On 11/26/05, Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
re: http://www.inkworkswell.net/booth/monroelab/
These are apparently invalid: #0147;solutions#0148;
According to: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/emen/
Do not, under any circumstances, use #147; through #149; for curly quotes.
You should use:
At 12:35 PM 11/26/05 -0500, you wrote:
In Safari (1.3 and 2), the menu on the right-hand side with the navigation
category text is almost starting to greek though (which might associated
with the 'small' declaration.).
Uhm, sorry. What does greek through mean in this context?
In
On (24/11/05 22:56), Adie Hart wrote:
The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html.
I don't have any consistend advices to give you, but I can confirm you the
page looks perfect on my GNU/Linux 2.4.29 box both with Opera 8.50, Firefox
1.5 and Konqueror 3.3.2 on my 15 LCD @ 1024x768.
Only
Adie Hart wrote:
I would really appreciate it if I could get a site check on a site that is
in production. The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. At present
only the homepage and main sub-pages work, although they do not have
content.
My main concern is achieving the correct layout
Adie Hart wrote:
www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html
The page is extremely vulnerable, and is breaking up and dropping
elements in all directions in all browsers, when just a little
font-resizing is applied.
Advice you to take another look at the layout, and add a bit stability
across
-d] site check please - navigation
Adie Hart wrote:
I would really appreciate it if I could get a site check on a site that is
in production. The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. At present
only the homepage and main sub-pages work, although they do not have
content.
My main concern
-3-
Font-sizing: Hardest to leave behind are my pixel-based fonts. :\ There
is a large difference between IE and Firefox, which I've slapped a
band-aid on for now... that Opera isn't happy with.
I've read about many people's preferences on this, but could use a lot
more. Opinions on the
L. Robinson wrote:
Converting legacy site to tableless layout and there are some advanced
(and not-so-advanced) cross-browser tricks eluding me. Having searched,
I'd be most grateful if someone can hit me with a clue stick on a few of
these.
Site here: http://beta.consupro.net/default_new.asp
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
One thing immediately stands out: you are declaring a font-size of 85% on
the body. As the standard browser font size is 16 pixels, and 85% of 16 is
13.6, you're starting from a baseline of 13.6 pixels. As you can't have
fractions of a pixel, you're pretty much bound
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
I personally find it useful to specify a font size of 62.5% on the
body, giving me a default size for 1em of 10 pixels. If I then want a
heading at 14 pixels, I can specify 1.4em.
Yes, it's a simple calculation - although not too precise across
browser-land.
However,
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
However, keep in mind that the 62.5% base may result in very, very,
large fonts if a user apply 'min-font-size'[1] in their browser.
Min-font-size isn't the only way for that to happen. User stylesheets
can do the same thing:
Reese,
On Nov 21, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Reese wrote:
We are looking for feedback on
http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab
Especially from MacIE/Safari users. All comments on display issues
welcome.
Safari and ie5/mac render the page comparably to ff1.5rc3 except for
the right hand
Hi,
The site renders OK in all Mac OS X based UAs.
In Safari (1.3 and 2), the menu on the right-hand side with the navigation
category text is almost starting to greek though (which might associated
with the 'small' declaration.).
No major issues with Mac IE 5.2.
Cheers,
Sasha
At 4:57 PM +0200 11/16/05, Schalk wrote:
Greetings All
Hopefully this will be the last request for a review of this site:
www.volume4.com/tc/ Thank you all in advance.
On Mac, Safari, when I hover over the nav bar, the hover state seems
to be taller than the normal state? This results in an
The top nav looks good in XP IE 6.0 and latest FireFox, but I wanted to
mention one thing, from a usability standpoint.
The page links are underlined until you mouse over them, and then the
underline decoration disappears. This is a bit confusing on pages like
Trish Meyer wrote:
At 4:57 PM +0200 11/16/05, Schalk wrote:
www.volume4.com/tc/
It looks like the photo should be the same height as the left column
(nav bar) area, but the left column is taller.
You can't do that without sizing things in px. To me it's obvious it
can't be, though maybe
Schalk wrote:
Greetings All
Hopefully this will be the last request for a review of this site:
www.volume4.com/tc/ Thank you all in advance.
On zoom FF gets it right-- the nav container expands vertically, and
throws h1. IE only /looks/ correct on zoom.You ignored Georg's
comment
Schalk wrote:
Greetings All
Please have a look at: www.volume4.com/tc/
One problem I am aware of and would like suggestions on is the top
navigation. In Firefox it is perfect but, in IE the padding, margin,
background color etc. is totally wrong. Thanks!
Sent this earlier as a
Charles Dort wrote:
If you'd be willing to glance at this index page
http://www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/index.html
http://www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/css/allsaints.css
Theophan (Charles) Dort
xp_sp2 ie/ff/opera
Looks good to me, Charles.
Some suggestions:
body { /* deleting
It's good, the only thing is if you are trying to avoid a horizontal
scrollbar at 800x600, you need to make it about 2 pixels more narrow.
--
--
C Montoya
rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
__
MANY thanks to those who replied on the list and privately with very helpful
observations and information about my site. I was dismayed to see that in
IE5/Mac there are serious problems, and I'm going to think about taking the
advice to assume hardly anyone uses that browser. I'll see if I can
RKN Studio wrote:
Just getting ready to launch a new line for the customer. The mail for isn't
working here - but I know that works.
http://www.rknstudio.com/sites/mlpformen/home.html
Mac users input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ron
www.rknstudio.com
A few Mac screen captures:
At 10:04 AM 10/4/2005 +0100, Mike Davies wrote:
I would appreciate a check on this new site, particularly in MacIE.
Not a MAC, just Opera 7.54 on XP, the links look like they are
strike-through (works fine on Opera 8.5).
HTH,
TTFN,
David
Director of Integrated Technology
CATALyST
Louisiana
Voices of CSM is a great website for a first attempt at CSS design.
All those having trouble designing with CSS should learn from this example.
If anyone has a moment and can check out my site (this is my first all CSS
site) - it seems to be okay in IE6, FF, Opera NN7, but I'm not sure
about
Juanita wrote:
If anyone has a moment and can check out my site (this is my first all CSS
site) - it seems to be okay in IE6, FF, Opera NN7, but I'm not sure
about other browsers or Mac.
I imported the stylesheet so as not to break in NN4, but haven't done a
more basic stylesheet for it
David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, September 22, 2005 at 9:17
AM -0800 wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
Juanita wrote:
She's looking and working much, much better now, Juanita.
Felix MiataIt's wonderful to see my text size preference there. :-)
The problem is,
your 699px wide #wrapper
On 17/09/05, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mac/ie5.2 and Safari screen captures here
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=191661.
In XP_SP2 you are drawing a scroll bar at 800 in all my browsers.
Other than that she's 'working' well in XP, albeit unreadable at any
screen
On 9/17/05 5:32 AM, olly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, thanks for the feedback - really appreciated. I'm purchasing a Mac in
the next few weeks so then I'll be able to cover most browsers...
Unless you have not uploaded the revised files, the problems are still
occurring in IE 5/Mac. Nothing
On 9/16/05 9:50 PM, olly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
... I'm mainly concerned about Macs.
http://www.whistlebump.co.uk/test
Looks good in Firefox 1.0.6, Safari 2.0, Opera 8.02, and somewhat good in IE
5.2.3 for Mac OS 10.4.2 (Tiger).
IE/Mac 5.2.3:
Home page:
The bottom of the second
olly wrote:
I'd appreciate it if some of you could check that a new site i'm working on
in your browsers. It validates XHTML 1.1 and looks fine in IE6, Firefox
1.0.6 and Opera 8 on the PC. I'm mainly concerned about Macs.
http://www.whistlebump.co.uk/test
cheers, olly
Olly,
Mac/ie5.2 and
Rahul,
I think the white space is coming from the menumachine 1.74 code down at the
bottom of the page, but I will check it out, thank you for looking at the
page. I plan to replace that menu with a MM2 menu soon.
Brian
On 9/14/05, Rahul Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep
Peter,
I am trying to come up with a new design for my website, one that uses less
pictures. I actually used Photoshops Save for Web to make these pictures
as small as I could. Thanks for checking my site. I'm new to this CSS, and
need all the help i can get.
Thank you,
Brian
On 9/14/05,
This is a bit off topic for a CSS forum.
I picked one of your images, the Californian Poppy,
and opened it in Photoshop. On the site it's 29896 bytes.
If I save it for web and chose medium quality (30) that
comes down to 5057 bytes. IMHO quality 30 is virtually
indistinguishable from the original
Petro Verkhogliad wrote:
Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check.
Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/.
CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css
PV
Petro, It seems fine in XP_SP2 ie/ff/moz/opera.
You are showing an approx. 165px horizontal scroll bar at 800
Petro Verkhogliad wrote:
Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check.
Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/.
CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css
Thank you,
PV
::SNIP::
Well, Petro, not to put too fine a point on it, but the text is all but
unreadable to
Petro Verkhogliad wrote:
Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check.
Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/.
CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css
It's not much better than invisible. Try plugging your foreground and
background colors in at
Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Glasgow wrote:
(http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk). Just a
suggestion...
Wierd site. I can find no evidence of a way to create a login account.
Sorry, I pointed to the Web interface for the list. The account creation URL
is here:
Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/.
I cannot read your content because the color constrast is not sufficient.
There are tools to analyze contrast at
http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/contrast_analyser/index.html
---
Paul Debban
A quick check on the home page in a few browsers:
Firefox 1.0.6, IE6, Opera 8.02 and NS7.2 - looks OK and FF reports no warnings
or errors.
IE 5.01 and IE 5.5 - It's all there, but the graphics (vertical navigation and
pictures) are no centered.
Just for a laugh - NS4.7 looks useable to start
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:53:34 -0700, Brian Gottier wrote:
This is the first time I have used CSS, so don't laugh at me please!
Every time I think I am finished...I learn something new and have
to redo a
bunch of stuff.
http://www.tv-sewingcenter.com
Brian:
I'm getting a large amount of
Mark Mckee wrote:
site
http://sixfoottwo.gotdns.com/~sixfoottwo/_test/index.html
Mark -
The site doesn't validate, but all of the problems are minor and easy to
fix. I would suggest validating it before chasing any bugs.
Given what you have up, it seems fine. Looks good in Safari, and
On 9/11/05 2:17 PM, Keith Burgin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Mckee wrote:
site
http://sixfoottwo.gotdns.com/~sixfoottwo/_test/index.html
On my Mac running 10.4.2:
--
Looks good in IE 5.2.3*, Opera 8, Safari 2.0, and Firefox 1.0.6
* In IE 5/Mac, the red first-letter is appearing
Tanya Renne wrote:
http://nolarelief.orchidsuites.net
(all browsers) nav on the left - color should go to the top of the
footer
Background can only go as far down as the '#nav2' itself. You'll have to
add a suitable background-image (faux column) to 'div#sitecontainer'
behind '#nav2'.
what I'm looking for a check on is any major layout issues.
It looks the same in IE6, FF, NS, and Opera on the PC,
and also in IE, FF, Safari, and Opera on the Mac. I saw no
layout problems.
HTH,
Steven Olson
__
http://www.phillyadclub.com/demo
Hi
Looks the same on IE5Mac and FireFox Mac OSX everything looks like it
is in the correct places - but you have a font resize problem in the
search box and at 150% in the top navigation.
HTH
Moira
--
Moira Ashleigh. M.A.
Lead Designer
SolsticeSun Design
John Haas wrote:
http://www.phillyadclub.com/demo
Thanks in advance!
Hi John,
- The Validator returns errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//philadelphiaadclub.com/demo/
- Submitting the form leaving the field empty brings a weird page
- You lose the headings with images
On 8/30/05, Mike Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a space above the horizontal navigation menu. The colours will
be changed before going live but have been left to show the problem.
Adding:
#navlist {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style-type: none;
}
Should fix the problem... you forgot
Kelly Miller wrote:
http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/designs/rpgsource/final/template2.htm
I've checked it in IE5, IE5.5, IE6, Firefox 1.0, Opera 7.5 and Opera 8
already. Thanks for helping out.
Some screen captures.(Safari, Mac/IE5.2, Win 2000/IE6/5.5/5.)
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:08:12 -0400, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(image is only properly representative if viewed at 1792x1344 or
1800x1350 resolution)
and the percentage of users in her site logs that run 1800x1350 would be
interesting to know, no?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior
Okay, I've updated an improved version with the following fixes:
1. I changed the very large link in the middle of the site layout, so
it shouldn't break Safari any more.
2. I added a height to the h1 on top, so IE/Mac shouldn't be tripped
up by that anymore.
3. I resized the sidebars just
Kelly Miller wrote:
http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/designs/rpgsource/final/template2.htm
4. I replaced 14px with small in the top font declaration. IE should
allow font resizing now.
The first part of the center content includes the following text: What
do you think of when you
Felix Miata wrote:
Kelly Miller wrote:
http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/designs/rpgsource/final/template2.htm
4. I replaced 14px with small in the top font declaration. IE should
allow font resizing now.
The first part of the center content includes the following text: What
Kelly Miller wrote:
What you have is actually:
div#feature p {font-size: 90%} (standard)
div#feature p {font-size: 80%} (contained in IE-only stylesheet; used
because IE makes text insanely large by default).
But since you're complaining, I boosted up the font size of the center
Felix Miata wrote:
There's so many apparently affecting the same text it makes my head swim
trying to figure it out, even with the help of Domi,
Thanks to that list, now there is no font-size related cascade. On top
of that, you accidentally isolated the portion of CSS that was causing
IE
Hi jackie,
Hi all... I've just completed my very first site using CSS and am
encountering difficulty with the site in Netscape and Firefox (the site
completely breaks). The site was fine during testing, but once uploaded to
the web server things
went screwy.
I think it might be worth checking
On (22/08/05 02:14), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Site is: http://www.bnh.org
Any feedback you can give would be greatly appreciated!
Checked with: OPERA 7.54 on Gnu/Linux 1024x768
(Mozilla Firefox 1.04 doesn't load CSS for the text/plain issue).
Found what they seem to be 2 different (maybe
On Aug 21, 2005, at 10:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all... I've just completed my very first site using CSS and am
encountering difficulty with the site in Netscape and Firefox (the
site completely breaks). The site was fine during testing, but once
uploaded to the web server things
Hello Schalk,
Thursday, August 18, 2005, 8:19:37 PM, you wrote:
SN Greetings All!
SN Please take a look at the following URL and let me know any problems
SN that come up. Thank you.
SN *http://tinyurl.com/8w2lj*
Laptop Win2000 SP4 1400x1050 true colour 32bit FireFox 1.0.6
Home about us
David Laakso wrote:
Schalk wrote:
Greetings All!
Please review the following site: http://tinyurl.com/8w2lj
Let me know any and all problems you experience. Thanks!
Hello Schalk,
Guess I feel about the same as before -- an irresistible urge to level
a 12guage shotgun at the moving text,
http://www.chumpia.net
little concerned about appearance in Safari
Identic. Only the Go button is not rendered whole (text truncated -
visible like Gc or so...).
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
Mason Chumpia wrote:
http://www.chumpia.net
On my machine (Win XP SP2), the page is looking okay in Firefox 1.0.6
and IE6. I'm a little concerned about appearance in Safari, since I
don't have access to a Mac machine. There should be too many places
to get tripped up in since the markup
Hello Abyss,
Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 3:52:34 AM, you wrote:
AI Hi
AI Could someone please site check
AI http://www.westernscrabblenetwork.org/pwp/
Laptop Win2000 SP4 1400x1050 true colour 32bit FireFox 1.0.6
Curl and Scrabble graphic work fine
boxes your email and below over-lap
If your
Abyss Information wrote:
Hi
Could someone please site check
http://www.westernscrabblenetwork.org/pwp/
Safari1.3 screen captures at 640, 800, and 1024.
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=182466
HTH.
David Laakso
--
David Laakso
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Jade True wrote:
I have one more issue; here are some browsercam views of it:
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=180317
My css forms are not rendering at all in NN 6.2. I can't figure out why! The
first legend text shows up, and that is it. Any ideas?
Here are the two pages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have current working drafts of my project located at:
http://www.delineations.org/sandbox/
If possible, I need site checks from every platform, for every commonly used
browser later than the 4.x generation.
There are some screen captures here:
Jade True wrote:
Hello all!
...
Here's the new site:
www.sagefish.com
Jade True
A couple of nit-picking comments:
The ascenders of the links in the upper nav are a little tight to the
top-- a little lead might help.
Constraining the width of the bottom nav may keep the page from
Sorry, in my Mac e-mail program they do appear as links.
Here are the pages again:
http: //www.vandevelde.co.uk/WebAlbum/index.html
http://www.vandevelde.co.uk/WebAlbum/jane_and_simon.html
http://www.vandevelde.co.uk/WebAlbum/webalbum3/album_index.html
Hi Rahul,
Thanks for that... I'm relieved it worked on IE 6 - I was expecting
problems!
Thanks for your comments, I can now get on and do the rest of the
albums.
Cheers,
Tracy
On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, at 02:37 pm, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Hi Tracy:
No access to a Mac, so can't help
Hi Rahul, No probs... Any chance you could send me some screenshots?
Hi List, Anyone one got any ideas as to why this might be happening in
IE6?
Cheers, Tracy
On Tuesday, July 26, 2005, at 03:35 pm, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Sorry:
Quick recheck with IE 6:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Thomas Hall wrote:
If some of you have time, please peek at this latest effort -
http://www.fragsburg.com http://www.fragsburg.com/
Becomes a real mess in all browsers when font-size is altered...
Exactly, and you can fix this if you let the elements on your page
Thomas Hall wrote:
If some of you have time, please peek at this latest effort -
http://www.fragsburg.com http://www.fragsburg.com/
Becomes a real mess in all browsers when font-size is altered...
Looking good otherwise.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
Thomas Hall wrote:
If some of you have time, please peek at this latest effort -
http://www.fragsburg.com http://www.fragsburg.com/
Thomas M. Hall
Thomas,
Forgive me, you're going to set a world record for using the same layout
that contains the same problems for different clients.
Matthew Ohlman:
I just finished designing this site with a CSS layout, and I was hoping
you guys could take a look at it and tell me what you think:
http://pictures.ohlman.com/tnbidco/index.html
You forgot to specify a background color for the page (like so many do).
--
Andree Hollander
I just wanted to say many thanks to all of you that helped me out both
on and off-list. I appreciate all of your comments and have made all of
the suggested changes. I don't know how I would get by without you
guys! :-)
Thanks again,
Matthew Ohlman
Matthew Ohlman wrote:
Hey List:
I just
Matthew Ohlman wrote:
http://pictures.ohlman.com/tnbidco/index.html
I need to know how it shapes up on some other browsers, especially
those on Mac. I've checked (800x600) in IE6, Mozilla 1.7, and FF.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, along with
accessibility, coding comments
Holly,
Thanks for the reply. I am a bit confused though. I don't have a
:visited selector in my style sheet for the gallery. Should I create
one?
Larry
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Larry Winfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Page with problem -- http://nomad48.x10hosting.com/photogal.html
CSS for page -- http://nomad48.x10hosting.com/style.css
in IE6 WinXP the
:hover's stop working after a page refresh.
IE seems not to like your - #container a.gallery:visited - selector.
My bad, I do have a visited, misread some stuff. Sorry for that.
Larry
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org --
Reply-To: Ray Dickman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think she meant :hover :)
No, actually, I didn't. Larry has a selector for a:hover, but there are no
rules in it. The selector that is causing the problem is the one for visited
gallery links - #container a.gallery:visited - which IE does not like the
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:31:03 -0400, Larry Winfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Page with problem -- http://nomad48.x10hosting.com/photogal.html
CSS for page-- http://nomad48.x10hosting.com/style.css
It is using the photo gallery technique from this site:
It's the similar problem in FF. Once visited, your
rules
#container a.gallery:hover { border: 1px solid white; }
.
.
.
#container a.gallery, #container a.gallery:visited { ... border: 1px
solid black; }
won't let the thumbnails gain a white border on hover.
two options:
- Delete that :visited
Thanks for the reply. I am a bit confused though. I don't have a
:visited selector in my style sheet for the gallery. Should I create
one?
Ingo has pointed out (to me) :hover rules that I somehow missed
Anyway, just moving the -
#container a.gallery, #container a.gallery:visited
On Fri, 13 May 2005 14:39:36 -0400, anthony croshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no way of checking macs, cheers
Ant
http://www.onceuponatimenursery.com
http://www.onceuponatimenursery.com/
Looks good in Safari 1.3 and Opera 8b1 except in both, the pages scroll
down much farther than
Would the group please check this site for me that just put up -
http://www.harborhouseinn.com http://www.harborhouseinn.com/ Thanks so
much. (Please excuse the Flash intro as it is not my creation..)
Hi
On Mozilla and IE 6.0, 2 things
- the red area at the top varies in height on different
On Fri, 13 May 2005 00:27:49 -0400, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would the group please check this site for me that just put up -
http://www.harborhouseinn.com http://www.harborhouseinn.com/ Thanks
so
Tom,
XP_SP2 IE6.0/FF1.0.3/Opera8 optimal 1280 LCD
Working well in above browsers with some
On the quiz page, I accidentally selected Select a Creation and was
taken to a page not found:
http://dev2.austindesign.ca/quiz/Select%20A%20Creation (Actually, I
selected Creation 3 and it worked, then i hit the back button and
selected Select a Creation by accident and got the page not
found).
301 - 386 of 386 matches
Mail list logo
