Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 23, 2017, at 5:28 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > @Phillippe - > I can't find the source where I found the unset now, but did find this note > on developer.mozilla which may be why the other site didn't list "none" and > why none did not work for the OP. I could be wrong. But `-moz-a

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

@Mi B, Just saw this reply. The use of !important would do the trick just fine I guess from my tests, but I choose to use the unset so I didn't have to put !important on everything. background, borders, text, shadows, etc. Also, I hate using !important, so it was also a personal choice. @Phil

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > >> On Jun 21, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: >> >> Again, I didn't see a -webkit-appearance:none in the specs. I may have >> looked right past it. Not sure. > > Which spec did you look at? > > https://drafts.csswg.or

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Again, I didn't see a -webkit-appearance:none in the specs. I may have looked > right past it. Not sure. Which spec did you look at? https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#propdef-appearance Value: auto | none the global keywords inher

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

My replies within yours below. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:17 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > >> On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: >> >> I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it bac

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 20, 2017, at 7:05 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it back on > say on an individual page. > With !important, I have to override and override and override and can't just > simply remove the !important. > Well, not that

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

On 6/18/2017 9:21 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Jun 18, 2017, at 7:56 PM, william drescher wrote: The original problem was that firefox sized the radio buttones and checkboxes very small and ignored the "html {font-size 2.2 rem}" for them. I am writing this for an intranet and ff is the

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> 20 juni 2017 kl. 12:05 skrev Karl DeSaulniers : > > I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it back on > say on an individual page. > With !important, I have to override and override and override and can't just > simply remove the !important. > Well, not that I have

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it back on say on an individual page. With !important, I have to override and override and override and can't just simply remove the !important. Well, not that I have found. Is there a way to remove original !important statement

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Hi Philip, At the time I didn't think to use !important (I try to avoid like the plague) but yes, putting the !important let my borders and shading work without using -webkit-appearance:unset; Excellent news. I completely agree with you that one should eschew !importan

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Hi Philip, At the time I didn't think to use !important (I try to avoid like the plague) but yes, putting the !important let my borders and shading work without using -webkit-appearance:unset; Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Jun 17, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Philip

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 18, 2017, at 7:56 PM, william drescher wrote: > > The original problem was that firefox sized the radio buttones and checkboxes > very small and ignored the > "html {font-size 2.2 rem}" for them. > I am writing this for an intranet and ff is the only browser supported. I > haven't had

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

On 6/17/2017 6:48 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit buttons and not letting my style be applied. It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and sha

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit > buttons and not letting my style be applied. > It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and shading to > be applied. > Once I added the

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Hi Phillipe, > Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit > buttons and not letting my style be applied. > It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and shading to > be applied. > Once I added the -*-appearance: unse

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

Hi Phillipe, Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit buttons and not letting my style be applied. It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and shading to be applied. Once I added the -*-appearance: unset, it allowed my style to be applied

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 17, 2017, at 9:08 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > Basically you told the browser your checkboxes and radios have no appearance. > I think what your wanting is to "unset" the native appearance so you can > apply your own? > > That would be: > > -moz-appearance: unset; > -webkit-appear

Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

> On Jun 17, 2017, at 3:58 AM, william drescher wrote: > > I have: > > > Since the most recent update of Firefox the checkboxes and

Re: [css-d] Problem with margins

On 11/1/2012 4:50 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: 2012-11-01 22:32, Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV wrote: I cannot get this declaration to work: p.date {margin-bottom:-10px; margin-top: 40px} It would in general be useful to specify what "to work" means, i.e. what is the expected effect and how th

Re: [css-d] Problem with margins

2012-11-01 22:32, Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV wrote: I cannot get this declaration to work: p.date {margin-bottom:-10px; margin-top: 40px} It would in general be useful to specify what "to work" means, i.e. what is the expected effect and how the rendering differs from it. However, in thi

[css-d] Problem with margins

Greetings, I cannot get this declaration to work: p.date {margin-bottom:-10px; margin-top: 40px} It is at the bottom of the CSS file. It is used to style the page below. I have gone through both the CSS and HTML numerous times and cannot find the culprit. Both the CSS and HTML validate. Thank

Re: [css-d] Problem with usemap in Fire Fox

On 08/02/2012 02:24 PM, Richard Wendrock Forum wrote: I have found a problem that occurs only in Fire Fox. This link will display a menu that remains visible as the visitor scrolls down the page. http://www.austinwebmaster.com/beecreekumc/christiancrisiscare.php It works perfectly in Internet

[css-d] Problem with usemap in Fire Fox

I have found a problem that occurs only in Fire Fox. This link will display a menu that remains visible as the visitor scrolls down the page. http://www.austinwebmaster.com/beecreekumc/christiancrisiscare.php It works perfectly in Internet Explorer 9, Chrome and Safari. The menu does not a

Re: [css-d] Problem with nav menu on Mac Safari and Mac Firefox

On 10.07.2012 00:01, Spencer, Laura Langa wrote: URL: http://www.bcbsm.com/foundation > > Problem: In Mac Safari and Mac Firefox, the final navigation option, > "RESOURCES" bumps down to a second line and it should be all on one > line. In all PC browsers (IE, Firefox, Chrome) it renders fine.

Re: [css-d] Problem with nav menu on Mac Safari and Mac Firefox

On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Spencer, Laura Langa wrote: URL: http://www.bcbsm.com/foundation Problem: In Mac Safari and Mac Firefox, the final navigation option, "RESOURCES" bumps down to a second line and it should be all on one line. In all PC browsers (IE, Firefox, Chrome) it renders fine. In

Re: [css-d] Problem with nav menu on Mac Safari and Mac Firefox

looks to be a difference in how the font renders on the Mac, the text is rendering wider and there isn't enough room for that last item. several ways to fix this, two which I'll mention here each introduce their own issues that you'll have to update: one would be to change the LI from float: left

Re: [css-d] Problem with nav menu on Mac Safari and Mac Firefox

Things such as : html { font-family: arial, sans-serif; h1 { color: #00338D; font-family: georgia, serif; are going to cause the text to render one way on a system with Arial and/or George, and another way on a system without. That almost certainly explains why it does not render as i

[css-d] Problem with nav menu on Mac Safari and Mac Firefox

URL: http://www.bcbsm.com/foundation Problem: In Mac Safari and Mac Firefox, the final navigation option, "RESOURCES" bumps down to a second line and it should be all on one line. In all PC browsers (IE, Firefox, Chrome) it renders fine. Question: Can anyone help explain why this is happening or

[css-d] problem with opera not showing scroll bar on first page only

Hi, I am having a problem with the opera browser only not showing scroll bars on this page: http://www.designhosting.biz/index.html The other pages work fine in opera. The only thing I added on this index.html page that's different is a body tag so I could style it differently. I appreciate y

Re: [css-d] problem with positioning

LOVE your answer Tim! >-Original Message- >From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css- >discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tim Arnold >Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:28 AM >To: Lisa Frost >Cc: David Laakso; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org >Subject

Re: [css-d] problem with positioning

Op 31-3-2012 17:27, Tim Arnold schreef: On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Lisa Frost wrote: Thanks that works a treat, but i do not understand why i have to put a relative position on my container div and then why my bee image is taking its values from the container div and not the div it is con

Re: [css-d] problem with positioning

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Lisa Frost wrote: >> > Thanks that works a treat, but i do not understand why i have to put a > relative position on my container div and then why my bee image is taking > its values from the container div and not the div it is contained in or the > parent of that

Re: [css-d] problem with positioning

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Lisa Frost wrote: Hi David, Thanks that works a treat, but i do not understand why i have to put a relative position on my container div and then why my bee image is taking its values from the container div and not the div it is contained in or the parent of that

Re: [css-d] problem with positioning

> > David wrote: > > Try: > #container { > border:1px dashed fuchsia; > position:relative; > } > .beeblog { > border:1px solid red; > position: absolute; > top:403px; > right:170px; > } > > > Hi David, Thanks that works a treat, but i do not understand why i have to put a relative position on my co

Re: [css-d] problem with positioning

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Lisa Frost wrote: On this page: http://www.koolfish.com/dev/beealive/ there is a bee img above the yellow counter. It needs to be in its opposite diagonal corner somewhere near the word blog and on top of the yellow box. TIA Birdie # Try: #container { borde

[css-d] problem with positioning

On this page: http://www.koolfish.com/dev/beealive/ there is a bee img above the yellow counter. It needs to be in its opposite diagonal corner somewhere near the word blog and on top of the yellow box. i just can't get my head round the correct positioning to use. I have tried both absolute and

Re: [css-d] problem with opacity

On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:45 AM, Tim Arnold wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Angela French wrote: > >> It appears that this background color is inheriting the opacity of the >> div it lives in as the white background-color seems to have no effect. I >> have even reset the opacity of this

Re: [css-d] problem with opacity

instead of opacity, try setting the transparency of the background for your DIV with RGBA or HSLA. background: rgba(250, 250, 250, .4); Frank M Taylor http://frankmtaylor.com @paceaux On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Angela French wrote: > Hello, > I am wanting to achieve the follo

Re: [css-d] problem with opacity

, February 16, 2012 11:45 AM To: Angela French Cc: css-d (css-d@lists.css-discuss.org) Subject: Re: [css-d] problem with opacity On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Angela French mailto:afre...@sbctc.edu>> wrote: It appears that this background color is inheriting the opacity of the div it lives

Re: [css-d] problem with opacity

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Angela French wrote: > It appears that this background color is inheriting the opacity of the > div it lives in as the white background-color seems to have no effect. I > have even reset the opacity of this by setting it to 100. > > Yes, the opacity css propert

[css-d] problem with opacity

Hello, I am wanting to achieve the following effect: A div with a white background color with a 40% opacity. This div is absolutely positioned over a picture so that that picture comes through the div because of its opacity setting. This part works fine. Then in that div I want to use a tag

Re: [css-d] Problem with IE7 content coming out of box

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote: Oops, should be Regards, Chetan Crasta __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.inc

Re: [css-d] Problem with IE7 content coming out of box

The suggestions that I gave earlier unfortunately work only when applied using the IE Developer Toolbar! The correct solution is this: Also, it is a better to load the html5.js file before loading the css files (by putting it earlier in the source). Regards, Chetan Crasta __

Re: [css-d] Problem with IE7 content coming out of box

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Chetan Crasta wrote: > Add this: > > #main {left:0;} > This will also work: #main {zoom:1;} or #main {height:1%;} Regards, Chetan Crasta __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www

Re: [css-d] Problem with IE7 content coming out of box

Add this: #main {left:0;} Regards, Chetan Crasta __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.

[css-d] Problem with IE7 content coming out of box

http://www.culpepers.biz/test/index.html Page parses and is correct on all browsers except IE7 where the content area is off to the right. Can't seem to find what may be open or what is causing this problem. Thanks, Carol __ cs

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

On 4/19/11 12:40 PM, Kevin A. Cameron wrote: Is the doctype on line 1? yes -- and neither DOCTYPE nor X-UA-Compatible meta-tag get me out of quirks mode on the app page, though both work just fine on the test page. -- Victor Danilchenko Senior Software Engineer, AskOnline.ne

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

Is the doctype on line 1? Kevin __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

Sorry to bug you guys again, but while this solved the problem in my test case, in my application the code behaves exactly like it used to, quirks-style. I even copy-n-pasted my test code into the app page, with the same result: it works fine on standalone page, but malfunctions on the app pag

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

Thanks, that was exactly what was needed! I greatly appreciate it. On 4/16/11 12:19 AM, David Hucklesby wrote: On 4/15/11 1:35 PM, Victor Danilchenko wrote: I put together a page to show the problem at http://www.askonline.net/overflow_test.html . Basically, if the container node is fix

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

On 4/16/11 4:55 AM, Michael Adams wrote: On Saturday 16 April 2011 16:19, David Hucklesby wrote: [snip] Without a DOCTYPE, browsers are in quirks mode. Real browsers still obey CSS rules except for a couple of things like box sizing. All versions of IE will behave like IE 5.5 though. If you wan

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

On Saturday 16 April 2011 16:19, David Hucklesby wrote: [snip] > Without a DOCTYPE, browsers are in quirks mode. Real browsers still obey > CSS rules except for a couple of things like box sizing. All versions of > IE will behave like IE 5.5 though. > > If you want to keep browsers in quirks mode,

Re: [css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

On 4/15/11 1:35 PM, Victor Danilchenko wrote: I put together a page to show the problem at http://www.askonline.net/overflow_test.html . Basically, if the container node is fixed-width with 'overflow: visible' set, the content node will not overflow the nodes A&B -- it will instead stretch them.

[css-d] problem with "overflow: visible" under IE8 resizing the containing node

I put together a page to show the problem at http://www.askonline.net/overflow_test.html . Basically, if the container node is fixed-width with 'overflow: visible' set, the content node will not overflow the nodes A&B -- it will instead stretch them. The link above starts out with 'overflow

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On 26/03/2011 4:26 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Basically, in both cases you have an invalid selector p [background: blue} .test1 and everything is ignored until the 1st instance of 'green}' The 1st valid selector after p{} is .test2 For those following at home: Following a discussion on

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On Mar 25, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > >> >> > > Basically, in both cases you have an invalid selector > p [background: blue} .test1 > and everything is ignore

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > > > > IE8 and IE9 see this. > > > p [background: blue} > > .test1 {background: green} > > .test2 {background: green} > > > And all other browsers see this, > > > p [bac

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On 25/03/2011 7:35 AM, Gates, Jeff wrote: On 3/24/11 2:18 PM, "Alan Gresley" wrote: On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: I will try this again but this time with the link to the new test.

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On 3/24/11 2:18 PM, "Alan Gresley" wrote: On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > I will try this again but this time with the link to the new test. IE8 and IE9 see t

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: I will try this again but this time with the link to the new test. IE8 and IE9 see this. p [background: blue} .test1 {

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: I have uploaded another test. IE8 and IE9 see this. p [background: blue} .test1 {background: green} .test2 {background: green} And all other browsers see this, p [backg

Re: [css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

On 25/03/2011 2:47 AM, Gates, Jeff wrote: I'm having a problem with a web page's display in IE 8. Here's a quick link I set up to show you how the page looks in IE8 and how it should look: http://americanart.si.edu/test2 I don't know where to begin with this one. You can see the real page at h

[css-d] Problem with Display in IE8

I'm having a problem with a web page's display in IE 8. Here's a quick link I set up to show you how the page looks in IE8 and how it should look: http://americanart.si.edu/test2 I don't know where to begin with this one. You can see the real page at http://africanamericanart.si.edu/timeline A

Re: [css-d] Problem with print style sheet

>> On this page: >> http://seidenschein.com/index.php/seidenschein/practice_areas/C11/ >> > > Which browser are you using ? I suspect Gecko-based… WebKit show 3 pages. I > think you need to 'unfloat' #sub_rightcol and remove that height declaration. > > ps- your print stylesheet is really minim

Re: [css-d] Problem with print style sheet

On Jan 26, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Rory Bernstein wrote: > On this page: > http://seidenschein.com/index.php/seidenschein/practice_areas/C11/ > > When I print it, the printed version contains only about half the text, it > goes to the bottom of page 1 (of the print layout) and then there is a blank

[css-d] Problem with print style sheet

On this page: http://seidenschein.com/index.php/seidenschein/practice_areas/C11/ When I print it, the printed version contains only about half the text, it goes to the bottom of page 1 (of the print layout) and then there is a blank page 2 with no content, even though there is a lot of text that

Re: [css-d] Problem with dropdowns

The ">" (eg ul>li ) is the symbol for child selector. It only selects child elements, not grand-child, great grand-child etc. Whereas the simple space eg( ul li ), called the descendant selector, selects all descendant elements -- grand-child, great grand-child etc. ~Chetan On Sat, Dec 11, 2010

Re: [css-d] Problem with dropdowns

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Chetan Crasta wrote: > Made a number of changes to the CSS. You can see the fixed page here: > http://roughtech.com/t/dropdown.html > > The changes I made to the CSS can be seen here: > http://roughtech.com/t/dropdown_files/dropdown.css > I have commented the chang

Re: [css-d] Problem with dropdowns

Found some more things that needed fixing. Fixed them now. ~Chetan On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote: > Made a number of changes to the CSS. You can see the fixed page here: > http://roughtech.com/t/dropdown.html > > The changes I made to the CSS can be seen here: > http://rou

Re: [css-d] Problem with dropdowns

Made a number of changes to the CSS. You can see the fixed page here: http://roughtech.com/t/dropdown.html The changes I made to the CSS can be seen here: http://roughtech.com/t/dropdown_files/dropdown.css I have commented the changes as "my change". ~Chetan On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Bri

[css-d] Problem with dropdowns

Hi, I'm working on this dropdown nav (http://www.bleusolutions.com/testing/dropdown.html) and I can't seem to get the text in sub menus to fit correctly. I also want to get the flyout menu to line up directly next to the dropdown menu. Any help would be greatly appreciated Thanks -- -bdot "There

[css-d] Problem with dropdown shifting right in IE6

Hi All, I am helping out a friend with his site and we're almost there. The only issue the client is having is that in IE6, the dropdown menu is pushed too far over to the right by about 50 px or so and the first 30 px of the list item are cut off. You can see one of the pages here: http://ww

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

Hi Chris, > > Verdana was ditched because it is pug ugly -- particularly at default > or > > greater than default. > >That is not true. Many people like Verdana. They prefer it over >other fonts because it is more legible. It may be more legible at *small size*, but as David said increas

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

On Wed, 19 May 2010, David Laakso wrote: ... > Verdana was ditched because it is pug ugly -- particularly at default or > greater than default. That is not true. Many people like Verdana. They prefer it over other fonts because it is more legible. -- Chris F.A. Johnson,

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

John wrote: > > > I can't have the faces I really want, so I use what I hope others > will actually have... > > Is there another way? > > thanks! > > J > > We are off- topic with this [nothing to do with CSS] and I accept full responsibility and blame for that. Best, ~d -- desktop ht

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

On May 19, 2010, at 3:21 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Verdana was ditched because it is pug ugly -- particularly at > default or > greater than default. Thanks for shining a light on that..I had no idea those other measurement systems would cause such issue with IE users...seems IE is a usua

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

David Laakso wrote: > Verdana was ditched because it is pug ugly -- particularly at default or > greater than default. How do you feel about Tahoma ? I prefer it to Verdana, and normally work at greater-than-default sizes. Philip Taylor

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

John wrote: > > On May 19, 2010, at 12:00 PM, David Laakso wrote: > >> body {font: /*11px Verdana,*/100% Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >>margin: 0; padding: 0;background: rgb(200,200,200); color: black;} >> >> img {border: 1px solid fuchsia; display : block; max-width: 96%; height: >> auto;} >>

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

On May 19, 2010, at 12:00 PM, David Laakso wrote: > body {font: /*11px Verdana,*/100% Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >margin: 0; padding: 0;background: rgb(200,200,200); color: black;} > > img {border: 1px solid fuchsia; display : block; max-width: 96%; > height: > auto;} > > Best, > ~d t

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

> >> body {font: /*11px Verdana,*/100% Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; > >>margin: 0; padding: 0;background: rgb(200,200,200); color: > black;} > >> > >> img {border: 1px solid fuchsia; display : block; max-width: 96%; > >> height: > >> auto;} > >> > > > > Max-width is a nice touch but it does no

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

Thierry Koblentz wrote: >>> thank you for any insight! >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.coffeeonmars.com/dez.html >>> >>> and >>> >>> http://www.coffeeonmars.com/two.html >>> >>> >> >> >> >> body {font: /*11px Verdana,*/100% Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >>margin: 0; padding:

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

> > thank you for any insight! > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > http://www.coffeeonmars.com/dez.html > > > > and > > > > http://www.coffeeonmars.com/two.html > > > > > > > > body {font: /*11px Verdana,*/100% Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; >margin: 0; padding: 0;background: rgb(200,200,200);

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

To save your visitors from having to horizontal-scroll (which most of them will hate), why not stack the last two images vertically instead of horizontally ? Philip Taylor John wrote: > http://www.coffeeonmars.com/dez.html _

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

> > That's because your last image on that page is 1279 pixel wide > > > yeah...it's a big boy, isn't it? ;-) > > > so, is the remedy to ammend the code on that page, or is a 1279 pixel > wide image just plain ridiculous? I don't know if it's ridiculous or not, but it is what triggers the scro

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

John wrote: > thank you for any insight! > > John > > > > > http://www.coffeeonmars.com/dez.html > > and > > http://www.coffeeonmars.com/two.html > body {font: /*11px Verdana,*/100% Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0; padding: 0;background: rgb(200,200,200); color: black;} img {bor

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

> so, is the remedy to ammend the code on that page, or is a 1279 pixel wide > image just plain ridiculous? > In marsB.css, line 27 Delete the width: 600px; (or change to min-width: 600px). That will let the paragraph expand to fit your image, which will in turn make the page expand to fit the

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

On May 19, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: > That's because your last image on that page is 1279 pixel wide yeah...it's a big boy, isn't it? ;-) so, is the remedy to ammend the code on that page, or is a 1279 pixel wide image just plain ridiculous? feel free to be frank in you

Re: [css-d] Problem with menu bar

> on both the pages below, the top menu bar (thick gray with thinner > gray bar underneath it) are meant to extend to the right to infinity, > but on the first of the two links below, Safari gets a horizontal > scroll bar and scrolling to the right shows the menu bar visibly > ending. Not so on pag

[css-d] Problem with menu bar

on both the pages below, the top menu bar (thick gray with thinner gray bar underneath it) are meant to extend to the right to infinity, but on the first of the two links below, Safari gets a horizontal scroll bar and scrolling to the right shows the menu bar visibly ending. Not so on page

Re: [css-d] Problem with expanded picture

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 1:46 AM To: Murgolo, James Cc: css-d Subject: Re: [css-d] Problem with expanded picture Murgolo, James wrote: > Hey all, > > I have a site I built using JQuery. If you go to > https://qa.oxford.emory.edu/WebApps/Directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=v.viewprofi

Re: [css-d] Problem with expanded picture

Murgolo, James wrote: > Hey all, > > I have a site I built using JQuery. If you go to > https://qa.oxford.emory.edu/WebApps/Directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=v.viewprofile&thisuserid=570&bioNumber=1 > in IE, the picture shows up expanded for a split second. The picture, of > course, is not the

[css-d] Problem with expanded picture

Hey all, I have a site I built using JQuery. If you go to https://qa.oxford.emory.edu/WebApps/Directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=v.viewprofile&thisuserid=570&bioNumber=1 in IE, the picture shows up expanded for a split second. The picture, of course, is not the size of the expansion to begin wi

Re: [css-d] Problem with limited control

Paul Ravenstone wrote: > sorry... very long weekend > > http://www.cafepress.com/graphixbyPaul > > Thanks! > > I think Paul meant to send his uri to the list... ~d -- desktop http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ mobile http://chelseacreekstudio.mobi/ __

Re: [css-d] Problem with limited control

Paul Ravenstone wrote: > A few moths ago I opened a cafepress.com store. > Paul > > > Uri? ~d -- desktop http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ mobile http://chelseacreekstudio.mobi/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] ht

[css-d] Problem with limited control

A few moths ago I opened a cafepress.com store.  We have limited control over the html and css.  Currently you see my header as correct, or mostly correct (I still have some ideas for @font-face and typography, as well as not being able to center that stupid Facebook button, but one step at a time)

Re: [css-d] Problem With Menu

Afternoon Victor You wrote; > Hi; > I've got a css menu here: > http://angrynates.com/nrelectric.com/ > This works fine in FF but in IE, if you mouseover "Services" the font > turns > black and you can't mouseover the dropdown! It disappears before you can > get > there. What do? Please advis

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >