[css-d] list elements in ie6

Hi, I am creating a vertical DD menu, and IE 6 does not like this. It outputs the list like a set of steps/stairs Menu item1 Menu item2 Menu item3 Can anyone tell me what the selector should be? I have sorted

Re: [css-d] IE6 and absolutely positioned divs not being contained in the wrapping div

Mark Wheeler wrote: > I have a problem with IE6 not rendering as expected, or at least as I > want it to. Go figure. It works fine in IE7, FF and Safari. Here is > the test page. > > http://dev.tonedeafdesign.com/test/wrap_div.html You can make it work by throwing IE6 out of its "not very stan

[css-d] footer problem MB

Hi, I'm Mauro I 've read the article: http://www.themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2005/08/29/ Then I try to center the preceding layout. In IE 6.x it goes well.This page couses problem in FF 2.0.0.12 . The footer go down the screen even if positioning at the bottom of the screen so the browser

Re: [css-d] Textarea padding and scrolling

On 3/1/08, Valerie Wininger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ray, > > I added a background-color:white to the div containing the overlay and then > played with the margins a bit, as well as the position of that div. This is > the result: http://valeriewininger.com/css_list/test.html > > It looked

Re: [css-d] list elements in ie6

Ross Hulford wrote: > I am creating a vertical DD menu, Why? A menu has nothing to do with Definition Data. Use logical and syntactically correct markup, _then_ consider styling. > and IE 6 does not like this. It > outputs the list like a set of steps/stairs You probably have malformed syntax.

[css-d] IE6 not recognising column % width

My site http://www.biofuels-maritime.com/n-news.asp?Category=6 &main=yes has a right floated list of ads which should be on 19% of the page width so that the other columns fit. This works in FF and IE7 but not in ie6 Any ideas? R

Re: [css-d] list elements in ie6

Ross Hulford wrote: > I am creating a vertical DD menu, and IE 6 does not like this. It outputs > the list like a set of steps/stairs > > > > See "vertical lists" on this page: Best, ~dL __

Re: [css-d] IE6 and absolutely positioned divs not being contained in the wrapping div

On Mar 3, 2008, at 2:01 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Mark Wheeler wrote: > >> I have a problem with IE6 not rendering as expected, or at least as I >> want it to. Go figure. It works fine in IE7, FF and Safari. Here >> is the test page. >> http://dev.tonedeafdesign.com/test/wrap_div.html > > Yo

[css-d] trying to fix this without using javascript

Hi all, Long time, no post. Here's the problem of the day. I'm working with a web design vendor who has decided that they need to use Javascript to fix what should be a CSS problem. I don't find this acceptable, but I'm having a hard time convincing anyone who makes decisions of that. So i

[css-d] Site Check in IE5/Mac http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm

Hi everyone Can I please have a check of my test page in IE5/Mac? http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm The problem is that IE5/Mac doesn't not support the property display:table which causes my header and menu to appear at the bottom of the page (initial source order). I hope the below hack

Re: [css-d] trying to fix this without using javascript

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Rebecca Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Long time, no post. > > Here's the problem of the day. I'm working with a web design vendor who > has decided that they need > to use Javascript to fix what should be a CSS problem. I don't find this > accept

Re: [css-d] trying to fix this without using javascript

Sorry about the previous empty post--what I intended to say was: I played around with the css in Firebug and by removing the absolute positioning from the footer div, it dropped down below the nav and allowed all the links to work again. Do you need that div to be absolutely positioned? Valerie

Re: [css-d] trying to fix this without using javascript

Yeah, I thought it might do that. Here's the thing, though: the folks on the committee want the bottom of the footer lined up with the bottom of the content on longer pages -- like this: http://kenyonbuildout.babywhale.net/visit/subpage.html Knocking out the positioning would align the top o

Re: [css-d] how to center this suckerfish?..

Jim Davis wrote: >> http://www.studiolumineux.com/menusample.htm > Julie, > > The ul will need a width in order to be centered in your 100% wide #nav. For > example > > #nav { > width: 100%; > > > } > > #nav ul { > width: 80%; > margin: 0 auto; > > > } > > Jim That would

Re: [css-d] trying to fix this without using javascript

I'm new to CSS myself, but I'd try adding a margin to the top of the footer div and see if that forces it down below the other div. or try br.clear { clear: both; } and put that before the on the Visit Campus? My sympathies over the problem of trying to convince others that Javascript

Re: [css-d] IE6 suckerfish menu disappears on hover over 2nd-3rd list items

Georg, you're my hero! Thank you so much, that fixed it! Lisa Onizuka wrote: > Hi All, I know this subject has come up recently: (IE6 suckerfish menu > disappears on hover over 2nd-3rd list items - > http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/96321) > http://cleanwebdesign.com/dev/raul/na

Re: [css-d] trying to fix this without using javascript

>> Long time, no post. >> >> Here's the problem of the day. I'm working with a web design vendor who >> has decided that they need >> to use Javascript to fix what should be a CSS problem. I don't find this >> acceptable, but I'm having >> a hard time convincing anyone who makes decisions

Re: [css-d] Pre-Loaders in CSS

I read some of the pages on using sprites for a pre-loader effect but is still is not clear to me, how you do this. David Hucklesby wrote: > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:57:50 -0500, Christopher wrote: > >> Anyone know in CSS if you can do a pre-loader effect ? >> > > You can pre-load images

Re: [css-d] IE6 not recognising column % width

Hi Pete, I think if you resize your images with an image editor rather than having the HTML/browser do it, they will look less crunchy, and won't break out of their container in IE6. You can also put a overflow:hidden or overflow:auto in your #c4 rules. IE6 has a really fun bug with margins and flo

[css-d] CSS Roll Over Effect - CONT'D

http://wellstyled.com/css-nopreload-rollovers.html This page I understand for a roll over effect, so it's as simple as making three graphic states within the big graphic then just entering this into the style: #menu a { ... background: url("button.gif") top left no-repeat; } #menu a:ho

Re: [css-d] Site Check in IE5/Mac http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm

Alan Gresley wrote: > > Can I please have a check of my test page in IE5/Mac? > > http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm > > > > Another problem, currently I have Firefox 3 (beta), Minefield (beta) and > Flock (Gecko 1.8). The sticky footer on this page > > http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9b.ht

Re: [css-d] Site Check in IE5/Mac http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm

I wrote: > Hi everyone > > Can I please have a check of my test page in IE5/Mac? > > http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm > > The problem is that IE5/Mac doesn't not support the property display:table > which causes my header and menu to appear at the bottom of the page (initial > source o

Re: [css-d] Site Check in IE5/Mac http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm

David Lackso wrote: > MacOS X > 10.4.11 > > IE/5.2 screenshot: > Thank you David. Well it looks like IE/Mac shall get IE7 styles since ordinary comments are treated as elements as I later realized. > Opera/9.24 > The footer is as intended.

Re: [css-d] Site Check in IE5/Mac http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm

David Lackso wrote: > MacOS X > 10.4.11 > > IE/5.2 screenshot: > Having another look at your screenshot it seems that IE5/Mac supports multiple backgrounds and background-size. How can that be correct. I talking about the stretched blue~green

Re: [css-d] IE6 and absolutely positioned divs not being contained in the wrapping div

Mark Wheeler wrote: > Wow. That works well. But I'm quite hesitant on putting IE6 into > quirks mode for all my pages. I've never done that before. Your hesitation is understandable. Using quirks mode for better standard compliance and behavior in one case, _may_ ruin whatever else you have if i

Re: [css-d] list elements in ie6

Certainly the original poster meant "DD = Drop Down" menu, not a in the markup. His CSS is for a ul. The trouble is that the subsequent items are not dropping below the previous items. Usually this happens in a float, but I am not sure in a ul li arrangement. Ross, do a Google for "pure css roll

Re: [css-d] Site Check in IE5/Mac http://css-class.com/test/alpha-0-9.htm

Alan Gresley wrote: > > > > > http://css-class.com/test/test2.jpg > > > >> Safari/3.0.4 >> The footer is as intended. >> There is an approximately 40px gap between the footer and the bottom of >> the image. >> > > > So is Safari 3 on Mac different to my screenshot on Window? > > > > > A

Re: [css-d] CSS Roll Over Effect - CONT'D

Christopher wrote: > http://wellstyled.com/css-nopreload-rollovers.html You only need this... #menu a { background: url("button.gif") 0 0 no-repeat; ... } #menu a:hover { background-position: -157px 0; ... } #menu a:active { background-position: -314px 0; ... }

Re: [css-d] trying to fix this without using javascript

Rebecca, I have run across a similar problem in my work. My solution was to set the footer to float:left and a negative top margin . It works well in most circumstances. The only place it doesn't work that I know of is when the content is really short, this can be resolved with a min-height

[css-d] The dreaded z-index bug in IE6/7

Hi all, I think I have stumbled across a variant of the z-index bug in IE6/ IE7. I have a set of thumbnail images and wanted to have a larger image appear over each on hover. I am finding with IE that the remaining thumbnails are showing through - Firefox 2 on Mac OS X and Windows 2000 are

Re: [css-d] The dreaded z-index bug in IE6/7

This might help you: http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/images/thumbhover/ Note what is relative and what is absolute and the relative z-indices. -- Al Sparber - PVII http://www.projectseven.com Extending Dreamweaver - Nav Systems | Galleries | Widgets Authors: "42nd Street: Mastering the Art of

Re: [css-d] IE6 and absolutely positioned divs not being contained in the wrapping div

> >> Besides your above fix, Is there any other way, or is that my only >> option? > > I'm sure there are, but you may have to rebuild your entire case > more or > less from scratch to avoid IE6' "standard mode bugs" without > disturbing > better browsers/versions. > > Someone else may chime in

[css-d] Help, please! Div behavior in IE 6.0 and 7.0

I am working on a site: http://mdh-test.com/ieresidential http://mdh-test.com/ieresidential/ierc.css The header is a background image so that the navigation in the upper right hand corner can be placed there. The box for the navigation is also a background image so the links can go on top. I

Re: [css-d] What is the difference between "float:left" and "overflow:hidden"?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:07 PM, 5h4rk @ gmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, in order for a parent element to wrap a floating child element > correctly, I used to use either "overflow:hidden" or "float:left" or > "float:right" for the parent element, both work fine for me, but I'd > like t

[css-d] What is the difference between "float:left" and "overflow:hidden"?

Hi all, in order for a parent element to wrap a floating child element correctly, I used to use either "overflow:hidden" or "float:left" or "float:right" for the parent element, both work fine for me, but I'd like to know the difference between them and when to use what. Thanks.