Hi all,
I have a three-column layout, all three of which have a white background.
The page background is black and I need the div containing the three
columns to expand with its white background down the page. I need the
longest of the three columns (2 or 3) to determine how high the containing
I have a three-column layout, all three of which have a white background.
The page background is black and I need the div containing the three
columns to expand with its white background down the page. I need the
longest of the three columns (2 or 3) to determine how high the containing
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I need the
longest of the three columns (2 or 3) to determine how high the containing
div is.
J.C. Berry, M.A.
---
There are a number of ways to do that. One is a CSS Table [looks like
a table but its not].
Please
I can't track this down!
My blog is here: http://evamoon.net/blog/
It's fine except that when someone leaves a comment on a post, the background
of the whole post area goes white. I can't figure out where this is coming from!
Here's an example: http://evamoon.net/blog/2011/09/04/clamhenge/
I tracked it down to a plug in. Thanks anyway!
Eva
On Dec 8, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Eva Moon wrote:
I can't track this down!
My blog is here: http://evamoon.net/blog/
It's fine except that when someone leaves a comment on a post, the background
of the whole post area goes white. I can't
CSS-d,
I am trying to use Firefox's userContent.css to over ride some CSS on a
particular page.
Here is the original CSS:
input.superbigbutton {
background-color: pink;
height: 14em !important;
width: 100% !important;
}
Here is what I want to over write it with:
On Mar 28, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Dave M G wrote:
input.superbigbutton {
color: green;
border: green 1px solid;
background-color: #63D46D !important;
height: 2em !important;
width: 33% !important;
}
Here's the problem: everything works *except* background-color, and border.
Philippe,
Thank you for responding.
-moz-appearance: none !important;
Yep, that did the trick.
It seems like an odd, tricky sort of thing, but it's not as if it's the
first or last bizarre quirky exception on the internet...
Thank you for providing the answer.
--
Dave M G
: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-
boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tim Arnold
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:51 AM
To: Thijs Hakkenberg
Cc:css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] background color of a with class
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Thijs
Hakkenberg
Cc:css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] background color of a with class
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Thijs Hakkenberg
th...@hakkenberg.com wrote:
Dear List,
I made an menu based on ul's and li's
(http://winkel.varkensinnood.nl)
with an a:hover turning
, 2010 8:51 AM
To: Thijs Hakkenberg
Cc:css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] background color of a with class
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Thijs Hakkenberg
th...@hakkenberg.com wrote:
Dear List,
I made an menu based on ul's and li's
(http://winkel.varkensinnood.nl
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Thijs Hakkenberg th...@hakkenberg.comwrote:
True, I was double mistaken.
The class is .active: http://winkel.varkensinnood.nl/catalog/2
so it should be .active after all.
However, both
#block-uc_catalog-0 a .active {
background-color:#69F;
}
as
#block-uc_catalog-0 a.active {
background-color:#69F;
}
won't change a thing.
#block-uc_catalog-0 li a.active {
background-color:#69F;
}
did the trick!
Thanks everyone.
On 21-7-2010 17:32, Tim Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Thijs
Dear List,
I made an menu based on ul's and li's (http://winkel.varkensinnood.nl)
with an a:hover turning the a element white.
However, when clicked the a element turns into a class=active.
I want to change the background color and should work with the following
css:
#block-uc_catalog-0 a
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Thijs Hakkenberg th...@hakkenberg.com wrote:
Dear List,
I made an menu based on ul's and li's (http://winkel.varkensinnood.nl)
with an a:hover turning the a element white.
However, when clicked the a element turns into a class=active.
I want to change the
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-
boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tim Arnold
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:51 AM
To: Thijs Hakkenberg
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] background color of a with class
A strange thanks for your reply David. You have indirectly fixed my problem. In
the process of stripping everything out to enable you to take a look, I
realised that I had not applied a width to the div which was producing my IE7
background problem. Of course, give it a width and IE7
Got a strange one here my friends. Go to the following page to view my problem.
http://www.mrskibbles.co.uk/virtuemart/sweet-categories/chews/black-jacks-chews/
My problem is with the order table that sits half way down the page in the main
donut, where the user adds a sweet to their
John Franks wrote:
Got a strange one here my friends. Go to the following page to view my
problem.
http://www.mrskibbles.co.uk/virtuemart/sweet-categories/chews/black-jacks-chews/
Thanks, John.
Not exactly up for looking for a needle in a
List,
What is the reasons for using:
background: #fff;
instead of:
background-color: #fff;
I've seen this lately, and wonder why the preference for the first
one. I've only used 'background' as shorthand for something like:
background: #fff url(images/image.png) left top no-repeat;
Tom Livingston wrote:
List,
What is the reasons for using:
background: #fff;
instead of:
background-color: #fff;
I've seen this lately, and wonder why the preference for the first
one. I've only used 'background' as shorthand for something like:
background: #fff
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Bill Braun bbr...@hlthsys.com wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
List,
What is the reasons for using:
background: #fff;
instead of:
background-color: #fff;
I've seen this lately, and wonder why the preference for the first
one. I've only used
No, using...
background: #fff;
...instead of...
background-color: #fff;
...is fine.
You would just be using the shorthand method. The advantage in this
case would just be less typing.
__
css-discuss
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
In CSS this
background: #fff;
is more lean and mean than this
background-color: #fff;
Both are valid CSS.
~d
Thanks David. That says it all.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Bill Braun bbr...@hlthsys.com wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
List,
What is the reasons for using:
background: #fff;
instead of:
background-color: #fff;
I've seen this lately, and wonder why the preference for the
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
List,
What is the reasons for using:
background: #fff;
instead of:
background-color: #fff;
I've seen this lately, and wonder why the preference for the first
one. I've only used 'background' as shorthand for
Thank you everyone. I was aware of background shorthand, but was not
aware I could use it for just ONE property. Looks like I am gonna save
me some bytes!
:-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
In CSS this
background: #fff;
is more lean and mean than this
background-color: #fff;
Both are valid CSS.
~d
Thanks David. That says it all.
I see I
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, Jason Arnold jaon.arn...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the reasons for using:
background: #fff;
instead of:
background-color: #fff;
I'm surprised no-one's pointed out the obvious: that using background will
override all other background-* properties (to their
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
In CSS this
background: #fff;
is more lean and mean than this
background-color: #fff;
Both are valid CSS.
~d
Thanks David. That says it all.
I see I
Tom Livingston wrote:
List,
What is the reasons for using:
background: #fff;
instead of:
background-color: #fff;
I've seen this lately, and wonder why the preference for the first
one. I've only used 'background' as shorthand for something like:
background: #fff
Bobby Jack wrote:
I'm surprised no-one's pointed out the obvious: that using
background will override all other background-* properties (to
their default values), in addition to setting background-color.
It's very obvious if you look at CSS specifications, but they aren't
everyone's
Dear Jukka --
When you say :
When you set background-color: #fff, you do not affect other background
properties in any way. Whether they are inherited or not depends on other
factors. The main factor is that according to CSS specifications, none of
the background properties is inherited in
At 8:10 PM + 2/23/10, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
I am confused. If you take the example below, which may
be seen online at
http://web-consultants.org.uk/sites/development/test-inheritance.html
both the first outer div and the first inner (nested) div
shew the same background colour.
Eric A. Meyer wrote:
Yes, it's that.[plus full explanation]
Many thanks, Eric : much appreciated.
** Phil.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
default background colour is transparent, and therefore
no inheritance is taking place but rather the colour is
simply shewing through ?
Yes, it's that. The easiest test to see if a background is being
inherited by a child element is something like this:
div#outer {background: silver
Hi;
I have a css menu with the following code:
#menu a {
color: #fff;
background: #00;
text-decoration: none;
}
Now, I've put an image in the background of this menu. I would like to get
rid of the background color completely; however, if I simply delete the
appropriate line, it defaults to
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi;
I have a css menu with the following code:
#menu a {
color: #fff;
background: #00;
text-decoration: none;
}
Now, I've put an image in the background of this menu. I would like to get
rid of the
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Jack Timmons jorac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi;
I have a css menu with the following code:
#menu a {
color: #fff;
background: #00;
text-decoration: none;
}
Now,
I would recommend taking a look at the parent elements and making sure
their backgrounds aren't set, either.
Couldn't see any.
It's in the header of the html.
#menu {
width: 12em;
background: #eee;
}
---Tim
__
css-discuss
That color code threw me! Thanks,
V
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Climis, Tim tcli...@indiana.edu wrote:
I would recommend taking a look at the parent elements and making sure
their backgrounds aren't set, either.
Couldn't see any.
It's in the header of the html.
#menu {
width:
Hi all, new to the list.
I recently started a complete redesign of my Web site, and because
cross-browser support for CSS3 is finally on the rise, decided to
throw in some goodies in the form of rounded corners and RGBA
backgrounds.
But while working on my navigation list I discovered something
Hugh Guiney wrote:
http://www.nospoon.tv/test/bgcolor.html.
I have tried this in Firefox 3.5.3 and Chrome 3.0.195.27 on Windows
XP and the result is the same. Oddly enough, IE7 renders them exactly
the opposite. So, barring that, how do I get the first example to
render the same as the
Thanks Georg.
I actually tried throwing in extra decimal places but as mentioned I
couldn't even get the *same* browser to agree on how to render it at
different font sizes.
And I would rather avoid ruling in pixels for anything (aside from
raster images) because I am going for
And I would rather avoid ruling in pixels for anything (aside from
raster images) because I am going for resolution-independence here,
and although I know most browsers these days zoom everything by
default, I wouldn't want the layout to break for someone with a large
font size and an older
On Thursday, October 22, 2009 6:17:15 am Hugh Guiney wrote:
Hi all, new to the list.
I recently started a complete redesign of my Web site, and because
cross-browser support for CSS3 is finally on the rise, decided to
throw in some goodies in the form of rounded corners and RGBA
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Oct 22, 2009, at 8:33 PM, G. Sørtun wrote:
Hugh Guiney wrote:
http://www.nospoon.tv/test/bgcolor.html.
I have tried this in Firefox 3.5.3 and Chrome 3.0.195.27 on
Windows XP and the result is the same. Oddly enough, IE7 renders
them exactly the opposite.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 7:17 PM, Hugh Guiney wrote:
http://www.nospoon.tv/test/bgcolor.html.
An additional note: if the intent is to have the border the same color
as the background, in order to use the 'border-radius' property, then
there is absolutely no need for the border.
Since I only want one color behind the text, I tried Philippe's method
of just dropping the border declarations altogether and it worked
without a hitch in Firefox, Chrome, and IE. I didn't realize that
border-radius didn't pertain solely to borders. (It really *should* be
renamed...)
I did go
Hello,
What's this about? Hex code for transparency? I like the sound of this
but it's the first I have heard
I notice you have put 'rgba' is that for alpha? Can I have opaque
colours too?
On 26/07/2009, at 9:52 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jul 26, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Sandy
On Jul 26, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Chris Blake wrote:
What's this about? Hex code for transparency? I like the sound of this
but it's the first I have heard
I notice you have put 'rgba' is that for alpha? Can I have opaque
colours too?
of course:
p {background: rgba(0,0,0,.8); color:
On Jul 26, 2009, at 6:13 PM, lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
What's this about? Hex code for transparency? I like the sound of
this
but it's the first I have heard
I notice you have put 'rgba' is that for alpha? Can I have opaque
colours too?
of course:
p {background:
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/index.shtml
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/css/mcb2009.css
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/css/ie6-hacks.css
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/css/ie7-hacks.css
One problem remains, as far as I can see - that's the white border on
the #globalnav. I think that is
On Jul 26, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Sandy wrote:
I didn't realize that there is a colour code for transparent! Do you
happen to know the hex?
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparent
It cannot be translated to hex (hex cannot express transparency).
As the spec mentions, it is functionally
Sandy wrote:
Sandy wrote:
[...]
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/contact.shtml
and there are a couple of divs with a transparent background
.headerleft
#globalnav
the search should be transparent, too.
instead that whole area is showing up with a white background in AOL
9.1, ie6 and ie7. ie8
Sandy wrote re: http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/contact.shtml
instead that whole area is showing up with a white background in
AOL 9.1, ie6 and ie7. ie8 is ok.
the styles are here
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/css/mcb2009.css
[...]
Now - your advice did get that white background
hey all,
I hope someone can help me out with this.
I am starting on a site (it's still very rough)
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/contact.shtml
and there are a couple of divs with a transparent background
.headerleft
#globalnav
the search should be transparent, too.
instead that whole area is
Sandy wrote:
[...]
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/contact.shtml
and there are a couple of divs with a transparent background
.headerleft
#globalnav
the search should be transparent, too.
instead that whole area is showing up with a white background in AOL
9.1, ie6 and ie7. ie8 is ok.
Sandy wrote:
[...]
http://www.uoguelph.ca/mcb/test/contact.shtml
and there are a couple of divs with a transparent background
.headerleft
#globalnav
the search should be transparent, too.
instead that whole area is showing up with a white background in AOL
9.1, ie6 and ie7. ie8 is
What does the background-color: transparent; actually do?
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies --
Andy Borka wrote:
What does the background-color: transparent; actually do?
Turns off background color on an element to make the underlying
colors shine through.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/colors.html#background-properties
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote:
David
At http://www.choroideremia.org/new/crf_header.php can you tell me why the
Orange background is not filling the background for Choroideremia Research
Foundation Inc. in the h1 header and not obstructing the curve graphic? And
why 26 point font in
Once again, I apologize for these extremely simplistic questions.
Here is my page:
http://home.comcast.net/~prairiedream/beginning/masthead.html
http://home.comcast.net/~prairiedream/beginning/masthead.css
How do I get the background color to show up in Sidebar A One?
Why doesn't the content
How do I get the background color to show up in Sidebar A One?
Your id is set incorrectly, in the css it is sidebar_a and in the html it
is set as sidedbar_a (theres an extra d before bar)
Why doesn't the content div show up at the proper width?
What is the proper width?
Why doesn't the content div show up at the proper width?
What is the proper width?
The width of masthead.gif is supposed to be 760px, though it shows up I
think as 750 px, I don't know why.
So the total width of sidebar_a and content should be 760px.
The content is not wrapped by anything
I'm trying to build a vertical menu for a church site simply using
borders, changing background and font colors.
This is only my second CSS site.
my CSS for the menu (so far) is this:
/*Menu Navigation*/
ul#menu {
list-style-type: none;
padding-left: 0;
margin-left:0;
}
Phoebe Taylor wrote:
my CSS for the menu (so far) is this:
My question. Upon hoover I don't see any change in background or font
color. Why?
Phoebe
Could it be because you misspelled hover in the selector?
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
You wrote:
#menu a:hoover {
background-color: #F4D455;
color: #000;
}
Shouldn't it be hover, and not hoover?
Kind regards,
Christian
*Directmedia Publishing GmbH* · Möckernstraße 68 · 10965 Berlin
www.digitale-bibliothek.de
AG Berlin-Charlottenburg · HR B 58002 · USt.Id.
bleh yes. sorry.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:41 PM, David Laakso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phoebe Taylor wrote:
my CSS for the menu (so far) is this:
My question. Upon hoover I don't see any change in background or font
color. Why?
Phoebe
Could it be because you
this email or I'll dispatch Treebeard on you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phoebe Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:34 PM
To: css mailing list
Subject: [css-d] Background color on menu
I'm trying to build a vertical menu for a church
Phoebe Taylor wrote:
bleh.. yes..
My question. Upon hoover I don't see any change in background or font
color. Why?
Phoebe
Could it be because you misspelled hover in the selector?
Think of the w3c validation services as your best friends.
css
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Phoebe Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm trying to build a vertical menu for a church site simply using
borders, changing background and font colors.
This is only my second CSS site.
my CSS for the menu (so far) is this:
/*Menu Navigation*/
ul#menu {
To thank all the responders, both here and private, I now have a new signature.
Phoebe
--
Words I have learned to spell from CSS-Discussion list members -
scissors, tortoise, hover (not hoover).
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote:
I had the following doing what what I wanted. Now the background in
the curve is not a dark blue (#191970) I wish to have. I would like
to keep the white and change the grey background choroideremia
Research Foundation Inc. br / (CRF) sits on to a dark blue
Can someone see why IE7 and Firefox 2.x running on Vista Home Premium puts a
Plump 4 background color for Choroideremia Research Foundation Inc. br /
(CRF) and Decrease Font Size By 10% in a midnight blue background color? I
should have a midnight blue background a white curve and then a
I had the following doing what what I wanted. Now the background in the curve
is not a dark blue (#191970) I wish to have. I would like to keep the white and
change the grey background choroideremia Research Foundation Inc. br /
(CRF) sits on to a dark blue (#191970). Can some one see the
http://server.npserver1.com/~netper/ph/
* This page looks the way I want it to in IE7.
* In IE6 there seems to be an extra padding/margin on the right hand side.
* In Firefox Safari, the background-color in the #main div isn't showing.
The extra padding problem may be there, but I can't tell
http://www.melbournecostumehire.com.au/test/
In IE6 7, the background of this navigation is black. In Firefox Safari,
only the hyperlinks are black background and when they finish, the
background color of the rest of the #navigation div is showing as white.
How do I fix this?
Joanne
Joanne wrote:
http://www.melbournecostumehire.com.au/test/
In IE6 7, the background of this navigation is black. In Firefox
Safari, only the hyperlinks are black background and when they
finish, the background color of the rest of the #navigation div is
showing as white.
IE/win is
Thanks to Philippe Wittenbergh's help, I now realize that - with the exception
of the root element - the background-color of any block element will normally
apply only to its content-area, and that area, of course, is defined by either
its actual content, or a specified width.
However, in
Ingo Chao wrote:
Unicorn Design wrote:
http://www.excellenterprisesllc.com/contact.php
The problem is demoized here [1].
I think a fix could be to pull the legend with a negative margin, apply
position:relative to fix the clipping, and to apply position:relative to
the fieldset
I am finishing up a site and having a small problem with how IE is
displaying the contact form.
The fields for the form are within one fieldset. I've applied a background
color to the fieldset.
The problem occurs with the legend, as IE displays the background color
outside the bounds of the
Unicorn Design wrote:
I am finishing up a site and having a small problem with how IE is
displaying the contact form. The fields for the form are within one
fieldset. I've applied a background color to the fieldset.
The problem occurs with the legend, as IE displays the background color
Matthew Bernhardt wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to figure out why the content block in the following site
doesn't always get the background color in IE 6. Any help would be much
appreciated.
This page works correctly in all the browsers I've checked:
Hello,
I've been trying to figure out why the content block in the following site
doesn't always get the background color in IE 6. Any help would be much
appreciated.
This page works correctly in all the browsers I've checked:
http://benedikt.knowlton.ohio-state.edu/default.asp?content=1
problem child - www.magnoliapr.com (/magpr.css)
IE 6+ gets the bg color happening in the wrap div, but to my surprise
FF, NN and Opera does not. Also, you can see in IE that there is a
slight space added after the banner/logo area. The home page is
validating XHTML and CSS (save for bgcolor
the good browsers have no idea that you want #wrap to contain the
floats inside, so they give #wrap a 0 height. you have already
triggered haslayout in ie6, which is why it's expanding to contain the
floats and the background is showing up.
i'd suggest sticking in the easy clearing method to get
Actually - CSS validation states in such warning that I have no
background-color assigned for my div#wrap, but if you scroll down to
(or otherwise read) the css, I do...?... WTF?!?
Thanks,
Ron
Quoting RKN Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
problem child - www.magnoliapr.com (/magpr.css)
IE 6+
On 9/8/06, RKN Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks cj - this seems to work. Can I assume then that I 'always' use
such clear practices after using floats? I didn't know to do this.
Thanks,
Ron
this method is the one i most prefer to both contain floats and to
clear them as well. if
RKN Studio wrote:
Actually - CSS validation states in such warning that I have no
background-color assigned for my div#wrap, but if you scroll down to
(or otherwise read) the css, I do...?... WTF?!?
Thanks,
Ron
Quoting RKN Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
problem child - www.magnoliapr.com
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:07:18 -0500, Rayne Bair wrote:
hi, I'm Rayne and I've just joined the list. [...]
Welcome, Rayne.
Re: http://testing.wifetalks.com/
You said:
I'm getting warning that no color is specified on
elements where I've defined a background-color. It's just a
warning, but
hi, I'm Rayne and I've just joined the list. I'm working on a redesign of my
new site and I've got several questions.
1) I'm checking that my CSS validates and I've fixed the errors (didn't
realize that background properties had to be in a certain order). But I'm
getting warning that no color is
1) I'm checking that my CSS validates and I've fixed the errors (didn't
realize that background properties had to be in a certain order). But I'm
getting warning that no color is specified on elements where I've defined a
background-color. It's just a warning, but should I explicitly define all my
I would appreciate it if someone would take the time to check out my
page and tell me why the background color is not working in the div
called main_content. I know the positioning is slightly off in Netscape
and way off in IE and I don't know why. It looks fine locally on my
computer. I
, thereby enclosing the former?
-Original Message-
From: Marlene T. Yogerst
Subject: [css-d] background color not working in div
I would appreciate it if someone would take the time to check out my
page and tell me why the background color is not working in the div
called main_content
I would appreciate it if someone would take the time to check out my
page and tell me why the background color is not working in the div
called main_content. I know the positioning is slightly off in Netscape
and way off in IE and I don't know why. It looks fine locally on my
computer. I
Morning!
Okay so the site looks right in IE and I know that IE makes some guesses
as to what you want to see so...how do I make [LINK:
http://pj-chron.com/redesign/] http://pj-chron.com/redesign/ look right in
Netscape, Firefox ect. In other words, how it does in IE.
The code is compliant :
mindy wrote:
http://pj-chron.com/redesign/
Here is the relevant css code:#container{
width: 760px;
}
The above width keeps IE/win happy, as it acts as a 'hasLayout'[1] trigger.
Other browsers need a proper 'Block formatting contexts'[2], so adding...
#container {overflow: hidden;}
...will
Marty Martin wrote:
I have a graphic (inside a div) that is 100px high and is positioned
absolute at left:0; top:0;. I am wanting to put a div beside the div
with graphic with a background color to stretch to the far right of
the screen so it appears to be one long banner no matter the size of
I seem to not to get the top navigation to come up with the
background properties e.g. color set in CSS for this site
http://www.chineseculturalcentre.org.uk/joomla/
have had a look at this bug and put in the fix
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/ie-listbug.html
still not working
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
