hi Philip, At the time I didn't think to use !important (I try to avoid like the plague) but yes, putting the !important let my borders and shading work without using -webkit-appearance:unset; Excellent news. I completely agree with you that one should eschew

[css-d] New stuff!

Awe sheezy! This could get interesting... https://hacks.mozilla.org/2017/06/css-shapes-clipping-and-masking/ Enjoy. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Hi Philip, At the time I didn't think to use !important (I try to avoid like the plague) but yes, putting the !important let my borders and shading work without using -webkit-appearance:unset; Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Jun 17, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Philip

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 18, 2017, at 7:56 PM, william drescher wrote: > > The original problem was that firefox sized the radio buttones and checkboxes > very small and ignored the > "html {font-size 2.2 rem}" for them. > I am writing this for an intranet and ff is the only browser

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

On 6/17/2017 6:48 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit buttons and not letting my style be applied. It would allow the color, but not the

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit > buttons and not letting my style be applied. > It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and shading to > be

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Hi Phillipe, > Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit > buttons and not letting my style be applied. > It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and shading to > be applied. > Once I added the -*-appearance:

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Hi Phillipe, Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit buttons and not letting my style be applied. It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and shading to be applied. Once I added the -*-appearance: unset, it allowed my style to be applied

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 17, 2017, at 9:08 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Basically you told the browser your checkboxes and radios have no appearance. > I think what your wanting is to "unset" the native appearance so you can > apply your own? > > That would be: > > -moz-appearance:

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 17, 2017, at 3:58 AM, william drescher wrote: > > I have: > > > Since the most recent update of Firefox the checkboxes and

Re: [css-d] A little SVG Help ?

I understand the differences but I don’t see what is wrong with my code compared to some of the examples on the linked page. I should see a shape with holes. I passed it onto someone else, they said “it should work” ! Christopher From: Tom Livingston Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 9:27 AM To:

Re: [css-d] A little SVG Help ?

Maybe this can help? https://css-tricks.com/masking-vs-clipping-use/#more-255253 On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:29 AM, wrote: > No, what is defined with is called outside of and should be > displayed ? > > > > > > Christopher > > > -- Tom Livingston | Senior

Re: [css-d] A little SVG Help ?

No, what is defined with is called outside of and should be displayed ? Christopher From: Tom Livingston Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 7:56 AM To: CSS Discussion Group Subject: Re: [css-d] A little SVG Help ? I see what looks like 2 black hourglass type shapes. Is that what you want? On Mon,

Re: [css-d] A little SVG Help ?

I see what looks like 2 black hourglass type shapes. Is that what you want? On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:59 PM, wrote: > Link > > > > Christopher > > > > From: Tom Livingston > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 10:19 PM > To: CSS Discussion Group; crestchristop...@gmail.com >

Re: [css-d] A little SVG Help ?

A link or some information would help. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:38 PM wrote: > I understand this doesn’t belong to this discussion. Anyone with deep > understanding of SVG because this is not displaying within CodePen ? > > > Christopher > > -- Tom Livingston |

[css-d] A little SVG Help ?

I understand this doesn’t belong to this discussion. Anyone with deep understanding of SVG because this is not displaying within CodePen ? Christopher __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] Embedded Video does not more work

Hi Philip... On 2017-06-03 12:18:42 Philip Taylor hacked into the keyboard: > What leads you to believe that this is a CSS issue, Michelle ? Grmpf! -- have used the wrong Mailinglist from my abook! However, if you have an idea, you can PM me. Have a nice day -- Michelle KonzackMiila

Re: [css-d] Embedded Video does not more work

What leads you to believe that this is a CSS issue, Michelle ? Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Experts, > > On my website I have several videos and > the one in this page (the bunny > animation) is working properly. > >

[css-d] Embedded Video does not more work

Hello Experts, On my website I have several videos and the one in this page (the bunny animation) is working properly. This one (nearly at the end)

Re: [css-d] Flex question

Thanks Al. This was the hint I needed. >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> I know you're very advanced in your CSS skills, so looking at the structure >> and CSS we're deploying on our home page should give you some clues: >> http://www.projectseven.com/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer |

Re: [css-d] Flex question

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Al Sparber wrote: > On 5/22/2017 12:50 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: >> >> Hello list, >> >> Given the following: >> >> >> Item 1 >> Item 2 >> Item 3 >> Item 4 >> >> >> ol{ >> position: absolute; >> display: flex; >>

Re: [css-d] Flex question

Just for the hell of it, try this: Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 CSS: ol{ display: flex; flex-direction: column; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; } ol li { display: inline-flex; justify-content: center; } ol li:nth-child(odd) { background-color:

Re: [css-d] Flex question

On 5/22/2017 12:50 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: Hello list, Given the following: Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 ol{ position: absolute; display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 100%; /* 100% of taller parent */ } ol li{ display: flex; flex:1; } ol li a{

[css-d] Flex question

Hello list, Given the following: Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 ol{ position: absolute; display: flex; flex-direction: column; height: 100%; /* 100% of taller parent */ } ol li{ display: flex; flex:1; } ol li a{ flex:1; } the OL is absolute and 100% height of

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

At 08:08 PM 5/21/2017, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Maybe a re-install is in order? Dunno. I asked about it on a Eudora group, I'm not the only one who has experienced this. Working hypothesis ATM: randomly-triggered bug in the Eudora v7.1.0.9 message viewer. Reese

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

Maybe a re-install is in order? Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On May 21, 2017, at 4:01 PM, Reese wrote: > > I hope this is correctable on my end, that it isn't something > that will force me to abandon use of Eudora.

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

At 09:24 PM 5/18/2017, Eric A. Meyer wrote: On 18 May 2017, at 19:26, Reese wrote: > Wow, the formatting on that got clobbered. Will probably get clobbered > on this email also. > > How long has that been happening? Hard to say. What formatting got clobbered? You initial post didn't look

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

On 18 May 2017, at 19:26, Reese wrote: Wow, the formatting on that got clobbered. Will probably get clobbered on this email also. How long has that been happening? Hard to say. What formatting got clobbered? You initial post didn't look mangled to me. -- Eric A. Meyer -

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

> On May 19, 2017, at 4:20 AM, Reese wrote: > > Is anyone playing with this yet? Using it in production? Yes and yes. To the second question “production” is for webviews inside an iOS app. > Browser support is reportedly 69% worldwide, US-only support is 77% > according to

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

At 03:20 PM 5/18/2017, Reese wrote: Wow, the formatting on that got clobbered. Will probably get clobbered on this email also. How long has that been happening? Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] How do you handle situations like this?

> On May 19, 2017, at 4:49 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > I have a content module. A div containing text above a flexible-width > video (could easily be an image too). > > I have 2 of these on a web page. They stack on narrow widths, and go > side-by-side at wide enough

Re: [css-d] How do you handle situations like this?

I'll have to whip up a test page. Can't share the real page. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Not without a link. > > Best, > Karl > > Sent from losPhone > -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 |

Re: [css-d] How do you handle situations like this?

Correction: Sorry, that should have said I started down the path of *min-height* not min-width. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > Listers, > > I have a content module. A div containing text above a flexible-width > video (could easily be an image

[css-d] How do you handle situations like this?

Listers, I have a content module. A div containing text above a flexible-width video (could easily be an image too). I have 2 of these on a web page. They stack on narrow widths, and go side-by-side at wide enough widths. They have different amounts of text in each. I will inevitably be asked to

[css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

Is anyone playing with this yet? Using it in production? Browser support is reportedly 69% worldwide, US-only support is 77% according to caniuse.com (as reported in the article) and IE-Edge support is in the works: https://medium.com/dev-channel/css-variables-no-really-76f8c91bd34e What it

Re: [css-d] bandcamp iframe breaks inside foundation modal

I had dinner and looked again, and I think it's more of a timing / ordering issue with content loading. I don't believe the css is what is breaking after all! I believe I can fix this by creating an empty iframe to start with, and loading target content in there when I actually need it. I humbly

[css-d] bandcamp iframe breaks inside foundation modal

Hi all, I'm having some trouble trying to use a bandcamp embed (iframe) inside of a Foundation Reveal modal. It works on the page itself, but inside the modal much of the content is not loading. I can't seem to see what is happening. Wonder if someone here wouldn't mind taking a look for me?

[css-d] form element styles flashing

List, Here's the page: https://tomliv.com/form/ In Chrome (latest Mac) the form elements flash different styles (borders, bg color on button) upon load and reload. FF and Safari do not show this issue. I have transitions on both states of the elements so attributes fade on both focus and blur,

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

I think he may have recently changed the site design as well. I don't remember that left side nav before. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:08 AM Nancy Johnson wrote: > I found it very helpful. I was only looking for syntax to plug into > my page fast. It provided that. I

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

I found it very helpful. I was only looking for syntax to plug into my page fast. It provided that. I didn't need to look at their layout other than to see if it solved my problem. Nancy On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > I think his breakoints aren't

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

I think his breakoints aren't quite right for that 3-column layout. The site itself is very useful and informative. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote: > >> What is that image ? I know what it

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote: What is that image ? I know what it is but it appears as junk ? It's a screenshot of the page in question. Christopher From: Chris F.A. Johnson Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:57 PM To: CSS Discussion Group Subject: Re: [css-d]

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

What is that image ? I know what it is but it appears as junk ? Christopher From: Chris F.A. Johnson Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:57 PM To: CSS Discussion Group Subject: Re: [css-d] Flexbox question On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Nancy Johnson wrote: > In the past I used it only for equal heights

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Nancy Johnson wrote: In the past I used it only for equal heights only but there is a great deal I am learning about. It is a very powerful tool. You do have to be careful for older browsers and have a fall back for those. This link has been very helpful for me

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

In the past I used it only for equal heights only but there is a great deal I am learning about. It is a very powerful tool. You do have to be careful for older browsers and have a fall back for those. This link has been very helpful for me https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/

Re: [css-d] Flexbox question

Interesting method of using FlexBox; for someone whom has never used Flexbox  Christopher From: Tom Livingston Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:40 PM To: CSS Discussion Group Subject: Re: [css-d] Flexbox question On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Al Sparber wrote: > On

Re: [css-d] list of all the CSS properties?

> apr. 15 2017 Dean, John : > > If I use the wiki page at > https://www.w3.org/community/webed/wiki/CSS/Properties (which is organized > quite nicely) instead of the above URL, can I count on that URL persisting > for a long time (my first edition should run about 4

Re: [css-d] list of all the CSS properties?

> On Apr 15, 2017, at 8:17 PM, Dean, John wrote: > > https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#properties. That link used to take me to a nice > table with all the properties with their associated default values and their > associated inheritability status. > > But now, that link takes

Re: [css-d] list of all the CSS properties?

Dean, John wrote: > CSS discuss group, > > I'm near the end stages of writing a book on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, and > I'm reviewing all the URLs in my book. Unfortunately, the link I used for > showing all the CSS properties is now quite a bit different than what it was > several months

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >